February 11, 2009 3:26 PM

U.S. To Shoot Down Spy Satellite

(CBS/AP)  President Bush has ordered the Pentagon to use a Navy missile to attempt to destroy a broken U.S. spy satellite - and thereby minimize the risk to humans from its toxic fuel - by intercepting it just before it re-enters the atmosphere, officials said Thursday.

The effort - the first of its kind - will be undertaken because of the potential that people in the area where the satellite would otherwise crash could be harmed, the officials said.

Deputy National Security Adviser James Jeffrey, briefing reporters at the Pentagon, did not say when the attempted intercept would be conducted, but the satellite is expected to hit Earth during the first week of March.

"This is all about trying to reduce the danger to human beings," Jeffrey said.

Gen. James Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at the same briefing that the "window of opportunity" for such a shootdown, presumably to be launched from a Navy ship, will open in the next three or four days and last for seven or eight days. He did not say whether the Pentagon has decided on an exact launch date.

Cartwright said this will be an unprecedented effort; he would not say exactly what are the odds of success.

"This is the first time we've used a tactical missile to engage a spacecraft," Cartwright said.

After extensive study and analysis, U.S. officials came to the conclusion that, "we're better off taking the attempt than not," Cartwright said.

He said a Navy missile known as Standard Missile 3 would be fired in an attempt to intercept the satellite just prior to it re-entering Earth's atmosphere. It would be "next to impossible" to hit the satellite after that because of atmospheric disturbances, Cartwright said.

A second goal, he said, is to directly hit the fuel tank in order to minimize the amount of fuel that returns to Earth.

CBS News correspondent David Martin reports that a fuel tank carrying the same fuel as that onboard the satellite survived reentry during the Columbia space shuttle disaster, but in that case, the fuel had already been burned up during the mission. This time the tank is loaded with 1,000 pounds of the toxic rocket fuel hydrazine - used to power the satellite's thrusters - which could contaminate an area the size of two football fields.

Describing the effects of hydrazine, Cartwright told CBS News, "it's similar to chlorine or to ammonia in that when you inhale it, it affects your tissues and your lungs. You know, it has the burning sensation. If you stay very close to it and inhale a lot of it, it could in fact be deadly."

Software associated with the Standard Missile 3 has been modified to enhance the chances of the missile's sensors recognizing that the satellite is its target; he noted that the missile's designed mission is to shoot down ballistic missiles, not satellites. Other officials said the missile's maximum range, while a classified figure, is not great enough to hit a satellite operating in normal orbits.

"It's a one-time deal," Cartwright said when asked whether the modified Standard Missile 3 should be considered a new U.S. anti-satellite weapon technology.

Cartwright also said that if an initial shootdown attempt fails, a decision will be made whether to take a second shot.

Jeffrey said members of Congress were briefed on the plan earlier Thursday and that diplomatic notifications to other countries would be made before the end of the day.

Shooting down a satellite is particularly sensitive because of the controversy surrounding China's anti-satellite test last year, when Beijing shot down one of its defunct weather satellites, drawing immediate criticism from the U.S. and other countries.

A key concern at that time was the debris created by Chinese satellite's destruction - and that will also be a focus now, as the U.S. determines exactly when and under what circumstances to shoot down its errant satellite.

The military will have to choose a time and a location that will avoid to the greatest degree any damage to other satellites in the sky. Also, there is the possibility that large pieces could remain, and either stay in orbit where they can collide with other satellites or possibly fall to Earth.

It is not known where the satellite will hit. But officials familiar with the situation say about half of the 5,000-pound spacecraft is expected to survive its blazing descent through the atmosphere and will scatter debris - some of it potentially hazardous - over several hundred miles. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.

Known by its military designation US 193, the satellite was launched in December 2006. It lost power and its central computer failed almost immediately afterward, leaving it uncontrollable. It carried a sophisticated and secret imaging sensor.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 128 Comments
by gce65 February 17, 2008 7:25 AM EST
badkarma72:
No, I don''t think too many people believe the reasons just because they come from the Bush Admin, first of all. A toxic hydrazine spill over a couple hundred square yards isn''t even as bad as damage from a summer forest fire. The real reason is that Georgie boy doesn''t want the top secret spy info to be available to any other country if it happened to crash in foreign territory. If he just came out and said that i think it''d be more beleivable.

Reply to this comment
by badkarma72 February 15, 2008 10:46 PM EST
Is anyone buying into the public safety factor in this story. The questions are:
1. Is the toxic fuel what they say it is or is really
nuclear powered?
2. Is the movie "Space Cowboys" really that far
fetched and is this spy satellite really armed
with some kind of Nukes as well?
3. since when is the government really concerned
about a contamination site the size of two
football fields? They haven''t been to effective
on keeping the environment clean on
larger scales.
Something just doesn''t add up here. What''s being left out and what information is being withheld or distorted?
Reply to this comment
by lochlan-2009 February 15, 2008 1:15 PM EST
Smart move. We can show off our missile technology for the arms race between Russia and we don''t have to worry about the enemy trying to find the fallen satelite. They don''t need to lie to us, but I guess they believe they should never tell the truth in the military. Wonder why they are not trying to use lasers on this satelite.
Reply to this comment
by easeup-2009 February 15, 2008 12:26 PM EST
"More lies from our dear Gov''''t. why don''''t they just say we do not want any evidence from this spy satellite to get into the wrong hands oh and add this from a loud mouth official who is not authorized to say this."

They''ve already said they don''t want a security risk. It''s common knowledge. Now go back to scanning the skies for black helicopters.

I-D-I-O-T
Reply to this comment
by gheemaster38 February 15, 2008 12:18 PM EST
Let''''s hope we don''''t miss. Otherwise China will have a very good laugh out of this, especially after they were able to take out a satellite with their missile.

Posted by incog-nito

They cant laugh to hard. Most of the guidance systems and parts were probably "Made in China."
Reply to this comment
by beehive21-2009 February 15, 2008 12:13 PM EST
Target practice,cool
Reply to this comment
by omega39-2009 February 15, 2008 11:46 AM EST
U.S. To Shoot Down Spy Satellite

I can''t see that headline without thinking of the Simpsons episode where they shot a missile at an asteroid that was bearing down on Springfield. The missile missed and blew up the only bridge out of town.
Reply to this comment
by goldesprit February 15, 2008 10:04 AM EST
NO. Read carefully.
Kauai, Hawaii (SPX) Jun 22, 2007
A Raytheon-produced Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) successfully engaged a ballistic missile target outside the earth''''s atmosphere during a flight test over the Pacific Ocean. Launched from the USS DECATUR (DDG 73), the SM-3 Block IA destroyed a medium-range ballistic missile target that had been launched from the U.S. Navy''''s Pacific Missile Range Facility on Kauai, Hawaii.--

And it will be useful to demonstrate this capability AGAIN--and destroy evidence of what this sattellite was--exactly.
Reply to this comment
by bennyblack1 February 15, 2008 9:56 AM EST
Uh...wouldn''t it make more sense to send the space shuttle to the satellite, and to have astronauts place explosives on the gas tank? Wouldn''t this be safer and the least expensive since it could be part of an existing mission?
Reply to this comment
by goldesprit February 15, 2008 9:44 AM EST
Kauai, Hawaii (SPX) Jun 22, 2007
A Raytheon-produced Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) successfully engaged a ballistic missile target outside the earth''s atmosphere during a flight test over the Pacific Ocean. Launched from the USS DECATUR (DDG 73), the SM-3 Block IA destroyed a medium-range ballistic missile target that had been launched from the U.S. Navy''s Pacific Missile Range Facility on Kauai, Hawaii.--

And it will be useful to demonstrate this capability AGAIN--and destroy evidence of what this sattellite was--exactly.
Reply to this comment
See all 128 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook