Military Subpoenas CBS Haditha Video
Prosecutors: Unaired "60 Minutes" Footage Has Marine's Admission Of Crimes In Iraq Massacre
-
Play CBS Video Video Wuterich: I'm Not A Monster Sgt. Frank Wuterich was one of four Marines charged with killing 24 Iraqis in Haditha, a suburb of Baghdad. He spoke out for the first time in an exclusive interview with Scott Pelley.
-
Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich speaks publicly about the Haditha killings for the first time with 60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley. (CBS)
-
Interactive Battle For Iraq The government, the insurgency, key players, background and photos.
Staff Sgt. Frank D. Wuterich "apparently admits in an unaired segment that he did in fact order his men to 'shoot first and ask questions later,'" Capt. Nicholas Gannon said in response to a motion filed by CBS seeking to quash a subpoena seeking the footage.
CBS is set to ask a military judge Friday to throw out the subpoena during a pretrial hearing for Wuterich, who faces voluntary manslaughter and other charges in the Nov. 19, 2005, deaths in Haditha, Iraq.
In its motion, CBS says the subpoena would be "unreasonable and oppressive," and turn a news organization into an investigative arm of the government.
"This fishing expedition is particularly inappropriate given the numerous other sources of information concerning the events underlying this court-martial," according to the motion obtained by The Associated Press.
The subpoena stems from an interview aired on March 15, 2007, on "60 Minutes" entitled "The Killings at Haditha."
In the interview, Wuterich recounted to CBS News Correspondent Scott Pelley his recollection of the events that led to the deaths.
The deaths occurred after a roadside bomb hit a Marine convoy, killing the driver of a Humvee and wounding two other Marines. Wuterich and a squad member, Sgt. Sanick Dela Cruz, allegedly shot five men by a car at the scene. Wuterich then ordered his squad into several houses, where they cleared rooms with grenades and gunfire, killing unarmed civilians in the process.
What I did that day, the decision that I made, I would make those decisions again today. Those are decisions that I made in a combat situation, and I believe I had to make those decisions.
Staff Sgt. Frank WuterichIn the CBS motion, attorneys Lee Levine and Seth D. Berlin contend there have been multiple government investigations into the Haditha incident, and numerous witnesses provided statements to investigators.
California has one of the nation's most protective statutes shielding journalists from prosecutors' inquiries. The law generally allows journalists to decline to divulge unpublished material to state authorities, but the protection does not extend to federal courts, which include military courts.
CBS says testimony is available from witnesses, including members of Wuterich's squad who are not being prosecuted.
But prosecutors, who have previously said squad members are "far from cooperative," say it is apparent to them from Pelley's narration that Wuterich made admissions in unaired footage.
In the response, Gannon writes that Pelley's questions and his narration are apparently based on information Wuterich must have provided during the interview.
The network had no comment on the subpoena or the pending hearing, said Sandra Genelius, a spokeswoman for CBS News, which is a division of CBS Corp.
Four enlisted Marines were initially charged with murder in the case and four officers were charged with failing to investigate the deaths. Charges against four of the men have been dropped, and none will face murder charges.
Still facing court-martial are Lt. Col. Jeffrey R. Chessani, who is charged with dereliction of duty and violation of a lawful order on allegations that he mishandled the aftermath of the Haditha shootings; and 1st Lt. Andrew Grayson, on charges of making false official statements, obstruction of justice and attempting to fraudulently separate from the Marine Corps.
Wuterich is scheduled to be court-martialed March 3.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
- There are people in power who deserve to be in a docket at the Hague for putting these soldiers into this position. Everyone that it can be shown lied and caused all this carnage, and that includes media, should be held before the world as war criminals of the worst sort.
- Reply to this comment
- why does not one muslim majority country grant equal rights to non-muslims???
Posted by terrorislam0 at 04:00 PM : Feb 22, 2008
Why homosexuals citizens of the United States are not allowed to serve their country, unlike the heterosexual citizens?
Why homosexual citizens are not allowed to marry unlike the heterosexual citizens (discrimination based on sexual orientation).
Why shouldn''t we denounce ISLAMIC RADICALS like OSAMA BEEN FORGOTTEN and JESUS who believed in discrimination based on SEXUAL ORIENTATION and GENDER? - Reply to this comment
- FASCIST NAZI TERRORISLAM SAYS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATES ISLAM LAW...
LOOK WHO IS TARGETING CIVILIANS!!!
posted by lars008
In damning testimony, a U.S. soldier Thursday told a court-martial he was ordered by his staff sergeant to shoot an unarmed Iraqi man and that the sergeant then laughed and told the trooper to finish the job as the dying man convulsed on the ground.
The military reported, meanwhile, it had opened an investigation of the deaths of five women and four children killed earlier this week in a village south of Baghdad where American forces had carried out ground and air assaults.
You are right lars008 (terrorislam0)
The Christian soldiers killing UNARMED CIVILIANS for bringing TERRORIST LEADER "JESUS" back to this world are FASCIST NAZI TERRORISLAM. Do you remember the FASCIST NAZI TERRORISLAM LEADER "JESUS" who said;
"Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to turn a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law---a man''s enemies will be the members of his own household%u2019" (Matthew 10:34-36). "From the days of John the Baptist until now, the kingdom of heaven has been forcefully advancing, and forceful men lay hold of it" (Matthew 11:12). - Reply to this comment
- and if christians or any other group were doing what inbred retarded radical fascist nazi terrorislamic jihadists muslim slavers, murderers and rapists
are doing,,, you would have a point,,,
but since they are not,,, you do not,,,
Posted by terrorislam0 at 03:18 PM : Feb 22, 2008
The worst enemy of United States are those CHRISTIANS who want to sacrifise GOD-NEGLECTED AMERICAN MONEY, GOD-NEGLECTED AMERICAN LIVES and UNHOLY LAND "UNITED STATES for a NON-AMERICAN CAUSE, NON-AMERICAN GOD-CHOSEN PEOPLE and a NON-AMERICAN HOLY LAND.
Why shouldn''''t we help Arabs in the destruction of ISRAEL far away from the CONCENTRATION CAMPS in GERMANY, to enjoy OIL in cheap prices?
Why should we protect ISREAL on Palestinian map, far away from the CONCENTRATION CAMPS in GERMANY, to buy HATRED, TERRORISM and 9/11 against UNHOLY LAND UNITED STATES and GOD-NEGLECTED AMERICANS? - Reply to this comment
- FASCIST NAZI TERRORISLAM SAYS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATES ISLAM LAW...
LOOK WHO IS TARGETING CIVILIANS!!!
posted by lars008
In damning testimony, a U.S. soldier Thursday told a court-martial he was ordered by his staff sergeant to shoot an unarmed Iraqi man and that the sergeant then laughed and told the trooper to finish the job as the dying man convulsed on the ground.
The military reported, meanwhile, it had opened an investigation of the deaths of five women and four children killed earlier this week in a village south of Baghdad where American forces had carried out ground and air assaults.
You are right lars008 (terrorislam0)
The Christian soldiers killing UNARMED CIVILIANS for bringing TERRORIST LEADER "JESUS" back to this world are FASCIST NAZI TERRORISLAM. Do you remember the FASCIST NAZI TERRORISLAM LEADER "JESUS" who said;
"Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to turn a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law---a man''s enemies will be the members of his own household%u2019" (Matthew 10:34-36). "From the days of John the Baptist until now, the kingdom of heaven has been forcefully advancing, and forceful men lay hold of it" (Matthew 11:12). - Reply to this comment
- terrorislam0
If sins were committed by Adam and Eve, why sinners are those new born children born in sins who can''t even differentiate between what is a sin and what is not a sin, and why the price is paid by a third party free of sins, named JESUS? - Reply to this comment
- terrorislam0
If sisns were committed by Adam and Eve, why sinners are those new born children born in sins who can''t even differentiate between what is a sin and what is not a sin, and why the price is paid by a third party free of sins, named JESUS? - Reply to this comment
- Terrorislam0: "are doing,,, you would have a point,,,
but since they are not,,, you do not"
"Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it."
The Christians engaged in a multi-century crusades against the muslims, jews, and other "unbelievers", torturing and slaughtering millions. Even if they were all "pure as the driven snow" now, it wouldn''t matter. Some people hold grudges for a looooong time. As you sow, so shall you reap.
Furthermore, "Christians" ARE doing bad things to them right now! We attacked Iraq for NO SANE REASON and killed over 1 million of their people. This, after having used "sanctions" to kill over a million of their children! We installed military bases in their "holy land", violating their most sacred religious edicts. We gave them (OBL + his merry men) weapons and training to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan, then abandoned them to die when our whims dictated it. Those that hate us do so because of what we have done to them, and what we continue to do to them!
I repeat: "Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it." You have failed to learn anything. - Reply to this comment
- and if christians or any other group were doing what inbred retarded radical fascist nazi terrorislamic jihadists muslim slavers, murderers and rapists
are doing,,, you would have a point,,,
but since they are not,,, you do not,,,
Posted by terrorislam0 at 03:18 PM : Feb 22, 2008
The worst enemy of United States are those CHRISTIANS who want to sacrifise GOD-NEGLECTED AMERICAN MONEY, GOD-NEGLECTED AMERICAN LIVES and UNHOLY LAND "UNITED STATES for a NON-AMERICAN CAUSE, NON-AMERICAN GOD-CHOSEN PEOPLE and a NON-AMERICAN HOLY LAND.
Why shouldn''t we help Arabs in the destruction of ISRAEL far away from the CONCENTRATION CAMPS in GERMANY, to enjoy OIL in cheap prices?
Why should we protect ISREAL on Palestinian map, far away from the CONCENTRATION CAMPS in GERMANY, to buy HATRED, TERRORISM and 9/11 against UNHOLY LAND UNITED STATES and GOD-NEGLECTED AMERICANS? - Reply to this comment
- terrorislam0
You sound like you don''t like Islamic Radicals, one of whom is OSAMA BEEN FORGOTTEN.
OSAMA BEEN FORGOTTEN does not support Homosexual''s right of marriage.
Do you support Osama been forgotten or oppose him?
Osama been forgotten is against Secularism.
Do you support Osama been forgotten or oppose him?
Osama been forgotten is against women''s right to choose Abortion.
Do you support Osama been forgotten or oppose him?
What do you think about the leader of OSAMA BEEN FORGOTTEN, "JESUS" who opposed HOMOSEXUAL''S RIGHT OF MARRIAGE just like OSAMA BEEN FORGOTTEN?
What is your opinion about OSAMA''s leader "JESUS", whose bible accused a woman of helping DEVIL in getting a man kicked out of heaven? - Reply to this comment
- terrorislam0, still blaming Clinton for EVERYTHING, claimed it was Bill Clinton who destroyed the US military by downsizing it. BUT THAT IS A LIE! The truth is, it was D.ick Cheney (now VP), who dit it!!!
Read it and weep, M/F: (excerpted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Cheney)
"Cheney''s most immediate issue as Secretary of Defense was the Department of Defense budget. Cheney deemed it appropriate to cut the budget and downsize the military, following President Ronald Reagan''s peacetime defense buildup at the height of the Cold War. As part of the fiscal year 1990 budget, Cheney assessed the requests from each of the branches of the armed services for such expensive programs as the B-2 stealth bomber, the V-22 Osprey tilt-wing helicopter, the Aegis destroyer and the MX missile, totaling approximately $4.5 billion in light of changed world politics. When the 1990 Budget came before Congress in the summer of 1989, it settled on a figure between the Administration''s request and the House Armed Services Committee''s recommendation.
%u2026
Over his four years as Secretary of Defense, Cheney downsized the military and his budgets showed negative real growth, despite pressures to acquire weapon systems advocated by Congress. The Department of Defense''s total obligational authority in current dollars declined from $291 billion to $270 billion. Total military personnel strength decreased by 19 percent, from about 2.2 million in 1989 to about 1.8 million in 1993." - Reply to this comment
- terrorislam0 asks, "do you know of any christian clergy calling for any of that???" You don''t specify what you mean by "that", so it''s rather difficult to answer. However, I was speaking about what many "Christians" do and say, not about what their clergy tell them to think and say and do.
terrorislam0: "where have i ever compared the two???"
The comparison is implicit in every post you make. You repeatedly claim that muslim people are violent, evil, murderers, bent on the total annihilation of the rest of the world, that they justify their behavior by what is written in their scriptures, and that we must all HATE and FEAR, and eventually annihilate, them because of it. However, the EXACT SAME violent, evil, murdering, genocidal rantings occur in the Christian Bible. If one is bad, so is the other. If the muslims have to be exterminated, so do the Christians.
Or, we could try to act like rational, sane people-- something you appear to have entirely rejected. - Reply to this comment
- demslie say, "CBS news did not air this (old) story for news. They keep putting it on the air as an anti-war statement."
The NEW part of the story is that THE MILITARY has supoenaed CBS to get the tapes of the interview! How is that CBS''s fault? CBS says it does not want to turn over the tapes. How is that an "anti war statement"?
Your blind hatred of CBS is misplaced.
PS: Interesting name choice, "demslie". It appears that you define yourself by your hatred of others. That is a truly sad existence. - Reply to this comment
- CBS news did not air this (old) story for news. They keep putting it on the air as an anti-war statement. The Democrats could not give a craaap about our military. This story is just part of an evil agenda to harm our military in no different way than AL Qaeda wants to harm our military.
Posted by demslie at 02:15 PM : Feb 22, 2008
Wow - you are all over the place. First - there is a LARGE number of veterans that are against the Bush''s Choice Conflict in Iraq - me being one of them. Second - Rumsfeld, Bush, Cheney and Company sent our military into combat unprepared and lacking the proper gear (also it is a Republican Administration pumping out lies trying to justify their actions). Third - there are veterans against this Iraq quagmire that have children in harm''s way over there.
The evil agenda was laid out by Bush - so don''t blame the messenger... - Reply to this comment
- Staff Sgt. Frank D. Wuterich new his legal rights before he gave his interview. He gave this interview freely. CBS should turn over the full interview as they would not be acting like the long arm of the law. CBS News also knew of the pending investigation and did the interview anyway. CBS also knew Wuterich''''s legal rights and it looks like CBS was more interested in getting a story.
Need an edit button. - Reply to this comment
- Staff Sgt. Frank D. Wuterich new his legal rights before he gave his interview. he gace tis interview freely. CBS should turn over the full interview as they would not be acting like the long arm of the law. CBS News also knew of the pending investigation and did the interview anyway. CBS also knew Wuterich''s legal rights and it looks like CBS was more interested in getting a story.
- Reply to this comment
- CBS news did not air this (old) story for news. They keep putting it on the air as an anti-war statement. The Democrats could not give a craaap about our military. This story is just part of an evil agenda to harm our military in no different way than AL Qaeda wants to harm our military.
- Reply to this comment
- The military was bad before but has gone too far this past seven years with its'''''''' unleashed, dog-eat-dog ethic. Thank God, I served the U.S. during the Vietnam era and did my stint. It (the military) is nothing short of a sadistic monster now that needs to be collared. Posted by RandyNason
-------------------------------
What has the military done wrong? I believe they are doing a fine job with the vague guidance and the extremely difficult mission. Why do they need to be collared? Last time I looked, the military is simply Americans sons and daughters. The streets and thugs of Detroit, Atlanta, LA and other big cities are more dangerous than the military.
Posted by JERSupporter
I cannot believe that any person who served in the Military would not understand the conditions that soldiers and Marines must work. The comments by RandyNason are obviously by a Liberal Democrat and not by a true person who served. - Reply to this comment
- terrorislam0, why do you always lead with your weakest case? You claim the muslims are all out to kill all the non-muslims. But you ignore the fact that your God repeatedly ordered his followers to kill all the unbelievers, or to kill their first born male children, or to bash their babies heads against the rocks, etc., etc.
There is absolutely NO DIFFERENCE between the two. If you want to convince anybody that "your side" is somehow superior, then you are going to have to come up with something new. As it stands, everything you paste into these comments simply demonstrates that you are an ignorant racist fool. - Reply to this comment
- The military was bad before but has gone too far this past seven years with its'''' unleashed, dog-eat-dog ethic. Thank God, I served the U.S. during the Vietnam era and did my stint. It (the military) is nothing short of a sadistic monster now that needs to be collared. Posted by RandyNason
-------------------------------
What has the military done wrong? I believe they are doing a fine job with the vague guidance and the extremely difficult mission. Why do they need to be collared? Last time I looked, the military is simply Americans sons and daughters. The streets and thugs of Detroit, Atlanta, LA and other big cities are more dangerous than the military. - Reply to this comment
The road ahead in Afghanistan, and the crucial decision Obama faces.



