CRAWFORD, Tex., Mar. 1, 2008

Bush: No Promises On Troop Withdrawals

Declines To Repeat Administration Promises Of Bringing U.S Troops From Iraq Before Term's End

  • President Bush at a news conference at his ranch in Crawford, Texas today, said he would not promise that troop levels in Iraq would be cut before he left office. Photo

    President Bush at a news conference at his ranch in Crawford, Texas today, said he would not promise that troop levels in Iraq would be cut before he left office.  (AP Photo/Haraz N. Ghanbari)

(AP)  President Bush declined Saturday to repeat promises made by others in his administration that more U.S. troops will return home from Iraq than scheduled before he leaves office.

Decisions about troop cuts beyond those now planned through July would be based on generals' recommendations, the president said.

"There is going to be enormous speculation," he said in a joint appearance at his ranch with Denmark's prime minister, Anders Fogh Rasmussen. But, Bush said, "My sole criteria is that whatever we do, it ought to be in the context of success."

He did suggest strongly that Iraq's provincial elections in October will require bringing more troops home to wait until after the voting.

"I think our generals ought to be concerned about making sure there's enough of a presence so that the provincial elections can be carried out in such a way that democracy advances," he said.

A senior administration official had told reporters during a briefing Friday at the White House, "I fully expect there to be more reductions this year — and so does the president."

Troop withdrawals are scheduled to bring the U.S. force presence in Iraq down to 15 brigades by July, for a troop total of about 140,000.

The top U.S. commander in Iraq, Gen. David Petraeus, makes his next required report to Mr. Bush in early April. He is expected to recommend the president wait for about four weeks to six weeks after the end of that round of cuts before deciding upon more, in order to assess the impact on the insurgency, Iraqi government's readiness and security gains. That would put off any new decision about cuts until August or September at the earliest, and Mr. Bush's remarks seemed to suggest it would come even later.

A chief topic of the talks between Mr. Bush and Fogh Rasmussen was NATO's increasingly tough fight in Afghanistan against militants.

The U.S., so far unsuccessfully, has pressed for some NATO members to send more troops to Afghanistan and drop military restrictions that the U.S. says hampers the effort. Mr. Bush and Fogh Rasmussen made the case again.

"We expect people to ... carry a heavy burden," Bush said.

The president sought to strike a balance between berating allies and meeting an urgent goal. "I understand that there's certain political considerations on certain countries," he said. But Mr. Bush said his message during a NATO summit in Romania in early April will be to both thank contributing nations and "encourage people to contribute more."

Added the prime minister: "We need more troops in Afghanistan."

All 26 NATO nations have troops serving with the mission. The fighting in Afghanistan is at its most intense since the Taliban government was driven from power by U.S. forces in 2001.

But those in the southern front lines — mainly Canada, Britain, the U.S. and the Netherlands — are irked that others countries such as Germany, Italy, France and Spain restrict their forces to the relatively peaceful north and west. Canada has threatened to pull out its combat troops from the south if other NATO members do not come through.

A senior administration official said Friday that while there should be no expectation of "a surge of NATO" to come out of the Romania summit, there are likely to be "announcements that will be helpful." The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to more candidly describe White House thinking, did not elaborate.

There are increasing signs that France, under the new leadership of President Nicolas Sarkozy, appears ready to answer the call. The White House hopes that such a decision would encourage similar ones from other countries, or at least keep Canada from leaving.

The United States has 29,000 troops in Afghanistan, both as part of the NATO mission and in its own terror-fighting and training efforts, and is sending an additional 3,200 Marines in April. Denmark has about 600 Danish troops in the south.

Mr. Bush declined to criticize Iraq's government for inviting Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, to Baghdad. The trip Sunday will be the first ever to Iraq by an Iranian leader. Bush suggested it was normal for neighbors to visit.

But he did seize on mention of the subject to offer his own pointed message to Tehran: "Stop exporting terror."

With U.S. hostility toward Iran growing over its suspected nuclear weapons program, Mr. Bush said, "The international community is serious about continuing to isolate Iran until they come clean about their nuclear ambitions."

Mr. Bush also offered advice for what Iraq's prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, should say to Ahmadinejad. The U.S. accuses Iran of seeking dominance over Iraqi affairs and of training and supplying Shiite militia fighters with the ability to target Americans; Tehran has denied the charge.

"The message needs to be: Quit sending in sophisticated equipment that's killing our citizens and that the message will be that we're negotiating a long-term security agreement with the United States precisely because we want enough breathing space for our democracy to develop."

Denmark is hosting an important climate meeting in December 2009 and the prime minister used his appearance with Mr. Bush to push for U.S. contributions to reducing carbon emissions to slow global warming.

"We need a comprehensive global agreement and American leadership is needed to reach that goal," Fogh Rasmussen said.

He also pleaded for American leadership to persuade fast-growing nations such as China and India to cut emissions.

One delicate topic that did not come up in public was Denmark's decision to investigate claims the CIA secretly used an airport on his country's remote Arctic territory of Greenland as part of the CIA's "extraordinary rendition" program for suspected terrorists.

The trip to the ranch was a diplomatic coup for Fogh Rasmussen. He pedaled around Camp David in Maryland with Mr. Bush in 2006 and went mountain biking with the president at the ranch Friday.

Mr. Bush said the two biked Saturday morning before their appearance — and he seemed in awe of his visitor. "The man did not even break into a sweat," Mr. Bush said, before serving his guest cheeseburgers and potato salad for lunch. "You're in incredible condition."

Fogh Rasmussen was gracious, calling his visit "a challenging stay, I must say."

"You made me work very hard out there," he said.

© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Video and Galleries from U.S.

Add a Comment See all 268 Comments
by waynabq March 1, 2008 4:12 PM PST
Monkeyboy needs to be sent over to Iraq after he leaves office for the duration of the Iraq occupation/"war".
Reply to this comment
by forthepeopl1 March 1, 2008 4:14 PM PST
The world is a better place without this man in it," State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said. "One way or the other, he was brought to justice."

LETS ALL AMERICANS PRAY FOR BUSH AND ALL HIS ADMINASTRATION TO BE BLOWN UP...AND THEY COME OUT FROM CONGRESS AND SAY THAT..BECAUSE IT WOULD BE THE BEST NEWS OF THE YEAR
Reply to this comment
by waynabq March 1, 2008 4:16 PM PST
John McCAin says the USA will stay in Iraq for at least the next 100 years. This misguided war is why we now pay over $3 per gallon of gasoline. Want more Corporate control of Americas political system, then either Hillary of McCain are for you.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by neoconism at 04:12 PM : Mar 01, 2008

Liberals are so dumb, don''t they realize after we invade we would be welcomed with flowers and candy and Iraq''s oil would pay for the war and make the price of oil cheaper!!! Bring it On and Mission Accomplished.

Don''t all you "Liberals" feel pretty dumb for not believing Bush/Cheney/Rove? Viva Bush 2008 and Rush Limbaugh for VP. YeeHa!!!
Reply to this comment
by waynabq March 1, 2008 4:18 PM PST
To call Bush supporters morons would be an unforgiveable insult to morons.
Reply to this comment
by omega39-2009 March 1, 2008 4:21 PM PST
Liberals are so dumb, don''''t they realize after we invade we would be welcomed with flowers and candy and Iraq''''s oil would pay for the war and make the price of oil cheaper!!! Bring it On and Mission Accomplished.

Posted by waynabq

True but if it had happened that way we would all have been screwed on Valentine''s day as they claimed the demand for flowers and candy in Iraq was responsible for driving up the price.
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 March 1, 2008 4:29 PM PST
But, Bush said, "My sole criteria is that whatever we do, it ought to be in the context of success."

Ummmm, knock, knock! Since you don''t know what success is and never have...it will appear that we need to decide what our success really means.
Reply to this comment
by dsproull March 1, 2008 4:38 PM PST
This President has got to be the biggest "BOOB" and "WORST" we have ever had. He babel''s like an idiot.Said the other day he didn''t know that gas was reaching $4.00 a gallon along with every other statment he utters. He is a true IDIOT and from what I have read we have seen nothing yet.
Reply to this comment
by tracy1471 March 1, 2008 4:43 PM PST
Why do they continue to call it a reduction in troops when all they are doing are bringing our men and women who are already over there BUT replace them by sending more over there?
Reply to this comment
by racam_us March 1, 2008 4:47 PM PST
Bush can''t guarantee any more troop cuts. Bush can''t do anything about gas prices. Bush can do almost anything those blind Republican followers will let him. But can they do it on their own? No, there are also a lot of blind Democratic rollovers that blindly follow him. Our government is definitely out of control. We need to start with a clean slate. But that is not possible either because of blind voters who rationalize that he is doing what is necessary. People in this country are apathetic or either stupid. I think the Democrats are perhaps apathetic and the Republicans are just stupid. The Republican Party is going to be led by a man who blatantly says that troops will stay in Iraq for the next 100 years. McCain is a ruthless man along the lines of Cheney. A vote for him is not a vote for change and it is certainly not being conservative. The other party is offering a ticket that is not much better. Clinton is part of the good old boys of politics, while Obama is not experienced enough to make a good Governor much less a President and Ralph Nader is a seasonal joke that it seems we must endure every four years. If this is the best that we have to run the country for the next four years - God help us.
Reply to this comment
by mcv57 March 1, 2008 4:48 PM PST
What! "No promises." Since when did the Bushman keep a promise and tell the truth in the first place. What a waste of journalism time.
Reply to this comment
by singingrick March 1, 2008 4:52 PM PST



