Inspector Arrested In Fatal Crane Collapse
NYC Inspector Charged With Falsifying Records On Crane That Later Collapsed, Killing 7
-
Play CBS Video
Video
NYC Crane Deaths Cause Outcry
Safety concerns have heightened in New York City after a 200-ft crane fell to the ground, killing at least four construction workers. Bianca Solorzano reports.
-
Video
NYC Crane Collapse Kills Four
A freak construction-site accident today in Manhattan killed at least four people after a giant crane crashed into an apartment building. Wendy Gillette reports.
-
Video
NYC Crane Inspector Arrested
An arrest has been made in the terrifying Manhattan crane collapse that killed seven people. Randall Pinkston reports.
-
-
Photo
A section of collapsed crane lies on top of a crushed building on March 15, 2008 in New York. A giant crane toppled over at a construction site and smashed into a block of residential buildings. At least six people are dead. (AP Photo/Jason DeCrow)
-
Photo
Rescue workers work at the scene of a crushed building on 50th Street near Second Avenue, March 15, 2008 in New York. A giant crane toppled over at a construction site and smashed into a block of residential buildings killing six people and setting off a scramble for survivors. (AP Photo/Toykin Chin)
-
Photo
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg addresses the media at the scene of a major crane accident in New York, March 15, 2008. A crane mounted to the side of a skyscraper under construction toppled with a roar Saturday, smashing into a block of apartment buildings. At left is NYC Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly. (AP Photo/Frances Roberts)
-
Photo
A section of collapsed crane protrudes from a crushed building on March 15, 2008 in New York. A giant crane toppled over at a construction site and smashed into a block of residential buildings. (AP Photo/Jason DeCrow)
-
-
Photo Essay
Deadly Collapse
Giant crane topples, smashing into a block of residential buildings in NYC
Edward Marquette, 46, was arraigned and released without bail Thursday on charges of falsifying business records and offering a false instrument for filing.
"We will not tolerate this kind of behavior at the Department of Buildings," buildings Commissioner Patricia Lancaster said at a news conference. "I do not and will not tolerate any misconduct in my department."
Marquette, who earns $52,283 a year as an inspector in the department's division of cranes and derricks, was arrested while being questioned Wednesday night, said Barbara Thompson, spokeswoman for the Manhattan district attorney.
If convicted, Marquette faces up to four years in prison. His lawyer, Kate Moguletscu, had no comment Thursday.
The 20-story crane broke away Saturday from an apartment tower under construction and toppled over, killing six construction workers and a visitor in town for St. Patrick's Day.
A complaint about the crane was logged March 4 to a city hot line, officials said, and Marquette said he inspected it. It was later determined he had not.
Lancaster said it is very unlikely an inspection would have prevented the accident because the equipment that failed was not on site March 4.
In addition to suspending Marquette, Lancaster said, she has ordered a full audit of his inspection reports over the past six months, and also of the cranes and derricks unit.
The crane collapse caused a swath of destruction along a full city block not far the United Nations, pulverizing a four-story brownstone and damaging at least seven other buildings.
The gigantic piece of machinery toppled over when a six-ton steel collar used to secure the crane to the building came loose, plunging into another collar that acted as a major anchor. Without that support, the spindly structure came tumbling down with terrifying force.
The collapse followed weeks of complaints by neighbors that the crane didn't appear safe. Bruce Silberblatt - a retired contractor who called in the complaint that the crane might not be sufficiently braced against the building - said the arrest stunned him.
"My first reaction was astonishment. My second reaction is anger that a person would have the gall to do this," said Silberblatt, vice president of the Turtle Bay Neighborhood Association.
City officials would not discuss Marquette's possible motive.
Investigators first interviewed him Sunday and got a copy of his route sheet. He told them that he had conducted the March 4 inspection and that it revealed no problems with the crane.
Marquette was also listed in city records as having responded to a Jan. 22 complaint by another caller who complained about the safety of workers assembling the crane. Marquette said in his report, filed two days later, that he examined the crane and found no violation.
CBS News correspondent Bianca Solorzano reported that the city had answered at least 38 complaints since the high rise project began. The city had issued 13 violations at the construction site in the past 27 months.
Residents said they weren't surprised by the arrest.
"It makes me very suspicious of the whole situation. I'd like to feel that it's safe to live in this neighborhood with all the construction going on," Sandra Graham said. "If he's been arrested, I think he should be made an example of."
Earlier, city officials said they had started inspecting every construction crane in use around New York City, though authorities have said there's no indication that Saturday's accident points to a larger problem.
The inspections began Wednesday, Buildings Department spokeswoman Kate Lindquist said.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



Killed by an uninspected crane that fell on your building.
I hope the victims families get lots of money.
When I started my career as an Iron Worker,we hardly used nylon slings.As time went by they became more commonplace as they have some advantages over steel chokers.But,once they get a cut,they tear quickly and the load is lost.''Softeners'' must be used where sharp edges come into contact with the load.
Industrial construction is very dangerous under the best of conditions.These conditions become much more dangerous when inspections become lax.
Republican administrations are notorious for letting contractors become very lax.The mining industry is another example of ''poor work inspections''.
Working people can not afford to let these work conditions go back in time.Vote Democratic.
I think an inspector''s political affiliation varies from state to state, I''m sure there''s plenty from both the D and R parties who have screwed up!
It just seems that on this kind of project---particularly dangerous---the inspector''s office would/should have paid particular attention to warning calls by neighbors/assns etcetera!
So f off....my friend.
Posted by tiddsanbeer at 04:32 PM : Mar 20, 2008
You are a lier, most inspectors are not liberal they are both so go lie some where else because I know for a fact that is not a job condition.
[Posted by tiddsanbeer at 04:32 PM : Mar 20, 2008]
so which happened first ... he was liberal and became an inspector, he was an inspector and became liberal, or his predispositions make him likely to be a liberal and good at inspecting?
what sample size are you using to make these assessments?
Knows politics has Everything to do with ''Working conditions'',..
It`s a Simple fact of Life!
This is a breakdown of moral responsibility. It doesn''t matter what affiliations the guilty have. It''s a sign of unacceptable behavior that is all to prevalent in our society as a whole. We have promulgated an atmosphere that promotes the peter principle. People are promoted just because they have seniority or contacts, not because of their skill level. The same attitude that awards contracts to the lowest bidder in preference to who has the better product or does the work better. Our whole system is predicated on a false premise. Our mistakes are coming home to roost.
7 people died, and all he can get is 4 yrs.????
I also think that his supervisor and their manager should also go to jail. Where was the due diligence.?
The commissioner of buildings and construction should be fired and fined.
I did not know this was a Rat Job,But I figured it was.
Thanks for the clarification. As a Brother Iron Worker,we know All about these incidents.
Most of these people have NO idea the risks we take to build their bridges,buildings and the many projects of our country.
I KNEW this article was written by a woman, only a woman would use a stupid descriptor about a 200 foot high crane like "toppled over"
"Marquette, who earns $52,283 a year as an inspector..."
Nope, "earns" is the wrong word to use in HIS case, in his case he sat on his lazy fat azz, falsified documents and probably because of him 7 people are now dead
You are Such an IDIOT!
Impersonating a human being is Not one of Your strengths ! MORON! MORON!
Every Time You post,You Show How STUPID You Are,.Go Back into HOLE!
Posted by RingADing3 at 09:18 PM : Mar 20, 2008
What an asinine comment.
Union or not, the guy had a boss - and if that boss couldn''t be bothered to ensure that his or her people do the work, that is where the buck stops.
Now that attitude you can blame on this cult of right-wing "It wasn''t my fault and I deserve my golden parachute."-types who are running this country with their morality of "Anything is acceptable, as long as somebody is making a buck off of doing - or not doing - it.".
You over simplify the post, it is the climate advocated by the conservative movement, of less regulation, and relaxed standards, which results in increased risk to life for the sake of profit that has resulted in this lack of quality control.
"rharrin1" was looking at the big picture of how this malfeasance came to be tolerated, as incidents from "the big dig" in Boston, to the major cracks in the highway of a southern state a few days ago, and numerous other incidents illustrate.
so as much as many of you want to see corruption or fake records and reports as a Republican problem--dig a little deeper. The Generic Drug Scandals heavily involving corruption of inspectors was tried between 1989 and 1994, no where near the amt of inspectors on the take or faking stuff were caught and most investigations were during a Dem. gov. Now ask yourself in the hundreds of thousands of deaths involving meds per year--how many can be laid at those doors. Remember that unity thing? Stop the bash of one party or another-like most sins, corruption is NOT partisan.
This is a breakdown of moral responsibility. It doesn''''t matter what affiliations the guilty have. It''''s a sign of unacceptable behavior that is all to prevalent in our society as a whole. We have promulgated an atmosphere that promotes the peter principle. People are promoted just because they have seniority or contacts, not because of their skill level. The same attitude that awards contracts to the lowest bidder in preference to who has the better product or does the work better. Our whole system is predicated on a false premise. Our mistakes are coming home to roost.
Posted by Sumarongi at 06:33 PM : Mar 20, 2008
Excellent post
Posted by gangesdak at 04:33 PM : Mar 20, 2008
For an example of government contractors'' work ethic see the story this morning about the contractors in the State Department fired for snooping into Barack Obama''s passport records.
Posted by taylpatr at 07:30 PM : Mar 20, 2008
He might have been on the take. Then again, he might have just been a lazy person who discovered he could "pretend to inspect" and never go to any of his sites, and could instead play on his X box or go eat some doughnuts. The fact is, many inspectors who do not do their jobs are not bribed, they are just lazy and figure--nothing happens much anyway--so they fake the records. The real question is, where is the QA tests to make sure inspectors are really doing their jobs and not faking reports? (Every business should have them)
"This boils down to failure on so many different levels."
This is why we should be worried. It would have been much more reassuring if they had simply used the words "If there is a larger problem, we will do everything we can to find out and remedy it."
Knows politics has Everything to do with ''''Working conditions'''',..
It`s a Simple fact of Life!
Very True Indeed!
Because people stick their head in the sand and make excuses does not change one thing.The fact IS Democrats are for the Workers and republicans are for the companies. PERIOD.
Are you " Keyboard Crane Operators" ?
Or Maybe " Word Erectors " ?
Or maybe you are just interested in seeing that things like this don`t happen in the future.If you truly care,
check into your local candidates.Look at their voting records,see how how stand on important issues,such as job safety and construction regulations.
-
by b-easy63
March 23, 2008 8:19 AM PDT
- .The fact IS Democrats are for the Workers and republicans are for the companies. PERIOD.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 38 CommentsPosted by neobrian at 11:00 AM : Mar 21, 2008
Which is why a Democratic President and a Dem. Candidate supported NAFTA--the greatest boon to companies (and NOT American workers) ever. Both parties are for companies, all you have to do to know that is follow the money. Ask Hillary what is on those tax returns and why she would not vote no to retro immunity sought by telecom companies for helping Bush to illegally wire tap.
Frankly, I believe she is also in cahoots with insurance providers and will no doubt kick a lot of business their way, if/when she can hold America hostage to her version of UHC.
Face it, many in Congress are corrupt and support those who line their pockets. Where do you think the bounce in Clinton finances came from after they said they were almost bankrupt? A money tree? LOL
Both parties will keep playing Americans as long as voters spout the rhetoric, believe the hype and refuse to just look at the real picture.