CHICAGO, March 17, 2008

Obama Campaign Hits Clinton On Tax Records

Campaigns Trade Barbs Over Financial Disclosure And Negative Campaigning

  • News Tools Campaign Calendar

    The latest list of primary and caucus dates as states continue jockeying for position.

  • In The Spotlight Campaign Watch '08

    Check out the latest campaign ads in the race for the White House.

(AP)  Strategists for the campaigns of Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton exchanged calculated barbs Sunday over accountability and ethics and who is engaging in personal attacks.

Obama communications director Robert Gibbs called on Clinton to release full post-White House tax returns; disclose all congressional "earmarks," or pet projects she had inserted into spending bills; and release all documents on the Clinton Foundation and Clinton Library, including a list of donors.

"What is lurking in those documents?" Gibbs asked as the two campaigns had dueling phone conference calls with reporters. "There are gaps that need to be filled," said senior Obama strategist David Axelrod.

"This is a tried and true technique of the Obama campaign that has repeatedly shifted negative when they find the momentum working against them," said senior Clinton strategist Mark Penn. He suggested the Obama campaign was trying to "deflect public opinion from their losses in Ohio and Texas" and faced with Clinton strength in Pennsylvania.

The Obama campaign's move on Clinton came after a weekend in which the Illinois Democrat sought to ease public concerns about his ties to an indicted Chicago developer and to inflammatory statements by his former pastor.

In interviews with Chicago newspapers, a TV appearance and a Saturday speech in Indiana, Obama disavowed racially tinged comments by Rev. Jeremiah Wright, who was Obama's pastor for nearly 20 years before retiring recently.

Obama also worked to distance himself from Antoin "Tony" Rezko, a former fundraiser for the candidate who is currently on trial in Chicago on corruption charges.

Obama's team asserted that Clinton was continuing to shield financial documents from public scrutiny at the same time she was calling for greater accountability.

Clinton has said she will release tax returns for the years after her the end of her husband's presidency before the April 22 primary in Pennsylvania.

When asked if the request for tax information is what they are calling personal attacks, Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson said: "When you accuse somebody of being disingenuous and question their integrity and their honesty, as they are doing, that constitutes a personal attack."

As to Pennsylvania, Obama strategist Axelrod rejected a suggestion that their campaign was all but giving up on the state and focusing its energies on primaries that come later where they expect to do better.

"'We are going to contest vigorously in Pennsylvania," Axelrod said, noting that Obama would be there on Monday and Tuesday.

Still, said Axelrod, "she (Clinton) does have a lot of advantages there - and we understand that. We know we have an uphill fight there. ... But in no way are we giving up on Pennsylvania."

© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Candidate Profiles & RSS Feeds


Video and Galleries from Politics

Add a Comment See all 38 Comments
by briannorwood March 17, 2008 12:59 PM PDT
The longer she holds out on her tax returns, the more it looks like the Clintons are hiding something.

We all know she could release that information right now. What''s the holdup?
Reply to this comment
by craigh9 March 17, 2008 1:01 PM PDT
Once again, Obama takes the lead regarding the "New Politics", he has opened his taxes and ear mark requests for all the world to see - but Hillary still hides her information. If there is nothing to be concerned about why is she concerned about them being brought out into the open? What a phoney!
Reply to this comment
by rational_1 March 17, 2008 1:25 PM PDT
...senior Clinton strategist Mark Penn. He suggested the Obama campaign was trying to "deflect public opinion from their losses in Ohio and Texas"...

Hate to break it to Shrillary but when the final delegate counts come in from the caucuses in Texas the winner of the most delegates overall in TX will likely be Obama.

And echoing yet again the refrain about those tax returns, what''s up with that? Bubba got a membership in the Emperor''s Club that he tried to write off?
Reply to this comment
by davek455 March 17, 2008 1:51 PM PDT
perhaps obama is trying desperately to take attention away from his pastor....that story seems to grow bigger each day and calls into question Obama''s judgment

I cannot ever recall any politician getting nailed for something sinister in their tax return
Reply to this comment
by neonink March 17, 2008 1:53 PM PDT
LOL... taxes? Well, they are not due until April 15th, no matter how Obama wants to spin this none-story.

The Clinton''s had 40 Million dollars and 4 years of Ken Starr researching every nook and cranny in their lives, finances included. If he couldn''t find anything, self-loathing Obama isn''t going to find anything.

But, CBS, keep pumping this non-story. If it makes you feel better about your appointed pseudo-god.
Reply to this comment
by jimmb4 March 17, 2008 1:59 PM PDT
Hillary is corrupt and we know it. If she had nothing to hide she would show it. And it is not this year''s tax returns that are the issue. It is last years.
Reply to this comment
by pepperp1 March 17, 2008 1:59 PM PDT
Rasmussen Reports

Just 8% Have Favorable Opinion of Pastor Jeremiah Wright

Most voters, 56%, said Wright%u2019s comments made them less likely to vote for Obama. That figure includes 44% of Democrats. Just 11% of voters say they are more likely to vote for Obama because of Wright%u2019s comments.
However, among African-Americans, 29% said Wright%u2019s comments made them more likely to support Obama. Just 18% said the opposite while 50% said Wright%u2019s comments would have no impact.
Yeah, we are on to Campaign tactic it the Rich White Divisive B who%u2019s the bad one not ME Saintly Obama, this one call everyone else names the when you are trying to change the story from the Racist Rev Johnson and Obama%u2019s confession Friday about his deep involvement Rezko that he had previously denied another nod nod wink......................


........................no one is biting anymore just KOS and KO Matthews Russert at MSNBC south africa claims my guess they go to the same church as Obama, and stop the hate and the negative camping just because you think you can attack women its unseemly to many of us. Step down you are destroying the Dem Party and the only reason I give a GD is that in a two Party country one Party being weak gives us tyranny form the other like we have seen for the last 8 years. ARRGANTLY Blinded by hate, Party leadership needs to step-in and stop this self inflicted bleeding before the entire down ticket is destroyed.
Reply to this comment
by jimmb4 March 17, 2008 2:01 PM PDT
As the economy melts down we have three choices: the guy who wants more war and knows nothing about the economy, the person who can''t figure out how to produce a simple report on previously filed taxes or the guy with the bad pastor. I''ll take the guy with the bad pastor.
Reply to this comment
by jimmb4 March 17, 2008 2:03 PM PDT
Go ahead elect Cliton so she can help Bill pay back the bribes or elect the Republican who knows nothing about the economy or the guy with the bad pastor. This is your choice.
Reply to this comment
by jimmb4 March 17, 2008 2:06 PM PDT
Didn''t Agnew have to resign due to tax problems? Can''t remember the details. If Clinton had nothing to hide she would show them. She is clearly hiding corruption. Do you want corruption, the more war guy or the guy with the bad pastor. What a choice. Do you remember Bear Stearns?
Reply to this comment
by jockh March 17, 2008 2:07 PM PDT
In her 2000 campaign for the Senate, Hillary Clinton''s campaign demanded her opponent release his tax returns and even sent a staffer dressed as Uncle Sam to taunt him during campaign stops. Today she refuses to release hers. Makes you wonder what crooked and shady characters have been contributing to her funds.
Dont be afraid Hillary, release your tax returns and let us vet you.

Hillary makes ridiculous claims that she is tried and tested in over 80 countries. As the wife of a visiting US President she simply tried and tested various tea and cookie offerings but she never negotiated anything, in fact she did not even have security clearance. By Hillarys childlike reasoning this means Laura Bush is also tried and tested to be President or that the wife of a brain surgeon is qualified to operate on people!!

Hillary may have answered the White House phone at 3am but I am sure the callers always said CAN I SPEAK TO YOUR HUSBAND PLEASE!!
Reply to this comment
by jockh March 17, 2008 2:17 PM PDT
In short, it''s well past time for Hillary Clinton to be as "vetted" as she claims to already be -- and to have this vetting done now by Democratic voters rather than later by GOP hit squads. She needs to live up to the standard she laid out for Rick Lazio, the opponent in her 2000 Senate race. At that time, she said it was "frankly disturbing" that Lazio was holding back on releasing his tax returns.
What a difference eight years -- and tens of millions of dollars (some of them from questionable deals) -- can make.
Reply to this comment
by wonderful122 March 17, 2008 2:19 PM PDT
Clinton is causing too much division in the Democratic Party. She needs to bow out. And speaking of guilt by association, has anyone forgotten about her ************ husband.
Reply to this comment
by greatdrivew March 17, 2008 2:29 PM PDT
honesty
transparency
hope
change
coalition

Obama 2008
Reply to this comment
by stn_sage March 17, 2008 2:30 PM PDT
jockh - well stated! That isn''t the first time she''s called on the opposition to do something that she herself will NOT do!

I dunno, I don''t believe her excuses. The Clintons could release their tzx statements if they REALLY wanted to! This suggests there''s something in them the citizenry isn''t going to like---therefore, wait until after she''s hopefully won PA! Otherwise, she might not win PA! We''ll see, I think she said she''d release them April 22nd? I wouldn''t be a bit surprised to see the day come and go, with no release, and an excuse! Whatever!---
Reply to this comment
by stn_sage March 17, 2008 2:39 PM PDT
To ALL: You know what people?! I think they should put a ''None of the Above'' on all state ballots & if it wins, they give D''s & R''s 30 days to nominate new candidates, & 30 days after that, we have another election. And we continue this until the parties nominate someone who REALLY wants to work for the public instead of rip us off!!

I know---there''s a ton of problems that would need to be worked out---but, it wouldn''t be any worse than getting one of the current nominees in there!!
Reply to this comment
by taddles-2009 March 17, 2008 2:44 PM PDT
"has anyone forgotten about her ************ husband.

Posted by wonderful122 at 02:19 PM : Mar 17, 2008"


No one has forgotten, but what does that have to do with Hillary?
Reply to this comment
by jsilver2th March 17, 2008 2:55 PM PDT
"Ferraro is currently a lobbyist in New York with Blank Rome Government Relations."

Oh I see she''s really a lobbyist for Republicans and the military industrial complex now...

Here''s what Blank Rome''s own web site says about Gerry:

"On a slightly territorial note, however, the Washington Post.com reported, Geraldine Ferraro is heading back to D.C. or at least she be spending more time here . . . . The 1984 vice presidential candidate . . . adds a bit of Democratic flava to a firm known for its GOP ties; she also returns to town just in time for the latest round of the nation ready to elect a woman? interviews."

So when she''s out there raising money for the Clintons and being disciminated against because she''s white- is she really on a feminist crusade or is she trying to buy favors for Blank Rome''s big bucks clients?

What a joke- Hillary''s superdelegate Mr. Spitzer isn''t the only NY politician that understands prostitution....
Reply to this comment
by jsilver2th March 17, 2008 2:57 PM PDT
taddles: "No one has forgotten, but what does that have to do with Hillary?"

What does Bill Clinton had to do with Hillary Clinton?

If you don''t believe he runs the show then you must work in the Clinton press room...

Looking more like George & Laurleen Wallace everday... Crackers included...
Reply to this comment
by stn_sage March 17, 2008 3:13 PM PDT
jsilver2th - excellent observation concerning Ferraro. Witty suggestion/observation concerning the Clintons'' resembling the Wallaces''!
Reply to this comment
by sierra20071 March 17, 2008 3:23 PM PDT
Obamma damma ding dong made another bone-headed move, only this time he was bone-headed for over twenty years. Noboby believes that Obama didn''t know of his black militant pastors beliefs and sounding points, especially when his wife spews the same dialogue. If he distances from his pastor he would almost have to distance himself from his wife as well because the dialogue of the pastor and his wife are the same...oh, i forgot he did distance himself from his wife, she was cut from the campaign trail for not knowing about the wink, wink, on their true black militant beliefs. What a farce...and, some of you continue to support the boy even when we know he is just wrong...just like some of you did Bush in 04.
Reply to this comment
by bombadil4 March 17, 2008 3:27 PM PDT
Who the heck is so bored out of their tree that they would want to see Hillary''s or anyone elses tax records? Just got through with my own and that was more than enough. I understand she is also reluctant to disclose the contents of her receipe book. Might mean she wants to hide that gopher stew she makes when she is in Arkansas.
Reply to this comment
by jrfld March 17, 2008 4:03 PM PDT
the current numbers by the most updated and accurate count (real clear politics), - pledged delegates: obama- 1415, clinton- 1245. (obama +170).
super delegates: clinton- 248, obama- 213.
super and pledged delegates: obama- 1628, clinton- 1493. (obama 135).
texas count: obama 98, clinton 94.
what is all this lying about the counts and why is she still in the race?
Reply to this comment
by jrfld March 17, 2008 4:06 PM PDT
the current numbers by the most updated and accurate count (real clear politics), - pledged delegates: obama- 1415, clinton- 1245. (obama +170).
super delegates: clinton- 248, obama- 213.
super and pledged delegates: obama- 1628, clinton- 1493. (obama 135).
texas count: obama 98, clinton 94.
what is all this lying about the counts and why is she still in the race?
Reply to this comment
by jrfld March 17, 2008 4:10 PM PDT
the current numbers by the most updated and accurate count (real clear politics), - pledged delegates: obama- 1415, clinton- 1245. (obama +170).
super delegates: clinton- 248, obama- 213.
super and pledged delegates: obama- 1628, clinton- 1493. (obama 135).
texas count: obama 98, clinton 94.
what is all this lying about the counts and why is she still in the race?
Reply to this comment
by sierra20071 March 17, 2008 4:11 PM PDT
Awwwwwww, but delegates can change their minds up until the convention.
Reply to this comment
by kmccliment March 17, 2008 4:36 PM PDT
Rev. Wright''''s church says this was all taken out of context. o.k. My request to this church is prove it. Every large church keeps transcripts whether it be taped or typed of every sermon. For in the future possibility of selling a "best of" sermons DVD$. Make these transcripts available, now! Then we''''ll be the judge. No spin. Just plain english from the entire transcripts.
Reply to this comment
by kmccliment March 17, 2008 5:01 PM PDT
**** OBAMA FLIP FLOPS ON RACIST REMARKS ****

MARCH 14, 2008: Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama on Friday denounced inflammatory remarks from his pastor

MARCH 17, 2008: Speaking with reporters, Obama said the media is portraying Wright inaccurately.

"I think the caricature that is being painted of him is not accurate, and so part of what I will do tomorrow is to talk about how these issues are perceived from within the black church community for example which I think skews this very differently."
Reply to this comment
by johnpa3 March 17, 2008 6:23 PM PDT
"Who''s foolin'' who?"

Clintons: Obama is all form -- no substance -- words not actions. She%u2019s the candidate we can count on to get it done. She''s the choice for action. Actions speak louder than words. Don''t be fooled -- vote for Hillary.

I get it.

If it%u2019s about actions, I don''t get their failure to act.

She says she''s the candidate that gets it done, but refuses to do what her opponent has already done. It makes me wonder, "They must have something really BIG to hide." If they want to win undecided voters like me, they may want to rethink their pitch about the "actions vs. words" and act quickly to put the tax return issue to bed.

She can%u2019t be soooo busy that she can''t make a copy. Does she expect us to believe she can handle difficult jobs, but can''t delegate simple clerical tasks?

I have used a copier before. Making a copy is a simple thing. If they cannot accomplish it within a day or or two -- how will they accomplish anything? Can you imagine, "we would like to address the economy and the war, and we will, as soon as we figure out how to use a copier."

Why beg to be judged by actions -- and then -- refuse to act -- hide behind words.
When asked about it -- they attack, deflect, bob and weave, make excuses and make more outrageous claims.
Then, straight faced, they say "on or around April 15th."

And in response to the silliness what has the press done?

Nothing.

Talk about free rides!
Reply to this comment
by jockh March 17, 2008 9:06 PM PDT
If Hillary can loan 5 million dollars to her campaign then surely the voters have a right to know the source of her funding.
Why wont Hillary release her tax returns? People with nothing to hide don''t usually hide.
The main excuse we''ve gotten so far is that Hillary Clinton just has too much on her plate. "I''m a little busy right now," she said during the Ohio debate. "I hardly have time to sleep. But I will certainly work toward releasing, and we will get that done and in the public domain."
That was three weeks ago. Two weeks ago, Howard Wolfson promised the returns would be released "on or around April 15." But weren''t the returns completed and filed a long time ago? Doesn''t Clinton''s accountant have time to print them out and make some copies (note to Clinton''s accountant: many Kinko''s are open 24 hours).

In short, it''s well past time for Hillary Clinton to be as "vetted" as she claims to already be -- and to have this vetting done now by Democratic voters rather than later by GOP hit squads. She needs to live up to the standard she laid out for Rick Lazio, the opponent in her 2000 Senate race. At that time, she said it was "frankly disturbing" that Lazio was holding back on releasing his tax returns.
What a difference eight years -- and tens of millions of dollars (some of them from questionable deals) -- can make.
Reply to this comment
by pepperwood2 March 17, 2008 9:50 PM PDT
Good News for Hillary from Penna. We are not, & let me repeat, are not playing the Gender Bias Card here in Penna. So stall em off Hillary until after the Primaries are in.

As a voting Democrat from the old school of Bill & Hillary Clinton, Mondale, Ferarro. I''m happy to learn that Governor Rendell has come out with a vengence for Hillary in our GRRREAT State of Pa.

The old guard is alive & well here. They''ve expressed the belief That The Shepherd Boy Obama is a Democrat out of line, not sure what that means, but it is clear that the Governor has connections, and assured us that Hillary will win Pa.

Each day his constituents gather together at the summit to find new ways to distain, mock, belittle, ridicule, and start rumors circulating concerning Obama. His camp is encircled & he is outnumbered. He has to go it alone! Somehow, we''ve been told that Pa, NY,OH, NJ, & MA are superdelegate states and since Rendell was president of the DNC, I''m sure he knows the ropes. We don''t understand this but it sounds like a pretty slick trick.

We''ve been told that Our Great White Hope is in Hillary and that she is entitled to the nomination and nothing is going to stand in HER way. I trust this will be good news for Bill, most Pa & all voters across this Great Nation of ours, & the Mainstream News. We are not Gender biased here in Pa.

This is fun & we''re just warming up here in Pa. It''s Polka time so lets Roll out the Barrel & start the count down for Hillary. Go Hillary! We love you Bill!
Reply to this comment
by boycot-china March 17, 2008 11:52 PM PDT
Senator Obama has been attacking his rivals and now it''''s coming back on him. He is crying fowl play and use the racial card!. If he can''''t handle the frying pan then don''''t jump in. This heat is nothing compared to the extreme pressure that he''''ll face as our president. He is truly out of his league. I am a Christian and "WAS ONCE" a loyal Obama supporter, but that quickly changed when I saw his dishonest financial dealings, his wife''''s anti-American comments, and his life time support of an anti-American Church. Why did it take Obama over a month to finally say something about his pastor? Obama freely supports this church by his regular tithing of thousand of dollars. That means HE support HIS pastor''''s RACIAL and REVOLUTIONARY statements of overthrowing America. Why donate all that money to a cause if he doesn''''t believe in it? Why is Senator Obama lying to America? So, instead of complaining about unfair coverage and accusing all of America of attacking him because he''s Black then just admit you''re wrong and drive on. Instead Senator Obama wants to pull out this racial and discrimination charge that doesn''t heal anything but actual creates more of a racial divide in America! Senator Obama is really contradicting his platform of change. I am one of many Americans who are getting turned off by Senator Obama''s hypocrisy and support of his pastor''s anti-white sermons. Again, he divided more than he''s healing!
Reply to this comment
by Netterz March 18, 2008 12:55 AM PDT
Since the delegates, and the super delegates will ultimately decide who will be chosen, it really doesn''t matter, because these few people can choose to either go along with public consensus, or there own decision/opinion, so what any of us want, really doesn''t matter. What it all comes down to, is which of the them can pull off playing and actually being, the perfect used car salesman/woman, who can sell sand to a dying man in the desert(America). How much money either has made/stole/hidden really doesn''t matter either. The election years are the years when you can clearly see that there really isn''t any party lines anymore. They can stand there an tear each other apart on stage, then kiss and smile, hand shake, and then go have a cocktail or 2, laugh at how great of a job they are doing at bluffing the American People. In this day and age, there is no reason for delegates, one state having more power or control over the votes. The biggest scam in America, is that you are told, that YOUR individual vote, counts for anything. That is how they keep us controlled, by picking out a few select people, to make sure what the Gov''t itself actually wants to happen, will happen.
Reply to this comment
by greatdrivew March 18, 2008 6:57 AM PDT
Are you tired of the lies, deceit, double-talk and corruption of yesterday''s politics?

If so, then join the new majority. Obama 2008.
Reply to this comment
by whtpresident March 18, 2008 9:27 AM PDT
Part II

The church holds services three times every Sunday at 7:30 and 11 a.m. and 6 p.m. Central time. While both the early morning and evening service allowed Sen. Obama to attend the service and still give a speech in Miami, Mr. Davis stands by his story that during one of the services he attended during the month of July, Senator Obama was present and sat through the sermon given by Rev. Wright as described in the story. Mr. Davis said Secret Service were also present in the church during Senator Obama''''s attendance. Mr. Davis'''' story was first published on Newsmax on August 9, 2007. Shortly before publication, Mr. Davis contacted the press office of Sen. Obama several times for comment about the Senator''''s attendance and Rev. Wright''''s comments during his sermon. The Senator''''s office declined to comment.
Reply to this comment
by whtpresident March 18, 2008 9:28 AM PDT
Part I

Clarification: The Obama campaign has told members of the press that Senator Obama was not in church on the day cited, July 22, because he had a speech he gave in Miami at 1:30 PM. Our writer, Jim Davis, says he attended several services at Senator Obama''''s church during the month of July, including July 22.
Reply to this comment
by johnpa3 March 18, 2008 10:40 AM PDT
Dynasty -- Just say No!

We had
4 years of Papa Bush
8 years of Billary,
8 years of Little Bush --

=20 Years of Bush/Clinton rule in the USA.

Who wants to sign on for the possibility of another 8 years of the Bush/Clinton/Yale Elites Dynasty? Bush/Clinton/Yale Elites have had their run -- and look at the state our Nation now. Yeah Yale Elites -- NOT!

Plus, with how involved Hillary claims she was in hubby''s Presidency -- Does not another Billary Presidential term violate Presidential term limits?

It''s time for a change!
Reply to this comment
by sharednotion March 18, 2008 2:39 PM PDT
I think that ALL of the candidates, including Clinton, Obama, and McCain, should be open with the media and the public on things such as their taxes and finances; all three are seeking the nation''s highest office.
Reply to this comment
See all 38 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs