Bush Vetoes Bill Banning Torture
Says CIA May Need To Use Harsh Interrogation Techniques That Critics Call Black Mark On America
-
Photo
President Bush vetoed a bill that would have banned the use of waterboarding and other interrogation techniques considered torture by the CIA. The president claims such a prohibition will inhibit the collection of information. (CBS)
"The bill Congress sent me would take away one of the most valuable tools in the war on terror," the president said in his weekly radio address taped for broadcast Saturday. "So today I vetoed it."
The bill provides guidelines for intelligence activities for the year and includes the interrogation requirement. It passed the House in December and the Senate last month.
"This is no time for Congress to abandon practices that have a proven track record of keeping America safe," the president said.
Supporters of the legislation say it would preserve the United States' ability to collect critical intelligence, and raise the country's moral standing abroad.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Congress would work to override Mr. Bush's veto next week. "In the final analysis, our ability to lead the world will depend not only on our military might, but on our moral authority," said Pelosi, a California Democrat.
But based on the margin of passage in each chamber, it would be difficult for the Democratic-controlled Congress to turn back the veto. It takes a two-thirds majority, and the House vote was 222-199 and the Senate's was 51-45.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Mr. Bush often warns against ignoring the advice of U.S. commanders on the ground in Iraq. Yet the president has rejected the Army Field Manual, which recognizes that harsh interrogation tactics elicit unreliable information, said Reid, a Nevada Democrat.
"Democrats will continue working to reverse the damage President Bush has caused to our standing in the world," Reid said.
"Torture is a black mark against the United States," said California Senator Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat. "We will not stop until (the ban) becomes law."
Jennifer Daskal, senior counterterrorism counsel at Human Rights Watch, said Mr. Bush "will go down in history as the torture president" for defying Congress and allowing the CIA to use interrogation techniques "that any reasonable observer would call torture."
"The Bush administration continues to insist that CIA and other nonmilitary interrogators are not bound by the military rules and has reportedly given CIA interrogators the green light to use a range of so-called 'enhanced' interrogation techniques, including prolonged sleep deprivation, painful stress positions, and exposure to extreme cold," Daskal said. "Although waterboarding is not currently approved for use by the CIA, Attorney General Michael Mukasey has refused to take it off the table for the future."
In a statement on Friday, Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., said, "Unless Congress overrides the veto, it will go down in history as a flagrant insult to the rule of law and a serious stain on the good name of America in the eyes of the world."
He noted that the Army field manual contends that harsh interrogation is a "poor technique that yields unreliable results, may damage subsequent collection efforts and can induce the source to say what he thinks the (interrogator) wants to hear."
The intelligence bill would limit CIA interrogators to the 19 techniques allowed for use by military questioners. The Army field manual in 2006 banned using methods such as waterboarding or sensory deprivation on uncooperative prisoners.
President Bush's veto will be one of the most shameful acts of his presidency. ... It will go down in history as a flagrant insult to the rule of law and a serious stain on the good name of America in the eyes of the world.
Senator Edward Kennedy, D-Mass."We created alternative procedures to question the most dangerous al Qaeda operatives, particularly those who might have knowledge of attacks planned on our homeland," Mr. Bush said. "If we were to shut down this program and restrict the CIA to methods in the field manual, we could lose vital information from senior al Qaeda terrorists, and that could cost American lives."
The CIA director said in a memo Saturday to agency employees that it is not a choice between a "blanket application of the Army Field Manual or the legalization of torture."
The manual "does not exhaust the universe of lawful interrogation techniques," Mike Hayden wrote. "There are methods in CIA's program that have been briefed to our oversight committees, (that) are fully consistent with the Geneva Convention and current U.S. law, and are most certainly not torture."
He said military and intelligence missions are different. Hayden described the CIA program as a "tightly controlled and carefully administered national option that goes beyond the Army Field Manual" and has been a "lawful and effective response" to the threat of terrorism. "It will continue to be so as we work within the boundaries established by our nation's laws," he wrote.
The 19 interrogation techniques allowed in the Army Field Manual include the "good cop/bad cop" routine; making prisoners think they are in another country's custody; and separating a prisoner from others for up to 30 days.
Among the techniques the field manual prohibits are:
- hooding prisoners or putting duct tape across their eyes.
- stripping prisoners naked.
- forcing prisoners to perform or mimic sexual acts.
- beating, burning or physically hurting them in other ways.
- subjecting prisoners to hypothermia or mock executions.
But waterboarding is the most high-profile and contentious method in question.
It involves strapping a person down and pouring water over his cloth-covered face to create the sensation of drowning. It has been traced back hundreds of years to the Spanish Inquisition and is condemned by nations around the world and human rights organizations as torture.
The Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 includes a provision barring cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment for all detainees, including CIA prisoners, in U.S. custody. Many people believe that covers waterboarding.
There are concerns that the use of waterboarding would undermine the U.S. human rights efforts overseas and could place Americans at greater risk of being tortured when captured.
The military specifically prohibited waterboarding in 2006. The CIA also prohibited the practice in 2006 and says it has not been used since three prisoners were subjected to it in 2003.
But while some Bush administration officials have questioned the current legality of waterboarding, the administration has refused to rule definitively on whether it is torture. Mr. Bush has said many times that his administration does not torture.
The White House says waterboarding remains among the interrogation methods potentially available to the CIA.
"Because the danger remains, we need to ensure our intelligence officials have all the tools they need to stop the terrorists," Mr. Bush said.
Meanwhile, Newsweek reported earlier this week that the Canadian government is refusing to use testimony from alleged al Qaeda leader Abu Zubaydah in its prosecution of two terror suspects, because the testimony was acquired during CIA interrogations in which Zubaydah was waterboarded.
Newsweek quotes a Canadian spokesman as saying that the director of the nation's intelligence service finds torture "morally repugnant and not particularly reliable," and that information obtained through torture is not knowingly used.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 15
- next
See all 710 CommentsHe keeps admitting and rationalizing war crimes.
It is interesting that western society is taking no action.
It seems that Godless capitalism is the true belief and value system of society.
It makes it plausable to argue that the Nuhremberg trials were just a phoney show for a nieve public who still believes in God and right and wrong.
Once America set the tone for the world... a humanitarian tone...ask the French after WWI. Now we set the tone for authorized lawlessness. And our lead is affecting the wars in Africa.
THE LIFE OF ***EVERY TERRORIST IN THE WORLD*** IS NOT WORTH ONE MOMENT OF OUR LIBERTY OR DIGNITY OR PLACE IN THE WORLD AS A PEOPLE OF COMPASSION ...PLEASE TELL MR BUSH.
You...I mean you dear reader...are thousands of times more likely to die falling down the stairs TODAY than to be affected by terrorism. Want to "save American lives"...put treads on the stairwells and encourage folks to use the hand rail. That will save many many more American lives than all the efforts of the S.S. oops!...I mean homeland security.
When GWB allows himself to be secretly, ruthlessly and violently interrogated with the exact methods he is espousing...then MAYBE he has the moral right to torture others. Until then he is what he is...a below average, out of control, rich frat boy.
Bush is a total failure and an insult to the American people. He has hurt us so bad. The only reasonable answer is in Brattleboro, VT.
http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&q=torture&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi
Did or did not the United States try, convict and execute Japanese officers for doing this very same thing to American soldiers during WWII? Why was water boarding so very, very wrong and considered torture then and yet totally acceptable behavior now?
How it is possible this guy has not been tossed to the world court to be tried as a war criminal or not impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors against our constitution? At the very least he and his administration deserve to spend the rest of their miserable (and hopefully very long) lives behind bars.
http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&q=torture&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi
Posted by dmcar2000''
Yeah. How do you define *** things up.
Under Clinton the Nasdaq was over 5,000, under Bush its less than 2,000.
Under Clinton we actually had an annual budget surplus of 234 billion, under Bush he does not include the costs of Iraq in the equation and its still a 400 billion deficit.
Under Clinton the economy was booming and under Bush we have a recession.
Clinton was a far better president than Bush. All you need to do is look at the facts.
Think about why that might be and you see whats really going on, not what somebody feeding you the government line or competing for ratings and more advertising money is telling you.
Everyone needs to get beyond the emotions and preconceived thoughts from years of being told untruths be well meaning but misinformed people.
It''s not democrats verses republicans or vise verse, It''s them against us!
To many, this kind of argument is the same sort of argument that Hitler used to exterminate the Jews, Slavs, Gypsies, and even capture allied POW''s. Although many of the young neocon Fascist Nazi Republicans here have not lived thru it, there are many in Europe who still remember the "death camps", the Gestapo, the SS, the gas chambers and furnaces and the "experimentation labs" of sadists like Mengele. And there are many WW II former POW''s who fought Japan who remember the Japanese death marches, the slave labor camps, the nerve gas and biological "experiments" carried out on live POW''s, and ask any former Iron Curtin country citizen about the Russian gulags.
At the end of WW II, the Allies prosecuted and hung those responsible for these actions judging them as WAR CRIMES!
Today, those same crimes are HERE, in the US, and protected by neocon Fascist Nazi Republicans like the Great Emperor Bush II. If there is any justice in the world to be handed out today, it will be the Europeans job to do it because here, "impeachment is off the table".!!
SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!
sig heil, McCain????
"...restricted CIA personnel include the "good cop/bad cop" routine, making prisoners think they are in another country''s custody and separating a prisoner from others for up to 30 days."
Okay: Good Cop Bad Cop? I''m a terrorist who is willing to blow myself up, I doubt a little good cop/bad cop will make me reveal my terrorist plot.
They do not march in uniform or for a country, so they are enemy combatants and not entitled to the terms of the Geneva Convetion.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by zolefart
I have a better idea. Starve them, then give them a plate full of ham sandwiches.....
I hope you''re not a neocon trying to shift the focus. We will all concede that Kennedy is a politician (poli=many, tic=blood-sucking parasite) with a dubious past. This subject is too important to waste time on trivialities like Kennedy''s comments. Americans should be taking to the streets to (peacefully) protest Bush''s actions. Rather than protect Americans, his sanctioning torture can be used by terrorists to justify their actions, attract funding, and recruit new terrorists!
How pathetic when they don''t even seem to have enough evidence to bring these men to trial. And any evidence they did have was destroyed in their maniacal attempt to deny that they ever used waterboarding! Now any confessions they have will automatically be questioned as authentic.
The incompetence of the Neocon regime and their manifest destiny ideology is a plague that needs to be wiped out of existence.
Posted by rermay,
Yeah, he is not exactly a poster child for the Democratic party. However, when you consider Bush''s actions and the way he has ruined the dollar''s value with his short sighted economic policies, he hardly represents the majority of the GOP.
Get ready for some real bad political news on the first Tuesday in November.
Other highlights
sky high deficits
$4 a gallon gas
935 lies
4000 DEAD AMERICANS because of those lies
$2.5 Billion American taxpayers dollars) a week down the ******** in Iraq because of those lies.
heckuva job, Liar-in-Chief!
Posted by poopusbuttus,
Good one. Ouch!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by the74blaster
THanks :)
Posted by poopusbuttus,
Why waste the water when you have perfectly good ham sandwiches?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by the74blaster
Well, they have to have something to wash the sandwiches down with :P)
Of course he will. I swear, this man is the Devil reincarnated.
OMG, you guys sound like little grade school boys. Try entering into an intelligent adult discussion, for a change, instead of indulging in faith-bashing rhetoric. You risk alienating Muslims who don''t like the extremists, and what they have done in the name of Islam, any more than you do.
But let somebody in France break a U.S. copyright law, and send in the stormtroopers!
It is a wonder any nation anywhere respects any of our laws or any international laws that we favor - why should they, when our chickenhawk leaders pick and choose which they will obey?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by spacetruck9
SSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHUUUUUUUUUUUUUT UP YOU FREAK
Want to know what REAL torture is? From a CNN article describing an Al Qaeda torture manual:
"The manual, illustrated by graphic drawings, shows how to use drills to torture people, sever hands, drag people behind vehicles, use a blowtorch or clothes iron on skin, remove eyes and electrocute people, among other tactics."
Now THAT''s torture. Tell me the US is doing this, and maybe you whiners might have a point. In the meantime, stop wringing your hands over "waterboarding", and think about the people who jumped to their death from 110 floors up rather than be burned alive.
dont you know why, because bush/cheney and their saudi freinds have done what they set up to do in the first place..profit,big profit, money lots of money..
and take out america...remember 18 out of 19 hijackers were saudi''s.........think about it..obl is a ralitive of the saudi king......nothing will ever happen to him while king bush and queen cheney is in office.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 15
- next
See all 710 Comments