March 18, 2008

Transcript: Barack Obama's Speech On Race

{value=1}

  • Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama D-Ill., delivers a speech on race in Philadelphia, March 18, 2008. Photo

    Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama D-Ill., delivers a speech on race in Philadelphia, March 18, 2008.  (CBS)

  • Photo Essay Barack Obama

    A look at the life and meteoric rise of the president-elect.

(CBS)  The following are the remarks prepared for delivery by Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama on March 18, 2008 in Philadelphia.


"We the people, in order to form a more perfect union."

Two hundred and twenty one years ago, in a hall that still stands across the street, a group of men gathered and, with these simple words, launched America's improbable experiment in democracy. Farmers and scholars; statesmen and patriots who had traveled across an ocean to escape tyranny and persecution finally made real their declaration of independence at a Philadelphia convention that lasted through the spring of 1787.

Obama Urges End To "Racial Stalemate"
CBS Poll: Pastor's Remarks Hurt Obama
Congregation Defends Obama's Ex-Pastor
Video: Obama On Anger Between Races

The document they produced was eventually signed but ultimately unfinished. It was stained by this nation's original sin of slavery, a question that divided the colonies and brought the convention to a stalemate until the founders chose to allow the slave trade to continue for at least twenty more years, and to leave any final resolution to future generations.

Of course, the answer to the slavery question was already embedded within our Constitution - a Constitution that had at is very core the ideal of equal citizenship under the law; a Constitution that promised its people liberty, and justice, and a union that could be and should be perfected over time.

And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. What would be needed were Americans in successive generations who were willing to do their part - through protests and struggle, on the streets and in the courts, through a civil war and civil disobedience and always at great risk - to narrow that gap between the promise of our ideals and the reality of their time.

This was one of the tasks we set forth at the beginning of this campaign - to continue the long march of those who came before us, a march for a more just, more equal, more free, more caring and more prosperous America. I chose to run for the presidency at this moment in history because I believe deeply that we cannot solve the challenges of our time unless we solve them together - unless we perfect our union by understanding that we may have different stories, but we hold common hopes; that we may not look the same and we may not have come from the same place, but we all want to move in the same direction - towards a better future for of children and our grandchildren.

This belief comes from my unyielding faith in the decency and generosity of the American people. But it also comes from my own American story.

I am the son of a black man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas. I was raised with the help of a white grandfather who survived a Depression to serve in Patton's Army during World War II and a white grandmother who worked on a bomber assembly line at Fort Leavenworth while he was overseas. I've gone to some of the best schools in America and lived in one of the world's poorest nations. I am married to a black American who carries within her the blood of slaves and slaveowners - an inheritance we pass on to our two precious daughters. I have brothers, sisters, nieces, nephews, uncles and cousins, of every race and every hue, scattered across three continents, and for as long as I live, I will never forget that in no other country on Earth is my story even possible.

It's a story that hasn't made me the most conventional candidate. But it is a story that has seared into my genetic makeup the idea that this nation is more than the sum of its parts - that out of many, we are truly one.

Throughout the first year of this campaign, against all predictions to the contrary, we saw how hungry the American people were for this message of unity. Despite the temptation to view my candidacy through a purely racial lens, we won commanding victories in states with some of the whitest populations in the country. In South Carolina, where the Confederate Flag still flies, we built a powerful coalition of African Americans and white Americans.

This is not to say that race has not been an issue in the campaign. At various stages in the campaign, some commentators have deemed me either "too black" or "not black enough." We saw racial tensions bubble to the surface during the week before the South Carolina primary. The press has scoured every exit poll for the latest evidence of racial polarization, not just in terms of white and black, but black and brown as well.

And yet, it has only been in the last couple of weeks that the discussion of race in this campaign has taken a particularly divisive turn.

On one end of the spectrum, we've heard the implication that my candidacy is somehow an exercise in affirmative action; that it's based solely on the desire of wide-eyed liberals to purchase racial reconciliation on the cheap. On the other end, we've heard my former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, use incendiary language to express views that have the potential not only to widen the racial divide, but views that denigrate both the greatness and the goodness of our nation; that rightly offend white and black alike.

I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely - just as I'm sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.

But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren't simply controversial. They weren't simply a religious leader's effort to speak out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country - a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam.

As such, Reverend Wright's comments were not only wrong but divisive, divisive at a time when we need unity; racially charged at a time when we need to come together to solve a set of monumental problems - two wars, a terrorist threat, a falling economy, a chronic health care crisis and potentially devastating climate change; problems that are neither black or white or Latino or Asian, but rather problems that confront us all.

Given my background, my politics, and my professed values and ideals, there will no doubt be those for whom my statements of condemnation are not enough. Why associate myself with Reverend Wright in the first place, they may ask? Why not join another church? And I confess that if all that I knew of Reverend Wright were the snippets of those sermons that have run in an endless loop on the television and You Tube, or if Trinity United Church of Christ conformed to the caricatures being peddled by some commentators, there is no doubt that I would react in much the same way

But the truth is, that isn't all that I know of the man. The man I met more than twenty years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my Christian faith, a man who spoke to me about our obligations to love one another; to care for the sick and lift up the poor. He is a man who served his country as a U.S. Marine; who has studied and lectured at some of the finest universities and seminaries in the country, and who for over thirty years led a church that serves the community by doing God's work here on Earth - by housing the homeless, ministering to the needy, providing day care services and scholarships and prison ministries, and reaching out to those suffering from HIV/AIDS.

In my first book, Dreams From My Father, I described the experience of my first service at Trinity:

"People began to shout, to rise from their seats and clap and cry out, a forceful wind carrying the reverend's voice up into the rafters….And in that single note - hope! - I heard something else; at the foot of that cross, inside the thousands of churches across the city, I imagined the stories of ordinary black people merging with the stories of David and Goliath, Moses and Pharaoh, the Christians in the lion's den, Ezekiel's field of dry bones. Those stories - of survival, and freedom, and hope - became our story, my story; the blood that had spilled was our blood, the tears our tears; until this black church, on this bright day, seemed once more a vessel carrying the story of a people into future generations and into a larger world. Our trials and triumphs became at once unique and universal, black and more than black; in chronicling our journey, the stories and songs gave us a means to reclaim memories that we didn't need to feel shame about…memories that all people might study and cherish - and with which we could start to rebuild."

That has been my experience at Trinity. Like other predominantly black churches across the country, Trinity embodies the black community in its entirety - the doctor and the welfare mom, the model student and the former gang-banger. Like other black churches, Trinity's services are full of raucous laughter and sometimes bawdy humor. They are full of dancing, clapping, screaming and shouting that may seem jarring to the untrained ear. The church contains in full the kindness and cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love and yes, the bitterness and bias that make up the black experience in America.

Continued



© MMVIII, CBS Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Candidate Profiles & RSS Feeds


Video and Galleries from Politics

Add a Comment See all 131 Comments
by p200-2009 March 18, 2008 1:36 PM PDT
Yada Yada Yada, Still not answer my question as to charater as why he stayed associated with Rev Wright for 20 years.
When first asked he said he never heard Wright sermons that he thought were negitive. Today Yes he did.
Then he brought his poor grandmother into the speach to just because she is white, but to have the world know what she may have may not have said is wrong.

This speach has been sitting around for a while and ready to be used when his hand was forced to use it.
Didn,t belive him yesterday don,t belive him today.
But people in MSM are comparing him to MLK.
WAKE UP AMERICA HE IS NOT MLK
Reply to this comment
by rizabove March 18, 2008 1:56 PM PDT
Stop hating'' and start congratulating''---Let''s love each other, come together and fight for one Country, One great Country, AMERICA!!!!!!! Thank God for our young people who can free their minds to hate and open their hearts to love!!! WE HAVE ONE CHOICE, stick together as Americans and defeat our enemies who could care less about Black and White and more about defeating America. So, let us realize that divides will make our Country fold, but standing together to fight and bring the American dollar back, education back, jobs back, and our place in the world back...is what we need and what the majority of Americans want!!! AMERICA the Beautiful, AMERICA the great. Spread love and peace, not division and separation!!! RISE ABOVE!!!!
Reply to this comment
by kayj81 March 18, 2008 2:15 PM PDT
The real truth is there is pain and resentment among Americans on all sides when it comes to racial issues. That is the core message here. It''s about time someone spoke openly about this.
To bring people together, one must understand the severity of this pain and resentment. And not alienate people who are angry about injustice and have clouded judgement and a certain degree of paranoia due to their anger.
Remember Psychology 101? Years of injustice and abuse will create paranoid, angry, resentful and unreasonable reactions.
Wake up America, and learn from this speech.
We have to NAME our real differences before we can TRANSCEND them.
We desperately need someone who has compassion for all views to bring us together successfully.
Reply to this comment
by rbrownjr13 March 18, 2008 2:44 PM PDT
Sounds like he peformed at his strengths today, a smooth talker! He has a very questionable past, and his judgment is questionable also. He has NO experience and comes from nowhere to be a presidential front runner. I dont understand. But I do understand dontvoteobama.net
Reply to this comment
by sarahberra76 March 18, 2008 3:03 PM PDT
This is the best speech I''ve heard on race in my entire life. Obama did an excellent job of looking at race from all points of views but making sure that everyone understands there has been a "historical" issue of race when it comes to African Americans in particular. If you have ever attended a Black church there is a 50/50 chance you may here some of the statements that have come out. Rather you agree with his the reverends comments there still remains an issue of "race" in America.No one has had the guts to talk about until now. I''m so glad Barack did and that he is running for the most important position in America. To the media and others who like to take things out of context, he has spoken and now leave it alone. And to any American who says they have never disagreed with a spiritual leader or anyone for that matter yet remained in contact or association with them is a LIE! Parents, children, co-workers, pastors are all human and make mistakes. "He who has not sinned throw the first stone".
Reply to this comment
by servingproud March 18, 2008 3:06 PM PDT
Without a doubt, Obama is has talent in speaking, motivating and perhaps inspiring.

I still won''t vote for him though.
He''s very clear we shouldn''t have gone to Iraq. Not so straight forward (or at least vocal) on whether we should have gone into Afghanistan.. We didn''t go into Rwanda.. Does he agree with that decision? If a genocide began in Kenya (home to his grandmother) would he feel inclined to commit our forces there?

Under his rationale it would seen that we wouldn''t have gone into Korea.. I think there are a number of individuals in S. Korea that look north across the DMZ and are glad we did.

Obama is clear we''ve been in Iraq too long (the message resonates with a populous opinion). Not so vocal on Afghanistan.. How about the Balkans, for that matter how about Korea, Japan or Germany.. How many years did we spend supporting the German economy as it was rebuilt following WW II? Or Korea? Yes they are fairly vibrant economies now but back in 1960??

Who cares about the Iraqis anyway.. If they can''t establish a free and strong government in 5 years or less then it''s obvious that the people don''t WANT to be FREE.

I probably shouldn''t bring up how long it took us (The U.S.) to get our feet on the ground and figure out a balance between state and federal powers (a Civil War, Civil Rights, socialized services...) Oh wait.. we''re still working on it..
Reply to this comment
by servingproud March 18, 2008 3:08 PM PDT
Without a doubt, Obama is has talent in speaking, motivating and perhaps inspiring.

I still won''t vote for him though.
He''s very clear we shouldn''t have gone to Iraq. Not so straight forward (or at least vocal) on whether we should have gone into Afghanistan.. We didn''t go into Rwanda.. Does he agree with that decision? If a genocide began in Kenya (home to his grandmother) would he feel inclined to commit our forces there?

Under his rationale it would seen that we wouldn''t have gone into Korea.. I think there are a number of individuals in S. Korea that look north across the DMZ and are glad we did.

Obama is clear we''ve been in Iraq too long (the message resonates with a populous opinion). Not so vocal on Afghanistan.. How about the Balkans, for that matter how about Korea, Japan or Germany.. How many years did we spend supporting the German economy as it was rebuilt following WW II? Or Korea? Yes they are fairly vibrant economies now but back in 1960??

Who cares about the Iraqis anyway.. If they can''t establish a free and strong government in 5 years or less then it''s obvious that the people don''t WANT to be FREE.

