BAGHDAD, Feb. 22, 2008
Turkey Launches Incursion In N. Iraq
Ground Forces Chase Kurdish Rebels After Aerial Attack
-
-
Turkish soldiers head toward Northern Iraq border near Sirnak, southeast Turkey. Turkey has recently bombed Kurdish rebel camps in northern Iraq after Washington shared intelligence about the positions of the rebels in the area. (APTN)
-
Turkish army tanks move along a road near the Turkish-Iraqi border town of Silopi in Sirnak province, southeastern Turkey, Friday, Feb. 22, 2008. (AP Photo/Mehmet Ersoy)
-
Followers of a radical anti U.S. cleric Muqtada al-Sadr carry his portrait during a ceremony to mark a fourth anniversary of the Shiite uprising against the American occupation in Sadr City, Baghdad, Iraq, Thursday, Feb. 21, 2008. (AP Photo/Karim Kadim)
-
-
Photo Essay Turkey-Iraq Tensions Nation mulls cross-border military incursion into northern Iraq to chase Kurdish rebels.
-
Photo Essay Week In Iraq Photos A daily diary with scenes of the latest attacks and snapshots from the effort to rebuild a nation.
The offensive, which started late Thursday after aircraft and artillery blasted suspected rebel targets, marked a dramatic escalation in Turkey's fight with the PKK rebel group even though Turkish officials described the operation as limited.
Turkish military said five of its troops and 24 Kurdish rebels were killed in clashes. At least 20 more rebels were killed by artillery and helicopter gunships, it said.
A military officer of the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq said on condition of anonymity that several hundred Turkish soldiers had crossed the border. The coalition has satellites as well as drones and other surveillance aircraft at its disposal.
CBS News correspondent Allen Pizzey in Baghdad reports Turkey's incursion runs the risk of involving soldiers in clashes with Iraqi Kurdish forces if it continues for any length of time, or expands beyond border areas.
The Kurdish Pesh Merga forces, who Pizzey says are both well-trained and highly motivated, have warned in the past that they would retaliate if Turkish forces attack Kurdish villages.
Pizzey adds that any clash between Turkish and Iraqi Kurdish forces could also prove problematic for the American military, as the U.S. is morally, if not legally bound to help Iraq defend its sovereignty.
Sky-Turk television said about 2,000 Turkish soldiers were in Iraq, operating against rebel camps about two miles in from the border. NTV television said a total of 10,000 soldiers were inside Iraq in an operation that had extended six miles past the frontier. The activity was reportedly occurring about 60 miles east of Cizre, a major city near the border with Iraq.
It was not possible to independently confirm the size or scope of the attack on the Kurdistan Workers' Party, or PKK, which is considered a terrorist group by the United States and European Union. CNN-Turk television, citing Turkish security officials, said the operation could last two weeks.
The advance was the first confirmed Turkish military ground operation in Iraq since the U.S.-led invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein in 2003. Turkey's army is believed to have carried out unacknowledged "hot pursuits" in recent years, with small groups of troops staying in Iraq for as little as a few hours or a day.
Turkey staged about two-dozen attacks in Iraq during the rule of Saddam, who conducted brutal campaigns against Iraqi Kurds. Some Turkish offensives, including several in the late 1990s, involved tens of thousands of soldiers. Results were mixed, however, with rebels suffering combat losses but regrouping after Turkish forces withdrew.
The PKK militants are fighting for autonomy in predominantly Kurdish southeastern Turkey and have carried out attacks on Turkish targets from bases in the semiautonomous Kurdish region of northern Iraq. The conflict started in 1984 and has claimed as many as 40,000 lives.
Turkey's government has complained that Iraqi and U.S. authorities weren't doing enough to stop guerrilla operations. The Turkish air force has been staging air raids on PKK forces in the north since December with the help of intelligence provided by the U.S., a NATO ally.
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said that he called his Iraqi counterpart, Nouri al-Maliki, on Thursday night to give him advance warning of the operation. Erdogan said he later briefed President Bush in a telephone call.
"The Turkish armed forces will return after they finish their job," Erdogan said in a televised speech. "The goal of the operation and of operations that will be conducted is just, and only, PKK camps located in the north of Iraq."
Confirming the advance notice, White House spokesman Scott Stanzel said the Bush administration was urging Turkey to show restraint.
"We were notified and we urged the Turkish government to limit their operations to precise targeting of the PKK - to limit the scope and duration of their operations - and we urged them to work, directly, with Iraqis, including Kurdish government officials, on how best to address the threat," Stanzel told reporters.
Turkey's president, Abdullah Gul, issued a statement saying the military would be careful in attacking the guerrillas in tough terrain and weather. "Utmost care is being taken so that innocent civilians living in the region are not negatively affected," he added.
Nihat Ali Ozcan, a terrorism expert with at the TEPAV research center in Ankara, said the operation was likely launched to hit at guerrillas before the traditional start of the fighting season in the spring.
"I think it is aimed to keep the PKK under pressure before the group starts entering Turkey," he said on CNN-Turk television.
The operation was reportedly concentrated in the Hakurk region, south of the Turkish border town of Cukurca.
The Turkish military posted photographs on its Web site that it said were images of the operation. In one photograph, five soldiers in white suits walk up a snowy hill in the dark. Others show a soldier walking with a land mine detector and three military helicopters on the ground.
PKK spokesman Ahmad Danas said two Turkish soldiers were killed and eight wounded in clashes along the 240-mile border, but there was no comment from the Turkish military and no way to confirm the claim independently.
Matthew Bryza, U.S. deputy assistant secretary of state for southeastern Europe, said Bush promised Turkey's prime minister at a Nov. 5 meeting that Washington would share intelligence on the PKK.
"The land operation is a whole new level," Bryza said in Belgium. "What I can say is that what we've been doing until now has been working quite well."
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon expressed concern about the escalation. He said he recognized Turkey's need for security, but appealed to Turkey and Iraq to work together to promote peace.
"The protection of civilian life on both sides of the border remains the paramount concern," Ban said, repeating calls for the PKK guerrillas to end their attacks inside Turkey.
The European Commission, the administrative body of the European Union, appealed to Turkey to act with restraint.
"Turkey should refrain from taking any disproportionate military action and respect human rights and the rule of law," commission spokeswoman Krisztina Nagy said.
"The EU understands Turkey's need to protect its population from terrorism," she added. "We encourage Turkey to continue to pursue dialogue with international partners."
In other developments:
(AP Photo/Karim Kadim )
The decision was revealed in a message read by clerics during prayer services.
"According to an order by Sayyid Muqtada, activities of the Mahdi Army will be extended ... for another six-month period," al-Sadr's aide Hazim al-Aaraji said, using an honorific during his sermon at the Kazimiyah mosque in Baghdad.
The cease-fire has been one of three important factors that have helped reduce violence since mid-2007. The two others are the influx of thousands of U.S. troops last summer, and emergence of Sunni-dominated groups that are fighting against al Qaeda in Iraq.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 91 Comments
- jwind,,,, You wouldn''t recognize the truth if you fell in it head 1st.
You want the truth in Iraq ?? -- Bush or McCain won''t tell you about ???
Here is the situation in Basra Iraq, a test of Iraqi rlie under relatively optmial conditions,, it has the best economic base, little ethnic tension. ----- It''''s not ''''Rosey'''' in the least bit.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/23/world/middleeast/23basra.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1&hp&oref=slogin - Reply to this comment
- Turkey has the right to hold it''s territory together. Serbia does, too. What gives them the right is military power. Without muscle a body slides into atrophy and disease. Get behind the thin red line and do your part to hold together.
- Reply to this comment
- So it turns out that Bushit, far from being concerned about Kurdish survival, is happy to stand aside while the murdering Turks attempt to recreate the Ottoman glory days when they ruled the entire Middle East with an iron fist and a scorched earth policy.
"No grass grows in the footstep of the Turk"--Arab proverb.
As usual, the Darth Bushit regime is pi$$ing away any goodwill the US might have among certain sectors of the population. The US could have done some good in Afghanistan, had not Bushit rushed into war with Saddam ("to save the Kurds"). The US could have had friends in the Kurds by helping with their dream of self-determination--how are Kurds any different from Kosovars?--but now he gives tacit approval to renewal of Turkish genocidal impulses.
Nice work, Bushits! - Reply to this comment
- When it suited his purpose in whipping up public hysteria against Saddam, Bush2 made a show of passionate concern for Kurds murdered by the same nerve gas his father shipped to Saddam.
Fast forward 16 years, however, and Bush cannot resist the impatience of a NATO ally which knows how to make a request at the point of a gun.
The Kurds have a long history of oppositon to such Turks and equally long memories, as only a reading of history provides. This is anything but easy reconciliation and peacemaking.
Yet, don''t count on Bush to rush in with a call to diplomacy and mutual assurances. Despite his passionate earlier concerns for Kurds, Bush is now content to put on the other mask, and coldly ignore those who thought their families might be safe in northern Iraq. - Reply to this comment
- With all respect, I disagree with that opinion. I believe it was fought out highly irrational, commie hating, cold war hysteria - initiated by another lyin'''' Texan, by the way. His initials were LBJ. He was my war president..
We had a term in those days for anybody who was killed. The term was "wasted". We didn''''t say that somebody was a casualty - we said he "got wasted". I always thought that was the perfect term. I was written about in the media of the day, and how it came from the "grunts" (another term) up.
Just a little history lesson - relevant to nothin'''' I guess...
Posted by hadenough43
mcvet said it,,, has to be true ... right? - Reply to this comment
- Posted by andrew_693
I couldn''t agree more... Gorbachev is the real "hero" in all of that. He took more - and more dangerous political risks than Reagan did. Teflon Ronnie was a good actor, though. Well, not really, more of a mediocre actor, I guess.... - Reply to this comment
- you are totally right in your analysis hadenough43.
- Reply to this comment
- You beat the soviet union in your dreams only. The soviet union collapsed in it''s own weight, it had nothing to do with you dumb arses, they just went broke and slowly deteriorated, they cold have remained communists for far longer if they wanted to. The loss to the afghans didn''t collapse them, they only lost 14.000 men, unlike the US that lost 58.000 in the same span of war in vietnam. Reagan liked to take credit for something he didn''t do, all he did was talk, talk and come up with more cheap cliches for the morons, specifically, he did absolutely nothing. Bush is praying that fidel castro dies so he can also claim victory over the cuban communism, but he did absolutely nothing different than other democracies did. Stop taking credit for things you didn''t do.
- Reply to this comment
- i am just reiterating what your king lib on here Mcvet said....he said vietnam war fought for our freedom
Posted by jwind11 at 11:30 PM : Feb 22, 2008
-----------------------------------
With all respect, I disagree with that opinion. I believe it was fought out highly irrational, commie hating, cold war hysteria - initiated by another lyin'' Texan, by the way. His initials were LBJ. He was my war president..
We had a term in those days for anybody who was killed. The term was "wasted". We didn''t say that somebody was a casualty - we said he "got wasted". I always thought that was the perfect term. I was written about in the media of the day, and how it came from the "grunts" (another term) up.
Just a little history lesson - relevant to nothin'' I guess... - Reply to this comment
- i am just reiterating what your king lib on here Mcvet said....he said vietnam war fought for our freedom
Posted by jwind11 at 11:30 PM : Feb 22, 2008
-----------------------------------
With all respect, I disagree with that opinion. I believe it was fought out highly irrational, commie hating, cold war hysteria - initiated by another lyin'' Texan, by the way. His initials were LBJ. He was my war president..
We had a term in those days for anybody who was killed. The term was "wasted". We didn''t say that somebody was a casualty - we said he "got wasted". I always thought that was the perfect term. I was written about in the media of the day, and how it came from the "grunts" (another term) up.
Just a little history lesson - relevant to nothin'' I guess... - Reply to this comment
- Reall
y! Lose a war, post in the comment''''s section...
Wow...
It''''s mean, I know, but I couldn''''t resist....
Posted by hadenough43
i am just reiterating what your king lib on here Mcvet said....he said vietnam war fought for our freedom - Reply to this comment
- The last war that had anything to do with our freedom of speech was WW2. Korea, Vietnam, Panama, Somalia, Lebanon, Iraq twice, Afghanistan... None of these conflicts have made us safer.
We beat the Soviet Union, the most formidable adversary we ever had diplomatically. What''s more, it was the great hero of the Republicans, Ronald Reagan who presided over this diplomatic victory. Reagan also cut and ran from Lebanon when he saw we couldn''t win there.
It''s better to stand with a strong military behind strong borders than to go to places where we find we can''t defeat angry people who refuse to put on uniforms. - Reply to this comment
- Now that''s what I call a surge!!
- Reply to this comment
- Any Marine Corps private knows that if you assault and take an enemy position, you then have to hang on to it. At the very least,a counter attack is surely gonna come. Like I said, any Marine Corps private knows that! But the idiot-son and his warmongerin'' neocons thought they knew better. We were gonna knock off Saddam (I.E. take the enemy position) - and then all of a sudden Jeffersonian Democracy was gonna break out all over--Straight out of some John Wayne movie.
The first indication that things were gonna go all sideways was the looting of Baghdad. We were totally unprepared for that - it''s been downhill ever since..
This Turk/Kurd thing is just another bunch of worms in the can. It''s an old hatred, and it ain''t gonna go away anytime soon....
All because the idiot-son didn''t know any better that a Marine Corps private. - Reply to this comment
- Turks always killing someone, check out Lawarence of Arabia ,same o same o ,wondering, whats taken em so long.Do not forget the Turks diaplay foolish carelessness. Posted by beehive21 at 07:47 PM : Feb 22, 2008
A Hollwood movie for a history example, that is hilarious; why not Shrek or Dumb and Dumber (Obama and Clinton). - Reply to this comment
- vietnam war was fought so we can have freedom to posts here!!
Posted by jwind11 at 05:24 PM : Feb 22, 2008
-------------------------
Really! Lose a war, post in the comment''s section...
Wow...
It''s mean, I know, but I couldn''t resist.... - Reply to this comment
- And the Clintons go down in flames......
They were your best hope libs and you let it slip away. Now there is nothing left for you but two choices. Join the enemy to fight America or Suicide.
poor libs, poor poor libs - Reply to this comment
- The Republicans are enthusiastically rallying around McCain as the candidate of excitement. Yippee!
- Reply to this comment
- Iraq is to blame, so weak, other nations march into to their territory and they can''t even respond! Muqtada al-Sadr should be directing his anger against Turkey too since he claims he wants all foreigners out of Iraq. The Turkey incursion would not happen if Iraq was united.
- Reply to this comment
- And the Clintons go down in flames......
They were your best hope libs and you let it slip away - Reply to this comment
How gold pays for 
