February 11, 2009 3:23 PM

Does Obama's Record Back His Rhetoric?

By
CBSNews
(CBS)  This story was written by CBSNews.com political reporter Brian Montopoli.

As Barack Obama has emerged as the frontrunner for the Democratic presidential nomination, voters have been offered a preview of how Republicans will likely characterize the Illinois senator in a general election match up.

One recurring theme has been where Obama falls on the ideological spectrum.

In early February, Republican National Committee spokesman Alex Conant called Obama the Senate's "most liberal" member. Presumptive GOP nominee John McCain, Newt Gingrich and others have echoed the charge.

Their evidence? A January 31st finding by National Journal that put Obama at the top of the list of most liberal senators in 2007.

Obama's critics don't always mention the fine print: Obama was found to be the 10th most liberal senator the previous year and the 16th most liberal the year before that, and other studies don't echo National Journal's findings.

Nonetheless, the "most liberal" charge is likely to be heard early and often should Obama emerge as the Democratic nominee, particularly as it appears at odds with his insistence that he will reach across the aisle and shift the political calculus away from the bitter antagonism of recent years.

"There's a lot of uncertainty about how he would govern and how he would put into practice what we think of as bipartisanship given what we know about his Senate record," said Sarah Binder, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and an expert on Congress.

Binder notes that Obama has spent his time in the Senate on "midrange issues," such as ethics reform and nuclear proliferation, where he could more easily find a Republican senator that would be open to working with him.

"He wasn't working on issues where you have hard Democratic vs. Republican divides," she said. "He seems to have very carefully chosen out areas where there were prospects of success and where he could find like-minded people across the aisle."

"He's been cautious, overall, as a senator," said David Epstein, a professor of political science at Columbia University. "He hasn't been a firebrand in terms of liberal causes, but he's staked out a leftist policy position. His record doesn't provide a lot of basis for the claim that once he's president he's going to win over Republicans and sort of bring everyone together."

Democratic Illinois State Senator Denny Jacobs, who played poker with Obama when they were both state legislators, disagrees.

"He brought some ethics reform to Illinois, and that's no easy thing," said Jacobs. "He worked with both sides of the aisle to get that done. I think he's pragmatic. Illinois is the wild west of campaign finance, and Barack came in here and created some rules."

"I think that what he's proven is that he does believe in something, he does have a core, but he's also someone who can move people from both sides to a resolution," Jacobs added.

Republican Illinois State Senator Bill Brady, who also worked with Obama, said Obama was "probably the most liberal member of the Illinois State Senate" - in part because he "represented the most liberal area in the state." (Epstein, using roll call vote and bill co-sponsorship data, found Obama to be the 6th most liberal in the State Senate.)

"I think he's a believer," said Brady. "He's a bleeding heart liberal, but he's smart enough not to put it in people's face right now."

In a debate with Hillary Clinton last Thursday, Obama was asked to respond after his rival brought up an uncomfortable cable-television exchange in which an Obama supporter was unable to identify any of the senator's accomplishments. Obama cited his work on health care, providing tax breaks to families, reforming the criminal justice system, and passing "the toughest ethics reform legislation since Watergate."

"I don't perceive him as one of the chamber's liberal members," said Jennifer Duffy, a veteran analyst with the Cook Political Report. "I don't perceive him as one of the guys who goes down on the floor and rails about his pet cause."

Obama has been criticized for not taking a stand early in his career on some hot-button issues, including abortion: He voted "present" on abortion questions seven out of 14 times in the state Senate, including once when the issue was a statewide ban on so-called partial-birth abortion.

Binder said Obama's time in the Senate suggests that he seems "comfortable working across the aisle on some of these smaller type of issues." But she suggested there are few clues as to how effective President Obama would be in dealing with larger, more divisive issues such as the war, health care, and entitlement reform.

"Those are all issues where there could be bipartisan solutions, but it's a big challenge," she said.

Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 380 Comments
by kailumego1 February 28, 2008 6:41 PM EST
What Obama brings to the table is to depolarize white and black Americans, and bridge the gap between the United States and international communities.

We need a leader that is believable, able to negotiate, and likeable by other political leaders,Bush, McCain, and Hilary certainly isn''t.

I think Obama will change the paradigm of American ideology to one of tolerance, cohesiveness, and Republicanism, the true sense of the word "Republicanism".

He comes from a multicultural background, which he will cater to neither black or white specifically, but to a nation as a whole.

We do need change, a dramatic change from the old-paradigm of American polity to a new pluralistic synthesis, of which Obama is the one to accomplish this and not McCain nor Clinton.



Reply to this comment
by pilgrimsway-2009 February 28, 2008 2:01 AM EST
In America today we have this knight in shinny armor coming towards us promising us deliverance! He never fought a battle, He was present when the other knights fought the battles, and keeps His armor very shinny. When He is with the other knights He speaks as one who fought battles, remember now He never did He was only present, that He can conquer lions and dragons and bring this land America to tranquility. The other knights ask Him of His experience and He just points to the fact that He has shinny armor. These other knights see His shinny armor and wonder why this so called knight calls Himself a knight. This knight in shinny armor states %u201CI can bring CHANGE%u201D. The people without experience in fighting real battles on issues are transfix on His shinny armor that they do not bother with the issue that He has no experience. The people see this knight as their hope. They point to the other knight who is in charge for now and say this is the reason why we need a knight with shinny armor (with no experience) the knight who is there now had no experience either and we want another one like Him!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by trace-sc February 27, 2008 11:28 PM EST
Does anybody really think Obama is ready to be considered a World class leader?

You''ve got to be kidding!

After electing George Bush, America has lowered its standards to unbelievable limits!

Reply to this comment
by libra127 February 27, 2008 7:09 PM EST
His first year in the U.S. Senate, he authored 152 bills and co-sponsored another 427.Posted by Buddhabman at 02:12 AM : Feb 27, 2008

These numbers are not correct. See www.govtrack.us/data/us/110/repstats/enacted/xml

Reply to this comment
by libra127 February 27, 2008 7:04 PM EST
Take Hillary for instance. Do you think she didn''t divorce Bill because she would not be able to run for president? I feel bad for her to be in a situation where she has to stay in a relationship to benefit her career. What else will she do to benefit herself"
Posted by pepie3 at 09:09 AM : Feb 27, 20

OF COURSE she could have run for President without being married to Bill. The truth of the matter is that being married to Bill has HURT her campaign, not helped it. She has a long and distinguished record of her own. She stayed married for love.
Reply to this comment
by kmccliment February 27, 2008 5:44 PM EST
The media keeps calling Barry an African American. The media knows this is untrue however this is an example of the media heavily supporting Barry and no one else. Barry is only 6.25% Negro. This does not make the US standards for the name of African American. He is in fact Arab American. Americans get a clue who this fake is.
Reply to this comment
by future_watch February 27, 2008 5:16 PM EST
Radarama, I don''t think you are making up the story about Repubs crossing over to vote for the least threatening candidate. It has worked for politicians in the past. It really isn''t a far-fetched idea. And I''ll better that...there is a Bill Moyers special or two devoted to uncovering the links between news media and their big business owners and how that impacts what is reported. Sounds like a big conspiracy theory, but fact is stranger than fiction.
Reply to this comment
by donnawinney February 27, 2008 4:35 PM EST
If you honestly think someone so cowardly they can''t even vote "Yes" or "No" is going to be brave enough to lead the free world, you are in an Obama-induced dreamworld. Real leaders lead; they don''t vote ''present''

John McCain will eat Obama''s lunch. McCain was brave enough to survive the Hanoi Hilton. Obama can''t even man-up in the comfort of a Senate chamber.

Bill Clinton had it right when he called the Obama campaign a fairy tale.

Reply to this comment
by jowand February 27, 2008 12:14 PM EST
RowdyTexan2 Thank you for stating a few facts. Just keep in mind that bigots don''''t want facts, they prefer half truths and lies.They''''ll still be debating Obama''''s middle name while he''''s being sworn in. Bigots are some of the dumbest critters on the planet. I almost feel sorry for them because most of them came from stupid parents who filled they minds with trash from the start.
Posted by vmcneal2 at 08:33 AM : Feb 27, 2008

Spoken like a true 24 karat BIGOT
Reply to this comment
by jowand February 27, 2008 12:12 PM EST
THEY know he could never win the presidency, even if Dubbya could run again. THEY know that Hillary is the real threat to the White House, so THEY are doing their level best, behind the scene skullduggery to get the Democratic nomination for Obama. This country would not put that man in office, and I don''''''''t care how many fanatics out there disagree with me. I''''''''m not saying it''''''''s right, but I''''''''m saying it''''''''s so. Want to know where all the Obama support is coming from???? Look to the Grand Old Party. And the worst part is, their scam is working. We are such a gullible country.
Posted by radarama11 at 05:58 AM : Feb 27, 2008

You are making all of this up it''s a lie, your delisional enough to believe it, because you want the power back and you''ll do anything to get it
Reply to this comment
See all 380 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook