June 26, 2009 5:18 PM

Florida Dems May Get A Recount

By
Scott Conroy
(The Politico)  This story was written by Amie Parnes and Josephine Hearn.

Florida Democrats were moving forward Monday with a plan to redo their presidential primary using privately-funded mail-in ballots, a key state party official said, even though some congressional and party leaders had yet to sign on to the idea.

"We're huddling with state brass now," the official said. "The spotlight will be on us. We will have a detailed plan."

The official said the state party expected both the Clinton and Obama campaigns to eventually agree to the plan.

"They've seen the writing on the wall and they realize this is something they need to get behind," the official said. "Both campaigns have reacted favorably to the idea so far."

Both Florida and Michigan have been studying ways to hold re-votes now that the Democratic contest remains so close and their states could determine the winner. The states' previous primaries were held earlier in the election season than party rules allowed, prompting the Democratic National Committee not to count their delegates.

The plan would be funded with money raised by the Florida Democratic Party and possibly include the help of the campaigns, the official said. The plan would also provide for the possibility of voting auditors and third parties to provide independent accountability.

The plan could eventually call on the state to play an active role in the mail-in primary, something Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Florida, has been actively pushing.

Under the plan now being considered, Florida voters would receive mail-in ballots, with return postage, in mid-May and possibly face a late May or early June deadline for returning them, the state official said. Before it could be implemented, the mail-in plan would need to be voted on by the state party before heading to the Democratic National Committee for final approval, the state party official said.

The DNC would then conduct a 30-day public comment period before allowing the state party to move forward. If approved, the state party would then need at least three weeks to verify the mailing addresses of the 4 million Democrats who reside in the state before ballots could be sent.

Florida officials had been studying alternate voting methods well before the current controversy erupted, affording them a familiarity with mail-in voting even though the state does not typically conduct its primaries by that method.

Michigan Sen. Carl Levin suggested on ABC's "This Week" on Sunday that the mail-in option might work for Michigan as well.

A spokesman for Nelson (D-Fla.), a driving force behind Florida's mail-in plan, said the senator saw no other options to allow Florida voters a say in the nominating process.

"He's pretty much wedded to having the state do this with the cost going to the state party," said Nelson spokesman Dan McLaughlin. "We realize there are some significant obstacles but we also realize there's no recourse."

Florida Rep. Alcee Hastings (D) was amenable to the plan, if it could be funded.

"Look, if we can find the money and the voters want it, then I'm open to being convinced that this is the best course of action," he said.

Another Florida representative, however, had grave concerns about mail-in ballots. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D) said the plan would disenfranchise many voters, especially those in low income areas.

"I really don't think it's a good idea," she said. "It's fraught with problems and now is not the time to be experimenting when we're talking about stakes this high…We still have very raw nerves from the 2000 recount."

Plans for revotes in Florida and Michigan have stoked pointed divisions not only in the states themselves but nationwide.

Rep. Mike Doyle (D-Pa.), an uncommitted superdelegate from the Pittsburgh area, enthusiastically supported revotes.

"They've got to redo that," Doyle said. "There's no way we can go to Denver (the site of the Democratic National Convention) without those states having a say. Those are two huge states you're talking about. You can't disenfranchise those voters. "

But Rep. Jason Altmire, whose district lies next to Doyle's, said he was against it.

"I don't agree with that. A decision was made to not play by the rules. If they just waited, as Pennsylvania did, they would be fine. You cannot change the rules in the middle of the game."

As the Democratic nominating process dragged on with ever more complexity and, in some cases, acrimony, one Democrat called on DNC Chairman Howard Dean to convene a convene a group of party elders to short-circuit the process and help decide a nominee.

"The road to Denver, as it currently exists, is dotted with intra-party explosive devices (IEDs) with the potential to blow away our party's very real chance to capture the White House," wrote Missouri Rep. Emanuel Cleaver to Dean Thursday. "The Michigan and Florida predicament ... could explode at the convention and cause more casualties than we could imagine."
By Amie Parnes and Josephine Hearn

The Politico
  • Scott Conroy

    Scott Conroy is a National Political Reporter for RealClearPolitics and a contributor for CBS News.

Add a Comment See all 76 Comments
by beader59 March 13, 2008 4:20 PM EDT
Why recount? Obama chose not to have his name on the ballot and his campaign pushed hard for people to vote uncommitted. So in reality, he had a chance and chose not to take it. Anyway, the DNC was wrong to act so irresponsible and punish the voters. They have a right to make a difference just as Oregon does who votes so late.
Reply to this comment
by michael0004 March 12, 2008 5:20 PM EDT
"I believe that there is such a thing as being too late", Senator Obama on the campaign trail as to why the nation badly needs a change partisan deadlock in Washington at this time in order to solve serious national problems.

No wise nation would rewrite a treaty to disadvantage its citizens.
Similarly, no wise individual would rewrite a rule that does not at least offer him a WIN-WIN outcome.

Therefore, there is no wise way for Senator Obama to now redo the rules for Florida and Michigan that would disadvantage his campaign and advantage his opponent.

"I believe that there is such a thing as being too late", (Florida & Michigan) ... Senator Obama.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Agnim at 09:36 PM : Mar 11, 2008


Does Obama really think that he has any chance of winning in Florida or Michigan in November given his position to disenfrachise Florida and Michigan voters? If the Democratic party does this, it would virtually guarantee that McCain will be the next President. Could it be that Obama is more concerned about blocking Sen. Clinton''s nomination than he is about winning the Presidency in November. Maybe this is just a "dry run" for him this year as "practice" for running in 2012.
Reply to this comment
by irmarebecca March 12, 2008 5:06 PM EDT
Honestly, I don''t like Obama the more I see him, but I like him better than his supporters, especially those on CNN and MSNBC as well as some who post. However, being that we are almost evenly divided among Democrats, most being for Clinton (Most of Obamas are Independent/Republican), they need to be together. Because half of us will most likely stay home. I don''t believe true Democrats would vote McCain. However, I do believe that we have increasingly learned to dislike the "other" Democratic candidate. I, naturally want Hillary to head the ticket, because the majority of the Party wants her.....
Reply to this comment
by jack3213 March 12, 2008 11:01 AM EDT
HYPOCRITICAL AND DECEPTIVE, CLINTON WILL STOOP TO ANY LEVEL, BE A MONSTER, AND REINFORCE HER SCUM STATUS TO WIN A POSITION SHE IS NOT QUALIFIED FOR. SHE STANDS BY A MAN WHO CHEATS ON HER AND THIS IS A DISGRACE. WOMEN WHO ACCEPT THIS KIND OF BEHAVIOUR SHOULD NOT BE RESPECT ESPECIALLY BY OTHER WOMEN.
Reply to this comment
by rogerbarton March 12, 2008 4:07 AM EDT
People in Florida did not go to the polls to cast a check mark for their favorite Democratic Candidate as they knew it was just a beauty contest. They went to the polls to vote for or against Property Tax Reform (lowering of property taxes). We all knew the primaries did not matter.. So I do not want to hear that Florida is upset that their vote doesn''t count. I do not want to hear that it''s the Democratic National Committee that is to blame, when it''s our own Governor Crist and the state Run Republicans who voted to move the Date, knowing the consequences to doing this.

The Republicans do not want to run against Obama. They want to run against Hillary. The reason, Obama can out perform their candidate in raising cash, can steal independents and moderate republicans, and he and his campaign really have a way of bring out the vote. Hillary on the other hand, will ensure that the Republicans Vote, because of their distain for the Clintons. She also hasn''t proven herself as a good manager of her campaign and her fund raising really hasn''t been what it ought to be.

For those voters who state they will vote for McCain I say to them this. Do it. There is a good chance, you all are Hillary Voters, and frankly she already knifed her party in the back by telling you to vote for him if she doesn''t win. So DO IT. For those voters who state they will become independents. DO IT. That way you have no say in any primary. Independents cannot vote in Democratic or Republican Primaries.


Reply to this comment
by girlinvt-2009 March 12, 2008 3:38 AM EDT
1)The vote in Florida was a clean vote.The only problem with it was the date it was held.Now you have the Democratic party ignoring the will of the people. in these economic hard times the DNC wants to revote,all on the peoples dime.I think that the voters in Florida should let Dean and the Dnc know your displeasure let me tell you a 5 minute shut down for the state would open some eyes. 2)Amail in vote.Can you say a bigger laughing stock for the state of Florida if theres any question of wrong doing or fixing
Reply to this comment
by jack99123 March 12, 2008 2:44 AM EDT
It%u2019s a shame that American political decisions are so subjective and emotional%u2014because by any objective, logical standard, Clinton is far more qualified to be President than Barack Obama. Clinton is superior to Obama in terms of experience and intellect; she will be a Commander-in-Chief who commands immediate respect, something that is difficult to the point of impossibility to say about Obama.
Dennis Kucinich is more qualified to be President than Obama. There%u2019s no need to take shots at Obama%u2019s middle name in order to defeat him: all one has to do is look at his limited accomplishments in the Senate, his undistinguished track record in the Illinois Legislature, his connection to a radical, race-baiting church and his link to scandal-scarred financier Antoin Rezko. Some politicians make good Presidents in theory. Obama doesn%u2019t even pass that threshold.
Obama has skillfully exploited anti-Bush sentiment to become a political rock star%u2014but has yet to truly appeal to those who will make their electoral decisions based on something besides Bush-loathing.
Reply to this comment
by jack99123 March 12, 2008 2:43 AM EDT
I see that the TV media finally has started thinking that Clinton is the better candidate than Obama after bashing her since Jan 1. Also notice that all the Afro American commentators side with Obama all the time. How racist can you get ?CNN specially is anti Clinton. Donna Brazille, Kelli Goff , Roland Martin, Dan Lothian and Amy Holmes ( who is supposed to be representing the Republicans) always talk against Clinton. Similarly Gwen Ifill ( another Afro American) on PBS and Meet The Press always talks against Clinton. Shame on you all. 50% of the commentators on CNN are Afro Americans and are 100% of the time talking against Clinton.These are the same commentators who would not have any jobs if they were not Afro Americans. Obama should not be made President because he has only 14 months experience in US senate out of which he spent 14 months running for presidency
Executive Level experience is what is needed. and to be president national level experience is what is important. Obama has none. Hillary has been in the Senate for 86 month. Also Hillary was Governor''s wife in Arkansas for 8 years and later for 8 years'' President''s wife. She was not just a housewife. Being an attorney herself and a smart politician she was constantly advising Clinton and was his right hand person. Bill was named the best Governor and he was the best President with no deficits and strong economy under his administration and you have to give a lot of credit to her as well for this .
Reply to this comment
by jack99123 March 12, 2008 2:41 AM EDT
Wake up Chairman Howard Dean !!! You are destroying the Democratic Party by not seating Florida & Michigan. Mr. Obama , you have been claiming that you can unite the country. This is the time for you to unite the Democratic party. If you cannot unite the democrats , how are you going to unite the country? To do great things , you have to make great sacrifices. You are not winning the big states and winning mostly red states. Democrats can never win without the big states. So please agree to be the vice presidential candidate and beat the Republicans with the Dream Ticket. Look at yourself in the mirror and you will realize that you are not ready. Your ego has gone to your head and you are acting like a kid throwing tantrums ,who has yet to grow up and develop maturity. After 8 years you will be ready to be the President . We are going through the playoffs. The Superbowl is in November and Republicans will beat the sh*t out of us if you are on top of the ticket.
Reply to this comment
by jack99123 March 12, 2008 2:40 AM EDT
The GAMES are now over. The election in November is the real thing .The winner takes all the electoral votes in any state even though he wins by only one vote in that state. No more Caucuses and no more 4 to 1 money advantage to one candidate over the other. Hillary Clinton, has already won all the big states . Obama''s inexperience clearly shows here but it is too late for him. Hillary has 267 electoral votes from all the states she has won. Obama has 202 electoral vote including Wyoming & Missisipi. If we give Pennsylvania to Clinton and all the remaining states to Obama , Clinton will have 288 electoral votes while Obama will have 254. You tell me now who should be on top of the ticket?
Reply to this comment
See all 76 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook