Bush Spy Bill Stance Called Fear-Mongering
President: U.S. Could Face Attacks That Would Make 9/11 "Pale By Comparison"
-
Photo
President Bush said failure to pass a new surveillance bill which also protects telecommunications companies from class-action lawsuits will "bring destruction to our shores that will make September the 11th pale by comparison." (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)
-
Interactive
Domestic Surveillance
The debate over the Bush administration's controversial wiretapping program.
-
Interactive
110th Congress
The balance of power shifts and new leadership takes control as the latest session convenes.
In response, critics of the new bill accused Mr. Bush of "fear mongering," and of trying to deflect attention from the bill itself. Its most controversial provision would prevent Americans from suing phone companies that helped the administration spy on them since the White House surveillance program was instituted in 2001.
Mr. Bush has made immunity from civil prosecution for the telecoms a must-have element for revamping the nation’s surveillance laws, repeatedly saying he would veto any bill that does not exempt telecoms from lawsuits.
The battle lines are being dug in more deeply as House and Senate members prepare to meet in conference to match competing versions of the legislation, an update of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (or FISA).
The House-passed version does not include telecom immunity. This past week, the Senate approved a similar version which includes a provision that protects telecoms from civil lawsuits.
There are approximately 40 lawsuits now brought by citizens and consumer groups against companies that enabled the government to illegally eavesdrop on Americans' phone and Internet communications.
Opponents of the administration's program, which engaged wiretaps against any and all Americans without obtaining court-ordered warrants, say the telecoms' participation was illegal. They say that, given the Bush administration's penchant for secrecy, lawsuits against the telecoms are the only way to obtain disclosure about the facts from the government.
Information being sought includes details about the origins of the program. The administration admitted that the sweeping domestic surveillance originated in the wake of the September 11, 2001, attacks. However, declassified documents obtained by the National Security Archive and testimony that is part of these lawsuits suggest the National Security Agency program was put into place shortly after Mr. Bush was inaugurated, long before 9/11.
Mr. Bush claims that unless the telecoms received assurance that they will not be sued for breaking the law (and therefore be liable for damages), those companies will not agree to enact future wiretaps, therefore undercutting the government's intelligence capabilities:
"If these companies are subjected to lawsuits that could cost them billions of dollars, they won't participate; they won't help us; they won't help protect America."

On Wednesday, after the Senate approved a bill granting immunity, the president for the first time admitted that the telecoms participated in the wiretaps which were not authorized by court-issued warrants.
Mr. Bush also raised the specter of what would happen if telecom immunity is not accepted by the House, by recalling the crime scene on 9/11:
"At this moment, somewhere in the world, terrorists are planning new attacks on our country. Their goal is to bring destruction to our shores that will make September the 11th pale by comparison."
Mr. Bush said, "There is really no excuse for letting this critical legislation expire," despite his refusal to sign an extension to the current law while negotiations continue.
House Republicans managed to defeat a House proposal to grant a 21-day extension of the current law.
Critics jumped on the president's refusal to extend FISA.
"The president and House Republicans refused to support the extension and therefore will bear the responsibility should any adverse national security consequences result," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
Expiration of the current Protect America Act would not mean an immediate end to wiretapping. Existing surveillance could continue under the law for a year from when it began - at least until August. Any new surveillance the government wants to institute could be implemented under underlying FISA rules, which may require warrants from the secret court.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., accused the president and Senate Republicans of being more interested in politicizing intelligence than resolving the debate.
The President and House Republicans refused to support the extension and therefore will bear the responsibility should any adverse national security consequences result.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi"The president could have taken the simple step of requesting new authority from Congress ... but whether out of convenience, incompetence, or outright disdain for the rule of law, the administration chose to ignore Congress and ignore the Constitution," Reid said.
Caroline Fredrickson, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's legislative office in Washington, lambasted the president for scare tactics and urged the House not to pass the Senate bill.
"The House should stand up to the bullying from the president and reject the administration’s lies and fear mongering," she said. "This administration has abused its power over and over again and it is time for the House to reject any attempts to consider the unconstitutional Senate Intelligence Committee FISA bill.
She also demanded that Americans not be denied their day in court in their suits against phone and Internet companies. "Let the American system of justice decide this case," Frederickson said. "Do not give the phone companies a 'get out of jail free' card. If the companies really 'did the right thing’ as the president said, then they have nothing to fear from going to court.
"Terrorism is a threat. But ignoring the Constitution is also a threat."
The 68-29 Senate vote Tuesday to update the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act belied the nearly two months of stops and starts and bitter political wrangling that preceded it. The two sides had battled to balance civil liberties with the need to conduct surveillance on potential adversaries.
While giving the White House what it wanted on immunity for the phone companies, the Senate also expanded the power of the court to oversee government eavesdropping on Americans. An amendment would give the FISA court the authority to monitor whether the government is complying with procedures designed to protect the privacy of innocent Americans whose telephone or computer communications are captured during surveillance of a foreign target.
The Senate bill would also require FISA court orders to eavesdrop on Americans who are overseas. Under current law, the government can wiretap or search the possessions of anyone outside the United States - even a soldier serving overseas - without court permission if it believes the person may be a foreign agent.
CBSNews.com producer David Morgan contributed to this report.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.


- 1
- 2
- next
See all 86 CommentsBull *****! If they''re presented with a warrant, they have to! This is ridiculous!
"YOU LET TERRORISTS STRIKE THIS COUNTRY" yes YOU GWB did that. Now you want everyone else to be scared like you.
Sorry GI George--you are the terrorist you try to warn us against.
September 11 "pale by comparison?" What are your plans this time coward of America?
FEAR FEAR FEAR!!!
What color today Bush??
Go to jail, do not pass go!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The above "pale by comparison" statement must have some boarding up their windows--when all along--it''s OUR leader we should fear.
I totally agree with you SgtRDS--Bush/Cheney are the greatest obstacles in peace.
This has nothing to do with terrorism and everything to do with hiding the fact that BUSH and the TRAITORS that run his administration BROKE THE LAW OVER AND OVER AGAIN. They are NOT Conservatives, but radical authoritarians who would trash the Constitution and the Rule of Law for their own power.
They are nothing short of TRAITORS.
Posted by SgtRDS at 12:25 PM : Feb 14, 2008
That would be virtually impossible!
Posted by liberalme at 01:03 PM : Feb 14, 2008
Well he could always shoot himself in the as*s since he has his head up there all of the time.
What the he11 is Bu$hCo planning next?
They did a magnificent job planning 9/11...
The coup went well - what now???
The FISA in effect at the beginning of this abomination/administration already allowed surveillance to start immediately, with the paperwork to follow. The only way to get information faster than immediately upon recognizing the need can only be accomplished by monitoring everything all the time to find questionable communications to follow through future legal monitoring. It''s like breaking into your home or office to go through all your financial records and using any questionable transactions as probable cause to get a legitimate search warrant for a tax evasion prosecution. The Constitution is pretty clear about warrants coming before searches and seizures. Monitoring everything is seizure without the legal justification of a warrant or FISA order.
www.house.gov/house/MemStateSearch.shtml
Click your State
Highlight the rep in your State
Rt. Click & copy
Paste that into a search and that persons web site shows up
Locate the contact info and send the message, DON%u2019T CAVE IN. DO NOT APPROVE THE SENATES VERSION OF FISA.
Posted by fiteit1 at 03:07 PM : Feb 14, 2008
actually,
the bush family has bought a 998,000 acre ranch in paraguay.
also, no extradition.
guess they dont like living in america as much as eveyone thinks.
This criminal Bush wants to spy on our communications, but covers up the treason of his own regime associates. He wants to increase the size of the police state allegedly to fight terrorism...but he leaves the borders wide open...He claims that drug dealers are terrorists...but he jails honest Border Patrolmen who interdict one...
This monster and his Demopublican regime are a criminal conspiracy against the freedoms of the people of the United States.
Posted by fiteit1 at 03:07 PM : Feb 14, 2008
actually,
the bush family has bought a 998,000 acre ranch in paraguay.
also, no extradition.
guess they dont like living in america as much as eveyone thinks.
Posted by nggr at 03:43 PM : Feb 14, 2008
He is not going to live where his mierda is all the place...
So our telephone companies will no longer protect America, folks.
Patriotism, anyone?
Boycott them, drop all telephone services to these companies that won''t protect America, if they can''t get protection FROM Americans.
Boycott the telephone companies.
Now you would think with all these fancy dancy Bush programs in place, America would be ready.
Isn''t Bush doing his job?
This is actually a THREAT from OUR president to US! He didn''t mention terrorists or AlQueada--
He should be grilled for making that statement---no perhaps waterboarded to tell the truth!!!
He really does need to be held accountable for that statement!!!!
Bush will have no other accomplishments to redeem his presidency. He has not led the nation to new concepts of justice or civil rights. He squandered a huge budget surplus and left us with monstrous debts. Under his watch the rich are richer than ever; the poor are poorer than they have been since the Great Depression. All positive social indicators are down. Internationally the United States has never been so disrespected. We have seen an American administration perpetuate torture and defend its use, making the United States seem barbaric to the rest of the world. Indeed, we have never been hated by so many people in so many places.
But one still wonders why this faux Emperor, Bush, is so persistent on the singular point of enshrining a law of the United States to allow corporations to spy its citizens?
For once corporations under any supposed constraints are allowed to spy on any citizens, for any supposedly noble purpose, and for any supposedly limited period ---- particularly and ironically in a war on terrorism which the faux Emperor has already defined as unlimited in scope and timeframe ---- then the global corporatist Empire will never give up that law and power over democratic citizens. And those citizens will never truly be democratic again.
***************************************************
Pleeeeeeeeze... It is over Bush. You blew it. You lied, manipulated American''s trust, bullied anyone who offered a different view, threatened, sulked, stomped, exaggerated, lied, and wasted billions and billions of dollars in Iraq that could have been spent upping the defense of America.
It is effing over. Shut up and sit down. We are not going to stand for your attack on civil liberties and the constitution. You should be tried for treason.
"At this moment, somewhere in the world, terrorists are planning new attacks on our country. Their goal is to bring destruction to our shores that will make September the 11th pale by comparison."
And Bush has brought death and destruction to the shores of a nation that had nothing to do with 9-11, that makes 9-11 pale by comparison.
Posted by SgtRDS at 10:06 PM : Feb 14, 2008
Amen to that.
What are you doing Dubya? Planning on putting together another one? I don''t think this country will be fooled again...so if you pull that krap, prepare to HANG FOR IT!!!
''On Wednesday, after the Senate approved a bill granting immunity, the president for the first time admitted that the telecoms participated in the wiretaps which were not authorized by court-issued warrants.''
He did not, however, mention he asked telcoms to wiretap the public TEN MONTHS before 9/11...
"....Bush should get someone to make him a t''shirt with FASCIST across the front of it!" ROFL
IRAQ - 935 LIES
4000 DEAD AMERICANS
That makes 9/11 "Pale by comparison"
The count so far:
Bin Laden - 3000 DEAD AMERICANS
Bush - 4000 DEAD AMERICANS
Bush wins hands down!
man(?)is the insult to our intelligence. He really believes he''s pulled one off because no one has lifted a finger to stop him. After the way they went after Clinton, it seems that nothing has been done to investigate the many impropriaties this administration is responsible for. The only thing that keeps him going is the power of his repug-pig cronies. Thus the need to abolish the two-party system. It keeps us divided against ourselves and it keeps people like dubya in power. Lincoln warned us about it 150 years ago. But then, the poor man''s probably spinning in his grave at what his party has festered into. God help us.
las vegas nv
Posted by bcamadi
-----------------
Why? Was Sen. Craig invited to the White House?
by spying on Americans won''t hamper their zeal to pay us back one - after all, we''ve murdered about 650''000 iraqis since 2003 and all of them have brothers, sisters, cousins.
if anything happens, it''s because this crack-pot, cocain, alcohol dependent azzz has created a new cesspool for terror all by himself.
Yank this idoit outta DC asap.
impeach the sob
Posted by neoconRcrazy at 04:41 AM : Feb 15, 2008
I''ve been saying that for a long,,long,, long time. But nobody is listening.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 86 Comments