June 18, 2009 6:27 PM

Clinton Says Obama Rash On Foreign Policy

(AP)  Hillary Rodham Clinton characterized rival Barack Obama on Monday as rash and inconsistent on foreign policy issues.

Shifting to foreign policy after two days of hammering the Illinois senator over their differences on health care, Clinton paired two of Obama's campaign statements to support her conclusion.

"He wavers from seeming to believe that mediation and meetings without preconditions can solve some of the world's most intractable problems to advocating rash, unilateral military action without the cooperation of our allies in the most sensitive part of the world," Clinton said in a speech at The George Washington University.

The former first lady has sharply criticized her rival for the Democratic presidential nomination for saying during a televised debate last summer that he would be willing as president to meet with the leaders of Cuba, Iran and other hostile nations without preconditions. He reiterated that willingness last week.

"We simply cannot legitimize rogue regimes or weaken American prestige by impulsively agreeing to presidential talks that have no preconditions," Clinton said. "It may sound good, but it doesn't meet the real world test of foreign policy."

Obama has also said he would be willing to send U.S. troops into Pakistan if there were "actionable intelligence" that the country is harboring terrorists.

Anticipating Clinton's criticism, Obama's foreign policy advisers held a conference call with reporters before she delivered her speech. Top Obama adviser Susan Rice said the New York senator had shown poor judgment on a range of issues, including voting to authorize the invasion of Iraq and supporting legislation declaring the Iranian National Guard as a terrorist organization.

"Those are critical foreign policy judgments. They are judgments that any candidate should be held accountable for. And obviously we look forward to Senator Clinton's explanation of how and why she got those critical judgments wrong," Rice said.

Hoping to slow Obama's surging candidacy before primaries in Texas and Ohio next week, Clinton painted a picture of a dangerous world in need of seasoned and wise U.S. leadership. She portrayed Obama as a national security novice and suggested he would need a "foreign policy instruction manual" to keep the country safe.

Once again, she compared her Democratic rival's foreign experience to that of President Bush upon taking office eight years ago.

Voters have already seen the "tragic result" of electing a commander in chief with little experience in national security and global affairs, she said. "We can't let that happen again. America has already taken that chance one time too many."

On a campaign trip for her through Ohio, her husband, former President Bill Clinton, urged undecideds among a crowd in Portsmouth to vote for her "if you believe that the fact of change is more important than the feeling of change."

Before her speech in Washington, Clinton was introduced by a group of distinguished military veterans who praised her work on international challenges in the Senate Armed Services Committee and as first lady during her husband's White House years.

"She's walked the walk in addition to talking the talk," said Togo West, who served as Army Secretary and Veterans Affairs Secretary during the Clinton administration.

As she has in the past, Clinton vowed as president to begin redeploying U.S. troops from Iraq within 60 days of taking office. She also pledged to address the global AIDS epidemic, work with other nations to reduce global warming, and tackle the challenges associated with the growth of China.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 92 Comments
by taddles-2009 February 28, 2008 4:15 PM EST
"If she did such a terrible job in the first six years, explain how she was re-elected for another term. Think about it.

Posted by Future_Watch at 03:11 PM : Feb 26, 2008"


She ran against Guiliani in 2000 who had to withdraw late in the race due to medical and marital reasons and was replaced by a relative unknow rick Lazio. She won the election by 12%, hardly a landslide in the largely Dem NY. In 2006 she ran against a completely unknown John Spencer. In both races she ran against very weak Rep candidates. Even a fat old man like me can win a race against a guy with no legs.
Reply to this comment
by taddles-2009 February 28, 2008 4:01 PM EST
So Hillary slags on Obama for stating that if he intelligence he would attack Al Quida in Pakistan. My question is why didn''t she slag on Bush when he had missiles fired into Pakistan to kill a primary Al Quida leader last month...huh must not be such a stupid idea after all.

Guess Hillary doesn''t really know what you are supposed to do as Commander in Chief when faced with just such a situation.
Reply to this comment
by taddles-2009 February 28, 2008 3:57 PM EST
"I say McCain wins by substantial margin in general election. Probably by 10% in each state if not more...

Posted by teatea7 at 05:07 PM : Feb 26, 2008"

Uh huh...good luck with that.
Reply to this comment
by evillein1243 February 27, 2008 3:30 AM EST
WOW, poor judgement for naming Iranian National Guard a terrorist organization?? Yeah that''s really poor judgement since that''s what they are.....
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 February 27, 2008 3:17 AM EST
I have another question about Mr. Obama. Why is it that he has abandoned the people of Illinois, who elected him to serve as their senator.
Posted by Future_Watch
***************************************

LOL. Well, aren''t people in Illinois Americans? It is not like he is running for president of Mexico. The Illinois people will still have him. Only they will have him as their president.
Reply to this comment
by wardoglrs February 26, 2008 10:53 PM EST
If Americans Knew For god''s sake wakeup.

http://video.aol.com/video-detail/if-americans-knew-aipac-adl-zionist-control-of-america/2704972319
Reply to this comment
by boatdocster February 26, 2008 8:10 PM EST
Future Watch

The first race was closer 55 to 47 percent; the second race she won in the high 60''s to a 37 % on the GOP side.

However, the GOP refused to support or fund their senate candidate in the second race. May have had an impact on the overall election numbers.

Her vote for the bogus Iraq war and agreeing to many Bush policies is still a deal breaker for me and many others.
Reply to this comment
by teatea7 February 26, 2008 8:07 PM EST
If Obama thinks the republicans that are voting for him now, are voting because they like him and his policies he is badly mistaken. So in the general, if you take away, 10% Republican support away from him, then another 47% of the democrats that voted for Hillary. I say McCain wins by substantial margin in general election. Probably by 10% in each state if not more, that is assuming that Hillary does not win the nomination. I believe she has to win in order for the democrat to be president.
Reply to this comment
by future_watch February 26, 2008 6:11 PM EST
In NY, Hillary was elected by the majority of the state residents not once but twice. Nobody gave that to her, she earned it. I don''t care what a couple of posts here say. Facts are facts. If she did such a terrible job in the first six years, explain how she was re-elected for another term. Think about it.
Reply to this comment
by boatdocster February 26, 2008 6:03 PM EST
Future_Watch

There have been quite a few posts here by folks from NY stating HRC has really done nothing for them as a Senator. Moved to a state at the last minute and ran for the Senate to get the Presidential race today. If 9/11 had not happened, I think HRC would have run against The Shrub in 2004, but knew that was a political time bomb after 9/11. HRC is more about her and less about the people.

Obama is moving quickly as well, but at least he is coming from the place he has lived in for the last 10 years or so, not just a place he moved to to get elected.

Reply to this comment
See all 92 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook