Sgt.'s Death Not Counted As War Casualty
Family Says "Undetermined" Cause Of Death Following Battlefield Injury Puts Son In Limbo
-
Photo
Sgt. James W. McDonald, in an undated photo, suffered a severe head wound in Iraq in a bomb blast last May, but the army says what caused his death six months later was undetermined, and thus keeps him off the casualty list. His family wants answers. (AP/Courtesy The McDonald Family)
-
Interactive
American Heroes
Profiles of U.S. soldiers who've died in Iraq, a look at the war's toll and pictures of mourning.
-
Interactive
Iraq: 5 Years At War
Five years after the U.S.-led invasion, the war wears on.
She and her family are demanding more answers in the death of Sgt. James W. McDonald.
"I don't want it to be an undetermined cause of death," said Joan McDonald. "That is ridiculous."
McDonald, 26, was injured in a roadside bomb blast in Iraq last May. He was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 5th Cavalry Regiment based at Fort Hood, Texas. After treatment in Germany, McDonald returned to Fort Hood and underwent extensive facial surgery in August.
His body was found in his barracks apartment Nov. 12, a Monday. He was last seen alive the previous Friday.
The Army ruled out suicide and accidental factors, but an autopsy could not determine the exact cause of death, in part because of the decomposition of the body, said Col. Diane Battaglia, a base spokeswoman.
As a result, McDonald's death is considered noncombat-related, with the caveat that medical experts couldn't rule out that "traumatic brain injury" may have been a factor, Battaglia said.
Joan McDonald, of Neenah, has no doubts about her son's death.
"If my son was not at the war, he would not be dead, plain and simple," she said. "He was a strong healthy boy. ... Don't tell me it was unrelated to the war. I will never accept that."
Tom Wilborn, a spokesman for Disabled American Veterans in Washington, said the question of whether McDonald was a war casualty is the first that he was aware of from the Iraq war.
"But it happened a lot during Vietnam," he said. "There's a long history where guys would be wounded in the jungle and they might live long enough to come home. And then they would pass away and were not counted as a combat casualty."
According to an Army study in 2007, 1.4 million people in the U.S. suffer traumatic brain injuries each year. Of those, 50,000 die, 235,000 are hospitalized and 1.1 million are evaluated, treated at a hospital emergency department and released.
A Government Accountability Office study found that of soldiers who required a medical evacuation for battle-related injuries in Iraq or Afghanistan, 30 percent suffered a traumatic brain injury. But it was unknown how many soldiers suffered more mild forms of brain injury.
The family has asked Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., for help. McDonald has a copy of a March 11 letter Feingold sent to Maj. Gen. Galen Jakman at the Pentagon outlining her concerns.
McDonald said her son was a strapping 6-foot-3, 200-pound soldier who served two tours of duty in Iraq and loved the military.
If my son was not at the war, he would not be dead, plain and simple. ... Don't tell me it was unrelated to the war. I will never accept that.
Joan McDonaldBefore he died, McDonald had worked on the base at a weapons room and the post office, she said. He had planned to leave the Army in January to pursue a career in firefighting.
She said she recently ran across a T-shirt that said he helped build a memorial wall at Fort Hood to honor its soldiers killed in Iraq.
"I want his name on that wall," she said. "We don't know what else to do. I have one brother who is saying 'Does it matter. To you, he is a casualty of war. To everyone that knew him, he is a casualty of war.' I am like, well, it kinda does matter."
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 64 CommentsHowever, if this soldier was in the US 6 months after the initial injury and passed away, then I guess technically he would not be considered as such ..
I feel he was and see the mothers point .. but we all know how the beauracacy works .. they love tehcnical reasoning and use it to their advantage whenever possible ...
Shameful & Sad but thats where we are ...
want to see some more conservative think tank politics
check out our nations economy
An illegal war, ill thought out attack on a disliked nation going after Bin Laden that has always been hiding in Pakistan.
Our government needs to wake up and count the soldiers that gave their lives for Bush, oil and profits and stop lying to cover up your war crimes.
That fits perfectly with the "morals" of the Bushits and the U.S. Fascist Party.
The loses need to be honored not cast aside on "technicalities" to make the death count less.
I wish politicians and the military would really "Support the Troops". What lip service!!!!!
Rev Jeremiah Wright may have been pretty accurate in his assessment of our country. Then we have losers like Nancy Pelosi that take impeachment off the table and refuse to hold them Constitutionally accountable.
This is clearly the most rediculous thing I have ever heard. He has died as a result of wounds received in the theater of war. Show him some respect for crying out loud! If we let the War Department get away with this, then all that exposure to chemical warfare suffered by our people will quickly be swept under the rug. Remember Agent Orange and Gulf War Syndrome. This is just another excuse to disrespect the people who volunteered to go to war.
For those of you considering enlisting, think long and hard.
This is absolutely goulish! ONLY a thoroughly evil administration would treat it''s country''s soldiers like this! How dare they! It''s clear we surpassed the 4,000 death level a long time ago---they just don''t want the public to find out about it! So, they''re not listing KIA''s as such!
