Feb 11, 2008
Hillary Hits Obama On Transparency, Style
Politico: Candidate Promises No New Scandals With Husband, Calls Rival's Rhetoric "Abstract"
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Looking Ahead To Potomac Tuesday
David Marks, Sr. Editor for Politico, looks ahead to Potomac Tuesday and discusses the tight race between Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama.
-
Video
Clinton Trails Obama's Lead
Hillary Clinton's recent losses have caused her to trail Barack Obama's delegate count. Susan Roberts reports.
-
Video
Clinton On Campaign Shakeup
"CBS News RAW": Hillary Clinton comments on the departure of her campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle. Clinton: "There really is no significant change. It's merely that we've got to get more help."
-
Photo Essay
Hillary Clinton
A look at a life and career full of firsts.
-
Photo Essay
Barack Obama
A look at the life and meteoric rise of the president-elect.
Senator Hillary Rodham (D-N.Y.) mocked Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) for his high-flown rhetoric, suggesting she would fight important fights when he would back down.
Clinton, speaking on WJLA Channel 7 in Washington and Politico.com, also promised there would be no new scandals involving her husband, former President Bill Clinton.
The senator was asked a question from a Politico.com reader in Santa Monica, Calif., who was seeking assurance that "no new business or personal scandal involving Bill Clinton" could erupt if she were in the White House and give fodder to Republicans.
"You know, I can assure this reader that that is not going to happen," she said. "You know, none of us can predict the future, no matter who we are and what we are running for, but I am very confident that that will not happen."
During the half-hour conversation, she said that when she hears Obama’s oratory about a more civil politics, she wonder what fights he would avoid.
“You never hear the specifics,” Clinton said. “It’s all this kind of abstract, general talk about how we all need to get along. I want to get along, and I have gotten along, in the Senate. I will work with Republicans to find common cause whenever I can. But I will also stand my ground because there are fights worth having.”
Clinton also suggested that she was getting more fair coverage from Fox News than from MSNBC, which recently ran afoul of her campaign when correspondent David Shuster said her daughter Chelsea Clinton had been “pimped” out to help with the election.
“I really am troubled by this pattern of behavior and comments that you hear,” she said.
Despite going 0-5 in recent contests, Clinton said she was winning in the big states where Democrats will need to prevail in the fall.
“I think things have gone well,” she said. “I’ve been around a long time - so, you know, sometimes you’re up, sometimes you’re down. I’ve been through all of that. But I feel
Clinton added: “The history-making nature of my candidacy and Senator Obama’s candidacy - it’s just thrilling to me.”
On other issues:
-About Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), she cracked: “Luckily, I agree with my party more than Senator McCain agrees with his party.”
-She said the delegates she won in Michigan and Florida should count toward the nomination, even though the Democratic National Committee said the states would be punished for moving their contests so early.
Clinton was the only major Democratic candidate on the ballot in Michigan, and she was the only candidate to fly into Florida the night of the election.
“I think that both Michigan and Florida should count, because these are two states we have to carry,” she said. “This is not about so much as the ins and outs of the Democratic National Committee as to whether the Democrats are going to win in the fall.
“In Michigan, all of us had a chance to leave our names on the ballot - I chose to do so,” she continued. “My opponents ran a very vigorous campaign to get people to vote ‘uncontested.’ There was a campaign going on - it was a campaign against me, and I still won a majority.
“I think that the Democratic Party has to be looking very realistically about what it is we’re trying to achieve here. We need to win in November. … I think that both in Michigan and in Florida, the Democratic Party should really give these people who came out and voted - they weren’t involved in the rulemaking. Give them a chance.”
- On Iraq, Clinton called the Bush administration’s plan for a “pause” in planned troop drawdowns “such a disheartening piece of news.”
“There is no military solution and it is time that the Iraqis understood that,” she said after noting that U.S. troops had done everything they have been asked to do.
-WJLA showed back-to-back interviews with Obama and Clinton. Originally, the station had offered a debate, but Obama declined. Obama has accepted one debate in Ohio and one in Texas. Clinton said she hopes he will join her in accepting many more.
“It seems kind of strange because he’s always talking about how we need to, you know, let the voters know where we stand,” she said. “I think the debate really concentrates attention.”
-Clinton said she eats hot peppers because “years ago, I was told that hot peppers would keep me healthy.”
- “Jalapenos, banana peppers - any kind of hot peppers,” she said. “I eat them raw, I eat them cooked. I don’t whether it’s for everybody, but it’s worked for me.
By Mike Allen
Copyright 2008 POLITICO






- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 8
- next
See all 366 CommentsAhead Of 3 Tuesday Primaries, Clinton Dismisses Talk That Her Campaign Is In Trouble
Just wait until the Clintonistas try and seel this away from him via secret delagates at the convention.
What would you call that? Lib on Lib crime?
How will she force people to buy insurance coverage they can''t afford? Will she garnishee their wages? Will she throw them in jail?
ow will she withdraw from Iraq in 6 months as she''s now promising Will she finally get that exit plan that the Pentagon hasn''t been giving her? Has she developed her own exit plan without the help of the military?
It''s time for Hillary to stop dodging and start fleshing out some detail of her own.
A promise that Bill will be a good boy is not something I place a great deal of confidence in.
I have more faith in Michelle being a good girl and not trying to pilfer FBI files, fire civil servants and political appointees in the White House travel
office, selling the Lincoln bedroom to foreign agents,
or advocating for the pardoning of international fugitives from justice.
According to a Rand Corp. report, the U.S. military is seriously deficient in meeting %u201Cthe threat of Islamist insurgencies.%u201D The report states that %u201CU.S. military intervention and occupation in the Muslim world%u201D is %u201Cat best inadequate, at worst counter-productive, and, on the whole, infeasible.%u201D
%u201CAs home prices fall and banks tighten lending standards, people with good, or prime, credit histories are falling behind on their payments for home loans, auto loans and credit cards at a quickening pace, according to industry data and economists.%u201D
Six major U.S. banks %u2014 Bank of America, Citigroup, Countrywide Financial, JP Morgan Chase, Washington Mutual, and Wells Fargo %u2014 have announced that they will be taking part in %u201CProject Lifeline,%u201D which will give homeowners an extra 30 days to renegotiate their mortgage payments.
I Think Progress COULD somone in the Press ask Obama what he would do about any of these this ...or just and watch Dems slughtered in Nov
1. Surrender Iraq to the terrorists,
2. Raise taxes,
3. Keep the borders open to illegal immigrants (including possible terrorists),
4. Force people to use government-run healthcare, and
5. Prevent people under 35 from ever getting Social Security benefits (even though they pay for it)
McCain/Huckabee positions:
1. Force the terrorists in Iraq to surrender,
2. Lower taxes,
3. Protect Americans by securing the border,
4. Allow people to choose their healthcare provider,
5. Guarantee that people who pay into Social Security will one day benefit from it
There is a clear difference here. Vote with these facts in mind.
gossip snide remarks anti women anti dem establishment threats charges of racism, is all you Ocyltes seem to come up with
How about some substance buddy
1. Energy where does the waste for his biggest contributor go hopefully Il?
2. Iraq as a source of foreign Oil? What are the impacts when we leave, how will he keep supply coming while America shift green?
3. If not universal, what then is he proposing reinstating Welfare Programs is that why he rails against Bill Clinton are my tax dollars going to be used is a social program bailout for people who wont pay there way? Or is the Senator advocating that the Health industry provide freebies without tax subsidy, or just flat out deny them throw them on the street
The press doesn''t need to ask Obama these questions because they''ve gone to his website and already have the anwers.
Maybe you should shut up and check it out yourself.
Kindly source your accusations of snide remarks, gossip(that''s funny coming from you), and anti-womanism.
I admit to the anti-Dem establishment part but deny the others.
What you present as substance is so incoherent that I don''t even know what I would be responding to. Energy waste from his biggest contributor? Keeping Iraqi oil supply coming while America goes green?
Huh?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by realpatriot1 at 09:35 AM : Feb 12, 2008
Just what I though no answer no clue. But we jsut LLOOOOOOOve O Hillary bad racist.
Do the research the deails are there.. hours upon hours of details on each and every issue in the speeches... way too much to put into a half hour speech.
Please at least be informed before you post!
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=4246640
--------------------------------------
how many more debates do you want??? they have debated and debated. do we really think there will be a lot of changes if HRC is president - she will not say that the Constitutional abuses of Bush will stop under her leadership = only that she will reevaluate what he has done.
The bottom line is this, HRC is running on her husband''s achievement (and his money connections, and ad visors) as president - she has no more experience than Obama. So this argument of who has the most experience is a bogus one. We should not be electing people because of the achievements of their daddy (in the case of W) of Hillary her husband.
Anyone who believes that we will not have an investigation redux if Bill and Hillary get back into the White House needs to have their heads checked.
Bill with nothing to do but follow HRC around will self destruct.
The country has too much hard work to do we cannot waste another four years on the Clinton Circus.
and there is no way she beats McCain in a general election - nothing will delight the GOP more than a HRC nomination.
Kindly source your accusations of snide remarks, gossip(that''''s funny coming from you), and anti-womanism.
I admit to the anti-Dem establishment part but deny the others.
What you present as substance is so incoherent that I don''''t even know what I would be responding to. Energy waste from his biggest contributor? Keeping Iraqi oil supply coming while America goes green?
Huh?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by realpatriot1 at 09:41 AM : Feb 12, 2008
Lordy, ...never mind
with everything the other party thinks. He (Obama) is a dreamer who believes he can unite people on his way of thinking. That JUST WON"T HAPPEN EVER. He needs to wake up to reality..........Doug
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by az97202 at 09:33 AM : Feb 12, 2008
Yes JFK born again, very inspirational but he dose not instill confidence in his ability to be Commander in Chief or handle terrorist, nice guy though who knows maybe he can inspire Osama to turn himself in%u2026and substance well remember he said he is more of a leader that a COO directing the government institutions wonder if that means the military as well hmmm
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote200
8/story?id=4246640
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by TRUTHradar at 09:54 AM : Feb 12, 2008
Ya know I am really saddened that the young republican wing nuts dont have a candidate on their side of the Isle why oh why is Ron Paul pulling back
stump speaking is his strengh and interrupting and talking around questions without answering in debates is hers.
If she would answer the questions she is being asked and allow Obama to answer his the debates might be more meaningful.
No matter how many debates are held we''ll have to wait until the General election to get the details on her healthcare plan and her plans for disengaging from the Iraq mess she got us into. We might see her tax return sooner than we get these details.
Also: History Check:
History check:
Hillary lead the push for health care reform in Congress first year of Clinton administration. Next year Congress was bitterly divided, Newt Gingerich was able to have the Republican revolution which turned power there over to the Republicans. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_health_care_plan
I am afraid Clinton would again be divisive and non-transparent.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by jncc1701 at 10:00 AM : Feb 12, 2008
Very well thought out amen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by dslowik1
Yup
It''s not in the nature of Hillary supporters to be informed before making unsubstantiated accusations. They''re too busy reading from the Karl Rove playbook
to study up on the differences between the candidates.
I''ve been visitng the websites of both candidates for some time and i''ve listened to all the candidates ad nauseum on talk shows and the like and no one is being terribly specific.
Some of the specifics that have been brought out raise questions as to just how viable the plans will be to be enacted.
There''s no way in hell that Congress will approve the Hillary healthcare plan as she''s presented it. The problem isn''t that people choose not to be covered(as she claimed on Meet The Press). The problem is that too many can''t afford coverage. Forcing pople to choose between food and housing and medical care is not a solution and that''s precisely what Clinton has proposed.
She screwed up healthcare in the 90s and she''s at it again.
On the other hand Oboma goes to a church that gave Farakkahn a life time achivement award. If Hillary went to a chuch that gave David Duke an award, she''d be over. But Obama gets a free pass. Why?
He has no experience, and he''s a bag of hot air. If MLK were the Beatles, he''d be Oasis...would you vote for Oasis?
Nice try, but the reality is that if we let the government in to control Health Care, the fact is it will cost TRILLIONS more than we''re ''estimating'' now. Look at Social Security and the ''hidden'' debt there. Look at the Pentagon and the waste there. Look at the Post office and the long lines and lacksidasical attitude you get from them. Look at the IRS and the courtesy and kindness they show you.
And you want the same organization to control and ration your health care?
But in the end, it doesn''t matter which Dembot gets the Nomination, they''re both running on broken, worn-out liberal ideas that have been tried and have failed countless times before.
Posted by battyellison at 09:49 AM : Feb 12, 2008
-Here are some answers to your questions:
http://origin.barackobama.com/issues/economy/
-good reading!
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/31/us/politics/31donor.html?ex=1359435600&en=23a4d96223965ebf&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=all
Borat-Gate as I call it is a prime example of what''s wrong with the Clinton''s they say one thing and do another, we don''t need this kind of self serving political environment anymore. We need a president that is more concerned with the future prosperity of America and Americans. Not a president who will tell us what we want to hear while serving their selfish needs first while ignoring ours.
I was one after his keynote speech at the 2004 Democratic convention. "Man," I thought, "here''s a guy who can get it done."
Obama left that convention with political capital to burn and then wasted it all calculating everything he did or said against his chances of winning the nomination this year. He''s effectively been on "hold" for four years. At a time when the nation desperately needed leadership Barack Obama was tiptoeing through the issues afraid to raise objections to the trashing of our country and its constitution.
This is not leadership.
Now, if I could just get past Hillary''s vote on AUMF...
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/02/12/politics/main3820259.shtml
Instead, she throws mud at Obama. I won''t be voting for either of those two idiots.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 8
- next
See all 366 Comments