The Long Road
Newlyweds Are Murdered. Now, 20 Years Later, Were The Convicted Men Guilty?
-
Karen and Dyke Rhoads on their wedding day. (CBS)
-
Play CBS Video Video Witness In Doubt Darrell Herrington claimed he was an eyewitness the night that Dyke and Karen Rhoads were killed.
-
Video Witness Recants Testimony Debra Reinbolt gave a sworn statement that her entire testimony was a lie in the Rhoads murder case. Reinbolt, a self-described drug addict, testified that she had seen and taken part in the killings.
Click here for more information on the Medill Innocence Project.
Center on Wrongful Convictions.
Callahan’s career with the Illinois State Police spanned nearly two and a half decades. He was promoted three times over the years, and in 2000, made lieutenant. He was asked to review the Paris murder investigation shortly before 48 Hours was to air a program about it.
He had no idea what he was getting into. "This is by far the worst investigation I’ve ever seen," he says.
In the case file, Callahan says he found hundreds of contradictions or problems: "Evidence or information or leads that weren’t followed that should’ve been followed. Again, contradictions of what people said in these reports."
Including serious questions - questions the students also had raised - about the real motive for the murders.
"The case file basically said that this was over a bad drug deal. It wasn’t over drugs. I mean, you look at Dyke and Karen. They had $200 in their savings account at the time of their deaths. They’re not major narcotics traffickers by any means," says Callahan.
Like the students, Callahan was interested in those stories of what Karen may have stumbled on at work -- not just large sums of money that seemed out of place, but also a machine gun.
Callahan wondered if someone at Karen's job knew something about the murders.
Karen had told family and friends that she had seen something in the parking lot at work, something that made her afraid and she was thinking about quitting her job.
But if Karen did see money and a machine gun, what did it mean? Was there any connection to where she worked? To find out would take a new investigation.
But Callahan says that in 2000, no one in the state police was welcoming a new investigation and that in fact, when he tried to pursue one, his superiors yanked the rug out from under him.
"I was told that I could not reopen the Rhoads case. That it was too politically sensitive. I could not touch it," he says.
No one ever explained to Callahan what "too politically sensitive" meant.
Callahan says he tried to get the case reopened five separate times.
Why Callahan's investigation was blocked never was clear. In 2003, he was transferred out of investigations, and that ended his pursuit of the Paris murders for good.
But Callahan refused to give up. Instead, he sued the state police, claiming they had transferred him to shut him up, not only about the Rhoads murders, but also about reports he’d made to internal affairs, alleging inappropriate conduct by superiors.
The case against the state police went to federal court. He argued that his superiors muzzled him, and violated his right to free speech, in part because he was trying to investigate any possible connections between what Karen saw at work and the murders.
Callahan, now retired, found his vindication in 2005, when he was awarded $360,000. A jury agreed that he had been punished for just trying to do his job.
"People come to us for the truth," says Callahan. "We should always try to do the right thing."
"It's my opinion that they were framed," Callahan says.
But fortunes were about to change, with a development that the students, the cop, and the prisoners all worked long and hard for and never thought they’d see.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.



One comments that the investigators should be embarassed.
I only saw one investigator mentioned, and I doubt, at the time this took place, if Paris, Il. had more than one investigator.
Almost every ill of our system can be traced to one thing. Lack of money, or the realities of municiplal budgets. It is the same thing.
Statistically speaking, for every 7 convicted inmates in our sytem one is innocent. With almost 4 million people involved in our nations prison system that translates into a lot of innocent people in jail.
As our municipalities find themselves awash in a sea of crime, they have to cope in the best way they can, and that translates into shortcuts.
If the Police tell the DA they think this man did it, the DA doesn''t really have the time or the resources to challenge that, and as most of the time (6 out of 7 anyway) they are right the DA''s actually believe they are persuing the correct individuals.
Then it becomes a game. They must do X to get the convition. How many cases each week? Each month? Each year? Do you honestly believe anyone can feel compasion for an endless stream of names?
One death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic.
My only hope would be that when Karen saw what she had seen in that parking lot, which made her so afraid, that she did mention names.
What bothers me is the lack of accountability that the legal profession has and the low standards of conduct it holds itself to.
In many cases which are overturned there is prosecutorial malfeasance, especially including exculpatory evidence that is not turned over to the defense. Yet, how often do the stories finish with the prosecutors losing their licenses or even being diciplined? Amost Never. Examples like Nifong in the Duke Lacrosse case should be the rule. Instead they are the very rare exception...and probably only happened in the Lacrosse case because of the power and connections of Duke and the parents, their wealth and the notoriety of the case.
Judges fail us too, over and over. Where is the demand of the profession for studies which show that given the same set of circumstances most judges will make the same decisions? Why doesn''t the legal profession demand this of itself?
Until the legal system demands more of itself and can demonstrate such, I cannot participate as a juror.
- by tbone6648 March 2, 2008 2:17 AM EST
- How can a Police Dept representing the state be so incompetent. This corrupted police dept has not only caused pain to the wrongly accused but also to the family of the victims who are seeking justice. I think it is the least this police department owes them. How they could still consider the wrongly accused suspects shows how incompetent they truly are. This story brought tears to my eyes and outraged me so much I just had to coment.
- Reply to this comment
See all 19 Comments