Iraq Fades From View For Many Americans
Poll Shows Only 28 Percent Know That Nearly 4,000 U.S. Troops Have Been Killed
-
Photo
(CBS/iStockPhoto)
-
Interactive
American Heroes
Profiles of U.S. soldiers who've died in Iraq, a look at the war's toll and pictures of mourning.
-
Interactive
Battle For Iraq
The government, the insurgency, key players, background and photos.
Only 28 percent correctly said that about 4,000 Americans have died in the war, according to a survey by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center.
That's down from last August, when 54 percent gave the accurate casualty figure, which was about 3,500 dead at the time. In previous Pew surveys dating to 2004, about half have correctly given the rough figure for the approximate number of deaths at the time.
In the new poll, around a third said about 3,000 U.S. troops have died while about one in 10 said 2,000 deaths. Fewer overestimated the number of casualties: about a quarter put the figure close to 5,000.
Exit polls of voters in presidential primaries and many national surveys have shown the economy has displaced the war in recent weeks as the public's choice as the nation's top problem.
Iraq was the most avidly followed news story for most of the first half of 2007, but it has not been the most closely watched story in any week since mid-October, according to a Pew survey of people's interest in the news. The portion of news stories on the war has dropped in recent months as well, according to a study by the Project for Excellence in Journalism, a nonpartisan group that evaluates news coverage.
The Pew poll was conducted from Feb. 28-March 2 and involved telephone interviews with 1,003 adults. The margin of sampling error was plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 57 CommentsPosted by ddhinnyc
So why then isn''t the right''s beloved faux newz covering all the supposed "good things" that are happening there?
In the first quarter, one of the most commented on findings was that the cable news networks had not covered Iraq in equal degrees. Fox News spent a much smaller percentage of time on the war than did its two cable rivals (15% of the newshole versus 25% on CNN and 31% on MSNBC).
In the second quarter the gap remained and in some cases even widened, if looked at overall. Fox news devoted roughly half as much airtime as the other cable channels to the war. Total war coverage accounted for 8% of the Fox newshole, versus 18% for CNN and 15% for MSNBC.
I hate to say this but you can''t spin it anymore. You see when the Republicans decided that they would decide for the majority of America they doomed themselves.
Once again the far right reactionaries missed the real point you have awaken the hard center and now their minds are already made up.
We are a pathetic nation. Afraid to be civilly disobedient because the federal government makes law abiding Americans feel they will follow you around like the Nazi''s did the Jewish sympathizers(Patriot Act).
"Let us dare to read, think, speak and write."
John Adams 1765
Somehow I don''t think John Adams would have been in favor of the current version of the "Patriot Act."
Our current "patriots" living back then in 1776 would have had five deferments from the Reveloutionary War and would have gotten "The Militia Veterans Against Adams" to create a smear campaign against John that would have made him look like a British spy.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/09/60minutes/main592330.shtml
I sure hope the rest of you Americans can see how free our country has become.
Do tell - please enlighten us on the progress in Iraq. Facts please - no jingoistic flag-waving, just facts. And please name your sources - FOX Noise doesn''''t count.
Posted by nokoolaid at 09:39 AM : Mar 13, 2008
FOX Noise shouldn''t count - It is not a News source - it is just another cable sitcom program...
All citizens should use this upcoming pathetic milestone to march in the streets.
America forgetting this war is the best thing that could happen to the BUSH administration and republicans.
We should all be ashamed.
Our young people dying everyday should lead all news service reports EVERY DAY.
Our Brave New World has arrived: WAR IS PEACE.
God help us.
Fox news coverage of the Iraq war is half of what CNN and MSNBC are doing.
Fox news has consistently shown itself to be a voice for President Bush and his policies.
If the good things alleged to be happening in Iraq were true, Fox news would have double the coverage of the other news outlets, not half.
Posted by mrmazerati
Guerrilla warfare against a better equipped and usually numerically superior force is as old as war itself is. The planners of this war ignored history and the advice of their own military leaders.
Posted by ddhinnyc
ROFL!! Kind of explains "the slipping from memory", eh?
Posted by ddhinnyc
You are using data to draw the wrong conclusion. Here''s why: If you are pro-Bush, you tend to watch Fox. If you are anti-Bush, you watch other channels. The anti-Bush people are spread between networks, not concentrated in one channel like the Fox/Bush people. So if you add up the non-Fox viewers, they outweigh Fox by over 5 to 1. Fox is actually in the vast minority in their position on the war.
it is just an immoral and illegal occupation of Iraq;
how do we win an occupation?
mission accomplished
these people wioll defend their lands with what they have , which happens to be suicide attacks, it is their only weapon
Only two winners have emerged from the conflict: oil companies and defence contractors
by Joseph Stiglitz
With March 20 marking the fifth anniversary of the United States-led invasion of Iraq, it%u2019s time to take stock of what has happened.
In our new book The Three Trillion Dollar War, Harvard%u2019s Linda Bilmes and I conservatively estimate the economic cost of the war to the U.S. to be $3 trillion, and the costs to the rest of the world to be another $3 trillion - far higher than the Bush administration%u2019s estimates before the war.
The Bush team not only misled the world about the war%u2019s possible costs, but has also sought to obscure the costs as the war has gone on.
This is not surprising. After all, the Bush administration lied about everything else, from Saddam Hussein%u2019s weapons of mass destruction to his supposed link with Al Qaeda. Indeed, only after the U.S.-led invasion did Iraq become a breeding ground for terrorists.
The Bush administration said the war would cost $50 billion. The U.S. now spends that amount in Iraq every three months.
Published on Wednesday, March 12, 2008 by The Toronto Star
Bush is on the ballot in the form of mccain
let''s all call him McBush
McBush is is four more of the same
for real progress vote democrat across the board
we need the senate to make changes
oust the republiCON senators
This country started all the wars we are nothing less than a war nation of death and destruction to the world. Now look at America she is falling cause of you and your vote. Now if you cant see why Ron Paul is the best choice then you voted for the wrong guy again. Vote Ron Paul tear down the fed reserve and the goverment departments bring the troop''s home from around the globe and throw out the eveil in the white House. Return to the constitution before we fall flat on our face
Let your Bush derangement syndrome go, honey! You''''ll stop being bitter all the time!
Posted by ddhinnyc at 11:43 AM : Mar 13, 2008
+ report abuse
Hey he can CLAIM to be a Maverick until the end of time. I saw how Maverick he was out there in front with Bush or snuggling up to that Minister. Look we need to change things in this nation. ANYONE with a brain can see the present course IS NOT working!! 7 years and a Trillion dollars later here we are.... NOWHERE!!
Your president ran the nation straight into the ground. You can still kiss his a$$ and call it candy, but the rest of us have a little more respect for ourselves and our nation.
The gloating of so-called "anti-war" lefties who can''t figure out that Iraq achieved not only the ouster of Saddam but the embarassment of al Qaeda in Iraq makes me sick. Nothing new here. British leftists accused arch-appeaser Neville Chamberlain of being a "warmonger" for taking even the wimpiest of actions againt Hitler. Any attempt by American conservatives to fight terrorism has met with the same hooting and howling. Liberals are great at this. They can always claim they''re "for the people" no matter how disastrous the results of their stupidity.
Suicide bombings continue to happen every day in Pakistan and other Muslim countries. Does that mean the governments of all of those countries have "failed" because they can''t prevent a miniscule number of people from running suicide bombings to terrorize the population?
It is way past time for us as American citizens to remind the pres. and the congress just who it is they work for.if death and destruction and bankrupting our country is what you want then sit back and watch our country die. If you want change and a new direction that will save our Country get active and speak out loud and clear!Hound these politicians until they cave in and listen to "We The People"
The suicide rate among liberals will skyrocket.
Posted by nokoolaid
Well said!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by jh6379 at 10:29 AM : Mar 13, 2008
Here is a fact for you, there are 40,000 enemy jihadist that died for what they beleived in on a battlefield called Iraq. They will never see the sunrise either or the shores of the United States so %uck &ou Socialist Pig.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by mrmazerati at 12:35 PM : Mar 13, 2008
You hope. The truth is you put all of your chips into an Iraq defeat. Now its going to come back to haunt you and your Socialist Pig friends. We are not leaving Iraq for a long long time lib. As a matter of fact, their is a better chance that you will impeach Bush and Cheny (as your lib congress promised you)then the US leaving Iraq.
We did it, folks, and we can all be proud! Thanks for all your hard work and we''ll see you at the party!
I''m not sure that''s entirely the case. I''m thinking more along the lines of "status quo" where apathy manifests as lack of interest.
We have won the war in Iraq? Really? Oh wow. Hmm... I would never have guessed if you didn''t tell me.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by JoeCoolSwat at 01:34 PM : Mar 13, 2008
Who the hell needs bases with which to launch other wars? There are no mop up operations. As soon as we get out of Iraq and stop trying to steal their resources, there''ll not need to be any terrorism in Iraq.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 57 Comments