NEW YORK, March 13, 2008

A Rough Road Ahead For Spitzer

Despite Resignation, N.Y. Governor Still Faces Prospect Of Criminal Charges Or Disbarment

  • Play CBS Video Video What Will Happen To Spitzer?

    Eliot Spitzer has left the governor's mansion disgraced, stepping down amid a deeply humiliating personal scandal. But what legal consequences does he face? Byron Pitts reports.

  • Video Banks Become "Big Brother"

    Banks may monitor your transactions and report them to the government as suspicious. Nancy Cordes reports on Eliot Spitzer's pitfalls and experts describe what actions spark the government's interest.

    • New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer announces his resignation with his wife, Silda, at his side Wednesday, March 12, 2008, in his offices in New York City. Lt. Governor David Paterson will succeed him effective Monday, March 17. Photo

      New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer announces his resignation with his wife, Silda, at his side Wednesday, March 12, 2008, in his offices in New York City. Lt. Governor David Paterson will succeed him effective Monday, March 17.  (AP Photo/Stephen Chernin)

    • Lt. Gov. David Paterson will become New York's first black governor effective Monday. Photo

      Lt. Gov. David Paterson will become New York's first black governor effective Monday.  (AP)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Interactive Spitzer Scandal

    New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer is the target of a federal prostitution investigation.

  • Photo Essay Sex & Politics

    Some elected officials whose libidos have gotten them in hot water.

(CBS/AP)  Although Eliot Spitzer departed the governor's office in disgrace amid a call-girl scandal, he is still facing the prospect of criminal charges and perhaps disbarment.

Spitzer, a first-term Democrat, resigned Wednesday, making an announcement without securing a plea bargain with federal prosecutors, though a law enforcement official said the former governor was still believed to be negotiating one. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the case.

"I cannot allow my private failings to disrupt the people's work," Spitzer said at a Manhattan news conference, his weary-looking wife, Silda, again standing at his side as he answered for his actions for the second time in three days.

The resignation brought down the curtain on a riveting drama - played out, sometimes, as farce - that made Spitzer an instant punchline on late-night TV and fascinated Americans with the spectacle of a crusading politician exposed as a hypocrite.

"This has been one of the hardest, the furthest and the fastest falls from grace that we've seen in American politics," David Birdsell, Dean of the School of Public Affairs at Baruch College in New York, told CBS News national correspondent Byron Pitts. "This is a man in very, very serious personal trouble, the governorship not withstanding, he could go to jail."

In a statement issued after Spitzer quit, U.S. Attorney Michael Garcia, the chief federal prosecutor in New York, said: "There is no agreement between this office and Gov. Eliot Spitzer relating to his resignation or any other matter."

Among the possible charges that law enforcement authorities said could be brought against the former governor: soliciting and paying for sex; violating the Mann Act, the 1910 federal law that makes it a crime to take someone across state lines for immoral purposes; and illegally arranging cash transactions to conceal their purpose.

The New York Post reports that, according to a law-enforcement source, federal investigators will pore over Spitzer's financial records dating to 1999 before they decide whether to prosecute him. It could be several months before that inquiry is done, the source said.

Spitzer could also be disbarred. In New York, an attorney can lose his license to practice law for failing to "conduct himself both professionally and personally, in conformity with the standards of conduct imposed upon members of the bar."

The scandal erupted Monday after federal law enforcement officials disclosed that a wiretap had caught the 48-year-old father of three teenage daughters arranging to spend thousands of dollars on a call girl at a fancy Washington hotel on the night before Valentine's Day.

Investigators said he had arranged for a prostitute named Kristen to take the train down from New York while he was in the nation's capital to testify before a congressional subcommittee about the bond industry.

Meanwhile, new details have emerged about the call girl at the center of the scandal. The New York Times reported that the real name of the woman - identified as "Kristen" in court papers - is Ashley Alexandra Dupré, a 22-year-old aspiring musician from Manhattan. (Read more about her.)

Don D. Buchwald, a New York lawyer, confirmed to The Associated Press that he represents Ashley Alexandra Dupré, the same woman in the Times story. "That's as far as I can go," he said.

It was unclear whether she would face charges.

She briefly spoke to the Times about the Spitzer scandal. Law enforcement officials identified the governor as "Client 9" who had a Feb. 13 tryst with "Kristen" and paid her $4,300, according to court papers.

"I just don't want to be thought of as a monster," Dupré told the Times. "This has been a very difficult time. It's complicated."

In New Jersey her brother Kyle Youmans said she was just trying to get through the scandal.

Speaking to CBS News correspondent Bianca Solorzano, Youmans said, "She's a great woman, independent woman. She's the best sister you can have."

Law enforcement officials said the governor had hired prostitutes several times before and had spent tens of thousands of dollars, and perhaps as much as $80,000, on the high-priced escort service Emperors Club VIP, whose women charge as much as $5,500 an hour. (Read more on the investigation.)

Senior Spitzer aides, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said Spitzer had been informed Friday by federal prosecutors that he was linked to the prostitution ring.

But he didn't tell his wife until Sunday, and after several excruciating hours, they told their daughters, the aides said. By Sunday evening, Spitzer had called top advisers, friends and loyalists. The little band huddled in the apartment until midnight.

After making a watery-eyed, non-specific public apology Monday with his wife by his side, Spitzer continued to talk to family and advisers through Tuesday.

The New York Times reports that Spitzer had his staff to contact the office of the Democratic speaker of the state Assembly on Tuesday afternoon to see if an impeachment vote could be avoided, but it was clear during the discussions that it was hopeless, with many Democrats prepared to abandon him.

By Wednesday morning, aides said, he had decided to resign.

It was a spectacular collapse for a man who cultivated an image as a hard-nosed politician hell-bent on cleansing the state of corruption. He served two terms as New York attorney general, earning the nickname "Sheriff of Wall Street," and was elected governor with a record share of the vote in 2006. The tall, athletic, square-jawed Spitzer was sometimes mentioned as a potential candidate for president.

In the aftermath of the scandal, Spitzer's replacement, Lt. Gov David Paterson, will face political challenges in place long before the news of this week paralyzed the state Capitol. (Read more about Paterson.)

Paterson will try to heal bruised relations with lawmakers in both parties who were offended by Spitzer's confrontational leadership style. He also faces a tight budget in a slowing economy and memories of divisive issues from Spitzer's less than 15-month tenure.

But Paterson, a fellow Democrat who becomes New York's first black governor and the nation's first legally blind chief executive, plans to be well prepared for the job. He asked for a handover on Monday, five days after Spitzer's resignation.

Paterson said he needed more time to prepare before taking office and wanted Spitzer to say a proper goodbye to his staff. He plans to meet with lawmakers on Monday to lay out his positions and any revisions to Spitzer's budget, which faces an April 1 deadline.

"In these situations, most politicians would be like vultures swarming around the body," said Rep. Steve Israel, who said he had spoken to Paterson. "In contrast, David Paterson actually asked for more time to do his homework."

Spitzer and his successor have starkly different leadership styles. While Spitzer was famously abrasive, uncompromising and even insulting, Paterson has built a reputation as a conciliator, and lawmakers quickly embraced the new order.

"The first thing he can, and I think he will, do is end the era of accusation and contempt and ridicule," Democratic Assemblyman Richard Brodsky said. "I think everyone will be better off because of it."

Barely known outside his Harlem political base, Paterson, 53, has been in New York government since his election to the state Senate in 1985. Though legally blind, he has enough sight in his right eye to walk unaided, recognize people at conversational distance and even read if the text is placed close to his face.

Paterson said in a statement that he was saddened by the scandal, but added: "It is now time for Albany to get back to work, as the people of this state expect from us."

©MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Video and Galleries from Politics

by mudrose-2009 March 13, 2008 10:43 AM PDT
Well, it''s been said that Mr. Spritzer''s moniker in the past was "Eliot Ness". Now, you can change that to "Eliott Mess". Another Mr. Pants-Around-His Ankles lackey who again jeopardizes his State and County and Oath of Office. To the DNC I say just keep those boys coming.
Reply to this comment
by culturechang March 13, 2008 10:43 AM PDT
Its been a rough road for the people he ran up the river for prostitution....before he got busted. No sympathy here.

Give thought to this. What if NYC legalized prostitution by escort service today? What would change? Escorts would still exist. Girls would still have internet ads. The same men who go now would continue to go. Very little would change except the media and FBI would have no reason to care....so maybe then they could focus on real issues. And no one would turn into a pillar of salt.

Reply to this comment
by camboh82 March 13, 2008 10:47 AM PDT
Who even cares about this anymore? It happened, he''s suffered, so just leave the poor guy alone!
Reply to this comment
by rushlimpdrug March 13, 2008 10:50 AM PDT

". . . who again jeopardizes his State and County and Oath of Office. . . "
Posted by mudrose at 10:43 AM

Is that right stupid?

He goes out with a prostitute and jeopardizes the Oath?

You definetly have your head waaaay up your lower ***.

Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 March 13, 2008 10:52 AM PDT
Who even cares about this anymore? It happened, he''''s suffered, so just leave the poor guy alone!
Posted by camboh82

You obvioiusly do. I don''t regard this chump as a poor guy. He deserves what he gets. He''s a snide, sarcastic, bully who thought he was above the law he himself erected. Love it when the Crocodile eats its own tail. Great story of pride, arrogance and stupidity.
Reply to this comment
by craigh9 March 13, 2008 11:38 AM PDT
He resigned, I don''t see any advantage to anyone sending him to prison. They should charge him with whatever crimes they can, and settle the matter with misdemeanor guilty pleas - pay huge fines, and if appropriate have him surrender his professional law and real estate licenses - but keep him out of jail, otherwise it''s a witch hunt solely because he was in politics.
Reply to this comment
by missingamerica March 13, 2008 11:44 AM PDT
Ever notice how quickly Republicans start talking "impeachment" when it is a Democrat who has showed his arse (literally, sometimes)?

lollll...but when they get busted, they always say it is "political posturing by the Democrats" or some other inane phrase that indicates that their innocent li''ll ol'' Party is being picked on...
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 March 13, 2008 11:44 AM PDT
Posted by jh6379

And that''s why Congress has tried to impeach Bush, because of his high crimes and misdemeanors, right? If you weren''t so stupid you''d be funny.
Reply to this comment
by clifden6 March 13, 2008 11:48 AM PDT
He has lost enough, plus he has wife, and three daughters, and why put his family through anymore. This is not Chemical Ali or Saddam Hussein we are dealing with here. Also Eliot Spitzer is not John Martorano who killed 20 people and is walking free.

On 60 Minutes was: There are few men alive today with the underworld credentials of John Martorano, and even fewer who are out of prison and walking the streets. For more than a decade, Martorano was the chief executioner for Boston''s Winter Hill Gang, a loose confederation of Irish and Italian-American gangsters run by James "Whitey" Bulger. Martorano had to remember them all. It was part of a deal he cut with the federal government that put him back on the streets of Boston after only 12 years in prison -- a little more than seven months served for each of the 20 people he killed, many of them fellow gangsters, and many of them at close range after looking into their eyes.

Reply to this comment
by missingamerica March 13, 2008 11:50 AM PDT
If you weren''t so stupid you''d be funny.

Posted by mudrose at 11:44 AM : Mar 13, 2008

Tsk, tsk...your immaturity is showing.
Reply to this comment
by andrew_693 March 13, 2008 11:53 AM PDT
you can have 4000 american soldiers killed, hundreds of thousands of iraqis killed, you can have an entire city like new orleans sink under a hurricane and let thousands of them die but oh my god! don''t pay for a blow job because god squad might put you in jail.
Reply to this comment
by andrew_693 March 13, 2008 11:55 AM PDT
when will bush, cheney, condi rice, and all the other criminals resign and follow spitzer''s example.
Reply to this comment
by culturechang March 13, 2008 12:08 PM PDT
"He resigned, I don''''t see any advantage to anyone sending him to prison." by craigh9.

Ok, then we have to let all the others go that have gotten or will get 5 and 10 years sentences for sending a hooker over state lines.
Reply to this comment
by brianp55 March 13, 2008 12:16 PM PDT
Oh, I see a BIG advantage in sending him to prison. This guy broke the law.....period. If anyone else solicited a prostitute, they would be arrested and prosecuted. He should be disbarred and then do some jail time.
Reply to this comment
by hawksprings March 13, 2008 12:19 PM PDT
"but oh my god! don''''t pay for a *** because god squad might put you in jail."
Posted by andrew_693

andrew, the problem with your bitter little rant is that Spitzer himself as Attorney General was busy putting people in jail for ''blow jobs''.
Shouldn''t he be held accountable for the same laws he was imprisoning others for?
Maybe he''ll get a chance to meet some of the people he put in jail while he''s there.
Reply to this comment
by jwind11 March 13, 2008 12:20 PM PDT
you can have 4000 american soldiers killed, hundreds of thousands of iraqis killed, you can have an entire city like new orleans sink under a hurricane and let thousands of them die but oh my god! don''''t pay for a *** because god squad might put you in jail.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by andrew_693 at 11:53 AM : Mar 13, 2008

i rest my case about nutjob libs.....can someone tell me what this post has to do with spitzer? anyone?
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 March 13, 2008 12:25 PM PDT
i rest my case about nutjob libs.....can someone tell me what this post has to do with spitzer? anyone?

Posted by jwind11

It''s the endless Bush Derangement Syndrome. They will rant anywhere, anytime and anyway. They have no perspective and I might guess that the fall of Eliot Spitzer is probably Bush''s fault too.
Reply to this comment
by hawksprings March 13, 2008 12:32 PM PDT
mudrose and jwind,

If there was EVER a case where Liberals should be outraged at someone''s behavior and demand jail time for it, it should be this case with Spitzer.

Liberals love slamming Conservatives for hypocritical behavior, like Haggard or Sen. Craig. But all they''ve done is moralized or simply "said words" against the behaviors they were later caught in or accused of.

But with Spitzer, you have a guy who used the full force of the government to imprison people for something that now we find out he was doing himself!
He threw guys in jail for what HE HAS BEEN DOING!!!!

Where''s the Liberals'' outrage about this?
Where''s the Liberals'' sense of justice?

Spitzer''s case really shows how twisted the Liberals in America are.
Reply to this comment
by infidel_us March 13, 2008 1:04 PM PDT
''A Rough Road Ahead For Spitzer''

That''s his problem.....the prostaho sat on his lap and they pretended to be driving down a ''rough road''. LOL
Reply to this comment
by deemsnyd March 13, 2008 1:06 PM PDT
Anytime a republican gets caught for doing something wrong, he''s a hypocrit because he runs on the "family values/morals" ticket.

This guy got caught for doing the same thing he puts people in jail for, so he is a hypocrit.

What''s so hard to understand.
Reply to this comment
by infidel_us March 13, 2008 1:09 PM PDT
Spitzer''''s case really shows how twisted the Liberals in America are.
Posted by hawksprings at 12:32 PM : Mar 13, 2008

They have become the very entity they accuse republicans of being....nazis. You have the right to free speech....until you disagree with them.

They don''t like recruiting stations, so they bomb them.....or city councils get together and conspire to throw them out of their cities.

Their cities refuse to follow the federal rule of law by offering sanctuary to illegal aliens.

I''m 48. If the US gov''t declared war on liberals, the ACLU, etc., I''d quit my job and enlist.
Reply to this comment
by singindick March 13, 2008 1:19 PM PDT
Let''''s dispense with all the chatter and get to what everybody really wants: Show us the video and photos!!!!! We want to see!!!!! Are there any dirty transcripts at least? Why is CBS holding back? It''''s not nice to tease!
Reply to this comment
by deemsnyd March 13, 2008 1:33 PM PDT
They need a new picture of this guy on the website. This very "tight lipped" pose is probably not indicative of what the prostitutes saw.
Reply to this comment
by neoconslayer March 13, 2008 2:35 PM PDT
hawksprings: so, you''re telling us that the centerpiece of Spitzer''s public life has been to crusade against prostitution!?
That would be a lie.
He does deserve pretty much what he gets, but your attempt to taint half of America by association proves your worth.
Consider this: if i smoke pot and become a prosecutor, how long will it be before someone notices that everyone who gets busted for pot goes free?
This is different from politicians who can choose (generally) which issues they wish to focus on.
I''m not saying that he doesn''t deserve what he gets, but you''re stretching it alot to cover your hate.
Reply to this comment
by slim1h2o March 13, 2008 2:51 PM PDT
This is all Bush''''s Fault.

Posted by FloydZepp at 01:02 PM : Mar 13, 2008

Which Bush? The Prez,,,or the one between the legs? LOL
Reply to this comment
by easeup-2009 March 13, 2008 3:50 PM PDT
I''m really getting tired of his tight-lipped "oh man I really fvcked-up" look they keep showing.

Looks like he just missed a 2-foot putt....
Reply to this comment
by singindick March 13, 2008 4:09 PM PDT
This is all Bush''s Fault.

Posted by FloydZepp at 01:02 PM : Mar 13, 2008

I totally agree, if Bush had not been so lawless and acted like he was not only above the law but above the U.S. Constitution, we wouldn''t have out-of-control governors who think they can act the same way. Instead of restoring honor to the White House, our president has disgraced the entire nation.
Reply to this comment
by singindick March 13, 2008 4:11 PM PDT
Looks like he just missed a 2-foot putt....
Posted by easeup at 03:50 PM : Mar 13, 2008

Or just lost the hottest piece he could get his hands on . . .
Reply to this comment
by March 13, 2008 4:38 PM PDT
But with Spitzer, you have a guy who used the full force of the government to imprison people for something that now we find out he was doing himself!
He threw guys in jail for what HE HAS BEEN DOING!!!!

Where''''s the Liberals'''' outrage about this?
Where''''s the Liberals'''' sense of justice?

Spitzer''''s case really shows how twisted the Liberals in America are.

Posted by hawksprings
------------------
It was all pretty much dissipated when he stood up and took full responsiblity.
Reply to this comment
by sdcjd1 March 13, 2008 4:55 PM PDT
I feel for his wife, but I also feel very sad for his daughters. He has 3 teenage daughters - 13, 15 & 17. How could he do this to them? They''ll be profoundly affected by it. What a selfish man.
Reply to this comment
by nolalou March 13, 2008 4:55 PM PDT
Where''''''''s the Liberals'''''''' sense of justice?
Spitzer''''''''s case really shows how twisted the Liberals in America are. Posted by hawksprings

Spitzer resigned, as he should have, and may get prosecuted as he should be, so Where is YOUR SENSE OF JUSTICE when Larry Craig is still in the Senate, and so is Louisiana Republcian Senator David Vitter, who is guilty of the same thing Spitzer is guilty of, yet he refused to resign! Why? Because the governor was a Democrat, and he would have been replaced by a Democrat and the Republicans would have lost another seat!

Sorry, hawksprings, if your looking for a hypocrite, I suggest you take a hard look in the nearest mirror!
Reply to this comment
by jjarden March 13, 2008 5:11 PM PDT
An ARROGANT NARCICIST...Plain and Simple.
Reply to this comment
by excoachken March 13, 2008 5:20 PM PDT
This is yesterday''s story. I thought CBS was supposed to have news on this site. Move ahead or you won''t be read!
Reply to this comment
by sharncedar March 13, 2008 5:32 PM PDT
This is an extremely important story. What this story reveals is one of two possibilities: either government prosecutors are targeting individuals, a violation of the constitutional prohibition against unreasonable search, or banks are gathering random data about everyone and filtering to the government, also a random search and illegal and reprehensible.

The official story about how Spitzer was "caught" doesn''t add up, unless one of the two types of illegal search above were conducted.

That means, for you Walmart folks, that someone trusted in the government has violated and is violating without qualms the highest law in the land.

This is one of the most important stories of the year.

Why exactly is a bank reporting "suspicious transactions" which are not themselves either illegal or subject to required reporting to the government?

When Spitzer commitd a crime, its bad. If the Justice department of the US commits a crime, it is a danger to our survival as a nation.

Tell me thats not an important news story.
Reply to this comment
by irliberal March 13, 2008 5:33 PM PDT
Both Spitzer and his "consort" broke the law, and, all partisanship aside, I want to know why they aren''t in jail right now - or headed to court right now.

Oh, and I also want to know why every prostitute along with everyone involved with this "club" hasn''t been arrested. Why?
Reply to this comment
by irliberal March 13, 2008 5:34 PM PDT
Tell me thats not an important news story.

Posted by SharnCedar at 05:32 PM

Oh, please Sharn. You can talk once you explain Larry Craig, who hasn''t even resigned. Until then, feel free to shut the he.ll up.
Reply to this comment
by hugbunney March 13, 2008 5:49 PM PDT
I know Spitzer did wrong personally and I feel for his family but it sounds like he did a lot of right for the people he represented. Isn''t that what he was hired to do? He could have used his public position to promote his private choices but is seems he chose to use his public position for the betterment of the public he respresented. I can''t think of a better definition of a politician. If we find out he paid out of his own pocket for those hookers...well...let him that has no sin...yada yada yada

Reply to this comment
by jankebenz March 13, 2008 8:51 PM PDT
Posted by singindick at 04:11 PM : Mar 13, 2008

The first part of your moniker is''nt you, "stupid" would be more suitable.

The second part however, is a good description and represents you well
Reply to this comment
by grazinggoat March 14, 2008 8:03 AM PDT
Spitzer was testing. He was testing his ''interior inferiority complex'' by daring the system and the will of people. To be able to govern you need to break the law to go above it, and say ''I AM THE LAW'', a bit like the Powerful God has told us (I''M THE LAW. I WROTE IT FOR YOU- I IMPOSE IT ON YOU). Instead of sayin I''m the GUARDIAN of the LAW and you need to have it obeyed, LIKE I DO, look here, and being all proud of it.

-Testing, challenging, daring. That''s what being male stands for...

GG, female 57.
Reply to this comment
by guidosfoot March 14, 2008 7:56 PM PDT
ooks like he just missed a 2-foot putt....


yeah, singin''***, yer just so cute (not).
Reply to this comment
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs