The Long Road
Newlyweds Are Murdered. Now, 20 Years Later, Were The Convicted Men Guilty?
-
Karen and Dyke Rhoads on their wedding day. (CBS)
-
Play CBS Video Video Witness In Doubt Darrell Herrington claimed he was an eyewitness the night that Dyke and Karen Rhoads were killed.
-
Video Witness Recants Testimony Debra Reinbolt gave a sworn statement that her entire testimony was a lie in the Rhoads murder case. Reinbolt, a self-described drug addict, testified that she had seen and taken part in the killings.
Click here for more information on the Medill Innocence Project.
Center on Wrongful Convictions.
"It did not happen the way the state’s witnesses said that it did," says Krista Larson.
For one thing, they doubted Herrington’s story, which had put the murders at shortly after midnight; the students tracked down witnesses who challenged that timeline. One had been a neighbor of the Rhoads', Ben Light.
"You would think that with the house located just 100 yards away, we would have heard something," says Light.
"This crime occurred much later in the night, at a time when Randy Steidl and Herb Whitlock were nowhere near the scene," says Protess.
And there’s one other thing that doesn’t quite add up: Herrington told police that after the murders, he was standing by the Rhoads’ garage with Steidl. But Reinbolt also says she stood by the garage with Steidl. Remarkably, the two eyewitnesses never say they saw each other.
"It could have happened that way, matter of fact, must have happened that way," says McFatridge. "That argument was presented at trial to two different juries by two different defense attorneys. The juries found the defendants guilty."
McFatridge may not find this odd, but his star witness, Debra Reinbolt, sure did. "I thought, somebody’s made this up, somebody’s lost their mind, this is the town drunk. There is no way this man was there," she says.
But what about Reinbolt’s own story? Her testimony was key to the guilty verdict. After all, she said she had seen the murders and even said she helped.
In 1996, nine years after the convictions, Reinbolt matter-of-factly stated in a sworn statement to Steidl’s lawyer that she had lied on the stand. Asked by the lawyer what parts of her story were untrue, Reinbolt said on tape, "Oh, I don’t know that Randy was there, I don’t know that Herbie was there."
As for those impressive details she had provided about what she had seen inside the house, Reinbolt told the lawyer she had actually never been inside the Rhoads house.
But in a head-spinning reversal, Reinbolt later insisted that she actually was lying on the tape, and that her original eyewitness account of being at the scene of the crime was and is true. Is it? Well, it’s pretty hard to know. Over the years, Reinbolt has changed her story more than half a dozen times.
Why has she changed her story so many times? "Basically wanting to get out of this, just wanting it over. The bottom line is I can’t change a story that’s true," she says.
Bill Clutter, an investigator working on the Steidl case, thinks he has proof, beyond her various accounts, that Reinbolt never saw the murders at all.
Remember that broken lamp?
"The prosecution used the lamp as the centerpiece of their evidence, corroborating Debra Reinbolt’s account of what happened this night," says Clutter. "It made her believable."
Reinbolt testified the lamp was broken when she got to the Rhoads’ bedroom, before fire tore through the home. After the fire, black soot covered the crime scene.
But Clutter says the broken inside parts of the lamp were white. He says had the lamp been broken before the fire there would have been soot on the pieces.
In the same 1996 statement, in which she denied being at the crime scene, Reinbolt also said police fed her the information about the lamp. "And they would come up with, ‘Well, there was a broken vase or broken lamp there.’ And then I’d say ‘Well, okay. So there was,’" Reinbolt said on tape.
For the students, it all added up to more than a reasonable doubt, especially when they started turning up other witnesses the police never had talked to.
One of those witnesses, a woman, pointed the students in an entirely new direction.
The woman let the students videotape her, but was so frightened she asked 48 Hours to conceal her identity. "I noticed two men standing opposite of the street light by Dyke and Karen’s house. Now what caught my eye was they had trench coats on in July. And it was very, very hot, and I wondered why they had trench coats on," she said.
She said she saw them around 9 o’clock the night before the murders. "And one of them was a big guy with blond hair, and the other guy was small-framed and looked like he had dark hair. But they were just standing there looking toward Dyke and Karen’s house."
The woman thinks she saw the same two men the next night, the night of the murders. "This car started coming around, and it was white with a gold stripe down it. And it had Florida license plates. It would just go by, turn in front of Dyke and Karen’s house, stop. And I seen them looking, you know? And then take off. They did this about ten times, just, I mean, continuously. Why would anyone be doing that?"
Across town, the students also tracked down a gas station attendant who worked the night shift and who remembered selling a lot of extra gas to a man driving a car with Florida plates. He told them he had sold someone 21 gallons of gasoline at 3 a.m. that morning, in seven three-gallon cans.
An hour later, the Rhoads’ house was ablaze. Police had interviewed the gas attendant, but the Florida connection went nowhere. The police never even knew about the other witness, who over the years did not volunteer the information.
But what would the killers' motive be? The students came up with a new theory, one that focused on Karen, not Dyke.
"Karen had told several family members and friends that she had seen something at work that had scared her," says Kirsten Searer.
Karen may have seen something in the parking lot of the pet food plant where she worked, an incident involving other people from the factory. "She had seen large amounts of money and a gun put in a trunk that was on its way to Chicago," says Kristen.
According to a friend the students interviewed, Karen was very worried.
Protess wonders if there could be a link between what Karen saw and the shadowy men from Florida.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- I applaud the Innocence Project and thank God they exist. My man was wrongfully accused as well. Spent all our money on two attorneys, the first one did NOTHING. He spoke of things he was "going" to do; investigate, talk with people, even go out to scene where "alleged" crime occured. NEVER, do you hear me, NEVER did anything stated. I would like to give details on the incompetence from A to Z, just like others would. . . but will contain myself for the moment. All the folks round here said they never seen or heard of such an injustice like what was done to my man. Only thing my man got going for him IS the Innocence Project. They contacted him a while back & we both sit patiently, praying they take own his case. We done lost everything & if they don't take his case ..... he'll be another innocent person rotting in prison for something he didn't do. We got our faith in God, yet the entire family & friends keep on praying they take his case. They all we got left & I know I'll end up in the hospital if our last hope is gone. Its been about 2 years now & I still can't get thru the day without crying. When you ain't got nothing left & nobody else to turn to, you just about go insane. Go to The Innocence Project on the internet and read what they about. Look for yourself how awesome they are. Its because of these marvelous & dedicated people that "some" laws have been changed. I call them our HOPE for we had none. My man & me learned that when you think all hope is gone ... there's The Innocence Project. God Bless Ya'll & thank God for some mighty warriors!!!
- Reply to this comment
- I must say after reading all the comments here that pertain to the issue, that few of the readers have a grasp on the realities of our justice system.
One comments that the investigators should be embarassed.
I only saw one investigator mentioned, and I doubt, at the time this took place, if Paris, Il. had more than one investigator.
Almost every ill of our system can be traced to one thing. Lack of money, or the realities of municiplal budgets. It is the same thing.
Statistically speaking, for every 7 convicted inmates in our sytem one is innocent. With almost 4 million people involved in our nations prison system that translates into a lot of innocent people in jail.
As our municipalities find themselves awash in a sea of crime, they have to cope in the best way they can, and that translates into shortcuts.
If the Police tell the DA they think this man did it, the DA doesn''t really have the time or the resources to challenge that, and as most of the time (6 out of 7 anyway) they are right the DA''s actually believe they are persuing the correct individuals.
Then it becomes a game. They must do X to get the convition. How many cases each week? Each month? Each year? Do you honestly believe anyone can feel compasion for an endless stream of names?
One death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic. - Reply to this comment
- NOTICE: I posted a comment back on 3/2/08. I haven''t thoroughly read everybody''s comments, but does anybody know where and how we can influence (and I mean INFLUENCE!) the Courts (here in North Carolina)? They should give my son''s case the attention it deserves and study how the legal system is working.
- Reply to this comment
- My cousin Berry Bolin was wrongfully convicted of voluntary manslaughter. While at a friends residence, A group of people that had made numerous threats arrived starting a fight. One of these people having a bond restriction preventing him from being within so many feet of the owner of the residence. The police ignored that fact among many others. They had no evidence to convict Berry of this crime. I sat through the trial and have seen guilty people walk out of the court room with more evidence than that! Again, if you or anyone you know can help please contact us @ mitchellbolin@bellsouth.net
- Reply to this comment
- Berry Bolin is my nephew. Everything about his conviction was unfair and very wrong! York County failed to properly investigate from the start and the solicitor set out for a conviction and used this case to set an example to young people in the community. Please if anyone can help, contact us @ mitchellbolin@bellsouth.net
- Reply to this comment
- Yes, it is so very sad! Two years ago, My son Berry Bolin was charged and convicted of voluntary manslaughter with no evidence. He couldn''t have a fair trial because the investigation was not fair. If you can help or know someone that can please contact me @ mitchellbolin@bellsouth.net
- Reply to this comment
- Yes, it is so very sad! Two years ago, My son Berry Bolin was charged and convicted of voluntary manslaughter with no evidence. He couldn''t have a fair trial because the investigation was not fair. If you can help or know someone that can please contact me @ mitchellbolin@bellsouth.net
- Reply to this comment
- 48 Hours Mystery keeps getting better all the time, and it was always great! You really outdid yourselves on March 2nd with the story about the young couple and the two men who were wrongfully convicted for their murder.
- Reply to this comment
- The two eye witnesses appear to be of questionable character. Motive appears to be very important in this case. The case could be drug related or be related to what Karen witnessed. I''m not convinced either way. Further investigation relating to the company she worked for may yield significant information or eliminate suspects outside the community.
- Reply to this comment
- Good story 3/1/2008, but need to go much deeper. All this info has been there for quite some time. Morgan(Karen''s boss)is into it up to his neck and so is states attorney in covering it up. A resident told me that when he first moved to Paris before the murder that he was told that this attorney in town had the best drugs! Before he was states attorney. Check out his background. Few years before the Rhoads murder there was a deputy killed by train. This was drug related too. He was dead before train got to him. Pizza Connection drug case ring any bells in relation to Paris,IL? Back to Morgan, Donations to campaign of now imprisoned George Ryan. Ex-Gov of IL. Too politically sensitive ? Ryan shreaded most all the papers of his office when he left both the Sec of states office and the Gov office. Top official of Jesse Whites office can confirm this. They saw it both times. The politics of Paris have been dirty for 30-40 yrs at least.
- Reply to this comment
- Any reason why these innocent people have refused to have lie detector exams? Never has been mentioned.
- Reply to this comment
- Pitiful that these men spent so many years in prison for a crime they did not commit, while the real killer(killers) are roaming the earth somewhere. I wonder what this new investigation will find and those officers that investigated this the first time, I wonder how they sleep at night knowing that they did a horrible job and that a group of "STUDENTS" did better than they did! I hope the families get the answers they so deserve after all these years.
My only hope would be that when Karen saw what she had seen in that parking lot, which made her so afraid, that she did mention names. - Reply to this comment
- Thank you to David Protess and to CBS.
What bothers me is the lack of accountability that the legal profession has and the low standards of conduct it holds itself to.
In many cases which are overturned there is prosecutorial malfeasance, especially including exculpatory evidence that is not turned over to the defense. Yet, how often do the stories finish with the prosecutors losing their licenses or even being diciplined? Amost Never. Examples like Nifong in the Duke Lacrosse case should be the rule. Instead they are the very rare exception...and probably only happened in the Lacrosse case because of the power and connections of Duke and the parents, their wealth and the notoriety of the case.
Judges fail us too, over and over. Where is the demand of the profession for studies which show that given the same set of circumstances most judges will make the same decisions? Why doesn''t the legal profession demand this of itself?
Until the legal system demands more of itself and can demonstrate such, I cannot participate as a juror. - Reply to this comment
- This kind of incident is sadly all to common and hedious in this day in this country. Two innocent men and their families have litrally been tortured for over 2 decades. Over zealous procecuters, incompetent investigators and corrupt government need to be held "ACCOUNTABLE" in such incidents, they need to know that when they fail to do their jobs properly that they will be held accountable and they will pay for their crime''s and make no mistake, it is a crime. Prosecuter''s are suppose to seek truth and justice not simply get a conviction, a win, this is a disgusting mentality to have in our justice system and it needs to be addressed. It''s unacceptable that this kind of thing happens frequently in the greatest nation on earth. All of our heads should be hung in shame and disgrace for allowing this type of injustice, so flagrant, to continually occur. Our law maker''s need to set some standards and consequences to deal with these issues, it should have been done already. "ACCOUNTABILITY", "ETHICS", "INTEGRITY", "MORALITY" and let''s add, "COMMON DECENCY" are NOT just words. People, wake up, this could have been you! YOU could be the next victim of this type of "CRIME", think about it! Who would save you? How long would it take? What would it cost you? your family? Maybe we should inact preventative measures NOW...
- Reply to this comment
- This story is one of many that I have tuned into because I am a victim - of a victim - of injustice. The work of the Northwestern students guided by their college instructor is becoming noticeably common in our communities and vital to overturn the injustice that happens so often. Now this injustice may not always be obvious. An appeal typically focuses on 4 main issues. Mis-actions by the court (judge), the prosecutor, defense counsel and the jury. However, these appeals are extremely confined in scope and do not allow the appellate courts the freedom and impetus to grant a new trial, much less a reversal of the conviction. They are weighted by a common thread in our lives. The ridiculous amounts of money required to properly appeal a wrongful conviction is a pity on the men (and women) who were improperly served by the legal system. If you don''t have it, you then become society''s victim of a victim of injustice. And again, this injustice revolves around any of the 4 parts of the pie. I plan on monitoring this website and comments area. If you would register and login to post your comment, we can continue this communication and find a way to right what might be wrong.
- Reply to this comment
- Since the case is now reopened, I''d like to know if anyone is actively investigating this case. It it is being investigated - is ts being done by the local police, State Police or Feds?
- Reply to this comment
- There is a black man named Carlton Gary on Georgia''s death row. He has been there since 1986. Gary was railroaded by Columbus Police and two racist, overzealous young DA''s. It took six years after the torture and strangling of those seven elderly white women, to find a scape goat that they could pin it on...somebody PLEASE go down to Columbus, GA and open up that Pandora''s box...that case has never gotten from under the rug that it was swept under...nobody has ever heard about the Case of the Columbus Stocking Strangler...it is time for the media to go down there and ask and keep asking questions.
- Reply to this comment
- Rarely do small town police departments have enough experience or resources to do a really excellent investigation and may "settle" for an easy arrest and conviction. Unfortunately, it happens a lot. Look at the Innocence Project. They have exonerated many convicted murderers, and while I do not know how many of those exonerated people are from small towns, I''d bet they comprise a great percentage. The point is that law enforcement often does not investigate all leads, and make a theory on who killed the victim(s) based on building a case early on, rather than investigating any and all leads. This is exactly what happened to John and Patsy Ramsey with the death of their daughter, JonBenet. Boulder law enforcement had very little experience in murder investigations and came off looking like the Keystone Cops, and the Ramseys lived their lives under suspicion from then on. I know this is true: I''m from there. The Ramseys were eventually exonerated as suspects in a court of law, but the media paid very little attention to it, and the real murderer went free and is free to this day.
- Reply to this comment
- How can a Police Dept representing the state be so incompetent. This corrupted police dept has not only caused pain to the wrongly accused but also to the family of the victims who are seeking justice. I think it is the least this police department owes them. How they could still consider the wrongly accused suspects shows how incompetent they truly are. This story brought tears to my eyes and outraged me so much I just had to coment.
- Reply to this comment


