Astronaut Calls NASA Robot A "Monster"
Building "Dextre" One Of Several Chores For Shuttle Astronauts in Mission Launching Tuesday
-
Astronauts bound for orbit this week will dabble in science fiction, assembling a "monstrous" two-armed space station robot named "Dextre" that will rise like Frankenstein from its transport bed. The seven Endeavour astronauts are scheduled to blast off Tuesday, March 11, 2008. (AP/Canadian Space Agency)
-
News Tools Space Place Your source for detailed, accurate information about the world of space exploration.
Putting together Dextre, the robot, will be one of the main jobs for the seven Endeavour astronauts, who are scheduled to blast off in the wee hours of Tuesday, less than three weeks after the last shuttle flight.
They're also delivering the first piece of Japan's massive Kibo space station lab, a float-in closet for storing tools, experiments and spare parts. For the first time, each of the five major international space station partners will own a piece of the real estate.
At 16 days, the mission will be NASA's longest space station trip ever and will include five spacewalks, the most ever performed while a shuttle is docked there. Three of those spacewalks will feature Dextre, which is sure to steal the show.
With 11-foot arms, a shoulder span of nearly 8 feet and a height of 12 feet, the Canadian Space Agency's Dextre - short for dexterous and pronounced like Dexter - is more than a little intimidating, at least for astronaut Garrett Reisman.
"Now I wouldn't go as far to say that we're worried it's going to go run amok and take over the space station or turn evil or anything because we all know how it's operated and it doesn't have a lot of its own intelligence," Reisman told The Associated Press last week.
"But I'll tell you something ... He's enormous and to see him with his giant arms, it is a little scary. It's a little monstrous, it is."
Dextre will be flying up aboard Endeavour in pieces, and it will be up to a team of spacewalking astronauts to assemble the 3,400-pound robot and attach it to the outside of the space station. That job will fall to Reisman, Michael Foreman and Richard Linnehan.
"I feel kind of like dad on Christmas Eve, you know, opening up this present and trying to put it together for the son or daughter and going, 'Whoa, what have I gotten myself into here with this 'some assembly required' part of the space station," Foreman said.
Reisman, who will be moving into the space station, can't wait to see Dextre rise from its shuttle transport pallet, rotating up "almost like it's Frankenstein's monster coming alive."
In reality, there's nothing sinister about Dextre. The robot, in fact, was once in the running to be the Hubble Space Telescope's savior.
Following the 2003 Columbia disaster, NASA canceled the last remaining Hubble repair mission by shuttle astronauts because of safety concerns, and considered sending Dextre up to do the job. The shuttle flight was restored after a change at NASA's helm - it's scheduled for late summer - and Dextre went back to being a space station assistant.
Dextre - which cost more than $200 million - was created by the same Canadian team that built the space shuttle and space station robot arms.
Equipped with a tool holster, Dextre is designed to assist spacewalking astronauts and, ultimately, to take over some of their dangerous outdoor work.
I feel kind of like dad on Christmas Eve, you know, opening up this present and trying to put it together for the son or daughter and going, 'Whoa, what have I gotten myself into here with this 'some assembly required' part of the space station?
Michael ForemanSpace station astronauts will be able to control Dextre, as will flight controllers on the ground. The robot will be attached at times to the end of the space station arm, and also be able to ride by itself along the space station arm's railway.
Canadian officials said they're convinced Dextre could have pulled off the Hubble repair job, and should have no problems replacing old batteries and other space station parts.
"It's quite surprising what a robot like Dextre can do with its sense of touch and its precision," said Daniel Rey, a Canadian Space Agency engineer who heads the project.
Dextre has only three tools, for now, versus the more than 100 tools available to spacewalking astronauts, Rey said. It will probably take months to learn how to properly use the robot; its first real job could come next year.
Linnehan, who worked on Hubble in 2002, wonders just how much Dextre will be able to do.
Even though it's suited for space station maintenance, astronauts are faster, Linnehan said. As for Hubble, he said Dextre cannot compare to a human repairman because it lacks fine motor control, and cannot think and react to problems that might crop up.
That said, Linnehan acknowledges it's "a cool project" that reminds him of Japanese animation shows from decades past, namely Gigantor the space-age robot. NASA officials agree that a big part of Dextre is learning how robots operate in space, for future exploration.
Dextre, by the way, isn't necessarily a "he."
"I tend to use 'he' because I think Dextre is a masculine name," Rey said. "But it's a robot. It's tele-operated. It doesn't have artificial intelligence yet. So I need to be more careful when I say 'he.' "
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
- It should be called Big AL after Al Gore, no brains and high maintenance costs.
Posted by jowand at 11:48 AM : Mar 10, 2008
Big "gay" Al??? Watch out for man/bear/pig. - Reply to this comment
- NASA is still a money pit, yes there is technology, but we didn''''t need space to create it.
Posted by fstop100
How amazingly short sighted--the space program in spin offs has paid for itself probably 100 times--life is not made up of meat and potatoes - Reply to this comment
- NASA is still a money pit, yes there is technology, but we didn''t need space to create it.
- Reply to this comment
- The technology spin-offs from space exploration have greatly improved life for many here on Earth.
Anyone who uses a computer, has space-exploration to thank!
Anyone who advocates for safer environmental practices for better air and water quality, has space-exploration to thank!
Anyone who advocates for efficient agricultural practices, has space-exploration to thank!
Anyone who advocates advocates for precision navagation and weather prediction, has space-exploration to thank!
There are not very many improvements over the last 50 years for people that are not tied to space-exploration. - Reply to this comment
We have to put the thing into space, where it will be safe from tap-tap-tapping Republicon lawmakers...- Reply to this comment
- NASA is a waste, it should be abolished.
Posted by fstop100
Is that your f-stop or your film speed? Anyway, humans can either expand into space or control our reproduction to decrease the population to a level sustainable by Earth. Frighteningly, I think the space option is the more realistic of the two. - Reply to this comment
- It should run for office on the republican ticket. It couldn''t be any less intelligent than who they''re putting up this year.
- Reply to this comment
- It should be called Big AL after Al Gore, no brains and high maintenance costs.
- Reply to this comment
- I wonder if they will install another one and call it DeeDee?
- Reply to this comment
- so what is the reason for this arm besides spend our tax dollars. NASA is a waste, it should be abolished.
- Reply to this comment
"Danger, Will, danger, we must get back to the ship!"
"What is it robot?"
"No time to discuss it Will,
my arms feel heavy"
Me thinks NASA is now beginning to have issues running out of ideas for "Lost In Space".- Reply to this comment
- He can call it a ''Monster'' if it isn''t running for office, LOL
- Reply to this comment
- Are you sure that they are not referring to Hillary???LOL
- Reply to this comment
- So what happens when some terrorist hacker breaks through Nasa''s network security and takes over control of the robot? A new summer blockbuster movie?
- Reply to this comment
- On human vs. machine probes of space, I suspect when it becomes painfully obvious a human cargo is an insufferable burden to mission design, someone at NASA quietly will move its political grandstands to a pasture somewhere, then decommission most (not all) of the spacesuits, and let machines come into their own.
Machine intelligence and vision have been a long time coming, but as Mercury, Gemini and Apollo programs matured, each assigned machines much more of the burden of spacecraft management.
Media may overplay the astronauts, and underplay the machine missions. Yet, considering what already has been accomplished in defining our solar system and galaxy, the machines are more likely to win. - Reply to this comment
- Yeah, could be Hillary, but the anatomy looks more like Bill. Definitely a ''monster'' either way.
- Reply to this comment
- Whoa am I ever the johnny come lately.
- Reply to this comment
- I thought it was off limits to use the word "monster". Shouldn''t he resign immediately, after, of course, making an over-the-top apology?
- Reply to this comment
- Hmmm .. an article about a *monster* called Dextre (pronounced *Dexter*) headlining on a CBS site ... coincidence?
- Reply to this comment
- You beat me to it marc,LOL
- Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.




