Blue Cross To Docs: Help Cancel Coverage
Calif. Health Insurer Sends Letters Asking Physicians To Report Pre-Existing Conditions
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Controversial Blue Cross Plan
Blue Cross is pressuring Calif. doctors to report their patients' pre-existing conditions. They say it's an attempt keep down costs, but many doctors say they've crossed the line. Ben Tracy reports.
-
Photo
Many Calif. doctors were unhappy about a letter sent to them by Blue Cross, warning that some patients might hide any medical history that could affect their prospects of receiving health insurance, Tuesday, Feb. 12, 2008 (AP)
-
Section
Healthy Living
Get tips and inspiration on how to live a healthy life.
The state's largest for-profit health insurer is sending physicians copies of health insurance applications filled out by new patients, along with a letter advising them that the company has a right to drop members who fail to disclose "material medical history," the Los Angeles Times reported on its Web site.
"Any condition not listed on the application that is discovered to be pre-existing should be reported to Blue Cross immediately," according to the letter obtained by the newspaper.
One of the conditions noted in the letter that could force a new patient to be dropped by Blue Cross - pre-existing pregnancies.
WellPoint Inc., the Indianapolis-based company that operates Blue Cross of California, said it was sending out the letters in an effort to keep costs at a minimum.
"Enrolling an applicant who did not disclose their true condition (and the condition is chronic or acute), will quickly drive increased utilization of services, which drives up costs for all members," WellPoint spokeswoman Shannon Troughton said in an e-mail to the newspaper.
"Blue Cross feels it is our responsibility to assure all records are accurate and up to date for HMO providers," she said. "We send these letters to identify members early on in the process who may not have been honest in their application."
Troughton added doctors are not required, but rather can volunteer, patients' information to Blue Cross.
Doctors were unhappy about the letter, warning that some patients might hide any medical history that could affect their prospects of receiving health insurance.
They are playing a game of 'gotcha' where they are trying to use their doctors against their patients' health interests.
Anthony Wright,HealthAccess California
Blue Cross is one of several California insurers that have been criticized for issuing policies without checking applications and then canceling coverage after individuals incur major medical costs. The practice of canceling coverage is under scrutiny by state regulators, lawmakers and the courts.
Patients in a raft of lawsuits accuse the insurers of canceling coverage over honest mistakes and minor inconsistencies on applications that they contend are purposely confusing. Victims of cancer and other serious medical problems often are unable to get new coverage once their insurance has been rescinded, reports the Los Angeles Times.
Troughton said the request of doctors has been in place for several years and Blue Cross has not received any complaints about it. The health insurance company doesn't always cancel the policies of patients with discrepancies in their applications and occasionally offers them another plan, she said.
Lynne Randolph, a spokeswoman for the state Department of Managed Health Care, said the agency would review the letter. Blue Cross is fighting a $1 million fine the department imposed in March over alleged systemic problems the agency identified in the way the company rescinds coverage.
"They are playing a game of 'gotcha' where they are trying to use their doctors against their patients' health interests," said Anthony Wright, executive director of HealthAccess California, a healthcare advocacy organization. "That's about as ugly as it gets."
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 100 CommentsPosted by crusherking at 02:43 PM : Feb 12, 2008
Another example of "too much regulation" - letting laws interfere with profits.
Posted by ibsteve2u at 03:05 PM : Feb 12, 2008
Are you an idiot this is because of deregulation not regulation. It was illegal to drop someone if they attempted to be honest. But now these misfits have idiots beleiving that this is in there best intrest.
Quit listening to the RNC and raido shock jocks they LIE. If you haven''t figured it out yet.
God there is one born every minute or in this countries case 30 percent born and breeding.
This profit grubbing and money grabbing and disregard for doctor-patient confidentiality are all results of the current private health care for-profit industry.
Time for a change.
Allstate- the good hands people, their logo should show those hands strangling you by the neck. These companies and their millionaire executives and paid pushers the doctors are driving the cost of healthcare thorugh the roof, not the consumer who pays their bills!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
---------------------------
What a joke. They are not interested in "cutting costs" to help anyone... the only want to increase profits for stockholders.
WellPoint Inc/Blue Cross of California is a predatory monster.
Trying to get doctors to help them profit from people''s pain is just pure evil.
Dr. Frankenstein has really put his finger on it.
Blue Cross is a monster run amok.
Dr. Frankenstein has really put his finger on it.
Blue Cross is a monster run amok.::"
Posted by Iceman_1960
Excuse me people, but if someone LIES on their application, then the insurance company should have every right to cancel their coverage.
You need to stop and think about that before you fly off the handle and crucify Blue Cross.
Just because Bill Clinton gets away with lying doesn''t mean everyone should.
- Posted by hawksprings at 04:13 PM : Feb 12, 2008
Excuse me, but I was having a little fun with the good physician"s name: Dr. Frankenstein.
Now don"t you feel a little dumb ?
Rp44_63= Delusional if you think that Socialist healthcare is the way to go. Check out the healthcare system in Canada eh.. It sucks!!! And to top it off. Check out how much tax they pay to maintain that miserable healthcare system. It sucks too. The idea of Universal Healthcare is wonderful, but the reality is that it will only drag down the system as a whole. Please research this issue before you support something that will completely destroy the level of healthcare we have now.
How could you even imagine that you will get free health care? The talk amonst the evil leaders is that Americans are too lazy, too selfish, too expensive and the whole problem with the economy is that they get oo many entitlements and benefits.
Hillary and her satainc friend are going to cut your benefits, not increase them. It''s liek the fools who didn''t bother to read Mein Kampf - Hillary states right out she is going to cut benefits, just listne to her, hear what she says, not what you hope she says. Her "health care plan" requires you to buy insurance, it doesn''t give anything to anyone.
Or maybe Hillary will make a law saying that you can lie on your app with no consequences.
Besides, when you apply for health insurance, many companies request doctors'' records, so they''ll catch you lying when you apply.
Posted by hawksprings
Excuse me people, but if someone LIES on their application, then the insurance company should have every right to cancel their coverage.
-----------------------
hawksprings, You have missed the point ENTIRELY.
WellPoint Inc / Blue Cross of California want to turn doctors in to cops or informers. That''s just evil. Insurance companies hould not give coverage until they themsleves have done an investigation.
Insurance companies have long used so-called "pre-exisitng conditions" to deny payments and kill off customer/patients that would hurt their profits.
No one can defend WellPoint Inc/ Blue Cross of California. No one should. They are a menance to humanity as are all other such companies that profit from pain and suffering.
I guess not.
Blue Cross should also appeal to all the Catholic priests in California, to report if anybody has admitted in the confessional that they lied on their insurance forms.
"I thought the ethics of physicians" confidentiality would prevent them from "ratting" their patients out to their insurers."
Posted by Iceman_1960
When you fill out an insurance application, you are agreeing to release your doctor''s records to the insurnace company. It''s in that big paragraph right above where you sign.
My neighbor worked for NCR and was laid-off. Some time later he landed a job at Intel. During his 90 day prebenefit employment he complained of abdominal pain but was afraid of it being deemed pre-existing before his medical kicked in. I couldn''t get him to see a doctor. He died of appendicitus complications weeks later. This was a sad way to lose a friend.
Gary Phillips R.I.P.
They''re not doing anything they haven''t done for years.
If you buy health insurance, and then soon after turn in a claim for, let''s say ulcers, the insurance company is going to say, "Hmm, I wonder if they had ulcers before they bought our insurance?" And they will request the doctor''s records and see if it was a pre-existing condition that you didn''t reveal on the app.
There''s nothing new about this.
I repeat: The Moral of this story is DON''T LIE ON YOUR APPLICATION!
Gary Phillips R.I.P.
Posted by aeasus
That is very sad.
"One of the conditions noted in the letter that could force a new patient to be dropped by Blue Cross - pre-existing pregnancies."
This is so wrong on so many levels, yet it is the COMPANY''S right to make money any way it can. Morality and ethics have no place in corporate business. When Americans did nothing to stop COMPANIES from taking over their health care, we asked for this.
P.S. Dr. Richard Frankenstein...are you sh*ttin'' me?
SBBM And just FYI, born, raised and still American.
[Posted by aeasus at 05:18 PM : Feb 12, 2008]
in most cases ... it''s only pre-existing because there''s no continuity in medical coverage across employers ... which there should be.
the absurd cost of medical insurance ... and the tie to the employer will ultimately lead to all employees to paying their own way ... or all good paying jobs will be outsourced because american companies will no longer be able to compete.
Really? Thats why I did the research. Thats why I understand the problems with Billary''s socialist plan. I think you are the one being blinded by and lied to by the Liberalist socialist party called the democrats. For example.
If you don''t accept the plan.. You''re on it anyway and she''ll garnish your wages.
Taxes will DRAMATICALLY increase. Do the math.
Doctors won''t make more than 70k? WOW! Glad I decided against a career in medicine!!!
Cradle to grave?? Yeah.It''ll tax you to death!!! And if it doesn''t, how competent and motivated do you think your surgeon''s going to being knowing that he only gets 70k? Yeah.. I''m the moron because I actually know what I am talking about..
I repeat: The Moral of this story is DON''''T LIE ON YOUR APPLICATION!
-----------------------
hawksprings, I think you must work for the insurance industry, because you couldn''t just be a moralists.
1. There have been many cases where the insurance companies have constructed forms that make it IMPOSSIBLE to report what they later wish to know when they want to cancel you.
2. Insurance agents COMMONLY say, "oh, the insurance company isn''t concerned about that" when you ask them about some issue. They only want the commission, not provide help in completing the complex forms.
3. Health insurance companies have a track record off TWISTING information put on forms if they want to cancel you.
Is lying immoral... if it is lying, yes. That''s why it is THEIR responsibly to check the facts BEFORE they issue a policy. Only SLEAZY insurance companies, like Blue Cross of Cal would enlist doctors as snitches. THAT is immoral. Denying coverage to increase corporate profits is also immoral.
- Posted by hawksprings at 05:17 PM : Feb 12, 2008
I knew there was some subtle catch there someplace.
But we"re talking about doctors going out of their way to call up the insurer and report things.
When you are dealing with doctors and patients, sometimes humane considerations occur that bend the written rules.
My brother was being treated for an asthma-like condition that later turned out to be just a little cat allergy. His doctor knew that he was switching insurers, so he told him he would not list this as asthma on the records, just a seasonal allergy -- which is close to what it turned out to be.
Human patients are more than numbers on an accountant"s balance sheet.
[Posted by rf35 at 05:26 PM : Feb 12, 2008]
capitalism in the health business yields the evil ... cause they don''t care about health ... just money. the only problem is ... they''re in the bad health mitigation business ... or at least that''s what their premium payers think.
of course ... since the ''more money'' comes from actually not providing mitigation to health problems ... there''s just a little something wrong w/ the model.
Exercise, eat right, don"t have any bad health habits like smoking.
Better you don"t need to throw yourself on the tender mercy of these sharks in the first place.
You can improve the odds.
This profit grubbing and money grabbing and disregard for doctor-patient confidentiality are all results of the current private health care for-profit industry.
Time for a change.
-----------------
That just means Capitalism is a killing machine, whether they''re are making weapons to kill in places like Iraq or killing people here at home as the result of the profiteering Health Insurance industry.
America is a sick, sick country. We are totally corrupt if we have come to the place where we can say, "That is not evil, it is capitalism" as if our horrible system was okay.
This profit grubbing and money grabbing and disregard for doctor-patient confidentiality are all results of the current private health care for-profit industry.
Time for a change.
-------------------
I am a Conservative, and I couldn''t agree with you more. Healthcare is NOT a liberal v. Conservative matter. Providing universal healthcare though taxes is a legitimate function of goverment.
Posted by Wango2007 at 05:51 PM
Well... since Obama and Hillary and the republican candidates are NOT, that kind of makes it a conservative vs liberal issue don''t you think?
Regardless of how you think of it in the vaults of your own mind, it is a necessary thing, at least on that we agree.
They''re TOTAL CROOKS!
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 100 Comments