The Long Road
Newlyweds Are Murdered. Now, 20 Years Later, Were The Convicted Men Guilty?
-
Photo
Karen and Dyke Rhoads on their wedding day. (CBS)
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Witness In Doubt
Darrell Herrington claimed he was an eyewitness the night that Dyke and Karen Rhoads were killed.
-
Video
Witness Recants Testimony
Debra Reinbolt gave a sworn statement that her entire testimony was a lie in the Rhoads murder case. Reinbolt, a self-described drug addict, testified that she had seen and taken part in the killings.
Click here for more information on the Medill Innocence Project.
Center on Wrongful Convictions.
Karen was 24 when they married, and had a job as an office assistant at a factory; Dyke worked in landscaping. There was no hint that just months after their wedding their lives would come to a violent end.
As correspondent Susan Spencer reports, in the early morning hours of July 6, 1986, a fire engulfed their home.
"My dad came over at 6 o'clock in the morning. I never will forget that. And he told me they had been killed," remembers Dyke's brother Tony. "He told me about their house burning. So we just naturally assumed they died in the fire, and it wasn’t until two o'clock that afternoon that we found out they had been stabbed or murdered."
Justice moved quickly. Within a year, two men were arrested and convicted of the crime: 41-year-old Herb Whitlock, a part-time construction worker and small-time drug dealer, and his pal, Randy Steidl, 35, who also worked in construction and had several convictions for assault.
Prosecutors said the motive for the killing was a drug deal gone bad.
Both men said they were innocent, but no one was listening. That is until 1999, when journalism professor David Protess of Northwestern University gave his students the Rhoads murder as a class project. He told them to re-investigate the crime. To him, at least, the case didn’t add up.
Protess has led classes on such projects before, investigating old crimes, and in ten cases they have produced evidence which helped free innocent men.
The job of finding the truth about the Rhoads case fell to students Kirsten Searer, Diane Haag, Greg Jonsson and Krista Larson.
Their professor admitted to having qualms about sending his students on this mission. "If that’s the case and the two wrong guys are behind bars that means the actual killer or killers are roaming free," Protess told his students. "Number one, you’re not going to stay anywhere in the immediate vicinity of the town. Number two, you’re not going to tell any of the sources you talked to where you’re staying. Number three, I don’t want you to stay in the same place more than two nights in a row."
For the next nine months, the students would spend most weekends on the road, making the 180-mile trip from Chicago to the small town of Paris.
They would plow through police reports and court records to track down new leads and old witnesses wherever they could find them. The students interviewed dozens of people for their project.
Over and over again, the students recreated the crime scene in their minds, going back to that Fourth of July holiday weekend. "Dyke and Karen were sleeping in bed. The people came in. They attacked Dyke first, stabbing him in the back. Karen had time to wake up and maybe grab her glasses off her night stand, and then she was stabbed herself, mostly in the chest," explains Greg Jonsson.
Blood everywhere, but on the suspects.
"This young couple was tragically stabbed over 50 times. These men would’ve been covered in blood. There would’ve been blood in their automobiles, there would have been blood on their clothes. There would have been hair, fiber, something that linked them to the crime scene. Nothing did," says Protess.
Remarkably, the professor's skepticism is shared even by Dyke Rhoads’ own family. "We weren’t 100 percent convinced that they were the ones who did it," says Tony.
Their doubt is based on both the lack of physical evidence and on the supposed motive. The prosecutors said it was a drug deal gone bad, a theory Tony will not accept. But Dyke had met Whitlock half a dozen times, according to the testimony of a friend who had bought cocaine from Whitlock.
Tony says his brother Dyke was an occasional pot smoker and that Karen never used any drugs. "There’s a big difference between somebody who’s an occasional pot smoker and somebody who gets involved in with a drug deal that’s gone bad, that’s going cost you your life," says Tony.
The students also doubt the drug deal theory, but finding holes in this case wasn’t as easy as it first seemed, because the juries heard from two people who said they had actually been there.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.



What bothers me is the lack of accountability that the legal profession has and the low standards of conduct it holds itself to.
In many cases which are overturned there is prosecutorial malfeasance, especially including exculpatory evidence that is not turned over to the defense. Yet, how often do the stories finish with the prosecutors losing their licenses or even being diciplined? Amost Never. Examples like Nifong in the Duke Lacrosse case should be the rule. Instead they are the very rare exception...and probably only happened in the Lacrosse case because of the power and connections of Duke and the parents, their wealth and the notoriety of the case.
Judges fail us too, over and over. Where is the demand of the profession for studies which show that given the same set of circumstances most judges will make the same decisions? Why doesn''t the legal profession demand this of itself?
Until the legal system demands more of itself and can demonstrate such, I cannot participate as a juror.
My only hope would be that when Karen saw what she had seen in that parking lot, which made her so afraid, that she did mention names.
-
by rad1025
March 4, 2008 9:30 PM PST
- I must say after reading all the comments here that pertain to the issue, that few of the readers have a grasp on the realities of our justice system.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 18 CommentsOne comments that the investigators should be embarassed.
I only saw one investigator mentioned, and I doubt, at the time this took place, if Paris, Il. had more than one investigator.
Almost every ill of our system can be traced to one thing. Lack of money, or the realities of municiplal budgets. It is the same thing.
Statistically speaking, for every 7 convicted inmates in our sytem one is innocent. With almost 4 million people involved in our nations prison system that translates into a lot of innocent people in jail.
As our municipalities find themselves awash in a sea of crime, they have to cope in the best way they can, and that translates into shortcuts.
If the Police tell the DA they think this man did it, the DA doesn''t really have the time or the resources to challenge that, and as most of the time (6 out of 7 anyway) they are right the DA''s actually believe they are persuing the correct individuals.
Then it becomes a game. They must do X to get the convition. How many cases each week? Each month? Each year? Do you honestly believe anyone can feel compasion for an endless stream of names?
One death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic.