Navy Sends Show Of Force To Mediterranean
Three Warships Headed For Region As Tension Grows Between Syria And U.S. Ally Lebanon
-
Photo
The Navy's Amphibious Assault Ship, USS Nassau is seen entering the Elizabeth River on its way to the Norfolk Naval Station in Virginia, in a May 29, 2003 file photo. The Nassau is one of three ships that have been deployed to the Mediterranean Sea amid tension between Syria and Lebanon. (AP Photo/Gary C. Knapp)
-
Fast Facts
Syria
Learn about the people, economy and history.
-
Photos
Israel-Lebanon Bloodshed
2006: Rocket attacks, missile strikes, incursions leave death and destruction in their wake.
Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters Thursday the deployment should not be viewed as threatening or in response to events in any single country in the volatile region.
"We did not request any warships from any party," U.S.-backed Prime Minister Fuad Saniora said, hours after the U.S. military announced it was sending ships off Lebanon.
He insisted the U.S. ships would cruise off the coast, not in Lebanese territorial waters.
Saniora, who has been accused by the opposition of following U.S. policy, spoke in front of Arab diplomats at government headquarters in Beirut after his Hezbollah opponents denounced the deployment.
"This is an area that is important to us, the eastern Med," he said when asked about news reports of the ship movements. "It's a group of ships that will operate in the vicinity there for a while," adding that "it isn't meant to send any stronger signals than that. But it does signal that we're engaged, we're going to be in the vicinity, and that's a very, very important part of the world."
Another military officer, speaking on condition of anonymity because full details about the ship movements are not yet public, said a Navy guided missile destroyer, the USS Cole, was headed for patrol in the eastern Mediterranean and that it is accompanied by two refueling ships. The Cole is equipped to engage in a variety of offensive actions, including anti-aircraft and land attack missions.
Another group led by the USS Nassau, an amphibious warship, is headed in that direction on a normally scheduled deployment and some or all six ships in the Nassau group might operate in the eastern Mediterranean also, the official said.
The officer said a third ship would go later, but he did not identify it by type or name.
A Navy news release said the Nassau Expeditionary Strike Group entered the 6th Fleet's operational area on Monday. Besides the Nassau, the group included a guided missile cruiser, two guided missile destroyers and two other amphibious warfare ships. The amphibious warfare ships can carry thousands of U.S. Marines.
The U.S. 6th Fleet, whose area of operations includes the entire Mediterranean, is based at Naples, Italy.
The decision to send the ships appeared to be a not-too-subtle show of U.S. force in the region as international frustration mounts over a long political deadlock in tiny, weak Lebanon. The United States blames Syria for the impasse, saying Syria has never given up its ambitions to control its smaller neighbor.
The presidential election in Lebanon has been delayed 15 times. Just this week the date was pushed back to March 11.
Several senior Lebanese officials have been assassinated during the past year, with anti-Syrian officials blaming Hezbollah - the militant Islamic organization based in Syria which the U.S. and most allied countries have long-considered a terrorist group.
Hezbollah has for years been a potent political force in Lebanon and Syria, with members of the legislatures in both countries. Its popularity and clout were increased by the stalemate war fought between its militants in Lebanon and the Israeli military in the summer of 2006.
Friday, Hezbollah rejected the deployment of the U.S. warships off Lebanon, calling it a threat to the country that will not affect the militant group.
This threat and intimidation will not affect us.
Hezbollah legislator Hassan FadlallahThe group is believed to be linked to Muslim militants who attacked U.S. forces and diplomats in Lebanon in 1983-84 during the Lebanese civil war, killing about 270.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is to visit the Middle East next week.
Michel Aoun, a major opposition leader to the U.S.-backed government in Beirut, said the ship movements looked like a calculated show of force by the United States.
"There is no need for it," Aoun was quoted as saying by the Al-Manar television of his Hezbollah allies.
Other Arab countries appear to be becoming involved in the Lebanese impasse.
Syria is to host an Arab summit in Damascus in late March, and pro-U.S. Arab states such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt reportedly are threatening to boycott if no president is elected in Lebanon by then. This could be a tactic by the Saudis and Egyptians to force Syrian concessions in Lebanon to save the summit. The Syrians so far have said the summit will go ahead as planned, regardless of who refuses to attend.
Mustafa Alloush, a member of the Lebanese Parliament from the U.S.-backed majority, told the majority's Future television that neither the government nor the anti-Syrian majority had any links to the dispatching of the Cole.
"But we remind what caused the situation to bring the American equation into the arena," he said, blaming Syria indirectly for inviting such American intervention. "It (the deployment) could be aimed directly at Syria or a declaration by the United States of America that it could be part of this equation that could develop if conditions remain the way they are," Alloush said.
Mullen was asked whether the deployment of the ships was linked to the timing of the Lebanese election.
"To say it's absolutely directly tied would be incorrect, but we are certainly aware that elections out there are both important, and they are due at some point in time," he replied.
And when asked whether Syria is the reason for the deployment, he said, "It's not specifically sent to any one country, as much as it is to the region itself."
The Cole was rebuilt after being almost sunk in a terror attack in Aden, Yemen, in October 2000. It was recommissioned in April 2002 and went on its first post-attack deployment in November 2003.
National Security Council spokesman Gordon Johndroe said the deployment of the Cole is meant as "a show of support for regional stability." He added that President Bush is concerned about the situation in Lebanon.
The Cole is sailing to the region from Malta.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 88 CommentsI wouldn''t be suprised if George Bush and the John McCain and most Republicans care as much about the common people of Lebanon as they care about the common people of America - which is to say - not at all.
*** it Bush, we need to fix our own country instead of burning through our resources and dollars flexing our military.
King George in his la-la land
Syria, in bed with Iran... what are you planning?
Didn''t Siria do some torturing for the US?
Posted by summarex at 04:48 AM : Feb 29, 2008
I wonder if this is designed to influence the election...or cancel it because of a state of emergency.
I don''t trust these crooks to leave when their term is up. They haven''t obeyed the law yet. Why should they start now?
It is natural that you would find this story so you can cut and paste your anti Islamic death worship.
Mow Syria and Lebanon are no threat whatsoever to the US, so your only possible rationale for supporting this could be simple joy at the prospect of killing more innocent people because of their religion.
Sticking our nose into everyone else''s business, while ignoring our own problems, and making us more susceptible to terrorism.
lez-balless inbred retarded radical fascist nazi terrorislamic jihadists muslim slavers, murderers and rapists
are firing rockets at israel civilians every day
but these are your death cult buttbuddies so that is alright with you
good one
Posted by terrorislama at 06:27 AM : Feb 29, 2008
What? Is Syria a threat now? Are we going to invade them now, since everything in Iraq is going so perfect?
I don''t even want to know how much this little excercise is costing us and our future generations.
Personally, this is another act of arrogance and me as an American living in Europe I want my Med to be clean of US warships.........it is not American territory and we are all fed up with being regarded as uneducated, savage, greedy barbarians....that is how far we have come within the last 8 years! being ashamed to be American instead of being proud is painful! ...but it is nothing compared to those people in the middle east who have lost everything thanks to us!
Posted by olebd at 07:22 AM : Feb 29, 2008
I was in the 6th Fleet (68 to 72) and we have had Task Forces in the Med for years. Costs - I got paid my normal $0.75/hr.
stop sponsoring terrorism,
stop trying to get WMDs,,,
Posted by terrorislama at 07:54 AM : Feb 29, 2008
What Syrian has sponsored terrorism against the United States?
Why is Israel allowed to have nuclear weapons, but Syria and Iran aren''t allowed to build nuclear reactors for energy production?
Why is Israel allowed to have nuclear weapons, but Syria and Iran aren''''t allowed to build nuclear reactors for energy production?
Posted by hungry1968 at 08:24 AM : Feb 29, 2008
I would bet the government knows more about this situation than you od
Posted by MCVet at 07:44 AM : Feb 29, 2008
wow....you toned down a little....new meds?
Posted by guyfrompa45 at 08:39 AM : Feb 29, 2008
good post.....the libs dont even realize that they are their own worst enemy in life.
Posted by MCVet at 08:06 AM : Feb 29, 2008
Hmmm
Son spent nine years on six month deployments hanging out off the coast of all these countries in the Med...why is this big news now?
Big deal!
i guess you do learn a few things..
I enjoyed Ashcroft''s Election-Time Color Warning System better than this year''s Fake Fear Tactics from Bu$hCo''s Pentagoons...
Different year, same shiite...
...yawn
Why is Israel allowed to have nuclear weapons, but Syria and Iran aren''''''''t allowed to build nuclear reactors for energy production?
Posted by hungry1968 at 08:24 AM : Feb 29, 2008
I would bet the government knows more about this situation than you od
Posted by jwind11 at 08:31 AM : Feb 29, 2008
Based on 935 statements - this government doesn''t know jack...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by jwind11 at 08:31 AM : Feb 29, 2008
btw, Jwind11, it''s spelled ''do'' not ''od''. I guess that''s a little toughter than Afghanistan.
Posted by notblue at 09:36 AM : Feb 29, 2008
Who said "they" fooled them ?
They are your talking points - not mine...
I never voted for Bush and what was it 59+ million or so never voted for him either.
Posted by notblue at 09:42 AM : Feb 29, 2008
Actually, it has nothing to do with right or left. It is called "Past Practice" of this Administration. Colin Powell realized it too late and resigned. Now anything put out by this government is questioned.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by notblue at 09:36 AM : Feb 29, 2008
He never fooled the democrats. If you will remember he had to steal the election.
He never fooled anybody with his 935 lies! However public opinion from idiots that supported him and political manipulation allowed him to do this!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by notblue at 09:58 AM : Feb 29, 2008
I wouldn''t know, Sir. I''ve never consulted with MoveOn for my opinions, but evidently you check it out every day. How come? Because you don''t have an opinion that doesn''t come from Rush Limpdrug, or Bimbo Coulter, or some other Neocon blabbing fool?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by notblue at 10:09 AM : Feb 29, 2008
lol, all your blabbing about my opinions doesn''t change the fact that you follow Bush like some blind sheep over a cliff! What''d you do vote the idiot son in twice???
I just have to wonder what the hell he thinks is going to happen?? Gen Gates, army chief of staff has stated in plain terms yesterday that MORE troops were going to be needed for both Iraq and Afghanistan. So much for the surge victory. It lasted about 6 months, longer than I expected.
I guess his hope is to drop a nuclear weapon on the middle east, but I still fail to see what he thinks that is going to do but condemn him as a mass murderer on innocent civilians along side Pol Pot, Stalin and Hitler.
I am just sure the middle east diplomats and rulers are praying to allah that they get through the next year with nothing more worse than current conditions. With luck, maybe!
%u201Chow does it feel that the "chimp" the "moron" the "liar" the "idiot" could fool the best minds the democratic party has to offer 935 times!???%u201D
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Speaking for myself; it has brought mixed feelings.
First, I am very proud that the office of the president was worthy of such trust that people, even opposition party members, could be fooled (lied to) so easily.
Second, great sadness that Bush has betrayed that trust so badly that such trust may never be regained
Al-Ahran Weekly
Al Jazzera English
American Prosptect
Angus Read Global Monitor
Antiwar
Asia Times online
Center for American progress
Counter punch
Consortium news
CounterCurrents
Crooks and Liars
Daily KOS
Dar Al Hayat
EurasiaNet.org
Financial times
Foreign polich in focus
Global research
Glenn Greenwald
TheHill.com
Huffington postIPS
Oil Cjange
Political.Com
Rasmussen Reports
Raw Story
RealClear Politics
Reuter
Slaters
ThinkProgress
Truth dig
US Policy World
National Security Network
Wired News
And this is only a partial list. I read other sites too. In fact, I will bet ya I will bet ys I read more in 1 day than you do in a month!
"You people" spent 8 years supporting your dummy dictator and then when thing go wrong (duh) you stamp you feet and are mad at the other side for being right all along. Again, brilliant.
Sorry, there''s nothing in your anti-American authoritarian philosophy "notblue" that is of benefit to me or my country. The Republican Party and conservative politics are a cancer on America.
Eight years ago I thought differently, but it''s "people like you who showed me the truth. Reap what you''ve sown.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 88 Comments