May 25, 2008
26-Year Secret Kept Innocent Man In Prison
Lawyers Tell 60 Minutes They Were Legally Bound From Revealing Secret
-
Play CBS Video Video Lawyers Keep 26-Year Secret Two lawyers tell Bob Simon about their decision to keep the secret that their client had committed a murder while an innocent man went to jail for the crime and remained there for 26 years.
-
Alton Logan (CBS)
-
News Tools 60 Minutes
Email AlertSign up for our 60 Minutes email alert.
This is a story about an innocent man who languished in prison for 26 years while two attorneys who knew he was innocent stayed silent. As correspondent Bob Simon reported earlier this year, they did so because they felt they had no choice.
Alton Logan was convicted of killing a security guard at a McDonald's in Chicago in 1982. Police arrested him after a tip and got three eyewitnesses to identify him. Logan, his mother and brother all testified he was at home asleep when the murder occurred. But a jury found him guilty of first degree murder.
Now new evidence reveals that Logan did not commit that murder, something that was not new to those two attorneys, who knew it all along but say they couldn't speak out until now.
Alton Logan's story cuts to the core of America's justice system.
Simon met Alton Logan in prison, where he's spent almost half of his life.
Asked if he still counts the months and days, Logan told Simon, "There’s no need to count the months and the days. Just count the years."
Logan said that during the first five or six years he was "consumed" by anger. "Then I come to the realization that 'Why be angry over something you can't control?'"
Logan, who maintains he didn't commit the murder, thought they were "crazy" when he was arrested for the crime.
Attorneys Dale Coventry and Jamie Kunz knew Logan had good reason to think that, because they knew he was innocent. And they knew that because their client, Andrew Wilson, who they were defending for killing two policemen, confessed to them that he had also killed the security guard at McDonald's - the crime Logan was charged with.
"We got information that Wilson was the guy and not Alton Logan. So we went over to the jail immediately almost and said, 'Is that true? Was that you?' And he said, 'Yep it was me,'" Kunz recalled.
"He just about hugged himself and smiled. I mean he was kind of gleeful about it. It was a very strange response," Kunz said, recalling how Wilson had reacted.
"How did you interpret that response?" Simon asked.
"That it was true and that he was tickled pink," Kunz said.
"He was pleased that the wrong guy had been charged. It was like a game and he'd gotten away with something. But there was just no doubt whatsoever that it was true. I mean I said, 'It was you with the shotgun-you killed the guy?' And he said, 'Yes,' and then he giggled," Coventry added.
The problem was the killer was their client. So, legally, they had to keep his secret even though an innocent man was about to be tried for murder.
"I know a lot of people who would say, 'Hey if the guy's innocent you've got to say so. You can't let him rot because of that,'" Simon remarked.
"Well, the vast majority of the public apparently believes that, but if you check with attorneys or ethics committees or you know anybody who knows the rules of conduct for attorneys, it’s very, very clear-it's not morally clear-but we're in a position to where we have to maintain client confidentiality, just as a priest would or a doctor would. It's just a requirement of the law. The system wouldn't work without it," Coventry explained.
So that was the dilemma. They couldn't speak out, they felt, but how could they remain silent?
Produced By Robert Anderson and Casey Morgan
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right

- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 33
- next
See all 653 CommentsObviously, Logan didn't get much of a trial to begin with and someone needs to take a look at the three so-called eyewitnesses that said he was the guilty one. Blaming the lawyers is just looking for a scape-goat.
Just a thought.
Some attorneys recuse themselves, if they have a moral conflict with their client. (These guys say they did NOT have a moral conflict.) I am glib they will have the money and ''friends'' to get them off, should they be in the same position some day.
OVERVIEW: Because our system is unjust, crime and injustice have sky-rocketed in our country. Our system was created to rid us of justice for the rich and punishment for the poor. But the checks and balances are not there. It is well-known that someone who commits a crime, will continue escalating until held responsible, humbled and re-educated (if they are rehabilitatable). If they are not, then they deserve to be monitored and/or imprisoned for the rest of their lives. Allowing them to not be held responsible (or to buy out by bargaining)
Freedom is an earned/given right...because...a person is reared/educated into a socially responsible human being, not simply because he was born.
If it had been a member of these lawyers OWN families, anyone really think they would have kept silent?
If your answer is ''No'', then everything these lawyers say is 100% self serving BS
Laws and rules are made to protect people, PEOPLE ARE NOT MADE TO PROTECT LAW. If these *** with all their education, social previlege and intellect could not protect the right of an innocent, they are worthless human being ( Sorry, they should not be called human). They certainly are one of those people who would have overjoyed Christ crucifaction, killing of innocent jews by Hitler''s, and torture of innocent human beings in Iraq, China, Sudan, and many, many other places, by terrorists and dictators. Put these idiots on trial and see what kind of defense they would produce.
The people with privilege have different norm, and use different color of glasses to see world through. And, there are some others, not so privileged but blessed with golden heart, and purely empathized to feel others suffering and pain as their own, and gladly sacrifice themslves for the sake of others. If you made even person to smile, and if you made one person to live with dignity for a day, in my vernacular, you have certainly lived your life with grace. These two scums of our time should not be given a platform to justify their inhumane behavior.
it would be worth saving an innocent man from prison.
How can you live with yourself? What in God''s name does Justice mean?
You were both clearly thinking about yourselves and only yourselves.
Fat chance! They will never be held accountable because the law is never held accountable for its immorality. Why? Because most people, let alone Logan, done wrong by it don''t have the $250 to $500 an hour to dole out to get their justice. Law is not only the most corrupt institution on the planet, supplanting even religion in that regard, but it also turns out folks like these two lawyers who have no clue how to even rationally think.
I hope the two lawyers who failed to do the right thing take the time to read these comments. You had your chance follow the moral path and make a difference. Instead you chose to slither under a rock and hide like scum.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 33
- next
See all 653 Comments