26-Year Secret Kept Innocent Man In Prison

Lawyers Tell 60 Minutes They Were Legally Bound From Revealing Secret

(CBS)  Asked if they contemplated doing something about it, Coventry told Simon, "We wrote out an affidavit. We made an affidavit that we had gotten information through privileged sources, that Alton Logan was not in fact guilty of killing the officer, that in fact somebody else did it."

"We wanted to put in writing, to memorialize, you know, to get a notarized record of the fact that we had this information back then so that if, you know, 20 years later, 10 years later, if something allowed us to talk, as we are now, we could at least we we'd at least have an answer to someone who says, 'You’re just making this up now,'" Kunz added.

They sealed the affidavit in an envelope and put the envelope in a lockbox to keep it safe under Coventry's bed.

While the attorneys kept silent about Logan's innocence, a jury convicted him of murder. Then the jurors had to decide whether to sentence him to death.

"I was in court the day they were dealing with the death penalty," Coventry recalled.

Asked why he went to court, he told Simon, "'Cause I had this information that this innocent guy was up there and the jury was deciding whether they’re gonna kill him or not."

Coventry said his heart was racing when he went into the courtroom. "It was just creepy. Knowing I was looking at the jurors thinking, 'My God, they’re going to decide to kill the wrong guy.'"

In the end, the jurors spared Logan's life.

"It was a 10 to 2 vote. Ten for, two against. Two individuals saved my life," Logan explained.

And the jurors saved Kunz and Coventry from coming forward. "We thought that somehow we would stop at least the execution. We weren't gonna let that go," Coventry told Simon.

"But instead he was sentenced to life in prison, and you did not do anything?" Simon asked.

"Right," Kunz said.

"So it’s just okay to prevent his execution if necessary, but it was not okay to prevent his going to prison for the rest of his life?" Simon asked.

"Morally there's very little difference and were torn about that, but in terms of the canons of ethics, there is a difference, you can prevent a death," Coventry replied.

"But the minute he was not sentenced to death, the minute he was sentenced to life in prison, you decided to do nothing?" Simon asked.

"Yes," Kunz said. "I can't explain it. I don't know why that made the difference but I know it did."

"There is no difference between life in prison and a death penalty. None whatsoever. Both are a sentence of death," Logan told Simon.

Logan said while he could sympathize with the attorneys' problem of not being able to speak up, he couldn't understand it. "'Cause if you know this is an innocent person, why would you allow this person to be prosecuted, convicted, sent to prison for all these years?" he asked.

[misslili2009]

if you all was in the legal business you would understand why the lawyers kept this a secret for so long. its not their fault its the priciple of the lawyer cliet privilage. they did what they was supose to do. they had to get permission from their client to release the information. even t hough it is wrong to know that the person is gnt guilty but its not up to the laawyers to decide what happens

[DianeGirl]

I think everyone is being very unfair to the lawyers. Yes, what happened to Alton Logon was terrible, but the lawyers did what they could. If they had violated their client's confidence, the information would have been inadmissable in court and so wouldn't have done Logon any good at all. They would have tanked their careers to salve their guilt without helping the man at all.
Obviously, Logan didn't get much of a trial to begin with and someone needs to take a look at the three so-called eyewitnesses that said he was the guilty one. Blaming the lawyers is just looking for a scape-goat.
Just a thought.

[ivehadit9]

Now, the least they can do is to delete Alton Logan's name from the prison records so that Mr. Logan can start life anew.

[elanshutz]

A law is needed to allow lawyers to go to the judge with "privileged" info in these rare cases. The law also needs to allow the judge to free innocent prisoners and announce that no further prosecution will be allowed because it would violate the attorney-client privilege. E. Anshutz, Tampa

[buscari]

Since our system is not based on truth, but the ability of one attorney to be trickier/smarter than the other, we will continue to get results *** the above.

Some attorneys recuse themselves, if they have a moral conflict with their client. (These guys say they did NOT have a moral conflict.) I am glib they will have the money and ''friends'' to get them off, should they be in the same position some day.

OVERVIEW: Because our system is unjust, crime and injustice have sky-rocketed in our country. Our system was created to rid us of justice for the rich and punishment for the poor. But the checks and balances are not there. It is well-known that someone who commits a crime, will continue escalating until held responsible, humbled and re-educated (if they are rehabilitatable). If they are not, then they deserve to be monitored and/or imprisoned for the rest of their lives. Allowing them to not be held responsible (or to buy out by bargaining)

Freedom is an earned/given right...because...a person is reared/educated into a socially responsible human being, not simply because he was born.

[specialkny]

This story should be told to all children so they can understand how corrupt and unreliable our justice system is. I hope 60 Minutes takes a look at the corruption within the Military Justice System also. There have been many similar cases that have happened to our troops. These two attorneys should be held liable for this man''s 26 year incarceration and forced to pay reasonable restituition to him and his family. They should also be lose their licens to practice along with the DA and Judge. Had it been one of their children they would understand.

[jim727]

One simple question

If it had been a member of these lawyers OWN families, anyone really think they would have kept silent?

If your answer is ''No'', then everything these lawyers say is 100% self serving BS

[madandev]

I agree with all the comments here. I watched the 60 Minutes, and was very much disgusted just by seeing the faces of those two *** lawyers.

Laws and rules are made to protect people, PEOPLE ARE NOT MADE TO PROTECT LAW. If these *** with all their education, social previlege and intellect could not protect the right of an innocent, they are worthless human being ( Sorry, they should not be called human). They certainly are one of those people who would have overjoyed Christ crucifaction, killing of innocent jews by Hitler''s, and torture of innocent human beings in Iraq, China, Sudan, and many, many other places, by terrorists and dictators. Put these idiots on trial and see what kind of defense they would produce.
The people with privilege have different norm, and use different color of glasses to see world through. And, there are some others, not so privileged but blessed with golden heart, and purely empathized to feel others suffering and pain as their own, and gladly sacrifice themslves for the sake of others. If you made even person to smile, and if you made one person to live with dignity for a day, in my vernacular, you have certainly lived your life with grace. These two scums of our time should not be given a platform to justify their inhumane behavior.

[jem888]

Jamie Kunz and Dale Coventy are disgusting. There is a special place in hell reserved for these two along with Adolf Hitler.

[twins4haygoo]

I agree the attorneys SHOULD HAVE found a way to make this information known. The scary thing is Mr. Logan was convicted of a crime HE DID NOT COMMIT. How do you find guilt of an "crime" when in FACT HE DID NOT COMMIT IT? How does evidence point to guilt if TRUE EVIDENCE DOESN''T EXIST. My point is this, Mr. Logan WAS found guilty and somehow the jurors "believed this beyond a shadow of DOUBT?"

[claremok]

This is so upsetting, Even if you were to loose your licence to practice law,
it would be worth saving an innocent man from prison.
How can you live with yourself? What in God''s name does Justice mean?
You were both clearly thinking about yourselves and only yourselves.

[pookie53-2009]

These lawyers and the false witnesses should be made to spend half their lives in jail; it''s the only they would know what it feels like.

[mgthman]

This is a perfect example of what is wrong with the law. It is not about fairness or right or wrong. It is about judging behavior against a set of rules without regard for truth or humanity. It turns out humans, like these two lawyers, who have no sense of morality or justice. They only know how to judge performance against a given set of rules. Each should be required to give Logan a million dollars, net of taxes, for what they have caused him to lose from the warped values they gained from their profession.

Fat chance! They will never be held accountable because the law is never held accountable for its immorality. Why? Because most people, let alone Logan, done wrong by it don''t have the $250 to $500 an hour to dole out to get their justice. Law is not only the most corrupt institution on the planet, supplanting even religion in that regard, but it also turns out folks like these two lawyers who have no clue how to even rationally think.

[ericv2644]

I wonder if it was a brother or father of the lawyers would they have been silent. I bet race played a significant role in their decision to remain silent.

[ericv2644]

Those lawyers should go to jail for conspiracy to lock up an innocent man for 26 years. They should not be able to hide behind the cannon of ethics. They have no ethics. Let them sit in jail and feel the pain of this man. They should be disbarred from the practice of law forever because they are exactly what is wrong with the Justice system. NO MORALS!

[gaye5]

I appreciate the ethics, but these two attorneys still could have led the courts to see that it was impossible for Logan to have done the crime, whilst keeping their secret..

How hard can it be to create a "cannon of ethics" for lawyers. Lie - lay your head down on your pillow at night and go on to be a politician. Apply those principals when you "represnet" the people!! I cannot find language strong enough to describe these men. Spinless cowards............despicable.......etc., etc. I am outraged.............the show took my breath away. We should all be scared to death knowing how our judicial system "works".........not!!

[dtron454]

All throughout history there have been those who chose to do the morally correct thing instead of the legally correct thing. Even though they have suffered the consequences, what they have done for their societies cannot be measured and will not be forgotten. Names like Rosa Parks, Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela, the list goes on.

I hope the two lawyers who failed to do the right thing take the time to read these comments. You had your chance follow the moral path and make a difference. Instead you chose to slither under a rock and hide like scum.

[dovestar]

This goes to show that a lawyer is lying even when his lips are NOT MOVING.

[dee241usa]

This story is a travesty. Not only because of the spineless attorneys who probably would not have cared about their clients %u201Cbest interests%u201D if the slain security guard was one of their family. But also because 60 Minutes gave no mention at all about the family of the victim. Because of the spineless duos actions, the victim%u2019s family and loved ones never got a chance to face the person responsible for the death of their loved one. It must have been like a slap in the face when they found out what really happened and why.