February 15, 2008 12:10 PM

Obama's Youth Movement

Supporters cheer for Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., during his primary night rally in Nashua, N.H. in this Jan. 8, 2008 file photo. The first two Democratic presidential contests have taught Barack Obama a lesson as women go, so goes the state. Obama won most of the women's vote in Iowa, and he won the state. In New Hampshire, he lost the women and the state. (AP Photo/M. Spencer Green, File)

Supporters cheer for Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., during his primary night rally in Nashua, N.H. in this Jan. 8, 2008 file photo. The first two Democratic presidential contests have taught Barack Obama a lesson as women go, so goes the state. Obama won most of the women's vote in Iowa, and he won the state. In New Hampshire, he lost the women and the state. (AP Photo/M. Spencer Green, File) (AP)

(The Nation)  This column was written by Cora Currier.

The youngest generation of American voters has chosen a candidate. Should Barack Obama be the Democratic nominee, his victory may well be the first in which the youth vote played a decisive role. So far, however, it is unclear whether Obama's success reflects his personal appeal or a more profound movement among young Americans.

Today's young voter has come of political age in the shadow of 9/11 and the lies and poisonous politics of the Bush Administration. Such an experience could have led to a deepening of cynicism and an increase in apathy, a turning away from politics entirely. Instead, the so-called millennial generation has responded with the reverse, bucking the trend of low turnout that has reigned since 1972, when 18-year-olds were given the right to vote. Participation has doubled and tripled in many contests, paralleling the spike in overall turnout and surpassing it in some states. Though he's done better among the college crowd, Obama has captured more than 50 percent of the vote of 18-to-29-year-olds in nearly every primary contest to date. Hillary Clinton bested him only in Arkansas, Florida (where no candidates campaigned), California and Massachusetts (by the slimmest of margins in the last two).

The key to Obama's appeal to young voters may be that he resembles them. In a New York Times essay contest on the state of American college students, Nicholas Handler labeled his generation "Post-Everything": "post-Cold War, post-industrial, post-baby boom, post-9/11." Obama himself is a collage of "posts." Time magazine recently observed that, like Tiger Woods and Angelina Jolie, Obama has "one of those faces that seem beamed from a postracial future." He has made a campaign theme out of being post-boomer, thus distancing himself from the generation Clinton represents. He also touts himself as a postpartisan leader, someone who "can get things done" outside the bickering of Washington Democrats and Republicans.

This all meshes well with the way young people view politics right now. According to opinion polls, they are less likely than older voters to be up in arms about gay marriage and abortion--perhaps because war, climate change and a plummeting economy appear to be more serious threats. The most telling sign that youth may be realigning political designations is the movement among young voters away from Democrat-Republican labels: a survey of 18-to-24-year-olds last fall found that 40 percent identified themselves as independents, and 37 percent said that the existing parties "do such a poor job that a major third party is needed." Obama's talk of "a new majority" fits nicely with these sentiments, as does the claim he made in a speech to Virginia Democrats on February 9 that he can "move beyond the divisive politics of Washington and bring Democrats, independents and, yes, Republicans who are disillusioned with our current course together to get things done."

Still, between the two parties, Democrats have an increasing edge over Republicans among young people: the Democrats' advantage among 18-to-30-year-olds surged from two percentage points in 2000 to thirty-one points in 2008. Of course, young voters were supposed to tip the presidential election for John Kerry in 2004, but their relatively disappointing turnout made many skeptical of a youth-fueled campaign. There are reasons to believe things will be different, however, if Obama is the nominee. He has targeted young people--particularly college-educated young people--from the outset of his run in a way Kerry never did. His organization on campuses is excellent, and he has tapped successfully into the power of social networking sites and the viral messaging of YouTube. And Obama has much more personal appeal than Kerry, drawing rock-star crowds and celebrity adoration.

The depth and substance of the Obama youth phenomenon, though, has yet to be tested. While the main things preoccupying young voters, like the rest of the nation, are Iraq, healthcare and the economy, top issues among youth also include climate change, the rising cost of education and action in Darfur (although young people are as vague as others about just what it is that effective "action" would entail). Obama has been a strong supporter of action in Darfur in the past, but--perhaps because of the complexities of intervention--it's fallen from prominence as the campaign gathers steam. On global warming, he's gotten little pressure over his support of biofuels, coal and nuclear energy. If young voters propel Obama to victory, they should in turn pressure him to address their priorities.

An Obama loss in the primary would test how much the surge in youth turnout is about the issues and how much it's just about Obama. Mike Connery, a youth activist and co-founder of the blog Future Majority, claimed recently, "Obama may be riding the youth wave, and he is certainly amplifying it, but in no way did he create it." Still, while Clinton has been working hard on improving her image among youth, it's unclear whether she can inspire the same turnout and impassioned campaigning.

Young voters have proven themselves to be a significant demographic, voting in greater numbers than even the much-courted senior citizens. But to amount to a movement, they must be willing to fight for their issues whether their candidate wins or loses.

By Cora Currier
Reprinted with permission from The Nation

The Nation
Add a Comment See all 26 Comments
by quatrops February 17, 2008 11:54 PM EST
In his malevolent diatribe, chad55555 would have us believe he has "studied history".

His bigotry and paranoia strongly suggest his "studies" consist of many, many hours spent following "hate threads" on the internet. We all have seen examples of this dynamic from both the extreme right and the extreme left.

As irritated as I sometimes get about CBS''s op-ed selections and the opposing-view posts that follow, they at least provide an opportunity to get info and opinion from BOTH sides of any issue, and I can come to my own conclusions somewhat informed.

History offers far too many examples of successful inter-cultural and inter-racial cooperation that demonstrate the absurdity of chad55555''s paranoid diatribe. Keep those "cards and letters coming", folks. There is always hope when we''re talking (and listening!) to each other.
Reply to this comment
by chad55555 February 17, 2008 12:26 PM EST
Study your history,you''ll find every movement that has destruction behind it''s motivation(like Hitlers)always gets the youth then after it brain washes the youth, a total destruction of that country and society soon follows. If you want to kow the future of America with this person in charge.Look at the Muslims and how they want Christians dead,look at Africa how all whites are in danger,look at the starvation and lack of medical care,that''s what you''ll soon see in America. Blacks and Muslims in America have a hate for CHRISTIANS AND WHITES that will come out as a mass genicide,it''s history and human nature if you allow it to happen,it will happen.The government has brain washed young people to thing everyone is equal but human nature and ethic hate will always take over and create destruction. STUDY YOUR HISTORY BEFORE YOU VOTE AND REALIZE MAN KIND WILL NEVER CHANGE ONLY PRETEND TO BE SOMETHING THEIR NOT TO GET POWER TO CARRY THEIR DEEDS. THE KEY HERE IS KNOW HUMAN''S AND WHY THEY DO THE THINGS THEY DO.IN THE END DAYS ETHINC GROUP WILL WAR ON ETHIC GROUP. YOU CAN''T CHANGE WHAT A PERSON IS,ONLY KNOW WHAT THEY ARE.
Reply to this comment
by user168-2009 February 17, 2008 2:31 AM EST
"Therefore, the good of man must be the end of the science of politics."

"There will be no end to the troubles of states, or of humanity itself, till philosophers become kings in this world, or till those we now call kings and rulers really and truly become philosophers, and political power and philosophy thus come into the same hands."

SO LET IT BE THAT OUR YOUTH SEES HOPE AND UNIVERSAL TRUTH IN OBAMA:

"Hold faithfulness and sincerity your first principles."

"Love each other or perish."

"From caring comes courage."

"LIVE THE CHANGE YOU WANT TO SEE IN THE WORLD."

GO! OBAMA!

Reply to this comment
by user168-2009 February 17, 2008 2:27 AM EST
To many of them, Hillary just seems like a Dem version of Bush. Only Obama seems to be focused on higher ideals, rather than lowly infighting, so it''''''''s only natural that they''''''''d pick him over the other choices.

The optimism of youth springs eternal.

Posted by IT_Oldtimer at 02:14 AM : Feb 16, 2008

I agree.

I''''m over sixty and am pleased as punch to see the younger generation enthusiastic and committed to making some much needed changes.

I think "Yes we can," is the perfect campaign theme for all of us who still believe in the possibility of goodness.

Posted by CBS_Oliver


That''s what we all must share - BELIEVE IN GOODNESS! Thank you.

HOW CAN WE LET OUR CHILDREN FOLLOW THOSE CALCULATING, NARCISSISTIC, AND SELF-SEEKING CLINTONS, I AM ASKING ALL OF YOU - PARENTS, TEACHERS, AND COMMUNITY LEADERS?

DO WE NOT LOVE OUR CHILDREN?

DO WE NOT SEEK BETTER ROLE MODELS FOR THEM?

DO WE NOT THINK THEY WORTH ANY LONG-TERM COMMON GOOD?

Reply to this comment
by cbs_oliver February 16, 2008 10:23 PM EST
To many of them, Hillary just seems like a Dem version of Bush. Only Obama seems to be focused on higher ideals, rather than lowly infighting, so it''''s only natural that they''''d pick him over the other choices.

The optimism of youth springs eternal.

Posted by IT_Oldtimer at 02:14 AM : Feb 16, 2008

I agree.

I''m over sixty and am pleased as punch to see the younger generation enthusiastic and committed to making some much needed changes.

I think "Yes we can," is the perfect campaign theme for all of us who still believe in the possibility of goodness.
Reply to this comment
by huanaco February 16, 2008 9:39 PM EST

WHO IS OBAMA ANYWAY ? WHAT HE HAS DONE ? HOW ABOUT HIS LEGISLATION IN CONGRESS ? 50 % OF THE TIME HE DIDN,T SHOW UP FOR DUTY . I THINK THE MEDIA HAS BEEN PLAYING A HUGE PART IN HIS LITTLE DESERVED FAME. MCCAIN AND THE REPUBLICAN ARE CROSSING FINGERS TO HAVE HIM ON THE OTHER SIDE AS PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE.
Reply to this comment
by quatrops February 16, 2008 6:39 PM EST
Better a half-breed than a half-a$$, Mistered9. The 50s movie character "Mister Ed", whose moniker you''ve chosen, was an intelligent donkey who could talk. Your posts seem to indicate you are a mentally challenged human who can bray! It''s revealing also that your superfluity of typos suggests you''re attacking the keyboard with a hoof.

Your hangups about race and other cognative aberrations suggest a very murky gene pool. Go back to your ward now, and be sure to do what the nurses tell you!
Reply to this comment
by esyrdr413 February 16, 2008 5:00 PM EST
barack oh bomb ah or is it hussein bomb ah?
Higher education! Does not equal a younger
generation with common sense!
If a country has to engage in war.
Would you have a corporal lead the troops,
or a general?
In other words someone with experience or
someone with very little!
It appears oh bomb ah is a cult figure to
our youth, well then:lets have a rock star
for the vice president!
Reply to this comment
by itchyb-2009 February 16, 2008 2:46 PM EST
mistered9, you are so out of touch with reality that you think these young voters are pinning their bets that Obama will legalize pot. That''s not what the election is about. Oh yeah, and how much legal alcohol do you and the "grown up" Americans consume in a year? Get real. White male, age 59, young mind.
Reply to this comment
by flreason February 16, 2008 2:21 PM EST
mistered9, dgal878, valentin73, et al:

I''d like to remind you that most of the patriots who framed the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution were younger than Obama, and very rebellious. They challenged the accepted authority. In addition, most of the soldiers who have fought and died for our freedom have been young. To stem corruption and bureaucracy, Thomas Jefferson felt a "revolution" was necessary every twenty years...each generation.

Our government institutions have becomed mired in corruption. They both collude and are beholden to business interests that place profit above loyalty and ethics. A voter and generational revolution is overdue, in the opinion of this senior citizen. Otherwise a much worse, and likely bloody, revolution will result somewhere down the line. As Aristotle said: "Republics decline into democracies, and democracies degenerate into despotisms." It should be the hope of every generation of Americans to conduct their own peaceful revolution, seeking to avoid or forestall the necessity of a violent one.
Reply to this comment
See all 26 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook