Why College Women Favor Obama

The New Republic: From Within A Girl-Positive Environment, College Women Are Weighing Other Factors Aside From Gender

(The New Republic)  This column was written by Elizabeth Cline.

---

In the Democratic primaries so far, women have voted in larger numbers than men. In the 13 states that Hillary Clinton has won, she owed her victories in no small part to a majority female vote -- a sign that a female president is an important election issue for women overall. Among young women, however, that girl-power momentum evaporates, and Barack Obama is the favored candidate. What happens -- or hasn't yet happened -- to young women that explains this gap? The answer can be found on campus.

Articles on youth voting routinely fail to address gender, focusing instead on how young people are picking the candidate who has their "aspirations" and "attitudes." But it's important to ask why gender, as an issue, is in a position to be ignored. At colleges today, women receive better grades than men and take home more honors degrees; they are more likely to get internships and be involved in campus organizations. They have stronger college applications than men, and have been outnumbering men in enrollment as a result for 25 years. According to Department of Education projections, by 2012, there will be roughly 142 women graduating for every 100 men. In other words, in four dreamy years, women run the show. And that is hurting Hillary Clinton's quest for young female voters.

Unfortunately, there's no exit poll data that singles out young female voters. But there are statistics that suggest how solidly this bloc supports Obama. Even though a majority of young Democratic voters are female, Obama has won the under-30 vote in most of the primaries. Of the 13 Super Tuesday primary states in which of the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE), a youth civic-participation research group, analyzed the youth vote, ten went for Obama and three went for Clinton. And in Virginia, the most recent primary in which youth voting data has been analyzed, people under 30 gave Obama a thundering 76 percent of the vote.

Obama's support gets even stronger as voters get younger. Among college students, it's even stronger. As far back as April 2007, polls showed Obama with a 17-point lead over Clinton among college Democrats. During that same period, Obama's lead over Clinton was only three percentage points among 18-24 year-olds not enrolled in a four-year school. Fortunately for Obama, this non-college group has abysmal voter turnout. According to CIRCLE, in 2004, the voter turnout for college students and college graduates under 25 was 59 percent; it was 34 percent for non-graduates. In other words, those young voters are mostly college students or recent grads.

Anyone who has graduated in the last decade has anecdotes of guys who come to class late or hungover, while their female classmates seemed to have all their work done. College has become one corner of American life where hardworking females are consistently and fairly rewarded, and they are succeeding there, to a much greater degree than their male counterparts. It's possible, maybe even likely, to graduate college with little sense and zero experience of institutionalized gender discrimination -- with almost complete freedom from the type of covert, daily setbacks that drive blacks to the polls for Obama and older women to vote for Clinton.

In a recent New York Times op-ed, Lorrie Moore used women's progress in academic settings to entreat voters not to choose Clinton. "The children who are suffering in this country, who are having trouble in school, and for whom the murder and suicide rates and economic dropout rates are high, are boys -- especially boys of color, for whom the whole educational system, starting in kindergarten, often feels a form of exile, a system designed by and for white girls," she wrote.

But if you can afford to be there, the college-world of grades and tests is astonishingly more objective than the rest of life -- and that's why women are able to get ahead. The classroom is not political; it's not a popularity contest. Studies show that women earn their school-years dominance by studying more and trying harder than men. The 2005 National Survey of Student Engagement showed that men were significantly more likely than women to say they spent at least 11 hours a week relaxing or socializing, and more men than women said they frequently came to class unprepared.

From within their girl-positive environment, college women are weighing other factors in the primaries aside from gender. Race is one of them. "There's a competition among dueling idealisms," says Yale University political science professor Donald Green, of college voters. "Maybe idealism associated with race is more compelling, has more of a visceral appeal. We're at a moment in our history where there's cause for optimism about gender equality, but less cause for optimism about racial equality. And from [a college student's] standpoint, the real inequality is likely to be racial or ethnic."

A less cynical explanation may be that, with sexism off the table, females in college feel less conflicted than other women about their vote. Gloria Steinem, in a now-legendary New York Times op-ed published the day of the New Hampshire primary, wrote that what "worries" her is that "some women, perhaps especially younger ones, hope to deny or escape the sexual caste system." Steinem's gloom-and-doom picture of a larger world full of everlasting sexism hasn't seemed to affect the votes of young women. Still, the advantage women have in college quickly slips away in the working world. Women get paid a lot less than the men they graduate with, no matter how much extra work or hours they put in. One year out of school, women working full-time are earning 80 percent of what their former male classmates are making, according to a 2007 study by American Association of University Women Educational Foundation. And this fact hasn't budged over the past ten years -- despite the advances women have made on campus.

