NEW YORK, Feb. 27, 2008

Bloomberg: I'm Not Running For President

NYC's Billionaire Mayor Says He May Support Candidate Who Takes "Nonpartisan Approach"

  • New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a Democrat-turned-Republican-turned-independent, has ties to Democratic presidential candidates Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. Hillary Clinton, as well as the likely Republican candidate, Sen. John McCain. Photo

    New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a Democrat-turned-Republican-turned-independent, has ties to Democratic presidential candidates Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. Hillary Clinton, as well as the likely Republican candidate, Sen. John McCain.  (AP)

  • In-Depth 2008 Presidential Hopefuls

    Profiles and the latest news on the Democrats and Republicans running for the White House.

  • Interactive Campaign 2008

    Profiles of the candidates, polls, fund-raising, blogs, video and more.

(CBS/AP)  After two years of playing coy about his presidential ambitions, Mayor Michael Bloomberg declared in a newspaper editorial Wednesday that he will not run for president but might support the candidate who "takes an independent, nonpartisan approach."

The 66-year-old billionaire businessman, who aides had said was prepared to spend $1 billion to run as an independent, wrote in an editorial on The New York Times' Web site that he will work to "steer the national conversation away from partisanship and toward unity; away from ideology and toward common sense; away from sound bites and toward substance."

On Thursday, Bloomberg said that the No. 2 job is not an option either.

"Nobody is going to ask me to run as vice president," he said at a news conference.

Said Bloomberg: "I've had a wonderful opportunity to influence the dialogue. ... I've said repeatedly when people focus on New York City and the mayor, it's good for New York City."

Bloomberg, who has almost two years left in his second term at City Hall, had publicly denied any interest in running for president since one of his political advisers first planted the seed more than two years ago.

But his denials grew weaker in recent months as aides and supporters quietly began laying the groundwork for a third-party campaign.

"I listened carefully to those who encouraged me to run, but I am not - and will not be - a candidate for president," he wrote.

Among his biggest obstacles was getting on the ballot. The process varies wildly from state to state and would have required Bloomberg to collect hundreds of thousands of signatures according to a strict timetable on which the first key date is March 5.

Beginning next Wednesday, a Bloomberg campaign would have had to begin gathering signatures to get on the ballot in Texas, which has one of the earliest deadlines.

Bloomberg underwent extensive preparation for a presidential bid. The work included mass polling and nationwide data collection to determine his viability as a candidate, as well as detailed study and preparation for a state-by-state ballot access drive.

Aides and associates had said in recent days that Illinois Sen. Barack Obama's rise in the Democratic contest against New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton was increasingly diminishing the chance that Bloomberg would run.

"In citing the 'current campaigns,' Bloomberg is acknowledging there is no opening for a candidate who would seek a plurality of voters in the broad middle of the political spectrum," said CBSNews.com senior political editor Vaughn Ververs. "With presumptive GOP nominee John McCain and Democratic front-runner Barack Obama, there is no void in the center for him to fill." (Read more analysis on Bloomberg from Ververs)

In the Times editorial, Bloomberg wrote that while he is not running, the race is too important for him to stay completely out.

"And so I have changed my mind in one area," he said. "If a candidate takes an independent, nonpartisan approach - and embraces practical solutions that challenge party orthodoxy - I'll join others in helping that candidate win the White House."

Putting his endorsement - and wealth - behind one of the candidates could make a significant difference. And Bloomberg, a Democrat-turned-Republican-turned-independent, has ties to Obama, Clinton and Republican Arizona Sen. John McCain.

Last November, Bloomberg and Obama met in Manhattan for a highly publicized breakfast, and the mayor has praised some of Obama's positions, such as supporting merit pay for teachers.

He also has worked closely with Clinton, his home state senator, and has a friendly relationship with McCain.

On Monday, Bloomberg defended Ralph Nader's right to seek the White House.

"This business of Ralph Nader being a spoiler - you know, in any three-way race, two of the three are going to be spoilers," Bloomberg said. "Come on. Everybody's got a right to do it - you're not spoiling anything."

Bloomberg's friend and political ally California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has endorsed McCain, and the senator said during a Republican debate that Bloomberg had done "remarkable things" with the city's education system, the nation's largest.

© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Candidate Profiles & RSS Feeds


Video and Galleries from Politics

Add a Comment See all 37 Comments
by goldesprit February 27, 2008 10:21 PM PST
NEWS FLASH:

I too have decided not to run for President, at this time.
Reply to this comment
by bm6005 February 27, 2008 10:43 PM PST
Too bad. He''s better than any of the dipsticks running now and much, much better than GW Dipwad!!
Reply to this comment
by ontheleft February 27, 2008 10:59 PM PST
If Hillary had won the nomination, he may very well have run. The chances of a viable third party candidate were greatest if it were Hillary vs. McCain.

Now let''s wait and see if a conservative steps up to run a third party campaign. It could very well happen because a lot of conservatives are unhappy with McCain as the Republican nominee. That would take votes away from him. What a shame.
Reply to this comment
by libra127 February 27, 2008 11:08 PM PST
"If Hillary had won the nomination, he may very well have run."
Posted by ontheleft at 10:59 PM : Feb 27, 2008

And you know this how ?
Reply to this comment
by l8c6 February 27, 2008 11:38 PM PST
The right wing divisive neo cons want to take an independent non-partisan approach now that the decades they have spent dividing the american people for their self serving profiteering appears to be on the blink.
Reply to this comment
by l8c6 February 27, 2008 11:39 PM PST
The right wing divisive neo cons want to take an independent non-partisan approach now that the decades they have spent dividing the american people for their self serving profiteering appears to be on the blink.
Reply to this comment
by harp1963 February 28, 2008 12:11 AM PST
Who cares? No one outside of New York knows who you are anyway. You wanna feel like a regular guy Bloomberg? Put on some jeans and a sweat shirt and go walk around Cleveland for a day. Nobody will know who you are.
Reply to this comment
by eddynewhope February 28, 2008 12:16 AM PST
Bloomberg would have run had Hillary won the nomination. He said as much. The strategy: with McCain on the right, and the polarizing Hillary on the left, Bloomberg was aiming for the middle 60% and I wouldn''t have been surprised if he won.
Reply to this comment
by jimfinster February 28, 2008 12:54 AM PST
yawwwwwn


Reply to this comment
by jesterbelle February 28, 2008 1:50 AM PST
''''You obviously don''''''''t know the history of this country well as it was the Republicans that were most supporti ve of civil rights in this country . . . not the democrats.

Posted by joule3 at 11:53 PM''''
You obviously don''t history if you think the civil war was a fight to free the slaves.Slavery was a side issue.Lincoln,a republican,enacted the emancipation during the war in the hope that slaves in the south would rebel.It was done in the hope that the confederacy would have to deploy troops to fight them,thereby taking some of the pressure off the union army,which,at the time,was losing.
Reply to this comment
by grazinggoat February 28, 2008 3:07 AM PST
Mikhael Bloomberg wears his tie too tight, preventing blood from flowing into his brain. Maybe he should loosen it a bit so he may re-consider running... he would be another ralph nader... please one of his aides, help him out!

-Yaawwwwwwwn !
Reply to this comment
by darrren12000 February 28, 2008 5:27 AM PST
this is just noise....who cares? and a nonpartisan candidate? what is that? obama, clinton and mccain are running for their parties. any talk of nonpartisanship is just rubbish.
Reply to this comment
by gronamox-2009 February 28, 2008 5:31 AM PST
Who gives a rats *** about Bloomberg. Because he''s rich that supposedly qualifies him for President? Being a Jew doesn''t really matter, only if you are running for office in Saudi Arabia, then it is tough. This is like the rumor that Al Gore will rise up at the convention and intone: "I''m ready to serve." At which point the Nobel Committee will demand his half of the award back, because it can''t be given to someone in a total delusional state. Saying there is global warming is an okay delusion, but thinking anybody still wants you after your Lockbox speeches and the 80 weight gain is far too gone even for them. I always wondered why they don''t give a yearly award for best explosive. Napalm would have been a big winner, followed by bunker buster, and then my favorite, the IED.
Reply to this comment
by reel-crazy February 28, 2008 7:10 AM PST

I know I am going to lose a lot of sleep over some rich trouser stain not entering the race.

This isn''t even remotely news...

Reply to this comment
by taotxzen February 28, 2008 7:31 AM PST
(cont)
Obama''s General Synod speech prompts IRS to investigate UCC''s tax-exempt status

The Bush administration is famous for embracing select religious causes, blurring the line between church and state and catering to the religious right wing that helped them win office in 2000 and 2004. The Terri Schiavo circus in Washington was just one of many examples of that shameful political strategy.
Furthermore, the Bush administration also has pushed the envelope of executive power when it comes to meddling in all kinds of government departments to gain a political edge -- in the Department of Justice, with political tainting of the US attorney appointments, for instance, and with top-down interference in scientific reports from NASA -- basically, giving departments under White House influence a mandate to further political goals at the cost of neutrality.

As McCain would say, this is what we are up against my friends.


Reply to this comment
by taotxzen February 28, 2008 7:33 AM PST
(cont)

The Rev. John H. Thomas, the UCC''s general minister and president, called the investigation "disturbing" but said the investigation would reveal that the church did nothing improper or illegal.

Obama, an active member of the United Church of Christ for more than 20 years, addressed the UCC''s 50th anniversary General Synod in Hartford, Conn., on June 23, 2007, as one of 60 diverse speakers representing the arts, media, academia, science, technology, business and government. Each was asked to reflect on the intersection of their faith and their respective vocations or fields of expertise. The invitation to Obama was extended a year before he became a Democratic presidential candidate.

"The United Church of Christ took great care to ensure that Senator Obama''s appearance before the 50th anniversary General Synod met appropriate legal and moral standards," Thomas told United Church News. "We are confident that the IRS investigation will confirm that no laws were violated."

(cont)
Reply to this comment
by taotxzen February 28, 2008 7:34 AM PST
(cont)

On Monday, February 25, the national headquarters of the United Church of Christ, Senator and presidential candidate Barack Obama''s church, received a letter from the IRS questioning whether the church "has engaged in political activities that could jeopardize its tax-exempt status." They were given 15 days to respond.

The IRS is scrutinizing specifically an address given by Barack Obama last June. Church leaders appear confident that all rules for tax-exempt groups were met, and they clearly address the issues in a post to their website February 26. If they''re correct, then does the IRS probe constitute harassment and a Bush administration breach of First Amendment rights?

(cont)
Reply to this comment
by taotxzen February 28, 2008 7:35 AM PST
Is This America? Is This Separation of Church and State? And Who Set the IRS on Obama''s Church?


NEWS ANALYSIS%u2028by Christine Bowman

Surely one of the greatest things, and a defining characteristic of the United States of America in contrast to the rest of the world, is our Constitutionally guaranteed separation of church and state. It gives us the freedom to worship or not; it gives our political leaders the responsibility to work for all Americans, not just for their own religious camp; it gives the religious organizations the freedom to meet and speak and honor their unique spiritual traditions without fear of political interference. Right?

Wrong. At least, not lately, and not in certain cases.

(cont)
Reply to this comment
by gkc99 February 28, 2008 8:14 AM PST
The ego of these little men--who cares?
Reply to this comment
by mcvet February 28, 2008 8:23 AM PST
Yeah maybe you should stay out of the way on this one... that new suit wouldn''t look real good afterward if you don''t.
Reply to this comment
by cfin5 February 28, 2008 8:24 AM PST
He means he''s supporting McCain. The only Senator whose "ONE WAY" reaching across the isle is touted as a "TWO WAY" partisan deal,.....yeah right.
Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 February 28, 2008 8:51 AM PST
Some one said he is better than what we have now.

NEWS FLASH:

A dead rat is better than what we have now.
Reply to this comment
by repdemapart February 28, 2008 8:54 AM PST
Bloomberg is big in big Cities. The problem is he thinks he''s as big in the rest of the country.
Reply to this comment
by easeup-2009 February 28, 2008 9:16 AM PST
"The only way any repunlikan is going to get in the white house is to take the tour. First off get there early and be prepared to line up. Ignore the smell in the East and Red Room A hole will be leaving soon and we will have it fumigated you loosers!

Posted by jerryomara at 08:00 AM : Feb 28, 2008"

awwwww,,,,does the wittle baby need a nappy?
Reply to this comment
by jowand February 28, 2008 9:23 AM PST
Three cheers!
Reply to this comment
by dovesong-2009 February 28, 2008 9:24 AM PST
Perhaps he will join Obama as VP? Secretary of State? Obama needs a great team, and of course he already has one. Bloomberg is respected, perhaps he will join the fight for a UNITED States of America.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 February 28, 2008 9:27 AM PST
I was holding out hope that he would run. He''s an excellent mayor with a lot of support, and the people of NYC love him as their mayor. Politicians in NYC are usually hated, and he has a 78% approval rating. What does that tell you?
Reply to this comment
by Hybdiesel February 28, 2008 9:45 AM PST
I don''t give a rats (keep it nice) butt who runs, I will never vote for a slime ball republican again.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 February 28, 2008 9:47 AM PST
Admit it or not, the USA is not ready to elect a Jewish President.
George W. Bush could win a third term before the majority of Americans are willing to vote for someone who''''s Jewish.
A Christian woman-yes; A Christian male American of African Heritage-yes; A Mormon-maybe; A Jewish person not now, not for a long time.
That''''s a fact-admit it or not.

Posted by Benst1 at 09:32 AM : Feb 28, 2008





95% of our country''s foreign policy is Israel, Israel, Israel.

Yet you say that we wouldn''t elect a jewish president?
Reply to this comment
by gwagener February 28, 2008 11:32 AM PST
I will be surprized if Ron Paul does not run a general election campaign. If he does, he will have to declare soon. Based on this article, anyone who wants to run a general election capnaign will have to do so very soon.
Reply to this comment
by dictatortot February 28, 2008 11:37 AM PST

That breakfast with Obama has me wondering what''s up behind the scenes. An Obama/Bloomberg ticket would be almost unstoppable.
http://newsprism.wordpress.com
Reply to this comment
by gwagener February 28, 2008 12:21 PM PST
GWAGENER

Maybe Ron Paul could be Ralph Nader''''s VP running mate

Nader/Ron Paul 2008

---------------------
Posted by mocaIeo at 11:43 AM : Feb 28, 2008

Nader wahts the Government to do everything for everyone. Paul wants the Government to go back to pre-1900 level. That does not sound like a good match to me.
Reply to this comment
by candide777 February 28, 2008 12:58 PM PST
Too bad, there will be no candidate for true conservatives this time around. McCain is a joke, and Huckajesus is pre-occupied with his religious agenda, getting the country ready for the Second-Coming instead of addressing any real problems that we face.
Reply to this comment
by denn034 February 28, 2008 4:09 PM PST
Yet, the press keeps asking.
Reply to this comment
by keithle1 February 29, 2008 6:49 AM PST
Good. Because no one cares. You''d have to be insane to jump in now. Nader is insane.
Reply to this comment
by keithle1 February 29, 2008 6:53 AM PST
Ron Paul...gimme a break. He''s this election''s Ross Perot. How many delegates does he have? 14? Please.
Reply to this comment
by neoconrcrazy February 29, 2008 12:58 PM PST
Bloomberg: I''m Not Running For President


there is a God, and I thank Him.

Reply to this comment
See all 37 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs