WASHINGTON, Mar. 16, 2008
Why The Iraq War Goes Ignored
Bob Schieffer Notes That Too Few Of Us, Including The Candidates, Pay Attention To This Deadly Topic
-
A recent poll showed only 6 percent of Americans were closely following the war news, and only 28 percent knew the U.S. death toll has now risen to nearly 4,000. Bob Schieffer wonders why so many can continue to ignore the fighting. (AP Photo/Wisam Sami)
-
Play CBS Video Video Out Of Sight, Out Of Mind Revived public interest in the presidential campaign is a good thing, says Bob Schieffer. But he worries that the media's focus needs to return to the war in Iraq and the rising death toll there.
A new Pew Foundation poll shows more than one-third of the American people are closely following this campaign. I'm not surprised; this campaign is creating interest in a way that we haven't seen in years.
But here is what really bothers me: Twice as many people, 12 percent, had more interest in the death of movie actor Heath Ledger than were following developments in Iraq.
Only 6 percent said they were closely following the war news. Only 28 percent knew the U.S. death toll on the war has now risen to nearly 4,000.
There are reasons. The elections and the shaky economy and the fact the war zone is quieter now has pushed the war off TV and the front pages, and for many it has become "out of sight, out of mind."
With an all-volunteer military made up of only one-half-of-one-percent of us making the sacrifices in this war, it's easy for the rest of us to forget war still goes on.
Certainly, there have been few reminders from the campaign trail. John McCain says it is still winnable. But he hasn't said what winning it will take.
The Democrats haven't said much beyond we have to withdraw at some point. As long as Iraq is relatively quiet, the candidates would rather not talk about it (It puts people in a bad humor). But it is still there.
And we can't ignore it forever. It won't let us.
By Bob Schieffer
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- Senator Clinton and Senator Obama are not veterans and not qualified to be Commander-in-Chief of the military. Senator Clinton''s husband in an interview with Tom Brokaw stated "I Loathe the Military" He was at that time and it seems to be so demoralizing to those troops you are to command. I am sure that Senator Clinton''s philosophy is similar. Both of the candidates are adamantly spouting the democratic party''s leadership challenge. "Cut and Run" To me they are telling our present and any future enemies that the United States don''t have the fortitude to stand and fight for what we believe in. Most of those protesters are the one''s who have no committment to the principles that this country were founded on and therefore have no patriotic sense of responsibility. We must stand up against those who wish to destroy us. Let us not forget the Lebanon Marines, USS Cole, Twin Towers, foreign embasies, World Trade Center. Heavy forbid the day we become so complacent that we don''t see those who may walk up to our doors and "bang". Yes I am a veteran of the Korean War and our son served a tour in Iraq. He beleived in his mission and their purpose even the two Senators don''t.
- Reply to this comment
- We are SICK of the war in Iraq. Many of us didn''t support the action in the first place, and even less support it now, but it doesn''t make any difference. We have an evil administration in place, with a seriously mentally deficiant president, who though the "mission was accomplished" four years ago. He won''t listen to anyone, will fire any general that disagrees with him, acts like everyone but his cronies are liars, so why worry about Iraq until someone with a brain moves into the Whitehouse????
- Reply to this comment
- The difference between traffic deaths and the invasion/occupation of Iraq was that the invasion/occupation was illegal, preventable and based on lies.
It was also for direct benefit of the neo con men and their benefactors the oil companies and other multi-national war profiteers. We are the stupid pawns in a grand experiment in economic imperialism. - Reply to this comment
- Frankbowers needs to get his head where he can see the sunshine. GWB doesn''t control the U.S. media here in the U.S. Yes, there are media elements attached to our military in the middle east who are limited in their story line. This is necessary due to idiots such as Geralod Rivera who publicly announce the location and grid coordinates of our military troops in the field. The media in the U.S. only answer to one thing. MONEY THROUGH ADVERTISING. Therefore, they print what sells, and unfortunately, the war isn''t a hot ticket right now.
- Reply to this comment
- Thank you Mr.Schieffer for reminding people that we are a nation at war. As a mom of an Army Scout the war is upfront, personal and horrifying. It angers me when news commentators, reporters, editors, etc ignore the fact that we are at war, 3,990 soldiers have lost their lives, the nation is borrowing money to fund this fiasco. Thank you for remembering and thank you for you on target comments.
- Reply to this comment
- Why shouldn''t the press ignore such large numbers? Even Bob Schieffer is ignoring the even more astronomical numbers of people who have died in traffic accidents right here at home during the same time period.
Bob Schieffer: how about doing an Op/Ed piece on traffic deaths right here in America? This is how we are using the oil that (allegedly) our soldiers are fighting to bring home! - Reply to this comment
- Why did any one think any thing different would occur gw bush and dic cheney have kept the news off the stations. Just like today I am wathing the 5:30 CBS national news and it announce in 5 seconds or less thet two more died in Iraq and in less than 15 seconds to the lady who killed another 36. You act as if the war is not going on. I remember well when Vietnam was going on and I had just gotten home from the FAR EAST and it consumed at leat 20 mionutes of the 30 news cast not just once in a while but 7 days a week and on the sunday mornig shows it was on each and ever major news cast then they were but 4 there in Houston, but they covered the war and today they treat it as a 15 second commercial how sorry this gw bush is not allowing the news of the most important thing to the families of the military women and men he is using as foder for his personnel war for revenge for his dad (I might say the parol officers as well as the mexican laraza folks)
i know the flag drapped coffins are not seen and I know they are coming in by the hundreds. Perhaps when Hillary gets into office that much will change and the news will be allow if Murdock the Owner of all the news stations except BBC and PBS from way down south, allows it as it will look bad on gws bush and dic his friends and he does own themn too much for allowing him to buy all the stations, and he does own the majority of them and will allow what he wants only America to see be seen.
Frank Bowrs - Reply to this comment
- Obama''''s foreign policy on the high road, Vet_SK? The guy has done more to agitate our ally Pakistan than any other leader in our country. Even our president is not that daft. Remember when Obama basically announced that he would invade Pakistan? "zfunk1 not that this post is on toipic , but if you want to talk about securiyt and worrrying about nukkes it was the pakistanis ,their secret service and scientists selling the nuke technology to every tin pot country with a few hundred million to spare , not saddam. errr I f our president no matter whio its is saw a chance to do a surgical strike wheterh it was inside the border region of pakkistan or jsut theother side in affghanistan iwould hgope they would take a shot at it . If we had kept our eye on the ball at tora bora this whole conversation would probably be moot .
- Reply to this comment
- I don''''t think it was ever about WMD, it was always about removing Saddam
Posted by tbweb
So you admit that we were lied to. I was all in favor of going after Al Quaeda in Aghanistan. The only reason cretin-in-chief can even spell Iraq is because Saddam insulted daddy. The only reason he got to be cretin-in-chief is because Cheney promised him he could get his own back by invading if he were president. If WMD were available to Saddam and he was as bad as C-ic-c and his neocon buddies said, don''t you think he''d have used them the momment the first Marine toenail crossed the border? No, the reason for the war was lies from Square 1. Barak had the vision to vote against it, Hilary went along with the common herd. Now, the whole situation is such a fu**ed up mess, maybe we have to stay longer then the public wants. But I for one don''t believe we''re any better off because of the sad sacrifices of our troops and the Iraqi population. - Reply to this comment
- Gee, I really would like to keep track of how many lives and how much treasure the American people have lost in the Carlyle Group War but I have been really busy lately accumulating enough money to buy gas and feed the kids. I''m selling my Bear Sterns stock today to meet my suddenly increased mortgage payment and if there is anything left over I will buy a big bag of rice and a full tank of gas for the SUV and take a day off from my second job to catch up on the Iraq news. Sorry I have been letting the country down. Thanks King George the Usurper for all yuo do.
- Reply to this comment
- It seems to me that there has been a concentrated effort on the part of the present administration to keep the media away from anything that concerns our troops who have been brought home in body bags. There are no pictures of coffins being unloaded, no coverage of funerals and very little publication of the names of those killed in action. Why is that? If the American people were hit in the face with those images there would be protesters in the streets and Bush and Cheney know that. If we invade Iran, which I believe is a very good possibility, the draft will have to be reinstated and that will bring the focus of the war directly to the American people. Lastly, we the people are just now starting to feel the impact of the war from an economic stand point and as prices continue to soar there will hopefully be more awareness of what is really going on. An uninformed public is easy to control but things will change as we learn more. We haven''t even started to unpeel this onion.
- Reply to this comment
- zfunk1 wrote: Obama''''s foreign policy on the high road, Vet_SK? The guy has done more to agitate our ally Pakistan than any other leader in our country. Even our president is not that daft. Remember when Obama basically announced that he would invade Pakistan? The man is barely a senator. He has zero experience. He should not be president.
----------------
Well our current commander-in-chief had even less connection to foreign policy before he was elected Pres & then re-elected....so you''re saying he NEVER should have been President either?? Or did you make the comment several years ago that he chose aides/advisors that did have experience to help him out? I know if has not gone well, but couldn''t Obama do the same thing? - Reply to this comment
- The war would be very popular if we nationalized the Iraqi oil industry and used it to supply America with cheap gasoline. Heck, if we did that, I would bet Americans would be clamoring to invade Iran and do the same thing.
Our government is just too dumb to see how popular they could be if they looted occupied countries to supply the masses with cheap gasoline. Why not drop the pretense of fighting a war on terror and start fighting a crusade to give America cheap gasoline? - Reply to this comment
- The Iraq "War" goes unnoticed because with an all-volunteer military about the only people really concerned with the War are those making a huge profit.
Since no one is threatened to go fight a war they don''t believe in there are no real protests and no involvement by the young people of this country. It''s just something they heard about from someone.
Getting rid of the draft has set the stage for the type of military adventurism by the two Bush Admins where they are able to take the military might of this country and trillions of tax dollars to wage military foreign policy instead fo "war." What war?, there has been no war declared, only a carte blanche war powers act approved by democrats who remain clueless now that they control both houses of Congress. - Reply to this comment
- Media has, and probably always will, have its own agenda. Support for our troops should be a given.
- Reply to this comment
- If we were allowed to see the body bags returning home, Iraq would be on the front pages.
For George and Laura their interest is their daughter''s upcoming wedding.
Total Fatalities
Operation Iraqi Freedom: 3,979
Operation Enduring Freedom: 482
(Updated March 17, 2008)
(Name of one of America''s bravest removed out of respect for the family)
Hometown: Greenville, North Carolina, U.S.
Age: 28 years old
Died: March 12, 2008 in Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Unit: Army, 7th Special Troops Battalion, 7th Sustainment Brigade, 10th Mountain Division (Light Infantry), Fort Eustis, Va.
Incident: Killed when his vehicle was hit by indirect fire in Tallil. - Reply to this comment
- I think Americans have just come to accept the fact that the goverment no longer represents the will of the people.
Posted by trillion1
I already have, years ago. Vote out all incumbents in November. Any left will be hung from the lamp posts in DC!!! - Reply to this comment
- I''m from President Eisenhauer years...he warned us about the corruption of the "military industrial complex...that started to gain momentum under the Regan years at the expense of the American people...we are in an illegal war in Iraq...read the books by Rev David Ray Griffin...about 9-11 and The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9-11...we have been mislead by the media and the Republican party...as a former Republican I am upset that we are staying the course to destruction. Where is the Oil money from Iraq the drug money form Afganistan and the intelligence that support our mess in the world arena. During the Bush years we have become less than a 3rd world nation, with the Republicans talking about Obama''s minister. Why...follow the debunking of the truth. We are challenging our Christian Faith and the Truth...watch out for the ignorant individuals that are not digging up the truth...remember the Clinton''s history from his position as the governor to the president has been filled with death and destruction...where has the media been when reporting these issues?...If Bill becomes the First Man...we are really in trouble...remember, how he handled himself as President.
- Reply to this comment
The People are not ignoring the Iraq Oil Invasion.
The Government is ignoring The People.- Reply to this comment
- The rotten economy and the Iraq war are inextricably tied together. Our entire well-being as a strong nation has been jeopardized by hocking souls to China and the big oil interests, who seem now to be calling in their IOU''s. We are trillions in debt, the dollar is collapsing around us and the idiots in Washington(ALL OF THEM!) go along as though nothing is wrong. Who in their right mind would want to tackle this house of cards?
- Reply to this comment