But would a woman who votes for Obama today rethink her choice after graduation, when she sees a man getting ahead in the workplace, or when she has to make a choice between a higher-level career and kids? Americans usually aren't so if-A-then-B with picking candidates, and Obama's popularity with voters in their thirties and forties has grown in recent weeks. But, interestingly, Clinton has won 25- to 30 -year-olds in a few primaries, such as New Hampshire, where the under-24 vote went to Obama. It gives weight to the idea that post-grads might shift their preferences after a few years away from campus, but given the minimal data collected during exit polls, it's impossible to say for sure.

Young people are going to continue to impact this election in unprecedented ways -- a force of history that leaves me simultaneously in love with young people's fervor and optimism and unnerved by their lack of interest in Hillary. For the candidate, the parallels between college and the real world are striking. She has worked hard and done what's expected of her, but may very well get passed over by a less qualified guy when payday comes.

[denise083]

Excuse me rr12343 I''LL TAKE HILLARY AS PRESIDENT ANY
DAY OVER "BAMPOT" DEFINITION -SOMEONE WHO TALKS
ROT

[denise083]

This artical says a lot about the education system
of America.
When college students are willing to throw their vote
away on someone who gives a great concert.

[guysdigdirt]

She is slick for sure.

She is in a league of her own ! ! !
Posted by old300d

Yes, she is in a league of her own, no other self-repecting person would want to have anything to do with that league.

[guysdigdirt]

They will be writing and talking about Sen. Clinton 100 years from now !

She is way ahead of her time !
Posted by old300d

If they are it will be as an example of what we need to avoid in any form of leadership in the US or anywhere else.

Hillary is a liar, a cheat, a self-centered dishonest tavern wench. and I do mean that in the best way possible.

[zji8bek]

I''m a 26 year old women who''s been out of college (and in the workplace) for three years. I''m an engineer so I''m definitely in a male dominated field, and I have never felt like my gender affects my career at all.

[katefranklin]

This article ignores some important realities. Women today are achieving the presidency in countries all over the world. Chile, Switzerland, New Zealand, Mozambique, Finland, Netherlands, Liberia, The Philippines, Ireland, and Germany all currently have women in their country''s highest position. Countless others have been elected to the highest office in years past. What all of these women have in common is that they got to where they are based on merit, not because their spouse was a former president. Hillary is no Margaret Thatcher.

[rr12343]

Hillary Clinton is the biggest sexist in Politics. Just look at her website and you''ll see that she supports only women''s issues (at large). It''s no surprise that men are smart in voting for McCain or Obama! It''s not because men are sexist, it''s because we don''t want this loser in the White House being a Misanderer!

[rr12343]

To the person who wrote that "college-educated men do not seem to be able to see past gender when they vote..." seem to imply that men are biased. What utter nonsense. Read the whole article and there''s no mention of college educated men being biased. It''s an insult and an outrageous remark. How dare a woman or man assume that we are not able to see past gender. Too bad if Clinton is losing. It might be a result of smart college educated men not tolerating the failed politics of the Clintons. She''s a loser! Also, Clinton''s healthcare policies, ideas on the economy and the war are laughable. So if a man votes for Obama is he a sexist or is he smart (could it be that men are following someone who can accomplish their issues)? what about women voting for Clinton? According to the comment above, one might assume that they are a bunch of sexists too (women voting for a woman)? This kind of argument is what makes me angry. I believe female centered educational programs have disenfranchised males in the school system. In addition, when you degrade men, fathers, sons in the media, books, news papers, talk shows, what do you expect (they are called stupid, immature, moronic)? less men will consider going to school. I believe Clinton is a selfish self centered candidate who will do anything to secure a nomination. She''s losing her base with women, low income earners, adult whites etc. Stop blaming smart men! We are tired of the sexist rants of women. Stop the MISANDRY!

[random_radar]

Who would have thought that college-educated women would be smart enough to consider other criteria than gender when voting? I mean, considering that college-educated men do not seem to be able to see past gender when they vote...

[inventagod]

Why college women favor Obama?

Stereotypes???