ROME, Feb. 12, 2008
Abortion Big Issue In Italy Elections
Italian Frontrunner Endorses Moratorium On Abortions
-
(CBS)
-
Fast Facts Italy Learn about the people, economy and history.
-
Interactive Abortion Debate It's one of the most hotly debated political and social issues in America. Review a history of that debate since the historic Roe v. Wade decision.
- Stories
- Vatican: Family Is Under Attack
Berlusconi told the weekly Tempi magazine that he believed the United Nations should recognize as a human right the right to life from "conception until natural death" - using the same terminology the Vatican uses to express its opposition to abortion.
The former premier stressed, however, that his center-right allies were free to decide on the matter according to their own conscience.
Abortion in state hospitals until the end of the third month of pregnancy has been legal in Italy since 1978. Abortion after three months is allowed only when the pregnancy is deemed a "grave danger" to the woman's life.
In mid-December, a prominent conservative journalist, Giuliano Ferrara, reopened the debate on abortion in Italy by proposing a universal moratorium. The proposal was immediately backed by top Catholic Church officials, including Italian Cardinal Camillo Ruini, the pope's vicar for Rome.
Ferrara, who is close to Berlusconi, launched his appeal on the pages of his conservative Il Foglio newspaper a day after the U.N. General Assembly approved a nonbinding resolution, pushed by Italy, calling for a moratorium on the death penalty.
Ferrara reasoned that if the United Nations could approve a moratorium on executions, it should approve one on abortions since millions of "innocents" are killed each year in what he called the "supreme scandal of our time."
Asked by Tempi magazine if he supported Ferrara's proposal, Berlusconi replied: "I think that recognizing the right to life from conception to natural death is a principle that the U.N. could make its own, just as it did with the moratorium on the death penalty."
Center-left leaders have resoundingly opposed Ferrara's call and rejected any change to Italy's existing law.
Italians upheld the current law in a 1981 referendum proposed by Catholic forces seeking to overturn the legislation in the predominantly Roman Catholic country. Since then, the issue has occasionally reappeared in the political debate, but to date there has been little public mobilization to modify the law.
Polls indicate Berlusconi's forces are likely to win April 13-14 parliamentary elections, meaning the issue could remain on the table in the next legislature if Ferrara's proposal gains momentum.
On Tuesday, Ferrara announced he would be running for office on an anti-abortion ticket, and confirmed his plans even after Berlusconi spoke out against the initiative and dashed Ferrara's hopes of joining the center-right coalition.
Berlusconi insisted on a TV show Tuesday evening that the issue should be left to the individual conscience of citizens, and lamented the formation of electoral tickets on the center-right at a time when he is trying to aggregate forces under his "Freedom People" list.
"I will run alone; Berlusconi doesn't believe in this fight enough," Ferrara, who once served as a minister for Berlusconi, was quoted as saying by the ANSA and Apcom agencies.
Livia Turco, the health minister in the outgoing center-left government, has said public debate about abortion was fine, but that changing the law was not. The law, she said, has proven effective, both in reducing the number of abortions and in saving mothers' lives, because it has effectively ended clandestine abortions.
In 2004, the last year for which statistics are available, 136,715 women had abortions, compared with 234,801 in 1982. There are about 58 million people in Italy.
©MMVIII, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
More From World
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."
+ report abuse
********
IF she is so inclinded and refuse to be accountable or responsible for her own sexual activities..THEN GET HER TUBES TIED....its the most reposnsible thing to do from a person who wants to get ''jiggy'' but dont want a baby..
(or is that too much work to save a life)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by p-syrus at 02:03 AM : Feb 13, 2008
+ report abuse
************
THEN DONT GET PREGNANT..PREGNANCY IS NOT SOMETHING THAT YOU CATCH FROM A HANDRAIL...A PERSON KNOWS WHAT SHE IS DOING AND SHE KNOWS WHAT IT WOULD RESULT INTO..
Posted by p-syrus at 02:03 AM : Feb 13, 2008
And abortion also causes physical stress on a human body and results in permanent changes (a.k.a. DEATH) to an unborn child.
Posted by hypnotoad72
That is certainly true.
However it is EVEN MORE TRUE that NO WOMAN SHOULD EVER BE REQUIRED BY LAW TO BEAR A CHILD.
Pregancy is NOT an innocuous biological process. It constitutes a significant physical stress on a human body and results in permanent changes to the physical health of a woman.
NO ONE has a right for ANY REASON to demand that ANY WOMAN carry a child to term.
I think the concept is abhorrent and the male has his part in making the apparently unwanted life as well. But there are post-born factors that need to be addressed.
I''m a "independent", but there are far-left militant idiots who talk of no abortions, allowing premarital ***, and lots of other things without being bothered to think of repercussions (drug use, teen violence, others thanks to no parenting or poor parenting, or what might be worse).
The far right, of which I''d much prefer TO agree with, are also wrong. The proverbial genie is out of the bottle. Calling women and men "***" for sleeping around and spreading disease isn''t going to cut any ice. Most of them think it''s okay to do whatever they want sexually. Some would clean up their acts, but then there are the militant bunch... this isn''t "re-education". It''s common sense remembered.
It''s time people who really care about restoring society think laterally; how to work with how things are, make sacrifices, and think of a future instead of wallowing on the sort of garbage most tv shows put out these days. Especially modern "sci-fi" that uses real life as a backdrop for one-dimensional, dripping maudlin drama fairy soap opera.
Less unwanted babies and less babies born in dysfunctional families. That''s what makes abortions so useful.
Because of the fall in crime rates abortions have saved us a bundle of money and headaches.
Such is life. To try to create a perfect world is how we end up injuring ourselves and others.
Be and let be.
This is something I will really like to see, anything else is hypocrisy.
and to those who think that abortion is some new phenomena that is causing "moral decline" talk to your grand mothers - ask them how many of their generation had "back alley" abortions.
Until artificial birth control how do you think women dealt with unwanted pregnancies??
abortion is older than this country, actually older than the catholic idea that life begins at conception.
What ignorance.
With Italy doing this many be there is some hope for the human race after all.. It appears in history that when a country goes down morally, it is not long before they are destroyed but now it is the world which has gone down morally.. what I have heard about both the Clinton''s is horrific and straight out dangerous,and yet Americans still vote them in..
I have also read that far to many people who have been involved with them in some way or another have sort of died mysteriously,, hmmm
There has always been some who do wrong, but now it appears that we are just not safe anymore..
+ report abuse
**
I agree with that..abortions should be open for special kinds of situation. but a lot does not see it that way..they see abortion as a cheap escape from responsiblity
why worry? in the end we can always blame somebody for our own failures..GOTTA LOVE THAT LIBERAL MENTALITY...give me give me..i need a hug..i need understand..I want it now..now now..
i guess they are right..we are fu cked immaculatly
- by libsrweak February 12, 2008 7:08 PM EST
- the problem with liberals is
- Reply to this comment
See all 17 Commentsdeath row inmates are GOOD PEOPLE WHO ARE HELPLESS
a fetus is an EVIL INCONVINIENCE