WASHINGTON, Feb. 26, 2008

Pfizer Drops Jarvik From Lipitor Ads

Doubt Cast Over Credentials Of Artificial Heart Inventor-Turned Pitchman For Cholesterol Drug

  • Dr. Robert Jarvik holds a medical degree, but he did not complete the certification requirements to practice medicine.

    Dr. Robert Jarvik holds a medical degree, but he did not complete the certification requirements to practice medicine.  (AP)

  • Interactive Eye On The Economy

    In-depth features on U.S. markets, taxes, employment and the Federal Reserve.

(AP)  When "diet and exercise isn't enough," Pfizer still wants consumers to ask their doctor about Lipitor - just not Dr. Robert Jarvik.

On Monday, Pfizer took the doctor and inventor of the artificial heart off the mound as pitchman for the world's best- selling medication, after his credentials - in medicine and in his own exercise regimen - came under fire.

In the ads, which began their heavy rotation on TV and in print in 2006, Jarvik touts the benefits of Pfizer's cholesterol-lowering drug. As of Monday afternoon, Jarvik's photo still appeared on Pfizer's Web site advertising the drug.

But House Democrats said the ads could be misleading to consumers because Jarvik appeared to be giving medical advice, even though he is not licensed to practice medicine. While Jarvik holds a medical degree, he did not complete the certification requirements to practice medicine.

Democratic Reps. John Dingell and Bart Stupak said Monday the company made the right decision.

"When consumers see and hear a doctor endorsing a medication, they expect the doctor is a credible individual with requisite knowledge of the drug," Stupak said.

In January, the lawmakers asked Pfizer to hand over all records of its contract with Jarvik as part of a larger investigation into celebrity endorsements of prescription medicines.

Lipitor ad scrutiny intensified earlier this month when the New York Times reported that Pfizer used a stunt double in an ad in which Jarvik appeared to be rowing. The company replaced that ad with one showing Jarvik jogging with his son.

"You add up the medical questions and the rowing questions, and it's a pretty damning indictment," said Dr. Bill Trombetta, a professor of pharmaceutical marketing at St. Joseph's University. "It made sense for them to cut their losses and move on."

Lipitor posted sales of more than $12 billion last year.

In a statement Monday, Pfizer president of operations Ian Read said "the way in which we presented Dr. Jarvik in these ads has, unfortunately, led to misimpressions and distractions."

Read said the company will provide "greater clarity in our advertising regarding the presentation of spokespeople."

Pfizer said it plans to launch a new Lipitor campaign in coming weeks, but did not provide details. The company spent $118 million on Lipitor advertising in the first nine months of 2007.

In his response to initial questions about his qualifications, Jarvik issued a statement in mid-January, in which he said he was neither a clinical doctor nor a celebrity but had the expertise to endorse Lipitor as a treatment against heart disease.

The use of celebrities in drug advertising has declined since reaching a peak in the late 1990s, said Professor Michael Montagne of the Massachusetts College of Pharmacy.

At that time Pfizer enlisted former senator and presidential candidate Bob Dole to pitch Viagra and rival Merck & Co. Inc. paid Olympic skating champion Dorothy Hamill to appear in ads for Vioxx.

"Much of the director-to-consumer advertising we see today doesn't use celebrities because they are viewed as being a deceptive argument," said Montagne, who studies drug marketing. "They distract from the message of the ad - if there is a message."

Not every drug maker sees star power as a distraction. Actress Sally Field appears in ads for Boniva, an osteoporosis drug marketed by GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Roche. And rival Wyeth tapped former Charlie's Angel Cheryl Ladd to steer women toward its menopause therapy, Premarin.

Shares of Pfizer Inc. rose 28 cents Monday to close at $22.78.

© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 23 Comments
by abigail531 February 27, 2008 2:53 PM EST
OKAY! Give the man a break! Just because he is not Board Certified to practice medicine, doesn''t mean that he doesn''t know how. Besides, Jarvik Heart has saved millions of lives. Give the man his credit he deserves.
As for Sally Field, she mocks women who take a little pill once a WEEK instead of once a MONTH. Is her memory so deteriorated that she cannot REMEMBER to take a pill once a week. She is so full of herself!
Reply to this comment
by estabwary February 27, 2008 12:03 AM EST
LOL wow these congresspeople think we all still think doctors won''t push any ole drug. As if the drug companies are angels. They can put House on pushing drugs for all I care, not taking them unless death is imminent. Real food, not processed, & exercise people -- that''s the best answer to profit for yourself, not to profit big pharma.
Reply to this comment
by gce65 February 26, 2008 11:21 PM EST
Jarvik has an MD, but he never did a residency (cardiology, for the heart) or took licensing exams.
He worked on the engineering side of medicine, improving on a colleague''s artificial heart and patenting the Jarvik 7, which only kept near-death patients alive for a little while longer anyway. It was never a true long term replacement for a heart. Then he sold that business and went into advertising and medical consulting for companies like Pfizer. I''m glad they pulled the ads, it''s way overdue.
Reply to this comment
by valentin73 February 26, 2008 11:01 PM EST
BIG SMACKING DEAL!!!

THE DOCTOR HAS ALREADY MADE MILLIONS OFF OF THEM.

P''FIZER PROBABLY CAN NO LONGER AFFORD HIM.

Who''s ads were they for: some rich SOG (sun of a gun) who is able to afford the $100K machine that brings nothing but artificial life.

P''fizer, go find yourself another salesman. We''re waiting for his pitch...
Reply to this comment
by enriquecaliente February 26, 2008 10:49 PM EST
Enzyte Bob is out of a job too.!
Reply to this comment
by Syndicate February 26, 2008 9:51 PM EST
I always thaught he was an actor. I guess I''ve become way to cycical.
Reply to this comment
by jwind11 February 26, 2008 9:21 PM EST
I see Prozac is under scrutiny now.

Posted by fishinfool43 at 02:31 PM : Feb 26, 2008

It didnt work for mcvet or walt1944
Reply to this comment
by random_radar February 26, 2008 8:51 PM EST
"When consumers see and hear a doctor endorsing a medication, they expect the doctor is a credible individual with requisite knowledge of the drug," Stupak said.

Yeah, I am sure that paperwork makes a world of difference between being a good doctor and a quack. Look at all the great doctors pushing Prozac all these years. Medical licensing sure made a difference there, too.
Reply to this comment
by ne1956-2009 February 26, 2008 8:04 PM EST
ANY television / radio commercial promotes in me an automatic reflex to hit the mute button on my TV remote control or to change the channel on my radio, or to pop in a CD. Doesn''t matter who, what, when, where or why.

Print media ads can be easily skipped. Web ads can be easily blocked.

Therefore, I cannot be mis-impressed, mis-informed or mis-interpret the words of the advertisers. I read labels. I read WebMD. I listen to my family doctor. I trust my instincts. Advertising, to me, is wasted time, money and energy.
Reply to this comment
by bizzzz-2009 February 26, 2008 6:45 PM EST
This seems pretty stupid. Does this mean Sally Field has to stop doing the Boniva commercials? Does that mean Wilford Brimley can''t sell me a glucose meter? Jarvis is the inventor of an artifical heart. He should know a little about it, just like Sally Fields knows her bones are brittle.
Reply to this comment
by ksjeff-2009 February 26, 2008 6:38 PM EST
Hugh Hephner said that Viagra "is the greatest legal drug ever invented". I went straight to the Doctor and got a monthly script. I want to thank Heph with all my heart. I just hope that it (my heart) hold out as long as my libido does.
Reply to this comment
by gunshack1 February 26, 2008 6:15 PM EST
Ask your doctor if ABC is right for you. Ask your doctor if XYZ is right for you. I have an idea. Let the doctor check you over, maybe do some blood work and let him/her decide what you need.
Reply to this comment
by connapa February 26, 2008 6:09 PM EST
Both the legal and medical professions had ethical standards which prohibited them from advertising directly to the public. Then both were allowed to advertise their wares, but did not say what they were for (lawyers did not say they''d help you sue for any particular reason, and pharmaceuticals did not say what their meds were indicated for.) Then, lawyers could say they''d help you sue if injured in an accident, and drug companies could say what their med was for, but had to let you know the side effects.
Reply to this comment
by fishinfool43 February 26, 2008 5:31 PM EST
I see Prozac is under scrutiny now.
Reply to this comment
by walt1944-2009 February 26, 2008 4:49 PM EST
It appears that Jarvik, who maybe a good mechanic, but not a doctor, will be joining "Smiling Bob" from the Enzyte commercials in that great limbo of drug commercials "gone bad".

