March 12, 2008

EPA Raises The Bar For Clean Air

Health Experts Say The New Ozone Standards Don't Go Far Enough To Protect Public Health

  • Smog covers midtown Manhattan in New York in this July 10, 2007 file photo. The air in more than 300 U.S. counties is simply too dirty to breathe, the government says, ordering a multibillion-dollar expansion of efforts to clean up smog in a host of cities and towns nationwide.

    Smog covers midtown Manhattan in New York in this July 10, 2007 file photo. The air in more than 300 U.S. counties is simply too dirty to breathe, the government says, ordering a multibillion-dollar expansion of efforts to clean up smog in a host of cities and towns nationwide.  (AP Photo/Adam Rountree)

  • Interactive Air Pollution

    Explore air pollution throughout the US and and find out which cities have the worst air quality.

(AP)  The air in hundreds of U.S. counties is simply too dirty to breathe, the government said Wednesday, ordering a multibillion-dollar expansion of efforts to clean up smog in cities and towns nationwide.

The federal action, which lowers ozone limits for the atmosphere, means that 345 counties will now be in violation of the health requirement, about four times as many as under the old rules. However, scientists said the change still isn't enough to significantly reduce heart and asthma attacks from breathing smog-clogged air, and they pressed the Environmental Protection Agency to issue even more stringent requirements.

Electric utilities, oil companies and other businesses had lobbied hard for leaving the smog rule alone, saying the high cost of lower limits could hurt the economy and noting that many communities still haven't met requirements set a decade ago.

EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson, already a target of intense criticism over emissions linked to global warming and regulation of mercury from power plants, decided to take the middle ground when it comes to smog.

The EPA directed that air must contain no more than 75 units of ozone, or smog, for every billion units of air in order to be considered healthy, a reduction from the current maximum concentration of 80 to 84 parts per billion.

The new ozone standard will serve as the benchmark for state and local officials as they design pollution control measures. The EPA gives states years to meet the needed reductions, and areas with the worst pollution are likely to have as long as a decade to comply.

Ozone is a product of nitrogen oxides and other organic chemical compounds from motor vehicles, power plants, manufacturing and industrial plants. As it comes into contact with the sun's rays it is seen as the smog that hangs in much of the nation's air, aggravating respiratory problems for tens of millions of people.

An estimated 85 counties of the more than 700 that have monitoring stations exceed the current 80 parts per billion concentration, according to the latest EPA calculations. More than 320 counties exceed the tighter 75 parts per billion standard.

Quote

It's disheartening that once again EPA has missed a critical opportunity to protect public health and welfare by ignoring the unanimous recommendations of its independent science advisers.

William Becker, National Association of Clean Air Agencies
Health experts say smog under the current ozone regulation - even in areas where the limit is being met - causes hundreds of premature deaths among the elderly and health problems for thousands of young children and people with asthma and other respiratory illnesses.

An independent EPA advisory group of scientists last year said an ozone standard of 60 to 70 parts per billion is needed to provide an adequate margin of protection for the millions of people susceptible to respiratory problems. A similar conclusion was reached by a second advisory board on children's health.

In December, 111 health scientists, in a letter to Johnson, urged the EPA to adopt the science panels' findings.

Clean air advocates called the latest EPA reduction a move in the right direction - but also a political compromise that does not go far enough.

"It's disheartening that once again EPA has missed a critical opportunity to protect public health and welfare by ignoring the unanimous recommendations of its independent science advisers," said William Becker, executive director of the National Association of Clean Air Agencies, whose members will be developing programs to meet the federal air quality requirement.

Becker acknowledged that the tighter the standard the more difficult it will be to meet, but he said: "The public deserves the right to know whether the air they breathe is healthy."

In recent weeks, some of the most powerful industry groups in Washington have waged an intense lobbying campaign at the White House, urging the administration to keep the current standard.

Electric utilities, the oil and chemical industries and manufacturing groups argued that lowering the standard would require states and local officials to impose new pollution controls, harming economic growth, when the science has yet to determine the health benefits conclusively. The 80 parts per billion standard was enacted by the EPA in 1997, but its implementation was delayed for several years because of court challenges by industry groups.

"Hundreds of counties haven't been able to meet the current standard set a decade ago," said John Kinsman, senior director for environment at the Edison Electric Institute, which represents most of the country's power companies. "Moving the goalpost again will inflict economic hardship on those areas without speeding air quality improvements."

The EPA has said, based on various studies, cutting smog from 80 to 75 parts per billion would prevent between 900 and 1,100 premature deaths a year and mean 1,400 fewer nonfatal heart attacks and 5,600 fewer hospital or emergency room visits. A separate study suggests that tightening the standard to 70 parts per billion could avoid as many s 3,800 premature deaths nationwide.

The EPA by law is not supposed to consider economic cost in establishing the federal health standard for air quality. The agency has estimated that new pollution control efforts to comply with a 75 parts per billion standard would cost as much as $8.8 billion a year, although it acknowledged that does not take into account reductions in health care costs that could be even greater.


© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 15 Comments
by rf35 March 13, 2008 5:04 PM EDT
Ozone was once added INTENTIONALLY to the air in the London Underground (subway train) system as a disinfectant.

If it''s such a health hazard, why did the life expectancy of Londoners increase during this period?
Posted by juwboy at 06:20 AM : Mar 13, 2008


While it''s true about ozone in the subway intended as a disinfectant, there are reports of sinus and other infections, some severe, linked to the practice.
Reply to this comment
by cdfoxtrot March 13, 2008 4:31 PM EDT
"PA Raises The Bar For Clean Air". Bush''s EPA "raises the bar"?? How?? It requires direction from three energy lobbyists per decision instead of two, now????
Reply to this comment
by excoachken March 13, 2008 3:13 PM EDT
A typical Bushy plan. Raise standards just enough to look like action but not enough to achieve any action. Much like when he wears his flight suit. He will always be the President who was "all for show and nothing for go!"
Reply to this comment
by juwboy March 13, 2008 10:34 AM EDT
MCVet:

Why don''t you ask the rest home nurse to change your diaper?
Reply to this comment
by mcvet March 13, 2008 10:03 AM EDT
Ozone was once added INTENTIONALLY to the air in the London Underground (subway train) system as a disinfectant.

If it''''s such a health hazard, why did the life expectancy of Londoners increase during this period?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by juwboy at 06:20 AM : Mar 13, 2008
+ report abuse

Did your momma drop you on your head when you were little. I''ve heard fascist come up with some real stupid remarks but this one really takes the cake!! SIEG HEIL Stupid!!
Reply to this comment
by juwboy March 13, 2008 9:20 AM EDT
Ozone was once added INTENTIONALLY to the air in the London Underground (subway train) system as a disinfectant.

If it''s such a health hazard, why did the life expectancy of Londoners increase during this period?
Reply to this comment
by jjp735i March 13, 2008 9:10 AM EDT
Electric utilities, the oil and chemical industries and manufacturing groups only care about profits. Your death is meaningless to them.

Once again another agency under the Bush White House follows the direction given by large corporations. The EPA is not doing the job it was created for.
Reply to this comment
by thee0racle March 13, 2008 9:07 AM EDT
GW has his veto pen ready for this one. Garsh, Dickey...Can''t let''em cut into the profits of big business. That''s just un-Merican and bad for the economy.
Reply to this comment
by watcher269-2009 March 13, 2008 8:18 AM EDT
Anything is better than NOTHING - the way it is under the Bush Administration. SO - anything is an improvement - Also - this administration is KNOWN for making FALSE promises - which this probably is because the government doesn''t have the money to fund this.

Reply to this comment
by pensacola88 March 13, 2008 3:11 AM EDT
Ozone is a huge health problem! Here on the Gulf Coast, during April, we have winds from the west that blow high concentrations of ozone from Houston, New Orleans, Beaumont, Port Arthur and Baton Rouge over this here and with advancing cold fronts come the temperature inversions that sicken thousands of people overnight! Many often though they were stricken from a virus, or allergy. A trip to the doctor for a headache or runny nose won''t draw much sympathy until you have a sinus infection, which takes about three days.

I applaud the ozone reduction efforts by the EPA!!

Also, the creation of blended fuels or boutique gasolines have contributed to the ozone problem!! While they do solve some types of pollution emmisions, they do create ground ozone and require wind to blow them away. (Refer to my first paragraph) This moves ozone created from one area to another and cause people to suffer up to 500 miles away!!

Boutique fuels (special gasoline formulas specifically designed for certain regions and controlled by the state legislatures) are ozone producers.

As it is now, only the EPA can address the problem effectively. One state can declare compliance by using boutique fuels, but cause problems for another. Some states downwind, can''t do anything to reduce their ozone, because they don''t have significant productions of it in their area, but the people suffer.

Reply to this comment
by alphaa10-2009 March 13, 2008 1:48 AM EDT
ontheleft said, "Let''s do what the neocons want and abolish all government regulation of pollution. Industry is perfectly capable of regulating itself."
---
Of course, just as they have done for years.

And while we are at it, let''s push for self-regulation for organized crime, a related industry. We cannot afford hypocrisy, here, can we? As any don will tell you, "It''s just business...".

It''s also the least any right-thinking American could do. And without pesky government investigators, just think of the money we could divert to tax breaks for the HaveMores (some of them also in organized crime). What a boon to business!

As that great American, Calvin Coolidge, once said, just before Wall Street crashed in 1929, "The business of America is business."
Reply to this comment
by alphaa10-2009 March 13, 2008 1:33 AM EDT
Money talks, and lobbies for the power utilities, chemical industries and car makers know it.

1. CBS reports, "... 345 counties will now be in violation of the health requirement, about four times as many as under the old rules."
---
So, after seven years of a Bush EPA, why are nearly 90 US counties still in violation of an old law?

2. CBS reports, "The EPA directed that air must contain no more than 75 units of ozone... a reduction from the current maximum concentration of 80 to 84 parts per billion."
---
A minor reduction, and it doesn''t take place for years. Clearly, this administration doesn''t consider public health a politically viable issue, since it angers the Bush constituency.
Reply to this comment
by ontheleft March 13, 2008 12:56 AM EDT
''Electric utilities, oil companies and other businesses had lobbied hard for leaving the smog rule alone''

Let''s do what the neocons want and abolish all government regulation of pollution. Industry is perfectly capable of regulating itself.
Reply to this comment
by slpdisk March 13, 2008 12:42 AM EDT
Does anybody question whether planes spreading chem-trails may effect our breathing. You know those planes that are spraying the air of all counties with chemicals. Look out your window at the sky there is a good chance there is one above your county right now. No, that is not jet exhaust, it is an experiment that is affecting our health whether you are willing to accept it or not.
Reply to this comment
by papatt-2009 March 13, 2008 12:32 AM EDT
WHERE DOES ONE GET AN ACTUAL LIST OF THE OFFENDING COUNTIES?
Reply to this comment
See all 15 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: