The Cost Of Addiction: R.J's Story

One Teenage Boy Was Born Addicted To Heroin; Now He's Out To Help Addicts With A Law

(CBS)  "Where's your iPod? Where's your phone? Where's your lunch?" he was asked.

It's a typical teenager's morning routine.

But R. J. Feild, a sophomore in Riverside County, is anything but a typical teenager, CBS News correspondent Sandra Hughes reports.

Everything about school is a struggle for R.J. He can barely read because his vision is so terrible. Only one hand works well. And walking is a major ordeal.

When he make new friends, do they ask him: "were you born like this?"

"Yea, which I'm fine with it. It's part of life. Like all my other struggles," he said.

What does he tell them?

"I tell them that my mom did drugs and she made me have to be born this way," R.J. said.

He was born addicted to heroin, with meth, alcohol and cocaine also in his system. Months premature, he weighed only two pounds. His birth mother, who was on public assistance, abandoned him in the hospital. No one expected him to survive.

But then again, surprising folks is what R.J. does best.

Now 16 years old, he just won an essay contest sponsored by California legislator John Benoit, called, "There ought to be a law."

Part of his essay reads, "For my entire life I will need assistance...."

What R.J. is proposing:

All welfare recipients would be randomly tested for drugs.

If they test positive, they'd be offered help.

If they refuse to enter rehab, they would loose their benefits.

It's not just about the human cost, says R.J., but the cost to taxpayers as well. The school district provides a full-time aide and special PE teacher. His medical bills are well into the millions.

At a Republican ladies luncheon, R.J. campaigned to turn his idea into a real law.

"What it's for is to stop other kids turning out like I did," R.J. said. One lady at the luncheon replied: "That's a brilliant idea, R.J."

"Why should there be a law, R.J?" Hughes asked.

"So that we can clean up the people and get babies so they don't turn out like I did, they don't have to go through what I went through, or what I'm going through," he said.

R.J.'s PE teacher is the same teacher who taught him how to walk - way back in kindergarten.

He's had nothing but encouragement from the foster parents who raised him.

"We've never told him there's something you can't do. We'd say you can do it. Just figure out a way," said Mary Beth Field.

Like earning a Varsity letter - in football - for assisting coach Peter McGowan.

"He has a great attitude," McGowan said. "He's a survivor, he's a warrior."

R.J. heads to Sacramento this week to introduce his bill to the California legislature. He knows that turning his idea into R.J.'s Law will be an uphill battle, but R.J.'s not even worried.

He's already conquered mountains.


© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Share:

Digg

Facebook

Yahoo! Buzz

Twitter

Mixx

More From CBS Evening News

• A Win for Abortion Opponents in House Bill
• Fans Bullish on Growth of Bull Riding
• Fort Hood Reflects, but Work Carries On
• Flight 93 Memorial Breaks Ground in Pa.
• High-End Designer Answers to Higher Power
• H1N1 Info is Scarce, Confusing for Many
• Aftermath Shows Sharper Picture of Hasan

• 

  VideoEvening News Online, 11.08.09

• 

  VideoBull-Riding, Sport Rising

Add a Comment

• 1
• 2
• next

See all 39 Comments

by sweetspuds1 February 23, 2008 2:44 AM EST

I am for this law..But I think everyone on welfare and SSI/SSD need to be drug tested. I used drugs for many years. What got me off the stuff was getting arrested. Was the best thing that ever happened to me. I got 6yrs clean from drugs, by the way no kids. I was smart in that area. I haven''t had a seizure in 6yrs. I got a job and I am slowly getting off social security and disability. I just can''t live off what I make a month on this income. So I am for this law. But I think all people need to be drug tested. It isnt just people on welfare. Its peeps on ssi/ssd too.

Reply to this comment

by libsrc0kskrs February 22, 2008 3:57 PM EST

For what it''''s worth.. I am subject to random drug testing to earn my pay so I can pay taxes. My taxes support Family Services, so why shouldn''''t people getting the assistance be subject to drug screening too?

Posted by Dooder712 at 07:13 PM : Feb 21, 2008
+ report abuse

****************

because your nieghborhood liberal WOULD NOT ALLOW THAT.

Reply to this comment

by paganmama February 22, 2008 2:39 PM EST

"What R.J. is proposing: All welfare recipients would be randomly tested for drugs."

It''s sad that this child has been brainwashed into believing that ALL people on public assistance are drug users. This is a classic exampling of stereotyping at it''s finest.

Reply to this comment

by keithle1 February 22, 2008 9:54 AM EST

Where do you think most violent criminals come from? Stable, loving families with a mother & father who make the kids the number one priority?

Reply to this comment

by keithle1 February 22, 2008 9:50 AM EST

Single women, assuming they have half a brain cell, need to use birth control AND demand that the Super Stud they''re sleeping with use a condom. If the man of your dreams doesn''t want to use a condom then the party is over. I''m sure you''ll be able to resist his charms.

It''s one thing for a married couple with kids to lose their jobs & end up relying on public assistance for a temporary period. No one has a problem with that.

It''s another thing for single women to have child after child & expect the government to pick up the tab. Single women have to take responsibility for birth control because they''re the ones carrying the baby for 9 months & will be doing most of the caregiving. Or their mother/grandmother will. Single men, especially black men, have an interesting habit of disappearing in such situations. It''s going to change your life in a HUGE way. Unless you get an abortion.

Reply to this comment

by michellem99-2009 February 22, 2008 12:25 AM EST

I am for the mums to be to be tested for illgal drugs that may be in their system to handicap a child. It is not right. I DO FEEL THAT THERE ARE PERSONS THAT MUST BE FIXED TO THEY CAN''T BREED. I had to fight to have gotten my tubes tied at 28. I was in a blind centre but left with a friend 24+ years ago. I am on meds. I think it is something that need to be addressed. The non handicapped don''t want to think about what drugs will do the unborn. I have gone thru the change of life at 37. I am 53.

Reply to this comment

by jewwop1 February 21, 2008 11:06 PM EST

PS,. I forgot to mention the most important part of RJs story and thats the babies who would be saved! Its a win win situation.

Reply to this comment

by jewwop1 February 21, 2008 10:40 PM EST

I agree with RJs Law and the others on here. Why shouldn''t ANY person not just woman, but men too who are receiving Public assistance be tested! They are receiving,cash, foodstamps and most importantly better healthcare then my own father who worked all his life and is now a retired Senior! Why shouldn''t they have to do something for our Working tax dollars! I live in Philadelphia, worst crime in the nation, mostly due to drugs not that our Mayor will admit it! So Im all for it! If these people are forced to get help then their off the drugs, the crime stops and then the free Methodone programs stop and we save more tax paying dollars! It would be a trickel affect. I Believe drugs are the root of all Evil and the reason we have soo much crime and craziness in the world today! Please let us know how we can help! Im sure the entire working nation would join forces with RJ! Im ready to do what I can! RJ your amazing, Keep Striving, Im praying and rooting for ya!

Reply to this comment

by sdance1 February 21, 2008 10:17 PM EST

This is a powerful story and one brave man''s struggles and accomplishments should inspire all of us to honestly look at all of the issues involved with welfare and lives destroyed from drug abuse. Without attacking, we should be asking what can be done. Innocent victims need to be protected and in circumstances in which individuals are not acting responsibly but are enjoying the rights (to food, shelter, etc...)then the govt. needs to take more control. If individuals are receiving assistance then their freedoms are subject to a wiser authority. Pregnant women should be given assistance but in a more responsible way whether it is required living in facilities that ensure maternity care or frequent visits from social workers to insure that they are taking proper care of themselves and their unborn babies.

Reply to this comment

by dooder712 February 21, 2008 10:13 PM EST

For what it''s worth.. I am subject to random drug testing to earn my pay so I can pay taxes. My taxes support Family Services, so why shouldn''t people getting the assistance be subject to drug screening too?

Reply to this comment

by libsrweak February 21, 2008 9:45 PM EST

and the LIBERALS wants to legalize drugs..WELL I SAY TAX THE HELL OUT OF THEM AND LET THEM PAY FOR THIS

Reply to this comment

by trac73 February 21, 2008 6:51 PM EST

I would like to know what WE can do to help RJ in his fight to get this bill passed! From what I am reading here, I am not the only one that agrees with his take on the "system"...I think most of america would agree SOMETHING needs to change. Maybe this could be the start.....

Reply to this comment

by candle10 February 21, 2008 6:28 PM EST

Millions for one person''s medical care, that''s a crime!

Reply to this comment

by dallyup2 February 21, 2008 5:32 PM EST

Give me a break! descriminate? now i have heard it all... People make a choice to take that first hit or snort or whatever they do with drugs, there is enough education around for idiots to know they most likely will get hooked. I think we need much tougher laws and welfare reform. I am personally sick of busting my butt to support drug addicts and lazy people.

Reply to this comment

by dallyup2 February 21, 2008 5:04 PM EST

There could be so many things fixed in this country with this law. People say welfare is for the kids, if the parents are using the kids foodstamps and checks to buy drugs how is it for the kids?

Reply to this comment

by livelymomof2 February 21, 2008 3:29 PM EST

mswolfestock: I pray that you NEVER have a situation where you need assistance. My husband and I were making over $90,000 annually when he was injured and eventually unable to work. Had it not been for family services, who provided food assistance and sports scholarships for our kids, we''d have been homeless in less than 2 months, because a family of 4 doesn''t survive on $25,000 a year. We had to use assistance until my promotion and raise came through, and his disability pay kicked in. so, contrary to your bigotted belief, MOST FAMILY SERVICES RECIPIENTS ARE NOT "some kind of low animal form." But, if you continue to believe that you are above everyone else, you will be wishing that you were a better person...Karma, man!

Reply to this comment

by livelymomof2 February 21, 2008 3:17 PM EST

and the conclusion...I know plenty of single parents (male and female both) who are raising their children just fine, and don''t see the "only safety net" as being welfare. By the way, it''s not welfare anymore, it is Family Services. birth control doesn''t always work, but I know a sure fix for these young people (and older ones, too)...get fixed! If you want to play, don''t gripe to me when you have 1 or more children and are receiving assistance because your loser of a partner cannot take care of their responsiblities. Grab your self by the bootstraps, pull yourself up and move on! In this day and age, it doesn''t make sense not to take advantage of several programs for education, work training, etc. So, if you want assistance, be prepared to prove you don''t need rehab!

Reply to this comment

by mswolfestock February 21, 2008 3:14 PM EST

RJ''s Law is a great idea, but it doesn''t go far enough. If a woman on welfare tests positive for drugs and refuses rehab, then she should have her tubes tied so she cannot bring any children into the world, drug-addicted or otherwise. I don''t think that women on welfare should be allowed to breed at all - they''re using my tax dollars and that''s always been wrong. They keep on breeding kids they don''t really want so they can get more welfare. I''m sick and tired of paying my taxes to these losers. And yes, textynn, welfare recipients ARE "some kind of low animal form." If they don''t want to be treated like animals they can get a life, go to rehab (on the tax-payers money), and then get a job.

Reply to this comment

by livelymomof2 February 21, 2008 3:09 PM EST

First, never did the article say that all children with disabilities were born to drug addicted parents, just that there is a rising number of children with disabilities who are born to drug addicts. So, if your 28 year old developmentally disabled son is upset, you need to explain that to him, and re read the article.

2nd, I''ve used Family services for food assistance after my husband was disabled and before Soc. Security was approved. To say that drug testing welfare recipients is discrimination is incorrect. I''d have happily submitted to a test, because if I''m using taxpayers money, they deserve for me to be clean.

Yes, every woman should be drug tested when pregnant. I was.

Reply to this comment

by azcagirl February 21, 2008 2:39 PM EST

I hope all the best for RJ. What a brave young man to make a stand. I agree with him 100% and I hope his law will be passed.

Reply to this comment

• 1
• 2
• next

See all 39 Comments

Add a comment

Comment SUBMIT

Click here to add another comment.

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.

Comment reply

Submit Cancel

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.

Report offensive content:

If you believe this comment is offensive or violates the CBSNews.com Terms of Use, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the comment). Once reported, our staff will be notified and the comment will be reviewed.

Select type of offense:

Offensive: Sexually explicit or offensive language

Spam: Advertisements, commercial links, or repetitive posts

Disruptive posting: Flaming or offending other users

Illegal activities: Promote cracked software, or other illegal content

Off-topic: Commentary unrelated to the storyline

Comments (optional):

Report Cancel

E-mail this comment to a friend.

E-mail this to: (Separate multiple e-mail addresses with commas. Limited to 10 addresses.)

Your e-mail address:

Send me a copy of this message

Note: Your e-mail address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the e-mail and in case of transmission error. Neither your address nor the recipients's address will be used for any other purpose.

Add your own personal message: (Optional)

Hi, I found this user's comment on CBSNews.com and thought you might be interested in reading it. Send e-mail Cancel

[sweetspuds1]

I am for this law..But I think everyone on welfare and SSI/SSD need to be drug tested. I used drugs for many years. What got me off the stuff was getting arrested. Was the best thing that ever happened to me. I got 6yrs clean from drugs, by the way no kids. I was smart in that area. I haven''t had a seizure in 6yrs. I got a job and I am slowly getting off social security and disability. I just can''t live off what I make a month on this income. So I am for this law. But I think all people need to be drug tested. It isnt just people on welfare. Its peeps on ssi/ssd too.

[libsrc0kskrs]

For what it''''s worth.. I am subject to random drug testing to earn my pay so I can pay taxes. My taxes support Family Services, so why shouldn''''t people getting the assistance be subject to drug screening too?

Posted by Dooder712 at 07:13 PM : Feb 21, 2008
+ report abuse

****************

because your nieghborhood liberal WOULD NOT ALLOW THAT.

[paganmama]

"What R.J. is proposing: All welfare recipients would be randomly tested for drugs."

It''s sad that this child has been brainwashed into believing that ALL people on public assistance are drug users. This is a classic exampling of stereotyping at it''s finest.

[keithle1]

Where do you think most violent criminals come from? Stable, loving families with a mother & father who make the kids the number one priority?

[keithle1]

Single women, assuming they have half a brain cell, need to use birth control AND demand that the Super Stud they''re sleeping with use a condom. If the man of your dreams doesn''t want to use a condom then the party is over. I''m sure you''ll be able to resist his charms.

It''s one thing for a married couple with kids to lose their jobs & end up relying on public assistance for a temporary period. No one has a problem with that.

It''s another thing for single women to have child after child & expect the government to pick up the tab. Single women have to take responsibility for birth control because they''re the ones carrying the baby for 9 months & will be doing most of the caregiving. Or their mother/grandmother will. Single men, especially black men, have an interesting habit of disappearing in such situations. It''s going to change your life in a HUGE way. Unless you get an abortion.

[michellem99-2009]

I am for the mums to be to be tested for illgal drugs that may be in their system to handicap a child. It is not right. I DO FEEL THAT THERE ARE PERSONS THAT MUST BE FIXED TO THEY CAN''T BREED. I had to fight to have gotten my tubes tied at 28. I was in a blind centre but left with a friend 24+ years ago. I am on meds. I think it is something that need to be addressed. The non handicapped don''t want to think about what drugs will do the unborn. I have gone thru the change of life at 37. I am 53.

[jewwop1]

PS,. I forgot to mention the most important part of RJs story and thats the babies who would be saved! Its a win win situation.

[jewwop1]

I agree with RJs Law and the others on here. Why shouldn''t ANY person not just woman, but men too who are receiving Public assistance be tested! They are receiving,cash, foodstamps and most importantly better healthcare then my own father who worked all his life and is now a retired Senior! Why shouldn''t they have to do something for our Working tax dollars! I live in Philadelphia, worst crime in the nation, mostly due to drugs not that our Mayor will admit it! So Im all for it! If these people are forced to get help then their off the drugs, the crime stops and then the free Methodone programs stop and we save more tax paying dollars! It would be a trickel affect. I Believe drugs are the root of all Evil and the reason we have soo much crime and craziness in the world today! Please let us know how we can help! Im sure the entire working nation would join forces with RJ! Im ready to do what I can! RJ your amazing, Keep Striving, Im praying and rooting for ya!

[sdance1]

This is a powerful story and one brave man''s struggles and accomplishments should inspire all of us to honestly look at all of the issues involved with welfare and lives destroyed from drug abuse. Without attacking, we should be asking what can be done. Innocent victims need to be protected and in circumstances in which individuals are not acting responsibly but are enjoying the rights (to food, shelter, etc...)then the govt. needs to take more control. If individuals are receiving assistance then their freedoms are subject to a wiser authority. Pregnant women should be given assistance but in a more responsible way whether it is required living in facilities that ensure maternity care or frequent visits from social workers to insure that they are taking proper care of themselves and their unborn babies.

[dooder712]

For what it''s worth.. I am subject to random drug testing to earn my pay so I can pay taxes. My taxes support Family Services, so why shouldn''t people getting the assistance be subject to drug screening too?

[libsrweak]

and the LIBERALS wants to legalize drugs..WELL I SAY TAX THE HELL OUT OF THEM AND LET THEM PAY FOR THIS

[trac73]

I would like to know what WE can do to help RJ in his fight to get this bill passed! From what I am reading here, I am not the only one that agrees with his take on the "system"...I think most of america would agree SOMETHING needs to change. Maybe this could be the start.....

[candle10]

Millions for one person''s medical care, that''s a crime!

[dallyup2]

Give me a break! descriminate? now i have heard it all... People make a choice to take that first hit or snort or whatever they do with drugs, there is enough education around for idiots to know they most likely will get hooked. I think we need much tougher laws and welfare reform. I am personally sick of busting my butt to support drug addicts and lazy people.

[dallyup2]

There could be so many things fixed in this country with this law. People say welfare is for the kids, if the parents are using the kids foodstamps and checks to buy drugs how is it for the kids?

[livelymomof2]

mswolfestock: I pray that you NEVER have a situation where you need assistance. My husband and I were making over $90,000 annually when he was injured and eventually unable to work. Had it not been for family services, who provided food assistance and sports scholarships for our kids, we''d have been homeless in less than 2 months, because a family of 4 doesn''t survive on $25,000 a year. We had to use assistance until my promotion and raise came through, and his disability pay kicked in. so, contrary to your bigotted belief, MOST FAMILY SERVICES RECIPIENTS ARE NOT "some kind of low animal form." But, if you continue to believe that you are above everyone else, you will be wishing that you were a better person...Karma, man!

[livelymomof2]

and the conclusion...I know plenty of single parents (male and female both) who are raising their children just fine, and don''t see the "only safety net" as being welfare. By the way, it''s not welfare anymore, it is Family Services. birth control doesn''t always work, but I know a sure fix for these young people (and older ones, too)...get fixed! If you want to play, don''t gripe to me when you have 1 or more children and are receiving assistance because your loser of a partner cannot take care of their responsiblities. Grab your self by the bootstraps, pull yourself up and move on! In this day and age, it doesn''t make sense not to take advantage of several programs for education, work training, etc. So, if you want assistance, be prepared to prove you don''t need rehab!

[mswolfestock]

RJ''s Law is a great idea, but it doesn''t go far enough. If a woman on welfare tests positive for drugs and refuses rehab, then she should have her tubes tied so she cannot bring any children into the world, drug-addicted or otherwise. I don''t think that women on welfare should be allowed to breed at all - they''re using my tax dollars and that''s always been wrong. They keep on breeding kids they don''t really want so they can get more welfare. I''m sick and tired of paying my taxes to these losers. And yes, textynn, welfare recipients ARE "some kind of low animal form." If they don''t want to be treated like animals they can get a life, go to rehab (on the tax-payers money), and then get a job.

[livelymomof2]

First, never did the article say that all children with disabilities were born to drug addicted parents, just that there is a rising number of children with disabilities who are born to drug addicts. So, if your 28 year old developmentally disabled son is upset, you need to explain that to him, and re read the article.

2nd, I''ve used Family services for food assistance after my husband was disabled and before Soc. Security was approved. To say that drug testing welfare recipients is discrimination is incorrect. I''d have happily submitted to a test, because if I''m using taxpayers money, they deserve for me to be clean.

Yes, every woman should be drug tested when pregnant. I was.

[azcagirl]

I hope all the best for RJ. What a brave young man to make a stand. I agree with him 100% and I hope his law will be passed.