It''s stories like this,on days like this---I wish we could have the election NOW! Kick every last Republican out of office!
Where ARE YOU, Nancy Pelosi?! How''s about looking into this?! Oh, that''s right---you''re too busy crying over Tibetan dead in Tibet than to worry about your OWN country''s dead soldiers, aren''t you! You can go with the Reps who are going to get voted out this Fall!
Let''s take a look at a precedent for such a tragic death after coming home from the war. Let''s take a look at how these deaths were treated in the past.
THis is just another misleading story by this liberal site. That''s it.
Do it NOW! TODAY.
FYI -- Repubs controlled Congress for the better part of 5 years & they also have an input into funding which quite frankly, billions have been wasted.
You, sir---are WRONG! Whatever shortcomings the Dems have---and they have them---they have NOT bad-mouthed the troops or the job they are doing! They HAVE criticized military leadership---and they should have---when they''ve screwed up, such as at Walter Reed Hospital!
Also, they have NEVER withheld necessary funds for operations or their physical support,sir. They have however---rightfully so---demanded this administration delineate how these funds are going to be used---in order to avoid any more billions of dollars in boxes from getting lost again, etcetera! Do you remember that Xlib?!
Additionally, they have increased spending on vets when it was the Bush administration & former GOP-controlled congress who were stealhily reducing medical coverage on our soldiers!
Finally, yes---let''s stick to ''traditional'' means! Let''s count a soldier dead when he''s shot in the field and not exclude him from the count because he took the hit in the back when his unit was retreating from overwhelming force---and all the other ''gotcha'' calculating done by this administration!
I hope these points serve to adjust your incorrect positions! Happy Easter to you! :)
They will not declare him disabled. Hmmm. I guess he''s not a casualty of war either.
I don''t know one Democrat who has bad-mouthed the troops, in fact they are the biggest supporters of these men and women...they want to stop killing them and bring them home. Your so gung-ho, enlist and make the trip. This is just another case of the conservative military leaders continuing to abuse and abandon the troops. When are you ppl going to wake up and see that this administration looks at our troops as fodder, nameless faces with no right to a future. This war is insane, and it is the people who want the troops home who REALLY support them. Your support of this abuse and the administrations failure to support them is like spitting on them and their graves.
Bushbot anti-Patriot Whines about Congress-- 2
Do you mean, congress "mistreated the military" when congressmen were the only ones demanding Rumsfeld armor the vehicles running patrol around Baghdad? And while Rumsfeld protested, "You go with the army you have..."
Or do you mean when congressmen demanded Bush overhaul places like Walter Reed, where the roaches run free? Where there is still a huge backlog of cases and staff is stretched to the limit-- all inexcusable overload from the war Bush started?
You want to support the troops? We can start by not sending them on a foolish errand like Iraq. To do what Bush did in Iraq is... UNAmerican!
But what do you think our military accomplished in Iraq? Found WMDs? Removed Saddam-- and unhinged the whole country into the four-year, $1.5 to $2 trillion running civil war and proxy fight it is today? Four thousand American dead, tens of thousands of wounded (DOD doesn''t like to release these figures)-- all, Bush claims, to "avenge" the three thousand who died at 911? Do the math, Bubba.
But you counsel like George Bush, or more aptly, George A. Custer, whose last words must have been, "Where did all these Indians come from?!"
Bushbot Anti-patriot Whines about Congress--
Says he, "You want the democratic congress to investigate the military??? The same democratic congress that has demeaned and bad mouthed our military?? The one that sits on funds for our military??..."
---
Words are cheap, Bubba, and yours need some research behind them.
By mistreating the military, do you mean the occasion when Bush cut appropriations for aid to military families, which congress was ready to provide to spare military families from living on borderline poverty?
Or do you mean running soldiers through two, maybe three tours of duty under an indefinite obligation of service?
Or, do you mean spending on high-cost new weapons systems, but so little on armor for troops, they have to ask their families to help them buy their own? (Talk about outsourcing the military budget.)
(see Bushbot anti-Patriot Whines about Congress-- 2)
"Let''''s take a look at a precedent for such a tragic death after coming home from the war. Let''''s take a look at how these deaths were treated in the past.
THis is just another misleading story by this liberal site. That''''s it."
It seems to me that it''s Republicans who have abandoned our troops - and especially so when they return home in need of help.
Inadequate health care (especially psychological care) and financial support are costing lives - and Republican scum choose to ignore it.
Republicans put profit above supporting our troops - and people like you ensure that continues to happen.
---
By now, most Americans can recount some anecdote of blatant Bush lies. Some remember "We know Saddam has WMDs..." That one''s good, but how about this-- when Bush was asked what 911 had to do with Iraq, Bush said, "Nuttin''"
Calling Bush the "Rhinestone President" is giving him too much credit. "Astroturf President", maybe, but with less emphasis on "president".
After all, Bush is the guy who, in November, 2005, facing an assembly of his own party members critical of his NSA spying program, bristled like a teenager caught drinking after curfew-- "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face! It''s just a GD)((#@*! piece of paper!"
Is this figure, who claims to be president of the United States, the same who pledged an oath to "protect, preserve and defend" the document he calls a "GD)((#@*! piece of paper"?
---
Nope, not yet. Your Bushbot partners have left.
Have your friend contact the DAV. They helped me get my disability. They are a great organization and thy helped me when i wasn''t even a member. Afterwards i bought a lifetime membership for myself and my father. They refuse to take no for an answer.
But it''s really stretching a point, i.e., so, the autopsy didn''t conclusively establish a link to his war service. Yet it''s inconceivable that he would have died had he *not* served in combat.
Besides, it''s really stretching a point to say, "Well, yes, he got hurt badly, and did suffer a severe brain injury, but we can''t count him as a war casualty."
I reckon his Mother is right: had he not served, he likely would have lived, barring the possibility of accident we all face every day.
I guess the Army folks who determine this stuff have as part of their charge the consideration of legal liability.
It''s sad to learn of an honorable veteran of war only because his status becomes newsworthy. It''s even sadder to see some of the completely irrelevant comments regarding the war, President Bush (whom I don''t like for the record), and so on. The story''s about one vet -- not the amount the war has cost, not the WMD b.s., none of that stuff. It''s about a man who died after serving his country.
With all due respect for your beliefs, he was perfectly healthy until wounded. Sometimes wounds take a long time before killing you. I am 100% disabled from Vietnambut when i die i will not be counted as a war casualty, even though i will die froma direct cause of the war. Agent orange. Barry Sadle who wrote and sang the song "The Green Berets ", died from a gunshot wound to the head 9 months after being shot. Supposedly he was drunk and oplaying russian roulette in a taxi when he shot himself. The man was a trained professional and was working as an arms dealewr when he was shot. I personally think it was an assination. He spoke out against our govt after the war and maybe he was dealing guns to someone our govt didn''t approve of.
I intend to vote 100 percent Democrat from now on.
Fool me once (Nixon) shame on you, fool me twice (Bush) shame on me, fool me three times never again.
So how do you excuse and propagandize the Bush administration''s abandonment of 1,000''s of veterans who have been denied disability, sent back to the war zone before medically cleared, who are not getting adequate post-injury medical care, who have been lied to by recruiters, who are losing homes and savings because they are inadequately paid, etc. etc. etc. Sounds to me like all you can do is the typical right wing, brain-washed mantra-make inane, unsupported comments and name calling to cover up your ''short'' comings. Just what have you and your friends got to be so smug about? Bush and Cheney, et al, have sent this country into a tailspin diplomatically, economically and morally. 70% plus of Americans have such a low opinion of Bush, the lowest approval rating of ANY president. Seems to me most of them are intelligent, reasonable people who have reacted to Bush''s incompetence, lack of empathy and ''let them eat cake'' mentality. Thank God you and your midget minded friends are in a minority.
Your son, and too many like him, deserve so much better. I, for one, will write to my Congressmen to demand they take notice and appropriate action for your son and the others.
May you and your family find peace in the caring thoughts of millions of Americans and Justice for your son.
In light of this article, I wonder what the REAL U.S. military death toll is from Iraq, so far?
Just so they won''t have to say "4001" for another day or so.
And the beat goes on, they whip up war fever, and encourage the castigation of all who don''t support it, saying that they "endanger the troops", or "they aren''t patriotic" but after the meat is ground, they play with semantics, and obscure "rules" in order to throw it away, no more patriotic than the worst war critic.
If a citizen volunteers to go into harm''s way, that person has given his life. If he survives the ordeal, that life should be the responsibility of the government, as repayment.
Playing word games to evade responsibility is pure hypocrisy, and those who play them are the real enemy.
Well said. Intelligently and succinctly put.
____
"But it happened a lot during Vietnam," he said. "There''''s a long history where guys would be wounded in the jungle and they might live long enough to come home. And then they would pass away and were not counted as a combat casualty."
And the beat goes on, they whip up war fever, and encourage the castigation of all who don''''t support it, saying that they "endanger the troops", or "they aren''''t patriotic" but after the meat is ground, they play with semantics, and obscure "rules" in order to throw it away, no more patriotic than the worst war critic.
If a citizen volunteers to go into harm''''s way, that person has given his life. If he survives the ordeal, that life should be the responsibility of the government, as repayment.
Playing word games to evade responsibility is pure hypocrisy, and those who play them are the real enemy.
Posted by brianbwb at 05:08 AM : Mar 24, 2008
Repeated by Reflecting_Pool
And the beat goes on, they whip up war fever, and encourage the castigation of all who don''''t support it, saying that they "endanger the troops", or "they aren''''t patriotic" but after the meat is ground, they play with semantics, and obscure "rules" in order to throw it away, no more patriotic than the worst war critic.
If a citizen volunteers to go into harm''''s way, that person has given his life. If he survives the ordeal, that life should be the responsibility of the government, as repayment.
Playing word games to evade responsibility is pure hypocrisy, and those who play them are the real enemy." Posted by brianbwb
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is impossible to improve upon perfection. Congratulations, brianbwb, on an excellent analysis.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 64 Comments