70 Percent Of Afghanistan Still Lawless

Top Intelligence Officials Say U.S.-Backed Government Controls Just 30 Percent Of Country

(CBS/AP)  More than six years after the United States invaded to establish a stable central regime in Afghanistan, President Hamid Karzai's government in Kabul controls just 30 percent of the country, says the top U.S. intelligence official.

National Intelligence Director Michael McConnell told the Senate Armed Services Committee on Wednesday that the resurgent Taliban controls 10 percent to 11 percent of the country and Karzai's government controls 30 percent to 31 percent. The majority of Afghanistan's population and territory remains under local tribal control, he said.

Underscoring the problems facing the Karzai's government, a roadside bomb in Paktika province killed two Polish soldiers who are part of the NATO force in the country and opium worth $400 million was seized in the southern part of Afghanistan. That brought the number of foreign troops killed in Afghanistan to 21 this year, according to an Associated Press tally.

In Helmand province, an ambush by militants of an opium poppy eradication force sparked clashes that killed 25 Taliban fighters and a policeman, a provincial police chief said Thursday. Four other militants died when a bomb went off.

Insurgents ambushed the drug eradication force Wednesday in Marja district of Helmand — the world's largest opium producing region — killing one police officer and wounding two, said Gen. Mohammad Hussein Andiwal, the provincial police chief.

Police attacked the militants afterward, killing 25 Taliban fighters, Andiwal said.

Separately, four militants died and another was wounded Thursday when the roadside bomb they were planting on a main road in Helmand province exploded prematurely, Andiwal said.

Also Thursday, an American aid worker and her Afghan driver kidnapped in the country's dangerous south one month ago were feared dead, according to the group she worked for.

Aid worker Cyd Mizell and driver Abdul Hadi were taken hostage by an unknown group in a residential neighborhood of Kandahar on Jan. 26. Mizell worked on aid projects for the Asian Rural Life Development Foundation, or ARLDF.

"Although we have no confirmation of their deaths, we have received information over the past few days indicating that our two aid workers have been killed," said a statement posted on the group's Web site Tuesday.

An official with ALRDF in Kandahar said the group had received reports in recent days from "two credible Afghan sources" that Mizell and Hadi were dead. He said officials were working with the Red Cross to try to recover the bodies. He spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to speak to the media.

In 2007, violence associated with the Afghan insurgency killed more than 6,500 people, including 222 foreign troops. Last year was the deadliest yet since the U.S.-led invasion in 2001.

Officials estimate that up to 40 percent of proceeds from Afghanistan's drug trade, an amount worth tens of millions of dollars, is used to fund the insurgency.

Lt. Gen. Michael Maples, the Defense Intelligence Agency director, who testified before the Senate committee next to McConnell, said the Pakistan government is trying to crack down on its lawless tribal area along the Afghan border area where Taliban militias and al Qaeda fighters are believed to be training, and from which they launch attacks into Afghanistan. But neither the Pakistani military nor the tribal Frontier Corps is trained or equipped to fight, he said.

Maples said it would take three to five years to take care of those deficiencies and see a difference in their ability to fight effectively in the tribal areas.

"Pakistani military operations in the (region) have not fundamentally damaged al Qaeda's position. ... The tribal areas remain largely ungovernable and, as such, they will continue to provide vital sanctuary to al Qaeda, the Taliban and regional extremism more broadly," Maples said.

The U.S. military, meanwhile, said on Wednesday that Afghan journalist Jawed Ahmad, 22, had been declared an enemy combatant.

Ahmad has been held for four months without charge at a U.S. military detention center at Bagram, 30 miles north of Kabul.

Army Maj. Chris Belcher, a spokesman for the U.S.-led coalition, said a review board had determined Ahmad to be a danger to troops and the government. Ahmad "was in no way targeted because of his work as a journalist," he said.

"His case went before an enemy combatant review board. He was afforded an opportunity to provide a statement to the board, and the board determined there was credible information to detain him as an unlawful enemy combatant," Belcher said. He did not say when the review took place or if Ahmad was represented by counsel.

Belcher declined to provide details about the "credible information" and would not say if Ahmad had any more contact with militants than other journalists working in Afghanistan. It is common for journalists in the country to have the contact information of Taliban fighters so they can seek the militants' comments for news stories.

Ahmad, who is also known as Jojo Yazemi, was detained Oct. 26 at a NATO air base in the southern city of Kandahar, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists, a New York-based rights group. The group said it was "alarmed" by what it called a recurring practice of journalists being held for long periods by the military without due process.

[ontheleft]

A dysfunctional government in Afghanistan? Sounds remarkably similar to the government in Iraq.

[jesterbelle]

Really?Maybe if the puppet hadn''t wasted our time and resources on the lame duck in Iraq...

[davideconnollyjr]

It is ironic that these people are selling themselves as high holy rollers, and then producing all this opium to addict the world. It makes sense, really- if blowing yourself, and other people up is a good deed, then selling opium must be a holy thing to do, also. (IN HELL...)

[joyous88]

dysfunctional government? Sounds a lot like the
government in Washington, D.C.,

anyway, thank god the surge is working!

[mcvet]

Well golly gee Maybe the LIAR in Chief can come up with some stupid new word to divert attention from YET another failure. Wasn''t this the Country the loser left to invade the Nation that NEVER attacked us. ROFLMAO. No wonder his approval is now 19%! ROFLMAO

[mcvet]

Pakistani military operations in the (region) have not fundamentally damaged al Qaeda''s position.

Now ALL you bootlickers repeat after me! This is NOT failure! This is NOT failure! Now keep repeating that until the Reich gets you a new line. Sieg Heil Bush

[formrusmcsgt]

Let''s do the math here...after 6 years, 70% of Afghanistan remains uncontrolled. So it would appear that we gain control over approximately 5% per year.

Another 14 years ought to do it, eh?

[barbaraf4]

"A dysfunctional government in Afghanistan? Sounds remarkably similar to the government in Iraq." Posted by ontheleft

Also similar to the US government under the Rove/Cheney dictatorship with the Moron in Chief as the frontman.

[mbcsmith]

Let''''s do the math here...after 6 years, 70% of Afghanistan remains uncontrolled. So it would appear that we gain control over approximately 5% per year.

Another 14 years ought to do it, eh?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by formrusmcsgt at 08:00 AM : Feb 28, 2008

You whine like a little school girl. Taliban control of the country is about 10%, so by my math that''s about 15% per year.

[rowdytexan2]

You whine like a little school girl. Taliban control of the country is about 10%, so by my math that''''s about 15% per year.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by mbcsmith at 09:40 AM : Feb 28, 2008

Ummm...c''mere....I still have a second grade math book around here somewhere.

[hungry1968]

Let''''s do the math here...after 6 years, 70% of Afghanistan remains uncontrolled. So it would appear that we gain control over approximately 5% per year.

Another 14 years ought to do it, eh?

Posted by formrusmcsgt at 08:00 AM : Feb 28, 2008





Or we could have gained control of 30% right off the bat, and have gained nothing since then.

In that case, we''ll be there forever.

[notblue]

What point is CBS trying to make? Hasn''t Afghanistan always been "lawless", obviously just more political crapp for the morons who mast surely will extrapilate that into Bush''s and Americas fault.

[donbl1]

Is the 70% a measurement in people or square miles? Makes a difference.

Most of Afghanistan is sparsely populated and it takes about as many soldiers to control the remote areas as live there. No way to make that process efficient.

The new willingness of America to go after the AQ leadership in Pakistan with Predator missiles indicates there will be no sanctuary.

[noloyalisti]

The Afghanis kicked out the Soviets and they will also kiss our butts out too. It''s just a matter of time.

[libsrweak]

The Afghanis kicked out the Soviets and they will also kiss our butts out too. It''''s just a matter of time.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by noloyalisti at 03:32 PM : Feb 28, 2008
+ report abuse


***********

the afghan DID NOT KICK OUT THE SOVIETS..the CIA and our Military assistance did..

[libsrweak]

Posted by formrusmcsgt at 08:00 AM : Feb 28, 2008
+ report abuse
Posted by MCVet at 07:47 AM : Feb 28, 2008
report abuse
***************

what I find amazing is that these ''former military men" are so easy to give up and surrender AND NOT TO MENTION DOES NOT HAVE FAITH IN OUR MILITARY..

maybe because they are either washed out losers or thier are simply posing as military..

SEMPER FI motherfu cker!

[hungry1968]

the afghan DID NOT KICK OUT THE SOVIETS..the CIA and our Military assistance did..

Posted by libsrweak at 04:51 PM : Feb 28, 2008





At least you''re willing to admit that Reagan gave the Taliban arms, weapons, training, and intelligence unlike most conservatives.

[pupeta-2009]

libsrweak your military didn''t participate in any of the operations the soviets fought, neither did the CIA. Now if a fat arse 50 years old carrying a suitcase full of money and weapons for your reagan loving taliban counts as a participation than you can say the CIA had something to do with it, but as far as military operations, all the US did in the soviet invasion, was made very good hollywood movies.

[tibu987]

"70% of Afghanistan Still Lawless."
Is that a problem for the U.S.?
Is that something that we want to send U.S. troops and money to resolve?
Is that something that the U.S. should sacrifice American and innocent Afghani lives for?
Is that somethinbg that the U.S. should spend millions of dollars to correct?
I think not.
Republicans are scary to me.

[libsrweak]

At least you''''re willing to admit that Reagan gave the Taliban arms, weapons, training, and intelligence unlike most conservatives.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by hungry1968 at 05:06 PM : Feb 28, 2008
+ report abuse


***********

and guess what..we gave saddam hussein weapons too..so that kinda dismiss the ''no wmd'' liberal bruhaha...what reagan was trying to avoid are those pesky liberals WHO WOULD WHINE THEN and it seems who are whinning now..We need to deal with our own wars NO MATTER HOW MUCH THE LIBERAL WOULD WHINE OR ELSE WE WOULD END UP WITH THIS KIND OF MESS...DO YOU AGREE?

[libsrweak]

Posted by pupeta at 05:08 PM : Feb 28, 2008
+ report abuse


*************

What reagan did was break the backbone of the soviet empire..in result..the soviets can no longer effectively engange in any campaigns in afghanistan..

[libsrweak]

Or we could have gained control of 30% right off the bat, and have gained nothing since then.

In that case, we''''ll be there forever.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by hungry1968 at 10:48 AM : Feb 28, 2008
+ report abuse

********

we have the military might and the technology to dominate the middle east..however, what is holding all that back and pretty much render our military half-arsed is that we have to pus sy-foot along this whole war as NOT TO **** OFF THE LIBERALS. hey at least we are at least allowed to shoot at them..but should I give you time to work that out?

[libsrweak]

afghanistan is a sh*thole..run by sh*theads..WE ARE LUCKY THAT WE EVEN HAVE 30%.. they started with sh*t..and now they are 30% less shi*tty..

take your aces while you have them

[dan9111]

The article title equates anything but Karzai''s control with no control. Amazing. Does anyone have statistics? It is 10 percent Taliban and 30 percent Karzai, right? Aren''t the odds of being murdered lowest in that remaining 60 percent? The murderers are the least well-funded in that area I would imagine. I am sure these authors get a nice kickback from the Pentagon.

[singingrick]

Basically Bush didn''t finish the job defeating the Talliban before he went in to Iraq to steal their oil.


Now, the folks who actually were responsible for 9/11 have rebuilt their organization. Bush is a moron and so are his supporters.

lol!

[libsrweak]

Basically Bush didn''''t finish the job defeating the Talliban before he went in to Iraq to steal their oil.


Now, the folks who actually were responsible for 9/11 have rebuilt their organization. Bush is a moron and so are his supporters.

lol!







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by singingrick at 07:38 PM : Feb 28, 2008
+ report abuse

**************

oh come on..you are not really pass the credit for all the terrorist support the liberals had been graciously giving our enemies?

since day one, the liberal masses are working fevershly to MAKE SURE that they have the chance to organize..hell we cant even look at thier leadership the wrong way without the liberals MAKING EVERY FUSS about "violation of rights"..

SO DOES THIS MEAN WE CAN START CRACKING AL QUEDA SKULLS WITHOUT YOU BITC*HING?

[libsrweak]

Posted by singingrick at 07:38 PM : Feb 28, 2008
+ report abuse

****

ARE YOU singrick''s idiot alter ego..that very flattering

[beehive21-2009]

Poppy world shall remain lawless,like LA,Phily,North Las Vegas,New York,etc, fact of life.

[beehive21-2009]

this report tells ,once a new pres takes aim at u , u know the one you bought off ? your *** is gone .

[taylpatr]

Hey, libsrweak; you are obviously in the same category of idiot as your hero. It''s easy for a coward to judge a war from a computer desk. You and your hero are both in the dark as to what it''s really like over there and the reasons for it. It boils down to this: this war is being pushed by the fanatic idiots(that''s you)on both sides. You no more speak for the majority of Americans the Osama speaks for the majority of Muslims. You''re just lucky it''s the internet and you''re lucky it''s still America for now. But if you idiots have you way this war is going to escalate into Armageddon. So shut up and crawl back under you rock and get your head back in the sand so all us other folks can figure out how to fix the mess your kind have made of our world.Go die, ya hear?

[libsrweak]

figure out how to fix the mess your kind have made of our world.Go die, ya hear?

Posted by taylpatr at 12:30 AM : Feb 29, 2008
+ report abuse

***********

and you will fix that from your computer desk??
dont worry your precious DNC is working hard to give these people another chance to park an even bigger 747 up your arse

[andrew_693]

the soviets were never defeated by the US, they collapsed on their own weight, their economic collapse came when they became capitalists because all the sudden the state was no longer around. They left afghanistan in a slow retreat, not like the US in vietnam, with the vietcong chasing their arse to the airport, the complete withdrawal took a year for the russians, they didn''t have to throw helicopters overboard nor take millions of refugees in desperation like the US did. That only happens in john wayne movies or maybe you were high when you were watching rambo as you ate your chips and drank your beer. There wasn''t a single battle between US forces and Russians. The insurgents in iraq are defeating the US with weapons far cheaper than a stinger missile. The afghans, are still holding 70 % of their territory with those same cheap inferior weapons.

[aldee41]

King George the Usurper is now loseing in three countries.

[libsrweak]

Posted by aldee41 at 10:43 AM : Feb 29, 2008
+ report abuse


***********

DNC and the liberal masses considered it lost and had surrendered EVEN BEFORE IT STARTED.

[libsrweak]

The insurgents in iraq are defeating the US with weapons far cheaper than a stinger missile. The afghans, are still holding 70 % of their territory with those same cheap inferior weapons.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by andrew_693 at 04:51 AM : Feb 29, 2008
+ report abuse


************

could all this tough ''we got weapons'' talk coming from a liberal who gets a little quessy at the sight of a wittle taser gun (dont taser me bro! aint that a sweet liberal battle cry)..we have the military might to make afghanistan glow at night...BUT OF COURSE YOU WOULD BITC H WHEN IT HAPPENS..

[libsrweak]

afghanistan is a shi*thole..run by sh*theads supported by sh*tfaced liberals..it was 100% lawless outhouse before running dope for liberal consumption..HAVING 30% is an achievement..to even be able to plan and move forward with afghanistan is monumental..TO BE PRESENT IN AFGHANISTAN is 100% better than before..

[libsrweak]

LIBERALS PREFER AFGHANISTAN TO BE 100% LAWLESS..