CBS Poll: Gender Matters More Than Race
Voters Say Woman Candidate Faces Slightly Bigger Barriers To Presidency Than A Black Candidate
-
News Tools Poll Database Search for results from the latest CBS News national polls on the president, the campaign and more.
-
In The Spotlight Campaign Watch '08 Check out the latest campaign ads in the race for the White House.
When it comes to the 2008 presidential election, voters say Hillary Clinton has been judged more harshly because of her gender than Barack Obama has because of his race. Forty two percent said Clinton has been judged “more harshly” and six percent said she has been judged less harshly because of her gender. Twenty seven percent said they think Obama has been judged “more harshly” because of his race while 11 percent said he has been judged less harshly.
Still, racism is seen as a bigger problem for the nation in general. Among all adults surveyed, 42 percent of respondents said racism is a “serious problem” in the country compared to just 10 percent who said the same of sexism. Twenty three percent said both are serious problems.
More Americans report having recently heard what they consider racist remarks from people they know than sexist ones. Forty two percent of all surveyed, including 65 percent of blacks, said people they know have made racist remarks in the last few months. Thirty five percent, including 33 percent of women, say they have heard sexist remarks from someone they know recently. And all groups said they are more offended by racist remarks than sexist ones.
There continue to be differences in how voters judge their own voting instincts and the instincts of other Americans. Just 6 percent of white voters say that all things being equal, they would prefer to vote for a white candidate, but 34 percent of white voters say that most people they know would not vote for a black person for president. And 29 percent are not sure that American is ready to elect a black president.
Overall, 56 percent said most people they know would vote for a black candidate while 33 percent said most they know would not. Sixty two percent of all voters said America is ready for a black president but just 50 percent of blacks agreed.
More voters admit their unwillingness to vote for a woman. Nearly one in five voters says that all things being equal, they would rather vote for a man. Fewer than half say that most people they know would vote for a woman for president, although this response may now be intertwined with whether or not people think their acquaintances would vote for Hillary Clinton. Still, 59 percent say America is ready for a woman president.
Read The Complete Poll ResultsThis poll was conducted among a random sample of 1,067 adults nationwide interviewed by telephone March 15-18, 2008. The error due to sampling for results based on the entire sample could be plus or minus three percentage points. The error for subgroups is higher.
NOTE: A small oversample of African Americans was also conducted for this poll, for a total of 122 interviews among this group. The results were then weighted in proportion to the racial composition of the adult population in the U.S. Census. The margin of error for African Americans is plus or minus nine percentage points.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- I am beginning to see that this is less about Obama and more about insecure Democrats. It seems that the problem with many of you is that you harbor ill will and use the Internet to pass judgment and venom. You say you don''t like Barack because of a 30 second sound bite of his preacher, without knowing not only the full context, but the nature of the struggle of the people of that congregation. Then the others that don''t like Hillary because she is a woman is not only ignorant, but shows that this country is far behind the rest of western civilization. Bush messed us up bad and I don''t know that we''ll ever recover. It''s time for some of you to learn that country trumps party and candidate. My suggestion for you bigots is to get out of the tiny block that you live in and do some traveling, see the world and meet other people. Maybe you will find some enlightenment. And as far as this article is concerned, I am not aware of any women that have been hanged, beaten by police, bitten by dogs or assaulted by water hoses or purposely infected with Syphilis and not offered a cure for the purposes of study. Don''t get me wrong, women have a tremendous uphill climb for equality, but let us not forget that African American men as a whole have long been a target for racism and violence. You had the perfect chance to win the presidency post-Bush, and you blew it.
- Reply to this comment
- How could this happen!
3 AM call to Whitehouse - Oct 3 1993 - Muslim extremists attack US Troops in Mogadishu, Somalia. 18 killed 90 wounded
The Clintons response: withdraw troops
Clintons decides to cut losses, but declares that American troops are to be fully withdrawn from Somalia by March 31. The hunt for Aidid is abandoned, and US representatives are sent to resume negotiations with the warlord.
Builds Confidence of Muslim extremists to plan further action in Africa, Middle East, Europe & USA. - Reply to this comment
- Cadalezza Rice: Muffelor or Muffelee?? Anybody know?
- Reply to this comment
- Why the notion of superdelegates is a good idea gone bad: It presupposes that the superdelegates have the wisdom of the Founding Fathers.
- Reply to this comment
- To SCREAM: Listen to the news much lately? Rev. Wright''s church SELLS the videos of the services. Too bad people who''re ignorant of current events are allowed to vote!
- Reply to this comment
- JULIB55 comment, cont.
Obama is smug and insincere. The very cadence of his speechifying assaults my intuition. It''s modulated and studied, showing a complete lack of compassion and an inability to speak straight from the heart, sans a script, about an issue that''s so important.
And his adherence, for 20 years, to black liberation theology is an outright dealbreaker! Forget that people have copies of the tapes circulating privately or have watched longer coverage of Rev. Wrong on YouTube. Each 1-minute soundbite is enough to tell us all we need to know. You can''t campaign on a platform of transcending both racial and partisan divisions, and at the same time belong to an extremist, Afro- centric church with a pastor who spews hatred and bitterness instead of inspiring through love. IAnd what about Wright''s invective against Natalie Holloway? How do you explain that to her parents? It just doesn''t wash.
And from a practical standpoint, your boy, if he manages to steal the election from Sen. Clinton, will need to win independents and crossover Republicans in the general election, and he''s now lost too many of them. Not to mention the loss of the Democrats who''re about to be shut out in two states and the rest of us who would never vote for him!
Please, step away from the Kool-Aid. The only candidate fit to run the country is Hillary Clinton. And I intend, with thousands of others, to write in her name on the ballot if the Obamination steals her rightful place. - Reply to this comment
- Obama proffers a new kind of politics: voter suppression. He''s happy, like the smarmiest of pols, to shut out 2 states'' worth of voters because it suits him. He cries "There are rules." Those "rules," imposed by Herr Dean and the Gang of Losers, were not made known to the VOTERS--"We, the people." Where was his foresight when he first heard about these rules? Why didn''t he speak up then? Why didn''t he run independent of any political party? Doing so would have constituted true change!
Where was his good judgment when he got mixed up with Rezko? I was also against giving Bush any war powers, so make me president. Easy to make those calls when you''re not privy to classified info or sitting in the Senate AT THE TIME OF THE VOTE. It''s easy to make the call when you''re not a senator from GROUND ZERO, which I lived right across from at the time. Most New Yorkers were in FAVOR OF HILLARY''S VOTE. Why is OK to adhere to the will of the people in a primary but not anytime else? - Reply to this comment
- It is interesting that the Clinton camp saw the race card as the only way to win the nomination. Make no mistake that the directive to not only bring up the race card but to also take movies of the Pastor came from a woman desperate to win the nomination-Hillary Clinton. This is a sign of a very weak woman. Are we really interested in putting a person who will stop at nothing to get her way in the White House? Haven''t we had enough of this behavior with Bush? I am a white woman and I voted for Obama because he is intelligent, kind and has great character. We need to send a message to Ms. Clinton that we don''t need her kind in control of our country.
- Reply to this comment
- America needs a real Man at the helm, not a woMAN. Sorry to rain on your pipe-dream of a women becoming president, ''lil Hillary. Now you can go join Geraldine Ferraro as two footnotes in history as examples of women who tried to become vice-president and president. Almost only counts in horseshoes ladies.
- Reply to this comment
- interesting how clinton''s name was mentioned as perhaps shading the data, but not obama''s name.
- Reply to this comment
- Would''nt it be funny, if she got caught with some man eating her puhtang in the ovale office....LOL
- Reply to this comment
- Not from me, a Woman should be givien a chance, and she''s been here before.She is a strong cookie. the men have had there shot, let''s see how a woman does it. It cant really hurt anything, seeing how bad things are. And bad i mean for the american people, not for me, im awesome, thanks for asking.
- Reply to this comment
- "More voters admit their unwillingness to vote for a woman. Nearly one in five voters says that all things being equal, they would rather vote for a man."
I think it''s difficult to separate the issue of gender and race from the association people have of the candidates, because Hillary and Barack are the only individuals people have the experience of envisioning in that role.
I think if you look at which group people have actually been elected in greater numbers into positions of power the evidence seems to show that people are more open to voting for women than blacks. Aren''t there 14 female Senators (for 52% of the population), and only 1 black Senator (for 12% of the population? - Reply to this comment
- The winner has a huge job to try to muddle through the Middle East mess and the worst recession of most of our lives. I like Obama, Clinton, and McCain for various reasons, and I disagree with all of them on some key issues. I really don''t care about their gender and race.
- Reply to this comment
- ritewingman,
Feminists generally like men--a lot. Feminists'' main argument is that women are people. Period. Don''t be sidetracked by the statistical outliers who get all the press in any group.
Ann Coulter and Al Sharpton don''t represent most Republicans or Democrats, either, for example, but they have loud mouths like the minority of feminists you likely refer to. - Reply to this comment
- Obama was muslum? You want someone who wouldn''t solute the flag as your president. All he does is play the race card... It shouldn''t be about the color of your skin. It should be about who you are. Last thing we need someone siding with the towel heads, and takeing over our country, killing us off. I may not be happy with Hillary, but I sure will not allow Obama to run this country.....
- Reply to this comment
- Michigan and Florida contain citizens that have an inalienable right to have a say through real primaries who runs for president.
There is no maybe about that. No one has to like it--its just true.
Ignore these states (and their real, actual expressed vote by the people/citizens) and you can''t waltz back through them come election time and expect to then convince them you "now" care how they vote (Barak!).
It is physically impossible to win in a national election by ignoring the electoriate in these states!
DUH. - Reply to this comment
- Barak thinks this particular election must be about race as a major issue--BECAUSE HE IS RUNNING.
I don''t need to be educated about how someone else views their church--that is what getting sidetracked
is.
This presidential election is about electing a president--not electing Jesus ...or Rap--or saltines either. - Reply to this comment
- Since race didn''t divide and conquer the democrat part and swing voters back to Corporate Clinton, now CBS says gender is the divide.
Dear CBS, (AKA Zionist tool and mouth piece)
Why don''t you try income... Oh yes, that is taboo to try and divide and conquer with income. People might wake up to the fact that 1% of the population controls 96% of the wealth in the US.
Clinton has few donors and they are big corporate donors. Obama has many donors and they are the average citizen.
We only come here to CBS to mock and laugh at you Zionist idiots. Keep it up, it isn''t like you have any credibility to lose anymore. - Reply to this comment
- It is not about gender or race. It is about brain-dead Hillary''s ill being too similar to Kim Jong-ill: experienced, clever, and very driven but missing a soul.
- Reply to this comment