I probably shouldn''t bring up how long it took us (The U.S.) to get our feet on the ground and figure out a balance between state and federal powers (a Civil War, Civil Rights, socialized services...) Oh wait.. we''re still working on it..
Reply to this comment
by elle56-2009 March 18, 2008 3:20 PM PDT
What an insightful and moving speech! Obama''s speech was a call to review our past but more importantly it was a call to UNITE! How beautiful. This speech compelled me to transfer my vote for Hillary Clinton to, hopefully, PresidentElect, Barack Obama!
Reply to this comment
by bulldogs623 March 18, 2008 3:39 PM PDT
Barack Obama Is the ONLY candidate that will be able to unite this country. He has more class in his little finger than Hillary or McCain. People say he is not qualified. What qualifies Hillary? She has already been caught in her lies about her "experience". I believe her statements were referred to by a man who was with her at the time, as a "wee bit silly". What qualifies McCain? The fact he was a prisoner of war for five and a half years? Some qualification to be president! Obama is intelligent, and level-headed and will surround himself with capable people. Go Obama!!!
Reply to this comment
by hhkeller March 18, 2008 3:43 PM PDT
Obama created this issue that wasn''t there 6 months ago. Obamas quest to solidify a monolithic African American vote in the South has come back to sting him and America. The man is dumber than Bush.
Now he''s wants to lecture the country about stuff we already know about so that he somehow looks presidential when in fact he created this issue during his campaign. Obama is worse than Bush.
Reply to this comment
by rbrownjr13 March 18, 2008 3:44 PM PDT
Yeah, will surround himself with "capable" people like Rev. Wright, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and Louis Farrakhan. As a jewish caucasian, that is scary to me, sorry but it is! http://www.dontvoteobama.net
Reply to this comment
by roach9703 March 18, 2008 3:50 PM PDT
Obama''s assoication with Reverend Wright should not be considered Obama''s view of the world. We have friends we like,but with which we do no agree.
However, Obama''s background is that of broken homes, mutilple family relatioships, and help from the government. His view of the world is based on a deep faith in the power of the Federal Govenment to change lives. The extent to which one agrees with this view, is the extent one is a supporter of Barak Obama.
Reply to this comment
by bulldogs623 March 18, 2008 3:50 PM PDT
To rbrownjr13...Maybe his speech went over your head. He DENOUNCED Rev Wright''s words and postion on race. Go back and read (or have someone read it to you) the text.
Reply to this comment
by jacqueliner3 March 18, 2008 4:39 PM PDT
Hillary''s problem is that she overestimates the intelligence of the American voter. Obama goes in the opposite direction but it''s becoming clear you can''t really underestimate it. Anyone who fails to see the cynicism and insincerity in this speech deserves the kind of President they will get if Obama wins - awful.
Reply to this comment
by element51 March 18, 2008 5:12 PM PDT
I just read the speech and thought it was the best speech of it''s type I have ever heard. And yet, many of you continue to spout the right wing rhetoric that has been spread. Maybe you didn''t understand what the man was saying. I don''t know. But I do know that to simply spin his words to make them serve your political philosophy is wrong. None are so blind as those who do not see. I will now settle back and wait for the death of a thousand cuts. I know that on this board I have taken the wrong stance but I won''t back down. Go on, take your best shot.
Reply to this comment
by jlt03218 March 18, 2008 5:46 PM PDT
Very moving speech. Speechifying is a grand American tradition, making kings of common men from Lincoln to the Wizard of Oz. It is very well organized and thought out, and its use of the vernacular is inspiring.
But we musn''t let one poetic flow from the mouth of an expert politician cut off the blood flow to our cerebral cortex: We have to keep in mind his history, his acceptance of the Rev. Wright''s words (words DO matter, and we all should accept the consequences of what we say). To believe that he didn''t know about the content of these inflammatory statements strains incredulity to beyond the breaking point. Now he''s lecturing us on how we can all get along. Hmm..
I guess he''s changed.
I''m not a liberal, a conservative, a Republican, or a Democrat.
I''m a skeptic.
JLT

Reply to this comment
by janismus March 18, 2008 5:52 PM PDT
He has earned my vote. If this speech did not move you, then nothing will, and I feel very sorry for your lack of intellect and emotion.
Reply to this comment
by pumaespiritu March 18, 2008 6:02 PM PDT
I guess it''s time to displace all of the white supremacists of this country, and allow them to create their own purebred nation. Oh wait, that would take away all of the McCain and Clintion supporters.... nevermind... For all of you purebred whites slandering President Obama go back to school and study history, anthropology, psychology, and learn another language before unleashing your beligerant ignorance on these blog pages. His speech was the best rhetoric in the public sphere since JFK and MLK, and ALL AMERICANS should be appreciative of his message.
Reply to this comment
by ddrbc March 18, 2008 6:36 PM PDT
Brilliant political posturing, as to be expected.
Reply to this comment
by desertclair March 18, 2008 6:44 PM PDT
Obama said, "black anger persists over injustice in America, and whites shouldn''t be surprised that it bursts out in sermons."
Sermons should teach forgiveness as Jesus taught, not justified anger and hatred, even if injustice still exists. What Bible are they reading? The world has been plagued by injustice since time began. Against women; against Jews; against minorities in every civilization. None of these horrible events were ever healed by continuing hatred. Hatred breeds more hatred. Jesus taught that only forgiveness and understanding calms the soul, heals the pain and empowers people.

Obama can not win the general election now! Only Hillary is our chance for "change" from the current Republican agenda.
Reply to this comment
by ddrbc March 18, 2008 6:50 PM PDT
Has Obama gotten past his own racial stalemate?

From Dreams of My Father, " I FOUND A SOLACE IN NURSING A PERVASISVE SENSE OF GRIEVANCE AND ANIMOSITY AGAINST MY MOTHER''S RACE".

From ''Dreams of my Father'', "The emotion between the races could never be pure, even love was tarnished by the desire to find in the other some element that was missing in ourselves. Whether we sought out our demons or salvation, the other race (WHITE) would always remain just that: menacing, alien, and apart."
Reply to this comment
by ericv2644 March 18, 2008 7:17 PM PDT
I go to a Mixed Church and my pastor is white, I heard him say some very inflammatory statements, no I don''t agree with those statements but i am not quiting my church and pastor. You probably wouldn''t either.
Reply to this comment
by citizen8888 March 18, 2008 7:31 PM PDT
To Element51:
I salute you!
Reply to this comment
by citizen8888 March 18, 2008 7:34 PM PDT
rbrownjr13:
Interesting that you try to throw white Jews under the bus by proclaiming that is what you are. Is that supposed to make you more believable or something. Cr@p coming out of the mouth of someone CLAIMING to be Jewish is still cr@p.
Reply to this comment
by citizen8888 March 18, 2008 7:44 PM PDT
eastwaviking said:
"Obama could never unify our country when he''''s a 20 year member of a Divisive church. It''''s time for him to step away from politics."

What do you think most churches are if not divisive? Churches are generally trying to divide those who they pick as able to get to heaven from those who they say aren''t. Do you know how many wars, and not just in the recent century, have been fought over religion? Do you know how many churches still believe that Jews are damned? Would you say that because a Christian goes to a church that doesn''t repudiate the New Testament''s anti-semetic bent that they should not be president? I would say that not many Christians are willing to repudiate the New Testament. However, I guess that is okay as long as it is only anti-Semitism and not anti-American or anti-white. The big 3 religions in the US, Christianity, Islam and Judaism, all have their bigoted histories and present. I don''t think that most churches could stand up to a deep and true examination of their beliefs. However, you may feel differently----but if you do, it is probably only about your own church.
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 March 18, 2008 8:20 PM PDT
"The church contains in full the kindness and cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love and yes, the bitterness and bias that make up the black experience in America."

Why foster the bitterness? Why not stand above it.

Your statement alone that says Geraldine Ferraro made racist statements show you are a liar. Ms. Ferraro was not condemning your race...she was point out your total lack of credentials for the job you were applying for and stating the obvious fact that not another man with your credentials could be running for president. You are fostering racism by such a statement!

Again, really good tear jerking speech fostering your racism. Every person in the United States today has the same opportunity as anybody else. If you pick up your freedom, your equality and run like hell with it to better yourself instead of obcessing on how oppressed your are, how abused you are, how separate you should keep yourself, there would be no need for gratituous speeches.
Reply to this comment
by bulldogs623 March 18, 2008 8:21 PM PDT
I am old enough to remember when JFK ran for president. Democrats had a dilemma. They had to vote democratic, but they couldn''t vote for a Catholic. I see the very same thing happenning now with Barack Obama. People are afraid of things they don''t understand. Here is a black man with a strange sounding name, and people conjur up all kinds of ridiculous ideas about the man. The fact is, he is an intelligent man with good judgement and a desire to heal this nation that George Bush has torn apart. This country cannot withstand another presidential term with Washington politicians playing their petty little political games. Every country in the world hates us, we are in a war we should never have started. We have 4000 of our young men and women dead because of George Bush. A finding came out this week, that after five years of research , they could find no link between Saddam Hussein and 911. Thanks George Bush. Does anyone really believe Hillary or another George Bush (John MCCain) can heal this countries wounds?
Reply to this comment
by tomtomasters March 18, 2008 8:45 PM PDT
Listening to Rev. Wright%u2019s remarks in concern to damning America only reminds us of our past great spiritual leader Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. He held similar speeches in congregations on Sunday warning us of the perils of a country absorbed in the false ideals of militarism. I stand honestly and willingly to congratulate Rev. Wright and his stand toward seeking a nonviolent country, in seeking a nonviolent President, and speaking from the context that anyone that is sermonizing hate of America; are really the people who support financially the military; to go abroad and kill innocent families in Iraq and Afghanistan. Those who are willing to distance them-selves from the harsh realities in hearing such news because they support war and killing will face their crippling realities when their War Crimes eventually come to the courts of heaven acclaiming the death and destruction to millions with the merciful verdict that there will be no welcome to them in our hearts.
Rev. Wright brings home the message loud and clear that violence has no place in our great society. It makes the message clear that those who are disenfranchised and poor in America living in ghettos, and seeing no future have a burning desire to unleash their anger; because of the injustices inside in America to get a better life; they succumb to enlisting in the military. %u201CTake out your anger toward terrorists in foreign lands,%u201D the government declares.
Reply to this comment
by tomtomasters March 18, 2008 8:46 PM PDT
And while we are unable to fix the malady of injustice and discrimination within our own society, we claim to be able to fix other societies in foreign lands. Talk about a disparaging concept when language barriers and customs are so uniquely not our own%u2026.yet we boldly and proudly anticipate benevolent change from the end of a barrel of a gun! It is insanity at its highest level of understanding.
There have only been 3 men in the world%u2019s history who have gone before us telling us and showing us the path toward freedom and peace. They spoke of the need and deliverance of nonviolence. They were Jesus of Nazareth, Mahatma Gandhi, and Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. They live this very day in our hearts as our living spirits toward the reality of truth and its goals toward peace and justice.


Reply to this comment
by tomtomasters March 18, 2008 8:48 PM PDT
We honor them as symbols in our lives, having thousands of Churches and Synagogues throughout America revering the Lord Jesus of Nazareth who did acts of kindness while living within the despairing confines of violence in the Middle East. We honor Mahatma Gandhi as a spiritual guru who won the independence of India from Britain by stopping the Opium Trade that caused havoc throughout the worlds societies, through his acts of nonviolence and resistance to the debacles of the Wests War machines. And we have made Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. a National Symbol of our American Dream; giving a day of remembrance as a National Holiday because of his unyielding acts and stand of courage for Americas poor and disenfranchised while taking the cause and following his hero%u2019s Jesus and Mahatma toward the ideals of nonviolence and its deliverance from the oppression of military and nuclear ambitions. He is the only leader who stood and still stands for a nonviolent America....making him truly our Nations only beloved and Original Founding Father.

Reply to this comment
by tomtomasters March 18, 2008 8:49 PM PDT
Yet we have leaders today who are not symbols of Americanism or symbols of nonviolent religions. These men disregard Rev. King who has gone before us; in which he was murdered because of his courage and uncowardly stand against violence. There is no Lyndon Johnson or Richard Nixon, or GW Bush Honorary Day, and so who are they to be proclaiming and declaring War on Gods people? They go to the same churches and lived during the same time Martin Luther King lived while he gave his life to the great sacrifice, yet they to this day continue to beat the war drums, and continue the murdering and discrimination for the sake of power and wealth and disregard of our brothers and sisters who live on this earth. Why would they do this?



It is because of hatred and their unwillingness to surrender their power to Gods benevolence in America, by making Americans believe their lies of authority. They truly are racist and bigots. Let%u2019s be clear that in my earnest Declaration, Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. is the Original Founder of America. Americans will not admit this; but I will and it is true, because he stood and gave his life for nonviolence in seeking to end discrimination to the people. He is the only leader of our time who stood for positive change, and took the example of Jesus and Mahatma as his guiding light. Some hate to think George Washington is not one of the founding fathers? How could he not be? He is not because he represented violence, and he was a slave owner.
Reply to this comment
by tomtomasters March 18, 2008 8:50 PM PDT
Yet we celebrate Washington and Lincoln%u2019s birthday as a National Obligation in honor to their unearned distinction. We honor a slave owner? We honor a man of violence? Let%u2019s look at Lincoln. Lincoln did not fight the Civil War to end Slavery. The Union was falling apart because of the disagreement of Southern States wanting to share tax revenues with the Northern States. The South was getting richer because of the trade coming from China; ships would dock in the South first. With the South and its free laborers the American Negro Slaves, the South was getting richer and richer, without an outlay of expenses. Americans were trading Opium for goods in China, instead of using their money, and now they wanted to secede from the Union.


Reply to this comment
by tomtomasters March 18, 2008 8:52 PM PDT
Myth #1: Lincoln invaded the South to free the slaves. Ending slavery and racial injustice is not why the North invaded. As Lincoln wrote to Horace Greeley on Aug. 22, 1862 "My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and it is not either to save or destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it" also Lincoln did not champion equality and natural rights. His words and, more important, his actions, repudiate this myth. "I have no purpose to introduce political and social equality between the white and black races," he announced in his Aug. 21, 1858, debate with Stephen Douglas. "I, as well as Judge Douglas, am in favor of the race to which I belong having the superior position." And, "Free them [slaves] and make them politically and socially our equals? My own feelings will not admit of this. We cannot, then, make them equals." In Springfield, Ill., on July 17, 1858, Lincoln said, "What I would most desire would be the separation of the white and black races." On Sept. 18, 1858, in Charleston, Ill., he said: "I will to the very last stand by the law of this state, which forbids the marrying of white people with Negroes."
Reply to this comment
by tomtomasters March 18, 2008 8:53 PM PDT
Lincoln in today%u2019s world would be a racist criminal and would have been impeached, yet we make a Statue of him and honor him in our Great Capitol Washington D.C. as being a symbol of our cause to Freedom. It is an outlandish lie, and the man who really needs to be sitting there should be our Great Black American Leader and truly Original Founder of America, Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. As we toppled the statues of Saddam in Iraq we still have not cleansed our own house in America. I think real freedom would seek its just beginning by toppling the sadistic untrue virtues of Abe Lincoln. How deep and perverse racism goes in America, and even our Black Youth are made to believe the lies. I pity Barack Obama for his misled beliefs and his poor education on the topic, to include the present lying murderous administration that says it is serving American interest. Clearly they are not. How outlandish we are in not doing more to honor Dr. King, with Schools and Universities teaching youth about supporting real America and equal rights, by practicing nonviolence. How appalling we do not recognize Dr. King as our messenger of hope and as our true founding established father of America. Oh no.. white America did not find or establish America; it was Black America who founded and established America, from their sweat in defeating slavery, to their continued struggle against discrimination of blacks through the Civil Rights era, to even today.

Reply to this comment
by candide777 March 18, 2008 8:53 PM PDT
Wow, finally a politician who is willing to talk openly about an issue that all others are running scared from -- you have to respect Obama''s integrity.
Reply to this comment
by tomtomasters March 18, 2008 8:55 PM PDT
President Bush said:as far as I''m concerned, is to never allow our youngsters to die in vain. And I made that pledge to their parents. Withdrawing from the battlefield of Iraq would be just that. And it''s not going to happen under my watch.%u201D
His statement in saying he will not allow our youngsters to die in vain, really means that he will allow Martin Luther King Jr. and his ideals to die in vain instead. Essentially he can not come to grip with knowing his leadership of lies to go to war caused those youngsters to die. And if he took upon the legacy values of Martin Luther King Jr. along with Jesus and Mahatma Gandhi, those youngsters would probably be alive today. If he took upon the cross and followed these great men who spoke of nonviolence in the face of violence; our world would change for peace, instead of more terror and war. Essentially our young black men who join the army fail to see the truths to their lives given in the name of nonviolence. Our young black men who have become members to the governing body in the United States having to be one Black Senator Barack Obama fails to see the truths of Rev. King and his message, due to the forces of propaganda and the deliberate attempt to subvert the truth.

Reply to this comment
by tomtomasters March 18, 2008 8:57 PM PDT
President Bush firmly believes Rev. King died in vain. He firmly believes Jesus and Mahatma Gandhi died in vain as well. If God died in vain, what does that tell us about our present leadership and direction our country has succumbed to? Are we not a Christian nation? Do we not believe that giving our life toward nonviolence really is the answer because God said it was so? I would rather die for peace without a gun in my hand as they did, instead of dying with a gun in my hand full of anger, rage, fear, and discrimination toward someone I never met before. Who is the hero? Clearly those who support nonviolence are the hero%u2019s. So why does our President go on talking about how our spiritual leaders have died in vain? In fact President Bush has no clue to American values, and American culture. America is not; I repeat, is not a GUN.
Reply to this comment
by timdgrim March 18, 2008 9:21 PM PDT
When is Oprah going to put an Obama channel on the air so we can get ALL OBAMA..all the time! CBS''s Website is almost doing it now! Enough already!!
Reply to this comment
by jesterbelle March 18, 2008 10:06 PM PDT
CBS has made the transcript of the speech available,if anybody''s interested.The link is on the main page,top right hand side.
Reply to this comment
by jesterbelle March 18, 2008 10:06 PM PDT
CBS has made the transcript of the speech available,if anybody''s interested.The link is on the main page,top right hand side.
Reply to this comment
by idiobiblio March 18, 2008 10:08 PM PDT
Aside from disparate treatment of left and right and black and white in our mainstream discourse, there''s also a difference in the basic narrative provided. The narrative from the Right - and its representatives in the conservative religious community - is of an America which was once the garden of Eden, until its tragic fall at the hands of (feminists, liberals, civil rights movement, whatever), and they wish to bring the country back to its former state. Thus they can hate the America that is while dreaming of the perfect America that was. Thus there''s no conflict between their unquestioned patriotism and their hatred of the country, as their patriotism is for the True America that was, not its current corrupted incarnation.

While the mirror image rhetoric from the Left is about a country which was flawed, often tragically so, but which has the capacity for improvement. Be disgusted with the country as it was and is, while hoping for an evolution to a better country.
Reply to this comment
by sonmi-2009 March 18, 2008 10:19 PM PDT
There is far too much bigotry and division in this country. Many of the comments on this board illustrate that.

It is time that we confront these issues and attempt to heal these deep wounds. We are at a profound junction as a nation. Will we retreat to the same old entrenched patterns of prejudice and fear or will we find the maturity and honesty to take ownership of our country''s legacy and future?

This is much larger than the divisive statements made by Jeremiah Wright, Geraldine Ferraro, Rod Parsley or John Hagee. This is about who we are collectively as a country. Should we remain disparate groups of angry ideologues yelling at one another, each accusing the other for our problems, or should we take pride in our country and band together as Americans of different faiths, races and ethnic identities to actually bring about positive improvements?

I feel Senator Obama''s speech today was precisely the kind of call for reconciliation that''s needed. However, I don''t begrudge those who disagree with his political platform. But as one American to any other, please let''s be civil.
Reply to this comment
by getacluidiot March 18, 2008 10:21 PM PDT
It is time that we confront these issues and attempt to heal these deep wounds.
Posted by Sonmi

OHHH REALLY??? You just come up with that futile and tired old mantra you useless dim wit???
Reply to this comment
by getacluidiot March 18, 2008 10:24 PM PDT
This is much larger than the divisive statements made by ... Geraldine Ferraro
Posted by Sonmi

How was ANYTHING Ferraro said "divisive"??? Maybe you should look the word up. She said NOTHING "against" blacks, no insultys, no slurs...she STATED that if Obama was not black, he would NOT be where he is - he is not that strong of a candidate and his blackness is the novelty of an ARTICULATE black man. He is no leader, he just a black guy with good grammar.
Reply to this comment
by sonmi-2009 March 18, 2008 10:28 PM PDT
getacluidiot:
I think you are making my case for me.

Best of luck to you.
Reply to this comment
by ddrbc March 18, 2008 11:07 PM PDT
BILL CLINTON"S FAREWELL SPEECH IN 2000, Farewell Address:
"Third, we must remember that America cannot lead in the world unless here at home we weave the threads of our coat of many colors into the fabric of one America. As we become ever more diverse, we must work harder to unite around our common values and our common humanity. We must work harder to overcome our differences, in our hearts and in our laws. We must treat all our people with fairness and dignity, regardless of their race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation, and regardless of when they arrived in our country-always moving toward the more perfect Union of our Founders'' dreams."

OBAMA''S SPEECH TODAY:"[W]e must remember that America cannot lead in the world unless here at home we weave the threads of our coat of many colors into the fabric of one America. As we become ever more diverse, we must work harder to unite around our common values and our common humanity. We must work harder to overcome our differences, in our hearts and in our laws. We must treat all our people with fairness and dignity, regardless of their race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation, and regardless of when they arrived in our country-always moving toward the more perfect Union of our Founders'' dreams."
Reply to this comment
by March 18, 2008 11:09 PM PDT
Posted by ddrbc
--------------
And your point would be....?
Reply to this comment
by ddrbc March 18, 2008 11:12 PM PDT
Oops, pasted the wrong quote:

OBAMA''S SPEECH TODAY:
This time we want to talk about the men and women of every color and creed who serve together, and fight together, and bleed together under the same proud flag. We want to talk about how to bring them home from a war that never should''ve been authorized and never should''ve been waged, and we want to talk about how we''ll show our patriotism by caring for them, and their families, and giving them the benefits they have earned.

Reply to this comment
by ddrbc March 18, 2008 11:15 PM PDT
From Larry Pinkney,veteran Black Panther on Obama:

As I stared blankly down at the awarded certificate and thought of my deceased father, the tears swelled and streamed down my face and I wondered how many thousands of sons and daughters of US armed forces Black American veterans had received such certificates honoring their fathers or mothers. I thought of the pain, futility and the utter horror of combat and of war for the masses of people. And then, like a lightning bolt, the thought struck me that some in this nation are actually seriously considering the candidacy of Barack Obama to be President of the United States and concomitantly Commander-In-Chief of its potent Armed Forces.

This is a man who has enjoyed the fruits of America at the blood and expense of Black Americans and others, but who has paid virtually no dues.

This is a man whose father had also enjoyed the fruits of university schooling in America but subsequently returned to his native Kenya.

This is a man, who also like his father before him, neither served in a branch of the US military nor in any organization in America opposed to US military adventurism.

This is a man who as a deeply corporate military industrial complex US Presidential candidate, has called for %u201Cunilateral%u201D US military actions in other nations. [And why not? After-all, his father, himself, or his wife and children were not and will not be the ones killing and being killed.]

Reply to this comment
by ddrbc March 18, 2008 11:16 PM PDT
On Obama by Larry Pinkney, veteran Black Panther

This is a man who dares opportunistically to feign admiration for the late Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., but does not share the collective memory, pain and deep concerns of Black America, other people of color, or even of numerous white Americans for that matter - in the ongoing struggle for equality and justice in this nation.

This is a man who has de facto contempt for the past supreme sacrifices made by thousands of activists from so-called %u201Cmilitant%u201D organizations such the Organization of Afro-American Unity (OAAU), the Student National Coordinating Committee (SNCC), the Black Panther Party (BPP), Students For A Democratic Society (SDS), the American Indian Movement (AIM), the Revolutionary Action Movement (RAM), etc.

This is a man who is silent about the need for reparations for Black American descendants of slaves and the genocide of the indigenous so-called %u201CIndian%u201D peoples on this continent. He is the consummate opportunist who, in reality, cares nothing about the horrors inflicted upon Black, Brown, and Red peoples in this nation, and has repeatedly signaled that he plans to inflict even more %u201Cunilateral%u201D military horrors upon various nations and peoples of the world.

This man, Barack Obama, is but a more articulate, younger, and shinier version of the current and infamous US Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, adorning himself dangerously and abundantly in superficiality and double-speak.
Reply to this comment
See all 131 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs
What do you think of President-elect Obama picking Hillary Clinton for his Cabinet?
 Brilliant
 Risky
 Awful