What''s the difference between Iraq and Viet Nam?

Bush actually had a plan to get out of Viet Nam.


lol!



Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 March 1, 2008 5:01 PM PST
Ye mean blind minded don''t ye. BE CAREFUL ON HOW YE USE THE WORD BLIND. The congress is fully sighted ,I am not. AMEN. I was told when I was 21 that if we America ever mess with the middle east God help our asre. This illegal war is over oil and oil only. Both Bush father and son started it. And now we are paying for it. EVERY ONE IN THIS NATION AND THE POOR IS HIT THE HARDEST. I CAN''T CAN''T DRIVE. I am legally blind and 53.
Reply to this comment
by barbaraf4 March 1, 2008 5:02 PM PST
I can''t believe that arrogant son of a b*i*t*c*h is still in office. Haven''t we impeached him yet?
Reply to this comment
by joyous88 March 1, 2008 5:08 PM PST
mccain would have us still in vietnam, and in iraq for many years, too much money to be made to pull out,

and the criminal president , his little surge would be shown for the joke that it truely is if he pulled out one single soldier
Reply to this comment
by randynason March 1, 2008 5:10 PM PST
Bush said, "My sole criteria is that whatever we do, it ought to be in the context of success."

Isn''t this statement, in fact, an oxymoron... spoken by one?


Reply to this comment
by singingrick March 1, 2008 5:11 PM PST


The surge is working. Halliburton''s stock is going through the roof! Bush and Chaney will both retire multi-millionares.





Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 March 1, 2008 5:12 PM PST
Oh well, I am sorry to the men and woman in Iraq that you will not be comming home. However, you must realize that in the end it will serve a greater purpose. The removal of the Republicans for the next 40 years they will never see power again.

And to my fellow Americans I know that next January seems like a long to time wait but it will be for the better. This long wait will teach you that you must pay attention to whom you vote for and never give them a second chance.

It will take at leat 30 years to clean up the mess ''s Repulbicans have made and another 10 years to get us on the right course again.

The problem is most of us who remember the Republcians will be gone by then and they can lie their way back into power just like they did in the 90''s. Our parents were right they had to live through MaCarthy and now we had to live through Bush.
Reply to this comment
by walt1944-2009 March 1, 2008 5:27 PM PST
The Great Emperor Bush II has stated that he will leave it up to his generals to decide when soldiers will come home and he will abide by those decisions.

Of course, the Great Emperor''s generals know full well that the Great Emperor frowns on soldiers coming home when they should make their "sacrifices" for the cause of defeating "terrrrrrrrorism" and protecting the profits of BIG OIL!! Any general who brings troops home sooner than the Great Emperor wants, stands the risk of being busted down to private or maybe even labeled as an in league with Al Qeada and arrested as an "enemy combatant"!

So, the end result is that all those soldiers in Iraq and other places in the MIddle East will have to continue making the "sacrifice" there until they are ready to either collect what is left of Social Security, or be sent home in a body bag!

After all, wasn''t it the older clone of the Great Emperor Bush II, John "the Great Pretender" McCain who said he intends on staying in Iraq for the next 100 years!!!

SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!
sig heil, McCain???
Reply to this comment
by slim1h2o March 1, 2008 5:48 PM PST
I do not believe shrubs elevator goes all the way to the top. But I could be wrong.

Posted by dragonwagon5 at 05:29 PM : Mar 01, 2008

No,, It doesn''t. It''s stuck in the basement..
Reply to this comment
by waynabq March 1, 2008 5:52 PM PST
The surge is working. Halliburton''''s stock is going through the roof! Bush and Chaney will both retire multi-millionares.








--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by singingrick at 05:11 PM : Mar 01, 2008

Wow, what a change of heart. Weren''t you one of the fools not too long ago singing the praises of Bush/Cheney? The dangers of "Liberalism" and the wonders and joy of Rush Limbaugh. Give me a break already.
Reply to this comment
by ringading3 March 1, 2008 5:56 PM PST
Don''t listen to the DemonCrap quiters, let''s go for a WIN!
Reply to this comment
by glossypan March 1, 2008 5:56 PM PST
King George The Decider has spoken.
It''s only $275,000,000 per DAY.
Get over it - get a second job to pay the interest on that money and make up for the runaway inflation borrowing it causes.
Get with the program.
Four More Years
Reply to this comment
by displeased March 1, 2008 5:59 PM PST
Don''''t listen to the DemonCrap quiters, let''''s go for a WIN!
Posted by RingADing3

Win what?
Reply to this comment
by myidoncbs March 1, 2008 5:59 PM PST
"My sole criteria is that whatever we do, it ought to be in the context of success." - GW BU.ll.SH.it

In order to succeed at anything, you have to have some well-defined goal. Otherwhise, how will you ever know that you have succeeded? Bush has no end-game for Iraq because every reason he ever gave for entering Iraq was a LIE. As each lie was exposed, another lie was created to replace it. That process has NO END.

Vote for McCain, and you guarantee this stu.pid game of death will continue forever.

BTW: don''t you think Bush looks like an angry hawk (literally) in the picture above?
Reply to this comment
by popstom1 March 1, 2008 6:01 PM PST
Bush and Cheney are multi millionares the word you looking for is billionares
Reply to this comment
by myidoncbs March 1, 2008 6:05 PM PST
terrorislama, you are repeating the same, old, tiresome, BS. You know as well as I do that the God of the Babble, the one the Christians and the Jews worship, commanded His followers to kill off everybody who worships some other god, too!

Oh, and btw, it turns out THAT''S THE SAME GOD that the Muslims worship, too! All the stupid bickering has been about which prophet or messenger or offspring of God to believe in. It''s the same, bloodthirsty SOB that you ALL worship!

PS did your SPAM bet you banned? Is that why you now have a different name, terrorislama (terrorislam0, terririslam8, etc.)? Or, are you just so dammmed stu.pid that you can''t remember your password from one day to the next?

Reply to this comment
by inventagod March 1, 2008 6:15 PM PST

Bu$h: blahblahblah
Reply to this comment
by lewiston14 March 1, 2008 6:16 PM PST
cheeseburgers and potato salad for lunch?

How cheep where is the BBQ ribs and pulled pork
Reply to this comment
by gkc99 March 1, 2008 6:17 PM PST
"President Bush declined Saturday to repeat promises made by others in his administration that more U.S. troops will return home from Iraq than scheduled before he leaves office. "

Because Bushit''s plan is the permanent occupation of Iraq''s oilfields and, coincidentally, Iraq.

If McBushit wins, plan on it to continue throughout his adminstration--"100 years!"
Reply to this comment
by kissamaarse March 1, 2008 6:30 PM PST
Bush: the greatest American tragedy of all time.
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 March 1, 2008 6:33 PM PST
John McCain"s trillion dollar "Great Society" plan for Iraq.

(Who"s going to pay for it, John ?)


http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/Issues/fdeb03a7-30b0-4ece-8e34-4c7ea83f11d8.htm


Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 March 1, 2008 6:35 PM PST
If you liked LBJ"s "Great Society," you"ll love John McCain"s.

It"s many times more expensive.
Reply to this comment
by cyberus-2009 March 1, 2008 6:35 PM PST
Gee .. the *surge* turns out to be a huge troop increase after all .. whoda thunk it
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 March 1, 2008 6:37 PM PST
John McCain"s bottom line:

Only BIG WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT action can solve the problems in Iraqi Society.

Reply to this comment
by jerr11 March 1, 2008 6:42 PM PST
No Promises?

More like no more lies about bringing the troops home.

Liar-in-Chief - Butcher of Crawford.

Heckuva job, Bushit!

Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 March 1, 2008 6:42 PM PST
"Great" minds think alike.

McCain, LBJ and the Great Society.

