ISLAMABAD, Pakistan, Feb. 26, 2008

Pakistan Drops YouTube Ban

Government Says "Blasphemous" Video Has Been Removed From Popular Internet Site

  • Photo

     (CBS/AP)

  • Fast Facts Pakistan

    Learn about the people, economy and history.

(CBS/AP)  Pakistan's telecommunications regulator said Tuesday it has lifted restrictions on YouTube that knocked out access to the video-sharing Web site in many countries for up to two hours over the weekend.

The Pakistan Telecommunication Authority told Internet service providers to restore access to the site after the removal of what it called a "blasphemous" video clip, authority spokeswoman Nabiha Mahmood said.

Pakistan ordered the site blocked on Friday over a clip featuring a Dutch lawmaker who has said he planned to release a movie portraying Islam as fascist and prone to inciting violence against women and homosexuals.

A Pakistani official told CBS News reporter Farhan Bokhari that an investigation was being conducted to determine why Pakistan's action resulted in the blocking of YouTube in other nations.

“Frankly we are all a bit puzzled because nobody imagined that such an action in Pakistan could lead to the kind of reaction we saw,” the official said.

Mahmood said the Pakistani authority had posted a complaint through the Web site - a facility open to any registered user - but had not been in contact with the administrators of YouTube.com, which is owned by Internet giant Google, Inc.

While several other videos featuring the politician, Geert Wilders, would remain visible to Pakistani Internet users, Mahmood said the one which was removed had been "totally anti-Quranic" and "very blasphemous."

She said it promoted Wilders' upcoming movie, but provided no details about its content.

The authority aimed to restrict the site only in Pakistan, but the move inadvertently cut access for many of the world's Internet users for up to two hours on Sunday.

YouTube said the next day that it was caused by a network in Pakistan.

"We are investigating and working with others in the Internet community to prevent this from happening again," YouTube said in an e-mailed statement.

Mahmood said the Pakistani regulator carried no responsibility for "technical hitches" which may have lead to problems elsewhere. She said it was not clear how that occurred.

Pakistani officials hope to prevent a repeat of violent anti-Western protests that erupted in early 2006 after a Danish newspaper published cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad regarded by many Muslims as offensive.

Danish editors reignited the controversy earlier this month by reprinting a cartoon that shows the prophet wearing a bomb-shaped turban.

On Tuesday, about 300 students rallied at a university in the Pakistani city of Multan carrying banners denouncing Denmark, the United States and Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf. It was the latest in a series of small protests by Islamic students in the country.

Umer Abbasi, a leader of the protest, urged all Muslim countries to follow Pakistan in blocking offensive material on the Internet.

"If you look deeply, America can be seen behind all anti-Muslim moves around the world," Abbasi told the crowd, who later burned Danish and American flags.

Abdullah Riar, Pakistan's minister for information technology and telecommunications, said authorities wanted to prevent Islamic hard-liners from seizing on the Wilders clips.

"We are already in the spotlight on the issue of intolerance and extremism and terrorism and this is something that somebody is doing by design to excite and insinuate Islamic sentiments," Riar said.

He said the indirect effects were "very sad, very unfortunate. We have nothing against the YouTube site itself."


© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Video and Galleries from SciTech

Add a Comment See all 29 Comments
by susanhelit February 25, 2008 11:14 PM PST
Time to forget about censorship. If your philosophy/religion/gov''t, etc. isn''t compelling enough to stand up to criticism and/or alternate points of view, it isn''t good enough, and you can''t shield your population from the rest of the world anymore.
Reply to this comment
by Scooter68 February 25, 2008 11:56 PM PST
Agree with you ''SusanHelit'' but beware, now you may be on some wacko groups hitlist for saying their religion it isn''t good enough.

Amazing how ''they'' can insult, spew hate etc but can''t stand the smallest amount of critical commentary. How small and petty is their god?
Reply to this comment
by antizion February 26, 2008 12:03 AM PST
The US is cutting the cables to stop Iran from opening their oil borse. One Iran starts selling oil in euros instead of dollars, the dollar will collapse.

It has already collapsed more that 60% in the past few years.

Where did our gold from Fort Knox go? Why is our money backed by someone else''s oil?

Brace yourself America, we are being taken down by zionist Asknazi jews from within just like Germany and by the same families and for the same reasons.
Reply to this comment
by antizion February 26, 2008 12:16 AM PST
CBS 60 minutes just yesterday blocked 15 minutes of their show in northern Alabama because they didn''t want the locals to know their former governor is in prison for 7 years and probably innocent.

Censorship is proof of corruption whether it is youtube or the boobtube.

Is CBS a Muslim? All they are doing is trying to create anti Muslim feelings and then tie that to Obama which is not true and America sees right through it.

So much for freedom of religion in America.

You see CBS is owned by Westinghouse, the largest military industrial contractor on Earth. Hillary or McCrazy will keep spending for wars we do not want.

Nice try CBS, you actually lowered yourself to FOX and Drudge.

The biggest threat to the US is not radical Muslims, it is radical jews loyal to Israel and our government is blackmailed and bribed by them.
Reply to this comment
by antizion February 26, 2008 12:33 AM PST
Agree with you ''''SusanHelit'''' but beware, now you may be on some wacko groups hitlist for saying their religion it isn''''t good enough.
Posted by gscotth at 11:56 PM : Feb 25, 2008
===============================================

Don''t listen to him Susan. You have the right to free speech. Use it or lose it. Let the cowards remain silent as they should.

Here, I''ll push the wall back for you a bit so you feel more comfortable.

Let''s see....
Mohammad was a goat herder and a psycho with poor handwriting.

The president of Iran is ugly.

George Bush and his Daddy are closet ***.

All US generals smell like pot and gay bathroom ***. Also known as "Ode de Larry Craig"

The president of Pakistan is a short dictator just like Bush only with a wig worse than Jim Trafficant.

And the big one... the baby Jesus could kick Mohammad''s *** because jesus the jew could do ninja stuff like walk on water and ascend to the magical outer space heaven land and then come back, heal the sick and brainwash morons like Jerry Falwell and crypto Jew Pat Robertson into worshiping them.

What the hell, one more - Chavez really is the second coming and Bush really is the devil and worships himself. Actually, everything I said about Bush is true.

I just wrote Mohammad on the bottom of my shoe.

See! I still alive. Carry on.
Reply to this comment
by libsrweak February 26, 2008 1:36 AM PST
Posted by AntiZion at 12:59 AM : Feb 26, 2008
+ report abuse

**************

did you get this revelation before or after you got fired by a ''jew?

sounds more like sour grapes..something a little child or an uneducted moron would do..
Reply to this comment
by gunnerv1 February 26, 2008 10:45 AM PST
Well, what did you expect from a Dictator, open access?
Reply to this comment
by rf35 February 26, 2008 11:14 AM PST
Once again, an Islamic nation proves there is no room in their world for free thought. Only absolute control by the religious/government leadership. This is the reason we have the First Amendment in the US Constitution. While we may not like everthing that is said, the alternative is Pakistani-style oppression of ideas not approved by the government/church.
Reply to this comment
by mediapreachr February 26, 2008 12:00 PM PST
Let me tell you why the paks took down Youtube-there was a video of the singer Aishwara(indian actress),showing a little leg and dancing provocatively.
This was distracting the masses,as they were actually having fun instead of gathering like sheep and trampling each other.
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan February 26, 2008 12:01 PM PST
When your religion is threatened by teddy bears and cartoons, maybe it''s time to find a less-pathetic faith?
Reply to this comment
by artemisdiana-2009 February 26, 2008 12:05 PM PST
How about we forget all this petty bickering, and immediately call in ALL our foreign aid loans to Pakistan from day one, payable IN FULL in 24 hours, or we freeze all their accounts with the world bank?!?!? That should shut those b***ards up for awhile!
Reply to this comment
by endpcnow February 26, 2008 2:28 PM PST
Impure thoughts? These are the same people who scr#w and marry their first cousins.
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 February 26, 2008 2:52 PM PST
Once again, an Islamic nation proves there is no room in their world for free thought. Only absolute control by the religious/government leadership. This is the reason we have the First Amendment in the US Constitution. While we may not like everthing that is said, the alternative is Pakistani-style oppression of ideas not approved by the government/church.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by rf35 at 11:14 AM : Feb 26, 2008

Oh yeah, just like the shutdown of the cablenetwork in the US when they were showing the presentation on how the Neocons sent Seigelmann to prison on false charges.
Reply to this comment
by denn034 February 26, 2008 3:25 PM PST
Censorship is wrong! People should have the right to be blasphemous if they want to. Shame on Pakistan!
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 February 26, 2008 4:22 PM PST
stop trying to equivocate their BS with anything in the west,,, it does not hold up


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by terrorislam0 at 03:06 PM : Feb 26, 2008

Now now, I was just pointing out that censorship can happen here too. Don''t get your undies in an uproar.
Reply to this comment
by rf35 February 26, 2008 4:56 PM PST
singinrick said: Kind of like how secularist liberals here in America make fun of Christianity and mock it all the time, all while letting other "religions" slide.

I''ll have you know that I mock all religions equally. Besides, I thought you didn''t like "religion," either.
Reply to this comment
by irliberal February 26, 2008 4:56 PM PST
In the USA, if you gathered up all the right wing radio hosts and their audiences and stuck them in a country and told them to form their own government, you''d get Pakistan. Ridiculous backwards fools.
Reply to this comment
by irliberal February 26, 2008 5:00 PM PST
Kind of like how secularist liberals here in America make fun of Christianity and mock it all the time, all while letting other "religions" slide.

Posted by singinrick at 02:00 PM

As I have stated many, many times, I view all religions as absolutely, equivalently, and resolutely vile, corrupt and dangerous. Christianity pushers are the ones that get in my face the most often, so that''s who I most often push back at, that is all. Next!
Reply to this comment
by rf35 February 26, 2008 5:09 PM PST
RowdyTexan2, I''m not saying it never happens here, but you have to admit that it''s not as bad as any Islamic country. Usually, it''s a result of some nitwit trying to self-censor his/her own netowrk''s broadcast. I''m not overly familiar with the case you mention, but the government did not take the network down and arrest those responsible for attempting the broadcast, it was only locally "lost." As for charges of the Web-based "attacks" on the journalists, I guess I missed those altogether. Never a big fan of 60 Minutes, anyway. If this were a Muslim nation, the media would doubtless be state-run in the first place.
Reply to this comment
by singingrick February 26, 2008 5:36 PM PST


I''m singingrick!


Reply to this comment
by soubaptist1 February 26, 2008 5:50 PM PST
All religions are simply man''s feeble attempt to confront the horror of existance. IF there is a " higher power " we will only know certainty at the instance of our individual death. Too late, Too late.
Believe as you will, I wish you the best of luck.
Reply to this comment
by rf35 February 26, 2008 6:22 PM PST
I''''m singingrick!

Posted by singingrick at 05:36 PM : Feb 26, 2008

Not to be confused with the original "singinrick," who is actually kinda fun to argue with, in a twisted sort of way.
Reply to this comment
by pilgrimsway-2009 February 26, 2008 6:55 PM PST
In America today we have this knight in shinny armor coming towards us promising us deliverance! He never fought a battle, He was present when the other knights fought the battles, and keeps His armor very shinny. When He is with the other knights He speaks as one who fought battles, remember now He never did He was only present, that He can conquer lions and dragons and bring this land America to tranquility. The other knights ask Him of His experience and He just points to the fact that He has shinny armor. These other knights see His shinny armor and wonder why this so called knight calls Himself a knight. This knight in shinny armor states %u201CI can bring CHANGE%u201D. The people without experience in fighting the real battles on issues are transfix on His shinny armor that they do not bother with the issue that He has no experience. The people see this knight as their hope. They point to the other knight who is in charge for now and say this is the reason why we need a knight with shinny armor (with no experience) the knight who is there now had no experience either and we want another one like Him!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by johngoodnews February 26, 2008 7:16 PM PST
I was wondering what it would be like in America if we had christians running around and screaming and threatening to kill people who made fun of their version of god.
Reply to this comment
by pilgrimsway-2009 February 26, 2008 7:18 PM PST
johngoodnews at 07:16 PM : Feb 26, 2008
Hey thats pretty good!
Reply to this comment
by ivandrago February 26, 2008 7:20 PM PST
Like I''ve said to my friends, I believe that religion is an evolutionary vestigial limb. A god idea helped fill a void in knowledge that early man could never solve. Humanity could then focus on bettering itself. YouTube clips pointing out the blaring fallacies of organized religion are good for everybody with an open mind. While it hardens true believers even more, I think it''s influenced alot of "fench-sitters" to get off the blissful crack pipe that is religion.
Reply to this comment
by pilgrimsway-2009 February 26, 2008 7:26 PM PST
johngoodnews at 07:16 PM : Feb 26, 2008
But its wrong what you imply!
Reply to this comment
by tmittelstaed February 26, 2008 7:55 PM PST
"said he planned to release a movie portraying Islam as fascist and prone to inciting violence against women and homosexuals."

For all those crying censorship, do you really believe this? Because if so, you need to go visit Germany and the Holocaust sites, you have no idea what real Fascists are. No religion today even remotely resembles that.

As the regulator said, "this is something that somebody is doing by design to excite and insinuate Islamic sentiments"

It''s no different than the so-called "art" of Andres Serrano, (ie: **** Christ) which is nothing more than a scam to extract thousands of dollars from NEA for 50 cents worth of film and a plastic cup.

Freedom of speech does not give license for yelling Fire in a crowded theatre, nor for outrageously lying or pulling scams.
Reply to this comment
by wolfenok February 27, 2008 6:08 PM PST

Amazing... No, it''s not amazing, but also it not depends to me, because I use VPN tunnel, by www.strongvpn.com VPN account. It requires some fee, but also it%u2019s not much for the advantages it gives. I can use now my laptop and iPod to download any videos from YouTube and other services without any permission. Used proxy before, but it seems to me that this service is much better.
Reply to this comment
See all 29 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs