AP/ February 11, 2009, 3:26 PM

Abortion Big Issue In Italy Elections

Abortion is playing an important early role in Italy's election campaign, with front-runner Silvio Berlusconi endorsing a universal moratorium and a prominent journalist on Tuesday announcing an anti-abortion ticket.

Berlusconi told the weekly Tempi magazine that he believed the United Nations should recognize as a human right the right to life from "conception until natural death" - using the same terminology the Vatican uses to express its opposition to abortion.

The former premier stressed, however, that his center-right allies were free to decide on the matter according to their own conscience.

Abortion in state hospitals until the end of the third month of pregnancy has been legal in Italy since 1978. Abortion after three months is allowed only when the pregnancy is deemed a "grave danger" to the woman's life.

In mid-December, a prominent conservative journalist, Giuliano Ferrara, reopened the debate on abortion in Italy by proposing a universal moratorium. The proposal was immediately backed by top Catholic Church officials, including Italian Cardinal Camillo Ruini, the pope's vicar for Rome.

Ferrara, who is close to Berlusconi, launched his appeal on the pages of his conservative Il Foglio newspaper a day after the U.N. General Assembly approved a nonbinding resolution, pushed by Italy, calling for a moratorium on the death penalty.

Ferrara reasoned that if the United Nations could approve a moratorium on executions, it should approve one on abortions since millions of "innocents" are killed each year in what he called the "supreme scandal of our time."

Asked by Tempi magazine if he supported Ferrara's proposal, Berlusconi replied: "I think that recognizing the right to life from conception to natural death is a principle that the U.N. could make its own, just as it did with the moratorium on the death penalty."

Center-left leaders have resoundingly opposed Ferrara's call and rejected any change to Italy's existing law.

Italians upheld the current law in a 1981 referendum proposed by Catholic forces seeking to overturn the legislation in the predominantly Roman Catholic country. Since then, the issue has occasionally reappeared in the political debate, but to date there has been little public mobilization to modify the law.

Polls indicate Berlusconi's forces are likely to win April 13-14 parliamentary elections, meaning the issue could remain on the table in the next legislature if Ferrara's proposal gains momentum.

On Tuesday, Ferrara announced he would be running for office on an anti-abortion ticket, and confirmed his plans even after Berlusconi spoke out against the initiative and dashed Ferrara's hopes of joining the center-right coalition.

Berlusconi insisted on a TV show Tuesday evening that the issue should be left to the individual conscience of citizens, and lamented the formation of electoral tickets on the center-right at a time when he is trying to aggregate forces under his "Freedom People" list.

"I will run alone; Berlusconi doesn't believe in this fight enough," Ferrara, who once served as a minister for Berlusconi, was quoted as saying by the ANSA and Apcom agencies.

Livia Turco, the health minister in the outgoing center-left government, has said public debate about abortion was fine, but that changing the law was not. The law, she said, has proven effective, both in reducing the number of abortions and in saving mothers' lives, because it has effectively ended clandestine abortions.

In 2004, the last year for which statistics are available, 136,715 women had abortions, compared with 234,801 in 1982. There are about 58 million people in Italy.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
16 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
grammawhamma says:
WOMEN: Don''t start a life if you consider ending it. Please use birth control instead of killing your child.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
libsrweak says:
Posted by p-syrus at 02:03 AM : Feb 13, 2008
+ report abuse

********

IF she is so inclinded and refuse to be accountable or responsible for her own sexual activities..THEN GET HER TUBES TIED....its the most reposnsible thing to do from a person who wants to get ''jiggy'' but dont want a baby..

(or is that too much work to save a life)
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
libsrweak says:
NO ONE has a right for ANY REASON to demand that ANY WOMAN carry a child to term.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by p-syrus at 02:03 AM : Feb 13, 2008
+ report abuse

************
THEN DONT GET PREGNANT..PREGNANCY IS NOT SOMETHING THAT YOU CATCH FROM A HANDRAIL...A PERSON KNOWS WHAT SHE IS DOING AND SHE KNOWS WHAT IT WOULD RESULT INTO..
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ladyjaneg says:
Really hoping I didn''t discourage anyone from posting because of that last post...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ladyjaneg says:
I''m sorry, I shoudln''t have posted. I"m glad people agree with me, but I think I''m biased on this issue. I mean, I''m 22, and I have been trying to have a baby for two years. Watching 14 years old and unfit mothers around me drag their kids around. Beating and berating their kids in public. I have often asked God why give THEM a child when I could actually take care of them. I wokr everyday full time AND I go home and cook a fresh full meal every night. Put pearls on me and you could call me a 21st-century June Cleaver. So it''s hard, thinking that a woman could have an abortion, when she could just have the baby and give it a family who wants so badly to have their own baby they cry at Pampers commericals. Sorry if that sounds rantish, but I really had to say I''m sorry for the biased post. :(
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
grammawhamma says:
Pregancy is NOT an innocuous biological process. It constitutes a significant physical stress on a human body and results in permanent changes to the physical health of a woman.
Posted by p-syrus at 02:03 AM : Feb 13, 2008

And abortion also causes physical stress on a human body and results in permanent changes (a.k.a. DEATH) to an unborn child.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
p-syrus says:
It''''s sad people even want or need to have abortions.
Posted by hypnotoad72

That is certainly true.

However it is EVEN MORE TRUE that NO WOMAN SHOULD EVER BE REQUIRED BY LAW TO BEAR A CHILD.

Pregancy is NOT an innocuous biological process. It constitutes a significant physical stress on a human body and results in permanent changes to the physical health of a woman.

NO ONE has a right for ANY REASON to demand that ANY WOMAN carry a child to term.

reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
j-whitman says:
Hi LadyJane,,,, I agree with you.. But unfortunatly our fringe conservatives aren''t capable of modern thinking ---- They pushed for over the counter sales of RU-486, the abortion pill for our teenagers
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
closethippy1 says:
I like to mention a little known fact about abortions that many people seem to be unaware of: After abortion became legal the crime rate across the board went DOWN.
Less unwanted babies and less babies born in dysfunctional families. That''s what makes abortions so useful.
Because of the fall in crime rates abortions have saved us a bundle of money and headaches.
Such is life. To try to create a perfect world is how we end up injuring ourselves and others.
Be and let be.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jncc1701 says:
What is this fascination with men about something they can know nothing about - pregnancy. And do we really think if the state attempted to police men this way abortion will still be a political football? (like forcing men to be financially responsible for their offspring)
This is something I will really like to see, anything else is hypocrisy.

and to those who think that abortion is some new phenomena that is causing "moral decline" talk to your grand mothers - ask them how many of their generation had "back alley" abortions.

Until artificial birth control how do you think women dealt with unwanted pregnancies??

abortion is older than this country, actually older than the catholic idea that life begins at conception.

What ignorance.
reply
See all 16 Comments