"It is now our turn to demonstrate that our power, ennobled by our principles, is the greatest force for good on earth today. Iraq''s transformation into a secure democracy and a force for freedom in the greater Middle East is the calling of our age. We can succeed." -Senator John McCain

"Will you join in the battle to build the Great Society, to prove that our material progress is only the foundation on which we will build a richer life of mind and spirit? There are those timid souls who say this battle cannot be won; that we are condemned to a soulless wealth. I do not agree. We have the power to shape the civilization that we want. But we need your will, your labor, your hearts, if we are to build that kind of society. Those who came to this land sought to build more than just a new country. They sought a new world. So I have come here today to your campus to say that you can make their vision our reality. So let us from this moment begin our work so that in the future men will look back and say: It was then, after a long and weary way, that man turned the exploits of his genius to the full enrichment of his life." - Lyndon B. Johnson, May 22, 1964


Reply to this comment
by tbweb March 1, 2008 6:47 PM PST
Bush: No Promises On Troop Withdrawals

President Bush''s attitude and stubbornness in regards to Iraq is why Sen. Obama is doing so well. Even though Iraq is not the top story in the news cycle of late, Americans want their Tax Revenue spent on the U.S., not on Iraq! In the context of the Iraq War if Americans want the War to continue they can Vote for a Bush third term and elect Sen. McCain, if Americans want the Iraq War to end and Americans to come home they can elect Sen. Obama, its really as simple as that. Sen. Clinton won''t end the Iraq War as quickly as Sen. Obama will and Sen. Clinton is subject to changing her mind if pressured.
Reply to this comment
by glossypan March 1, 2008 6:55 PM PST
*894th of 899 in his graduating class at the US Naval Academy.
*One of the Keating Five. In fact received the most campaign loot from Keating in return for keeping federal regulators off his back.
*A social liberal - author of such bills as the McCain - Bingaman Immigrant Health Care Bill which would have allowed American taxpayers to pay for all health care, not just emergency care, for illegal immigrants.
*Advocate of George Bush''s most disastrous and unpopular policy: Eternal War - Borrow & Spend
========================
Would one of you Republicans please explain to me why John McCain is a shoo-in for your party''s prsidential nomination.
Reply to this comment
by eyeballer7 March 1, 2008 7:00 PM PST
"Decisions about troop cuts beyond those now planned through July would be based on generals'' recommendations, the president said."

It is truly a sad state of affairs that Bush can count on Americans being ignorant enough to fall for this kind of rubbish. In the United States of America, the military is subservient to the civilian leadership. Bush is the Commander in Chief. He decides whether and when to pull troops out or keep them in Iraq, NOT the military. Notice how the supposed ''liberal media'' do not even bother to point out this elementary fact. They just parrot the administration line like the nice lap poodles they are.

What a poor excuse for a president, hiding behind his generals like this. Clinton may have left a little stain on a blue dress, but what a permanent stain Bush has left on the US Constitution and the reputation of the United States of America.
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 March 1, 2008 7:19 PM PST
What is the the difference between Veit Nam and Iraq..OIL..
Reply to this comment
by cyberus-2009 March 1, 2008 7:21 PM PST
========================
Would one of you Republicans please explain to me why John McCain is a shoo-in for your party''''s prsidential nomination.

Posted by glossypan at 06:55 PM : Mar 01, 2008
----------
I''m an Independent but I''ll field this one ... in order for McCain to lose the nomination he would have to lose every state left to vote AND have all of Romney''s delegates move to Huckabee and then it would still be close (not sure about numbers to last decimal). So if McCain takes the win this Tues he''ll have it locked down.
Reply to this comment
by knyghtwolf March 1, 2008 7:45 PM PST
Satan got all the greatest political minds in the 20th century together and appeared in the oval office to confront bush & cheney and announced that he would continue the war in Iraq IF between Hitler, Mussolinni, Chairman Mao, Nixon, Ronald Reagan, and OJ Simpson, along with bush & cheney, could produce 2 feet of combined manhood. At last, it got down to 20 inches and only bush & cheney were left to finish the contest and behold, there was just enough to continue the war and satan disappeared. After all had returned to their historical places, bush & cheney looked at each other and exclaimed thank goodness we both had hard*on''s, eh.
Reply to this comment
by terrorislame March 1, 2008 7:56 PM PST
UAE to add a new state soon!
Yes,the United Arab Emirates whose headquarters is in
Dubai,announced this earlier today. King Al Seaweed da Walleyed said the area formerly known as the United States of America will be formally annexed in January of 2009.
"We welcome the serfs of King W. Shrub" King Al said.We understand that many of people are braindead, but we think we can continue to use them just the same. " The people who belonged to ReCon party will be
put to work shoveling sand in the desert." There`s not much else we can do with them,since their brains are mushy."
The people who belonged to democratic party will be imprisoned,according to press secretary Condomless Rice.The resources that have not been ravaged yet will be government property.
King Al added " King W. Shrub did an outstanding job convincing his people . The years of lies and deception have paid great dividends for our country "( the UAE ).Insiders say they look to add more states in the future.
Reply to this comment
by guadalcanal3 March 1, 2008 7:58 PM PST
Actually is was Nixon who got us out of Vietnam.
Reply to this comment
by terrorislame March 1, 2008 8:04 PM PST
UAE to add a new state soon!
Yes,the United Arab Emirates whose headquarters is in
Dubai,announced this earlier today. King Al Seaweed da Walleyed said the area formerly known as the United States of America will be formally annexed in January of 2009.
"We welcome the serfs of King W. Shrub" King Al said.We understand that many of people are braindead, but we think we can continue to use them just the same. " The people who belonged to ReCon party will be
put to work shoveling sand in the desert." There`s not much else we can do with them,since their brains are mushy."
The people who belonged to democratic party will be imprisoned,according to press secretary Condomless Rice.The resources that have not been ravaged yet will be government property.
King Al added " King W. Shrub did an outstanding job convincing his people . The years of lies and deception have paid great dividends for our country "( the UAE ).Insiders say they look to add more states in the future.
Reply to this comment
by cbsblogger March 1, 2008 8:33 PM PST
Tucker says: The choice seems fairly clear.

Want unlimited perpetual war and $10 a gallon gasoline? Vote Hillary or McCain.

Want peace and prosperity? Vote for Obama.
=====================================

Sorry but there is another just as credible candidate that would repair our tattered image and economy....Ron Paul. He would be the most independent from outside interests. He''s made a career out of it.

But I agree with you on Hillary and McCain.
Reply to this comment
by fiteit1 March 1, 2008 9:21 PM PST
Bush said, "My sole criteria is that whatever we do, it ought to be in the context of success."

What would Bushit know about success? Mr. Mission accomplished. I guess if you put his idea of success into prospective it would sound something like this. He succeeded to convince the public that 9/11 was solely a terrorist act. He succeeded to convince the people Sadam had weapons of mass destruction. He succeeded to convince people that he is still looking for Bin Ladin. He succeeded to convince people that Iraq was a safe haven for Alqida. He succeeded to convince people that it%u2019s okay to lose freedoms and rights to him in exchange for safety from terrorism. He succeeded to convince people that torture is okay for the U.S. but not others. He succeeded to convince people that the firings of the State attorney generals were not politically motivated. He succeeded to convince people that no one needs to find the real leak exposing CIA agent Valerie Plame. He succeeded to convince people that contempt of congress is okay if he says you can brake the law. He has just too many successes to list all of them.
Reply to this comment
by tibu987 March 1, 2008 9:22 PM PST
I predict that before the November elections Bush will announce a major troop pullout from Iraq. In the meantime, we will lose more American lives and of course the collateral damage, the deaths of innocent Iraqi men, women and children.
But hey, that''s war.
Then there''s the cost of the war, $2.4 billion a week.
But hey, that''s war.
If you want more of the same, vote for Hillary or McCain, if you are looking for solutions, vote for Obama.
I am.
Reply to this comment
by tbweb March 1, 2008 9:54 PM PST
The Iraq War has made Iran stronger, a nation that is the sworn enemy of the U.S. and Israel. After spending over a half a trillion dollars on the Iraq War, all the U.S. has done is made Iran the major benefactor, something Iran could not have done on its own in a hundred years. Iran is the winner from the U.S. War and invasion of Iraq.
Reply to this comment
by barbaraf4 March 1, 2008 10:06 PM PST
"There is but ONE way to deal with evil. Fight it till we prevail. Remember the saying: "The cowards die a thousand deaths, the brave but once"" Posted by dumbshun
~~~~~~~
I''d rather die on my feet than to live on my knees.
Reply to this comment
See all 268 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs