U.S.: Raul Castro A "Fidel Lite"

Ailing Communist Leader Resigns Post; Fidel's 76-Year-Old Brother, Raul ,The Heir Apparent

(CBS/AP)  The Bush administration is ruling out any changes in its Cuba policy, including the status of a five-decade-long trade embargo, after Fidel Castro's resignation.

A State Department spokesman derided Castro's 76-year-old brother and heir apparent, Raul Castro, as a "Fidel lite" and "dictator lite."

Despite having wished openly for Castro's demise and the end of his rule for years, U.S. officials said Tuesday that the Cuban president's decision to step down on his own terms leaves little hope for real democratic transition in communist Cuba during President George W. Bush's final year in office, although it may open options for Bush's successor in the White House.

Castro said in his letter that he was not bidding his thousands of supporters farewell, and that he would continue to fight for the ideals he's espoused for almost 50 years, CBS News correspondent Kelly Cobiella reports.

Led by Bush, a chorus of officials expressed hope that Castro's departure would spark fundamental change for the Cuban people. They also said they doubted that would happen under Raul Castro and said there was little chance the nearly 50-year-old U.S. embargo on Cuba would be lifted.

"They're the ones who suffered under Fidel Castro," Bush told a news conference in Rwanda. "They're the ones who were put in prison because of their beliefs. They're the ones who have been denied their right to live in a free society. So I view this as a period of transition, and it should be the beginning of the democratic transition in Cuba."

"Eventually, this transition ought to lead to free and fair elections - and I mean free, and I mean fair, not these kind of staged elections that the Castro brothers try to foist off as true democracy," Bush said. "The United States will help the people of Cuba realize the blessings of liberty."

In Washington, senior State Department officials said there would be no lifting of the embargo, which has been the centerpiece of American policy toward Cuba since it was imposed in 1960 and strengthened in 1962.

"I can't imagine that happening any time soon," said Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte.

The ailing Castro, 81, who has called the embargo "criminal" and claims its impact has run into the tens of billions of dollars, announced early Tuesday he would not accept another term in office when parliament meets to elect a new president this weekend.

Castro outlasted nine U.S. presidents who, with some minor policy adjustments, have steadily ramped up pressure on Cuba. At least two secretaries of state, Madeleine Albright and Colin Powell, said publicly while in office that they hoped "the actuarial tables" would catch up with the aging Cuban leader who was a persistent thorn in Washington's side.

Long-standing U.S. irritation with Castro was evident on Tuesday with officials stressing they were not optimistic for any kind of quick change under Raul Castro, to whom Fidel ceded power temporarily in July 2006.

"The changing of the guard is not significant of and by itself," said deputy State Department spokesman Tom Casey. "It will be significant if in fact it leads to greater openness and freedom for the Cuban people and ultimately to a democratic transition."

Casey said "the general analysis is that Raul Castro is 'Fidel lite.' He is simply a continuation of the Castro regime, of the dictatorship."

Jumping into the fray, the top three presidential candidates all said Washington should look for ways to encourage democratic change in Cuba, steps that could lead to normalizing U.S. relations with Cuba later on.

Democrats Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama and Republican John McCain also demanded the release of Cuban political prisoners.

"The United States must pursue an active policy that does everything possible to advance the cause of freedom, democracy and opportunity in Cuba," Clinton said.

Obama, who is waging a hard-fought campaign with Clinton for the Democratic nomination, said the United States must be prepared for normal relations with Cuba and an easing of the embargo if Cuba's new leader "begins opening Cuba to meaningful democratic change."

Castro's resignation "should mark the end of a dark era in Cuba's history. ... Fidel Castro's stepping down is an essential first step, but it is sadly insufficient in bringing freedom to Cuba," he said.

In a statement, McCain underscored that "freedom for the Cuban people is not yet at hand. We must press the Cuban regime to release all political prisoners unconditionally, to legalize all political parties, labor unions and free media, and to schedule internationally monitored elections,"

Republican Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, who was born in Havana, said Castro's resignation was irrelevant because his regime had already "done great harm to the suffering Cuban people."

Sen. Robert Menendez, a Democrat who also is of Cuban descent, said Castro's resignation "is not the cause for celebration that some would believe. This does not represent the replacement of totalitarianism with democracy. Instead, it is the replacement of one dictator with another."

Cuban leaders have often expressed willingness to deal with the United States, but only on Cuban terms. Those conditions look nothing like U.S. demands laid down to lift the embargo in the Helms-Burton Act of 1996.

The law grants U.S. presidents broad leeway over how to enforce the embargo. The embargo rules themselves stand as long as either Raul or Fidel are in power, according to Helms-Burton.

Still, Raul Castro has offered repeatedly to improve relations with Washington, even if the Bush administration shows no sign of taking him up on it. He has hinted that he favors greater, if still limited, economic freedom. And he already has allowed more, if limited, public criticism of the government.

Since taking the provisional presidency, he has extradited three U.S. fugitives, reduced the number of Cuban political prisoners by more than 20 percent and refrained from imposing the death penalty in two military mutinies where firing squads seemed likely. He also said Cuban forces would recapture any terror suspects who escape from the Guantanamo prison.

More uncertain is who will be chosen as Raul's new successor, although 56-year-old council Vice President Carlos Lage, who is Cuba's de facto prime minister, is a strong possibility.

"Raul is also old," allowed Isabel, a 61-year-old Havana street sweeper. She speculated that he could be succeeded by Lage, Foreign Minister Felipe Perez Roque, "or another younger person with new eyes."

[leftyintexas]

I was, and, I still am. However, I''''m voting for McCain. There is no way we can let Hillary or the semi-terrorist O''''sama bin Obama into the white house.
Posted by poopusbuttus at 06:17 PM : Feb 19, 2008

What are you going to do about it when they are elected? Nothing. Just shoot off your pie hole, that''s all. Only 335 days left poop-for-brains. Enjoy them while you can!

[dixxson-2009]

Castro kicked out the Robber Barons.
He put the Boots to the Mafioso.
He expelled the Drug lords.

They all moved to the USA.
Now if relations were restored with Cuba, the people that are moving and retiring to Puerto Rico, Dominican Reppublic, Bahamas,
Bermuda and Mexico would Flood Cuba!

[incog-nito]

See? U.S. policy toward Cuba has been a total success: Just wait until the dictator retires or die of old age, then hope for the best.

[brianbwb-2009]

Posted by Like5927

No, we wouldn''t, take your spam to the *** sites, they are not welcome here.

Reported, along with all the others.

[brianbwb-2009]

"...senior State Department officials said there would be no lifting of the embargo, which has been the centerpiece of American policy toward Cuba since it was imposed in 1960 and strengthened in 1962."

Yay! So those outside of the US can still enjoy the exquisite cigars without the US hoarding them and driving up the price.

On a more serious note, Bush''s latest hobby seems to be calling the kettle black. It will be better for the Cubans if the US, by its'' own choice, or Cuba''s, is not allowed to interfere and corrupt the politics and economics of the country.

[ajmarine1]

We have a 400 year supply of oil here in the US.

Posted by jowand at 10:11 PM : Feb 19, 2008


You can never have to much; especially if they keep building bigger and bigger pick-ups. Geez, how big a truck do some people have to have?

[nothappyatall]

"The Bush administration is ruling out any changes in its Cuba policy, including the status of a five-decade-long trade embargo, after Fidel Castro''s resignation. "

No surprise THERE, but when the butt-wadis out of power, hopefully President Obama will DUMP this idiotic 50 year old embargo that has been a 100% total failure in every way and has done nothing but cause misery to the people in Cuba and caused 300% more ecological pollution from their driving 1950''s cars which is all they have and repair over and over.

Time to DUMP the Nazi-esque USA embargo.

[jowand]

Cuba''''s got oil; maybe now we will make friends with them.
Posted by AJMarine1 at 07:05 PM : Feb 19, 2008

We have a 400 year supply of oil here in the US.

[downtowner97]

It''s ironic that Bush lovers gush about how wonderful it is to spread democracy while democracy here is about to replace their beloved king with an inexperienced young, black, muslim, crack smoker just to let them see how little we enjoyed their ideas.

[downtowner97]

This would be a fantastic opportunity to lift the embargo. China has MFN status and is hosting the Olympics, and is no more or less opressive than Cuba.

[ontheleft]

Funny how we don''t hear the U.S. government complaining that Saudi Arabia is not a democracy.

The United States government needs to stop meddling in other countries affairs.

Their energies should be used to fix the many problems we have right here in our own country. That is why we elected them and that is what we are paying taxes for.

We need to boot these ''freedom loving'' neo-Cons from office in November to get control of this country back .

[rowdytexan2]

"Despite having wished openly for Castro''s demise and the end of his rule for years, U.S. officials said Tuesday that the Cuban president''s decision to step down on his own terms leaves little hope for real democratic transition in communist Cuba during President George W. Bush''s final year in office."

Awwwwwwwwwwww, too bad! Mean old Fidel wouldn''t let Bushit and friends into his country and exploit it!
In that one area, Fidel was a smart man!

[ajmarine1]

No oil, no challenge, no way for big business to milk the system?

Posted by bozworth4 at 06:53 PM : Feb 19, 2008


The discovery of potential deep-water oil and gas reserves off Cuba''s northern coast has caught the eye of the world''s energy-hungry nations.


The US could see rigs drilling for Cuban oil only 50 miles off Florida
India''s state-run oil firm ONGC, already signed up to exploration in the area, has just upped its stake - the latest to place its bets on a Cuban oil rush.

The 44-year-old US trade embargo, meanwhile, continues to bar American companies from doing business with the Caribbean island.

But, some observers are asking, can the US really afford to risk losing out on valuable energy resources only 50 miles (80km) off Key West?

The prospect of nations such as China, Venezuela or India lining up to exploit Cuban oil has already led some politicians to call for the embargo to be relaxed.



Cuba''s got oil; maybe now we will make friends with them.

[bozworth4]

Done the same thing in Nam!

[bozworth4]

Has anybody asked yet why we go half way around the world to fight for a nation (or the lastest reason given) to give them democracy??? We could have done that in less than 200 miles. No oil, no challenge, no way for big business to milk the system? do like the looks of some of the old cars still in use there!

[skeezix06]

I''m trying to get excited about Castro stepping down. ...Still trying. ...Yep, still trying. ...Hmm, he''s really gone? (yawn)...

[hungry1968]

then you are saying the constitution is out of date as well

Posted by terrorislam0 at 06:24 PM : Feb 19, 2008




Yes - parts of it are. That''s why we have an "amendments process" - to change the things that need to be changed. And the electoral college system is definitely one of those things -- IMHO.

[generey]

"Eventually, this transition ought to lead to free and fair elections - and I mean free, and I mean fair, not these kind of staged elections that the Castro brothers try to foist off as true democracy," Bush said. "The United States will help the people of Cuba realize the blessings of liberty."

ROFLMAO! Here we go again sticking our nose into another country''s biz. As Winston Churchill said, "democracy is the worst form of government known to man". Go figure.

[hungry1968]

I was, and, I still am. However, I''''m voting for McCain. There is no way we can let Hillary or the semi-terrorist O''''sama bin Obama into the white house.

Posted by poopusbuttus at 06:17 PM : Feb 19, 2008





Start licking your wounds now - it''ll save time later.

[hungry1968]

Posted by terrorislam0 at 06:16 PM : Feb 19, 2008




No - I''m not against the constitution. I''m against something that is pitifully out of date - the electoral college. I''m sure it was the best way to tally the votes as quickly as possible during the days of the pony express, and in the years before the telegraph and telephones were invented.

I do believe that we are now a little bit ahead of that technology at this point in our history.....