February 11, 2009 3:13 PM

Iraqi Forces, Shiite Fighters Clash

(CBS/AP)  Iraqi security forces clashed with Shiite militia fighters southeast of Baghdad on Friday, the second day of fighting that killed at least two police officers and two gunmen, police said.

The fighting in the city of Kut broke out after factions of the Mahdi Army militia attacked checkpoints around the city amid a crackdown by Iraqi troops.

A joint U.S.-Iraqi operation also targeted a Shiite militia stronghold in the volatile city of Diwaniyah, 80 miles south of Baghdad, and at least 12 suspected fighters were detained, local police said. The U.S. military had no immediate comment.

The fighting underscored rising tensions between rival militia factions battling for control of the oil-rich southern Shiite heartland with an eye toward the eventual withdrawal of U.S.-led forces.

The Mahdi Army militia is nominally loyal to the radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, who renewed a six-month truce in February, but its fighters have been involved in clashes. The U.S. has not accused al-Sadr in the violence, blaming instead rogue militiamen who ignore his cease-fire order.

But U.S. and Iraqi officials have been cracking down on al-Sadr's followers, angering many in the movement who complain the security forces have been infiltrated by rival factions.

Iraqi reinforcements were sent to Kut four days ago to wrest control of a militia stronghold controlled by Mahdi Army fighters who had become increasingly brazen in recent weeks in their attacks on security forces, police said.

(AP / CBS)
The fighting in Kut, about 100 miles southeast of Baghdad, began when militiamen attacked checkpoints around the city Thursday. At least two police officers and two gunmen had been killed since then, said Maj. Gen. Abdul-Karim Khalaf of Iraq's Interior Ministry.

In other developments:

  • Dozens of Kurdish youths threw stones at police at the close of a festival celebrating the advent of spring in Turkey's southeast, and police fired warning shots. This year's celebration follows a Turkish military incursion last month that targeted Kurdish guerrillas based in northern Iraq.

  • In Baghdad, U.S. troops fought with Shiite gunmen Friday in a southwestern neighborhood, police said, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to release the information. The military did not immediately comment and no other details were available.

    Meanwhile, the U.S. military released 13 detainees who were welcomed home at a ceremony in the former Sunni insurgent stronghold of Azamiyah in northern Baghdad. It was the latest in a series of releases meant as a goodwill gesture to promote reconciliation with minority Sunnis who have turned against al Qaeda in Iraq.

    One of those freed, Muntasir Abdul-Mahdi, said he had been held at Camp Bucca for a year after being arrested by U.S. troops.

    "They said that they would make inquiries, but I was there for one year," he told AP Television News. "I am innocent. They released us because we are innocent."

    American officials have touted the sharp decline in violence over the past year as a sign the Bush administration is beginning to show success in a conflict widely unpopular with the American public.

    According to the U.S. military, attacks have fallen about 60 percent since early last year, when President Bush ordered in about 30,000 American reinforcements to curb a wave of sectarian killings that had Iraq teetering on civil war.

    But U.S. commanders caution that Iraq remains far from secure and say the security gains are fragile because of political disputes among the country's rival Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish communities.
  • © 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
    Add a Comment See all 29 Comments
    by hungry1968 March 22, 2008 11:15 AM EDT
    How in the hell are out troops supposed to be able to defend themselves, or "fight the enemy", when the combatants change from one day to the next?

    Iraqi forces vs Shiite fighters?

    Yesterday, weren''t the Iraqi forces predominantly Shiite?
    Reply to this comment
    by alphaa10-2009 March 22, 2008 4:19 AM EDT
    Iran always has had great influence over the Iraqi Shia, and currently has a powerful working relationship with Talabani, who fought with Iran against Saddam.

    The new violence represents al Sadr''s bid to face down Talabani in competition for Iran''s favor and support as the principal power broker in Iraq.

    Iran could care less whether al Sadr reignites attacks against Iraqi police, army and occupation forces, because it can only gain by creating problems for the occupation.

    The great irony is Bush helped create the very Iranian hegemony he claimed he did not want during his "Axis of Evil" speech, well before the Iraq invasion. By unseating Saddam, Bush opened a power vacuum he is in no position to fill (whatever candidate John McCain might say).

    It will be only a matter of time before Iraq either disintegrates into its de facto Kurd, Sunni and Shia partitions, or joins a formal partnership with Iran.
    Reply to this comment
    by samthetvcat March 22, 2008 4:06 AM EDT
    So is it true Cheney was there to push Iraqis to hurry up and hold their elections so Sunnis who sat the last election out will participate and have more representation in government?

    Might that not cause backlash and panic with Shiites who now dominate government if they start to see Sunnis (who oppressed them for years) start to creep back into the realm of power?

    Like is the trust really there for them to have a democratic government?
    Reply to this comment
    by gce65 March 22, 2008 12:13 AM EDT
    liberalme:
    Shhhhhhhhh! You''re not supposed to say that. we''re all supposed to get in line and repeat in unison: "The surge is working...the surge is working...the surge is working," like Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz: "There''s no place like home..."
    Reply to this comment
    by gce65 March 22, 2008 12:08 AM EDT
    Let them clash. It''s a civil war that the US refuses to acknowledge. Get out of the way and let them go at it; it will happen in time anyway.
    Reply to this comment
    by liberalme March 21, 2008 9:43 PM EDT
    Which means---the current lull of fighting in Iraq is an aberation and not a sustainable event! And hence, we can expect the war to rage ferociously on when the Sunnis & Shiites decide the time is right!
    Posted by stn_sage at 02:44

    SHHHHHHHH you''re not supposed to say that-----it''s the "surge" thats keeping them down!!
    Reply to this comment
    by sevenveils March 21, 2008 8:53 PM EDT
    The radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr is studying in Iran to become an Ayatollah. His and Iran''s ultimate plan is for him to return to Iraq as a supreme religous leader and over throw what ever existing government there is and set up a government just like Irans.
    Reply to this comment
    by underdogus March 21, 2008 8:33 PM EDT
    Lieberman & McCain letting Israel drive our foreign policies ????

    Posted by j-whitman ..because WE said so...$$$$$
    Reply to this comment
    by beehive21-2009 March 21, 2008 8:20 PM EDT
    The Fatman Sadr, is up to something,Little does he know trickery can get you hung.
    Reply to this comment
    by j-whitman March 21, 2008 7:20 PM EDT
    NOWARFORZION,,,,, That brings about anonter big question nobody''s looking at ----- Why is people like Lieberman & McCain letting Israel drive our foreign policies ????
    Reply to this comment
    See all 29 Comments
    .
    Scroll Left
    Scroll Right More »
    CBS News on Facebook