It will be remembered that Jarvik claims to be the inventor of the artificial heart in his commercials and pushes Lipitor, which makes one wonder how much Jarvik is getting to push a drug he isn''t involved with? In the "Ferengi economy" of the Great Emperor Bush II, no one does something for nothing anymore, so it is hard to believe that the "non-doctor" Jarvik is pushing Lipitor to save lives.

Perhaps, more to save Pfizer''s bottom line and realize a profit for himself is more like it!!!

SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!!
sig heil, McCain????
Reply to this comment
by kennergirl February 26, 2008 4:21 PM EST
I also think that there should be a ban on advertising of medications.

My 6 year old daughter wants everyone to be on Lunesta including herself. It is a sort of brainwashing that these drug companies want to make you feel that you need these medications and they are working not just on you and I but our kids too! I can''t remember watching tv for more than an hour without seeing at least two or more drug commercials! I guess the more they get the word out the more dollar signs they see.
Reply to this comment
by cpaide February 26, 2008 4:21 PM EST
"...could be misleading to consumers because s/he appeared to be giving [fill in the blank] advice, even though s/he is not licensed to practice [fill in the blank]. While s/he holds a [fill in the blank] degree, he did not complete the certification requirements to practice [fill in the blank]."

Phil McGraw
Suze Orman
Oprah Winfrey
now Robert Jarvik

Maybe Jarvik can start a show with Oprah''s backing. Or maybe appear on Dr. Phil''s upcoming show "The Doctors" (can''t even type that without laughing out loud).

Interesting how Congress isn''t worried about "Doctor" Phool. Probably because his "advice" is so patently absurd that only a few imbiciles can be pfooled.
Reply to this comment
by klingon69 February 26, 2008 3:58 PM EST
The only fair way to resolve issues such as this is to have a complete ban on all direct to consumer ads for medications. Take things one step further and also include direct to consumer ads for the scheister lawyers.
Posted by connapa at 11:10 AM : Feb 26, 2008
Many years ago, attorneys could not advertise. I can''t remember if the medical field was also forbidden at that time.
Reply to this comment
by rf35 February 26, 2008 3:00 PM EST
I wouldn''t use Dr. Jarvik as a spokesman anyway...he just looks creepy...almost as scary at the Burger "King."
Reply to this comment
by rf35 February 26, 2008 2:59 PM EST
I agree with connapa that prescription medication should not be advertised to consumers. Doctors seem to prescribe more based on a person''s desire than on a valid medical need. Look at the overuse of antibiotics because people think they help with the cold or flu and ask for them. The "superbug" is the result (but probably only the tip of the iceberg). Now they are prescribing drugs with possible serious side effects because people see them on TV, promptly start experiencing the condition the drug is meant to treat, and run to their doctor to get some. Even if they don''t experience the side effects, 15 years later they''ll wonder why their liver is shot. And nobody seems to pay attention to the warnings, especially about interactions with OTC drugs. They just go on popping their NSAID''s and herbal "supplements" until they wind up in the hospital. The drug makers are shameless and the doctors prescribing this junk to anyone who asks need to have their licenses revoked. Most of these drugs are great for people who really need them, but stick to informing doctors, not advertising to consumers. Let the guy with the medical degree decide if a certain person would benefit from a certain drug and quit pushing it on the patient who isn''t supposed to know better.

P.S. For those who think over-prescribing doesn%u2019t hurt you, look at your health insurance bill%u2026it%u2019s right there.
Reply to this comment
See all 23 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Graham: House Bill "D.O.A." in the Senate

    (405 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: