Vatican Lists New Sin: DNA Manipulation
Church Official Also Lists Drugs And Pollution As Sins With "Social Resonance"
-
Photo
(CBS/AP)
-
Fast Facts
Vatican City
Learn about the people, economy and history.
Also receiving fresh attention by the Vatican are society's injustices, along the lines of the age-old maxim: "The rich get richer while the poor get poorer."
After last year's "Ten Commandments" against road rage and other sins committed behind the wheel, the Vatican has provided its latest update on how God's law is being violated with modern means.
"The poor are always becoming poorer and the rich ever more rich, feeding unsustainable social injustice," Monsignor Gianfranco Girotti, the head of the Apostolic Penitentiary, told the Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano in an interview published Sunday.
Girotti was asked what, in his opinion, are the "new sins."
He cited "violations of the basic rights of human nature" through genetic manipulation; drugs which "weaken the mind and cloud intelligence" as well as imbalances between rich and poor.
"If yesterday sin had a rather individualistic dimension, today it has a weight, a resonance, that's especially social, rather than individual," said the monsignor, whose office deals with matters of conscience and grants absolution.
Vatican officials stressed that Girotti's comments broke no new ground on what constitutes sin.
Both Benedict and the late Pope John Paul II frequently expressed concern about the environment. Under Benedict's papacy, Vatican engineers developed plans for some Holy See buildings to use solar energy, including photovoltaic cells on the roof of the auditorium for pilgrims' audiences with the pontiff.
John Paul dedicated much of his long papacy to condemning the gap between have and have-nots in speeches in his travels throughout the world as well as in writings.
Closer to home, Girotti was asked about the many "situations of scandal and sin within the Church," in what appeared to be a reference to allegations in the U.S. and several other countries of sexual abuse by clergy of minors and coverups by hierarchy.
The monsignor acknowledged the "objective gravity" of the allegations, but contended that the heavy coverage by mass media of the scandals must also be denounced because it "discredits the Church."
Benedict has been leading the Vatican's campaign against abortion, and Girotti was asked about the "widespread perception" that the Church does not consider women's "difficult" predicament.
Girotti rejected that view, saying that Catholic organizations help unwed mothers, educating "their children who come into the worth because of their lack of foresight" and facilitating adoption.
Last year, the Vatican took on the social problem of road accidents, issuing a kind of "Ten Commandments" for drivers against the sins of road rage, alcohol abuse and even rudeness behind the wheel.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 14
- next
See all 651 CommentsThank God.
Starting today things are going to change cause everyone lives and dies by what these guys say.
2. Thou shalt not flirt with a nun
3. Thou shalt not faart in the pew (PEEE-YEW)
4. Thou shalt not look down a ladies blouse sitting next to you
5. Thou shalt not look cross-eyed at the cross
6. Thou shalt not sing "He11''s Bells" in Church
7. Thou shalt not drink tequila before receiving Communion
"Vatican Lists New Sin: DNA Manipulation"
Now they tell me.
What am I suppose to do with all the equipment and the freaks in the cages?
Posted by pug_ster
We have to give the humans with authority to adjust "God''s word" time to make the necessary modifications enabling religion to adapt to modern times.
So being a socialist/communist is now virtuous? Just in time for old Fidel before he croaks! LOL
Posted by godofredo29 at 01:52 PM : Mar 10, 2008
Amen bro.
---------------
"Vatican Lists New Sin: DNA Manipulation"
Now they tell me.
What am I suppose to do with all the equipment and the freaks in the cages?
Posted by rushlimpdrug at 01:46 PM : Mar 10, 2008
GREAT!! I''m still laughing!!
I like to see those geniuses see where in the bible tells them specifically that DNA Manipulation is a sin.
Posted by pug_ster
Jesus said it in the sermon just before he turned the water into wine.
It was in the same sermon where he said it was a sin to assemble withouth any wine.
This would be fine and dandy if everyone believed there was some big daddy/santa god in some cloud with a lightning bolt ready to smite you...
Someone let the Vaticon know we have moved on...
Among the "new" sins listed are the use of drugs, pollution, and DNA experimentation. It is puzzeling why God would "forget" to put drug use on the tablets He gave Moses, after all people have been snorting and getting drunk for thousands of years. When it comes to pollution, again, mankind has been dirtying up the planet for just as long, but maybe God is afraid we will start shooting our trash into outer space: first the earth, next the universe!
And with DNA, I can see where God might get nervous with the possibility that our crazy scientists might put together something (or someone) we wouldn''t want them to (like another Hitler, or an army of George W. Bushs (how sickening!)).
So, maybe it''s a good thing that God did speak to Pope Benedict. After all, He is supposed to have been talking to every other televangist out there, including the Great Emperor Bush II in the Rose Garden!
SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!!
sig heil, McCain????
You%u2019re kidding right? This is the kind stinking thinking that keeps that church in denial. I hardly think they have the right to pass judgment on what constitutes a %u201Csin". This group of closet case pedophiles need to get a grip, no one cares what they think is a sin because they are the biggest sinners of all time. Blaming their sick sexual dysfunctional acts on the media is unbelievable because if it weren%u2019t for the media they would still be raping little boys and getting away with it. The Vatican got caught with their pants down and with their d i c k in their hands%u2026I really don%u2019t think they have a leg to stand on when it comes to announcing what is and what isn%u2019t a sin, they really need to focus on their own sins and not mine!
Hey, wouldn''t have it been crazy had those folks way back after reading some boring lineage of Abraham it would have finished up with, "and thou shall not manipulate DNA"
Now that would have funny stuff.
I could see some of them asking, "What the helll is DNA?"
At Mecca, there is a comet - a space rock - in the Kabbah. This is the square building they circle, pray toward and bow to during the Hajj. This is the direction all muslims face when they pray - toward a space rock.
This space rock is an idol, a false substitute for the real rock: Jesus Christ.
Recently, pursuing his goal of unifying the two apostate religions, Islam and Catholicism (paganism mixed with Jesus) into one super, "universal" (global) religion - The pope bowed and worshipped to Mecca, to the space rock, to the idol of Islam.
If any Catholic is reading this, listen to an ex-Catholic: you need to choose: Catholicism or Christ.
It is time to cast off the ways of the ancient past and seek enlightenment from more truthful sources.
For mankind to flourish and survive, thou shall establish and maintain separation of church and state.
I''m not exactly sure what "certain violations of the fundamental rights of human nature..." means, but I would have thought they would laud DNA manipulations in order that we fix whatever corruption produces gay people!
The church has always been a few hundred years behind science & its benefits. Judging from their stand on things, really, we should all just live with (or die from) whatever ails us & pray for healing? Maybe it is "damaging to society as a whole" to keep old people around so long, when really they should head off & meet their Maker according to natural selection or something.
"Sins increasingly manifest themselves as behavior that damages society as a whole... social resonance..." The implication is that what affects the social is in the area of the moral as it pertains to godliness. Or is it only the area of the social where moral intersects? Unfortunately, what is social/moral is not black & white; & the church certainly is no seer of the future. So how wld it know what thing might benefit OR harm the social.
Their pronouncement presumes upon the Grace of an infinite God, establishing the equivalent of a preemptive strike against an unrealized or imagined enemy.
The BIBLE is the authority.
NOT the Catholic Church.
Posted by singinrick at 02:29 PM : Mar 10, 2008
A big AMEN to that
Plain and simple:
Sin is an instrument of guilt for control of the masses by the priveleged few.
Don''t knock it, it works.
They forgot child molestation and rape.....
Seems to me that drugs, pollution, social/economic injustices are NOT "new areas" at all. And hybridizing plants & cross-breeding animals has been around for since at least Leviticus noted it -- DNA is simply a more direct route. At what point weren''t these things "social" as much as having an "individualistic dimension"? They certainly can''t be saying they *just* now noticed?
What?? The bible has been changed to meet the political needs of religious leaders to maintain control of a large population. What the bible says today and what it said a thousand years ago is completely different.
2. Isn''t it ironic, the church hierarchy says woman can''t be priests & priests can''t marry because the bible and church law is static, unchanging, & everlasting---but, then attempts to define ''new sins'' in the secular world, outside the bible, and probably subject to change as needed? This is just a little too bit convenient and why American Catholics should split off from Rome!
Posted by sevenveils
I wouldn''t say "completely different", but I would agree that the translation & nuance of the Bible has been changed thru time by lexicographers & scribes (to mention the most obvious) to suit issues & biases of the time; as well as translation of notions & concepts that the languages to which it was being translated did not contain. For instance, the two Hebrew words for "sin" translated as a single word in English. Another problem, but not necessarily changes in the words, is contemporary understanding of a term 4 definitions removed from its original meaning: viz., ''nature''.
Evidently you''''ve never heard of the dead sea scrolls. . .
Posted by singinrick at 03:07 PM
I haven''t are they good?
Are they planning a tour?
Where can I get tickets?
Do they need a guitar player?
Posted by Jimbo554
She drank a little wine, passed out, and woke up pregnant. This is common when you allow a stranger to bring you a drink.
And apparently you don''t know that 90% of what is in them isn''t in the bible, they were lost until recently you know. And remind yourself that the majority of the dead sea scrolls have not been made available to the public because the historians are still interpreting them scientifically and not to some religious leaders taste.
Perhaps you should become aware of the recent collection of bibles from various centuries that is being shown in Europe and US cities highlight how the wording and interpretation has changed, significantly in many places.
Also you should study the history of Christianity outside of the King Jame''s version and see how the Catholic church rose and how Christianity became what it is today. And please don''t burn me at the stake for telling you the truth. Having knowledge outside what is taught in the bible doesn''t make me a witch.
lotsa love
CORN
Posted by singinrick
Nobody knows. You might think you know from a belief but that doesn''t make it a fact. You are an ignorant human like the rest of us.
I''''''''ve already accepted the Lord Jesus Christ as my personal Savior and I know where I''''''''m going when I die. Do you?
Posted by singinrick
I would guess you''re going to fill a hole in the ground unless you get cremated.
If you get cremated you will go in a jar.
It amuses me that people still follow these religious theories that were developed by uneducated primitives who had no choice but to rely on delusional assumptions to answer their questions of existence.
Posted by singinrick
All religions do that. As one of god''s slaves, it''s your job to tell them they''re wrong. It''s arrogant of you to claim you are absolutely right and everybody else is wrong.
Posted by singinrick
What did I do?
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 14
- next
See all 651 Comments