Nobel Laureate Fears For Obama If Elected
Writer Doris Lessing Believes Senator Would Be Assassinated If He Wins Presidency
-
-
Photo
Senator Barack Obama's ascendency in the race for the White House has led a Nobel Laureate to fear for his life should he become president. (AP Photo/Rick Bowmer)
-
Photo
Writer Doris Lessing, who was recognized by the Nobel Prize Committee for the "skepticism, fire and visionary power" of her writing, has also made polarizing statements about politics. (AP)
-
-
Photo Essay
Barack Obama
A look at the life and meteoric rise of the president-elect.
Asked whether she supported Hillary Clinton or Obama in the presidential race, Lessing told Stockholm daily Dagens Nyheter "it doesn't matter," but suggested the two Democrats should join forces in the election.
"It would be best if they ran together. Hillary is a very sharp lady. It might be calmer if she wins and not Obama," Lessing was quoted as saying in comments translated into Swedish.
"He would probably not last long, a black man in the position of president. They would kill him," Lessing said in the interview published Saturday.
She did not specify who she believed would kill Obama.
Her agent in London did not answer phone calls seeking comment on Sunday.
Lessing, 88, who won the Nobel Prize for literature last year, is known for her fierce and sometimes contrary statements.
In October, she told a Spanish newspaper that the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks were "neither as terrible nor as extraordinary" as many people think.
The Swedish Academy, which awards the Nobel Prize, praised the British writer for her "skepticism, fire and visionary power."
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 187 CommentsOh have you forgotten, John F Kennedy was assasinated in 1963, with a high powered rifle. That is probably why Obama wants to eliminate guns across America.
Besides Ms. Lessing, at 88 years old has seen more and knows more than you probably have. After all considering the honor she has been awarded, she has traveled internationally.
there ar far greater issues at stake here over and above the simple dononation roll of world power . We are running out of Food , within the next 40 years , so attention must be taken to alter this course we are on , a course thats because of Natural Resource domination and these powers not willing to see alternatives developed to take pressure off the shortage of vital resources that we are running out of and at war over today like Oil , and soon food . The future of global farming and food supply http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Borlaug
I expect the Secret Service is on top of it, despite the fear-mongering by this geriatric case.
Posted by BarbJC1 at 11:04 AM : Feb 10, 2008
I would have to agree with you there!
The limited potential for land expansion for cultivation%u2014only 17% of cultivable land produces 90% of the world''s food crops[30]%u2014worries Borlaug, who, in March 2005, stated that, "we will have to double the world food supply by 2050." With 85% of future growth in food production having to come from lands already in use, he recommends a multidisciplinary research focus to further increase yields, mainly through increased crop immunity to large-scale diseases, such as the rust fungus, which affects all cereals but rice. Besides increasing the worldwide food supply, Borlaug has repeatedly stated that taking steps to decrease the rate of population growth will also be necessary to prevent food shortages. In his Nobel Lecture of 1970, Borlaug stated, "Most people still fail to comprehend the magnitude and menace of the
aug
"Most people still fail to comprehend the magnitude and menace of the
''Population Monster''...If it continues to increase at the estimated present rate of two percent a year, the world population will reach 6.5 billion by the year 2000. Currently, with each second, or tick of the clock, about 2.2 additional people are added to the world population. The rhythm of increase will accelerate to 2.7, 3.3, and 4.0 for each tick of the clock by 1980, 1990, and 2000, respectively, unless man becomes more realistic and preoccupied about this impending doom. The tick-tock of the clock will continually grow louder and more menacing each decade. Where will it all end?"[20]
Bio-diesel: Engineered algae the way to go
KA Cheah | Feb 5, 07 5:14pm
If Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) and all the independent power producers (IPPs) in Malaysia were to grow engineered algae as feedstock in bio-reactors at their power stations to produce bio-diesel and also bio-ethanol, our electricity tariffs need not be increased but could be reduced instead.
This is because the income from the sale or re-use of bio-diesel and bio-ethanol at these power plants could offset some of the cost of natural gas or other fuels being used by them to produce electricity.
The tapping of engineered algae to produce bio-diesel and bio-ethanol has the best potential of great success because algae is very oily (it has about a 50% oil composition), it is the fastest growing organism and it becomes very dense enough to be harvested three times a day.
It feeds only on waste gas such carbon dioxide and some nutrients and sunlight and grows very fast.
Complete algae to bio-diesel and bio-ethanol productions systems have been made successfully in the US, Australia, New Zealand and elsewhere. The absorption of carbon dioxide (CO2) to grow algae and then produce bio-diesel has also benefitted the environment in terms of reducing greenhouse gases causing global warming. http://www.news.com/Want-alternative-energy-Try-pond-scum/2100-11386_3-6145197.html?tag=sas.email
That is because King George is just a white idiot. Obama is black. To a lot of you Americans that is much worse.
I am actually amazed that with all the hatred towards Bush that someone hasn''t tried to eliminate him.
YES THOSE WHO GAIN FROM KEEPING AMERICA IN THE MIDDLE EAST WOULD TRY TO END AN OBAMA PRESIDENT IN ANY MEANS THEY COULD...
THIS INCLUDES, OIL COMPANIES, ISRAEL, SAUDI ARABIA, NEOCONS, AND THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX....
IT HAPPENED TO KENNEDY!
AMERICA STAND UP FOR CHANGE OR SHUT UP!
Hello!? Are you an American? Obviously you don''t read many posts on this site because if you had, you would realize that racism is alive and well in the good old U.S.A.
There may be blacks serving in the White House, congress etc. but that is a whole lot different that PRESIDENT. Geez, we are talking about a country that is so racist that the blacks have to live in their own neighborhood! YIKES!
The election isn''t final until November''s voting is in.
There''s primaries, natural disasters and political maneuvering that''ll go on before then.
This nation''s Economy is in SERIOUS trouble and WHOEVER is President in 09 will have to deal with a lot of "it" hitting the fan; whether it be Obama, Clinton McCain, Huckabe, Ron Paul, some come from behind 3rd party candidate or even GEORGE due to some inane excuse for Martial Law.
Americans are growing ever more saddened, disappointed and angry with the way things are going with this nation and unless there is a drastic turnaround by some miracle we''re guaranteed to be in for rough times ahead.
My guess is WHOEVER IS filling that job is going to have to be careful simply because there are so many that for one insane reason or another would try such a stupid thing and with the way things are going the THAT group is likely to increase.
Poverty Breeds Violence.
posted by hotpaulie
That''s because the people most likely to do that are in the 30% that are propping Bush up.
I got news for her. McCain will be elected. So Hillary and Obama are safe.
You need to stop posting because everytime you do, you show just how DELUSIONAL you are.
Posted by vancouverboo at 12:52 PM : Feb 10, 2008
I never thought of that another Rodney king riot?
erasmus6 - you are right on the mark.
Doris Lessing - stick to poetry; this country certainly doesn''t need any more negativism than we''ve been saddled with under the present regime. Not that the same thoughts for his safety haven''t crossed my mind, but how about we actually go positive and think Yes We Can? Thoughts like yours are what stop everyone from trying anything. We love to tell people what they are unable to do. No wonder we ended up with what we''ve got !!!!!!!!
Posted by UnderMyBoot
I''ve been living here for almost 20 years, and I don''t understand Americans or how they think. The fact that she''s in Sweden and not Bum-fu-ck, Tennessee, is neither here nor there. She''s clearly smart and insightful and Americans might learn a thing or two by listening to people like her. The over-reaction to 9/11 by the US is a case in point. This tiny group called Al Queda is not a serious threat to the world''s only Superpower but we''ve squandered hundreds of billions of dollars "fighting" an enemy that doesn''t exist or is too puny to be worried about.
Yes, but the odds are much worse for Obama.
The possibility of assassination is something both candidates will have to fear although the odds would be against Obama as a black man.
Still, that fear cannot stop one, like Obama, who offers the possibility of exciting and necessary change in the U.S.
I wish Obama the best and hope that he be free from harm.
There are enough whackos in this country to fill all the mental hospitals in the world and then some. We cannot change that.
"undermyboot" I think she understans America more than you do...what part do you not understand?
Two provisions of the MCA , MISERY HILLARY GOT THIS PAST INTO LAW...WHY
First, the MCA changed the definition of war crimes for which US government defendants can be prosecuted. Under the War Crimes Act of 1996, any violation of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions was considered a war crime and could be criminally prosecuted. Section 6 of the Military Commissions Act amended the War Crimes Act so that only actions specifically defined as "grave breaches" of Common Article 3 could be the basis for a prosecution, and it made that definition retroactive to November 26, 1997. The specific actions defined in section 6 of the Military Commissions Act include torture, cruel or inhumane treatment, murder, mutilation or maiming, intentionally causing serious bodily harm, rape, sexual assault or abuse, and the taking of hostages. According to Mariner of Human Rights Watch, the effect is "that perpetrators of several categories of what were war crimes at the time they were committed, can no longer be punished under U.S. law."[32] The Center for Constitutional Rights adds:
The MCA%u2019s restricted definitions arguably would exempt certain U.S. officials who have implemented or had command responsibility for coercive interrogation techniques from war crimes prosecutions.
. . . .
This amendment is designed to protect U.S. government perpetrators of abuses during the "war on terror" from prosecution.[33]
Posted by cdfoxtrot at 01:42 PM : Feb 10, 2008
you ought to tell that to the tens of thousands of people who have died at their hands or to the families who lost loved ones in 9/11.
Because she is elderly does not make her wise and ditto for for her status as nobel laureate. the head of al fatah was given nobel peace prize.
Its typical of liberals to rule out the danger of al quaeda. what if next time they manage to get their hands on an atomic bomb.
I am not personally fearful but I do not think you should dismiss it either and thats what many liberals do.
I agree with your post, entirely, but it brought a question to mind: given all the killers and those who feel they have some God-given right to do whatever they please, no matter who it hurts, and who obviously are unaccustomed to having been told "no" as they were growing up, do you suppose that if parents disciplined (were allowed to discipline) their kids as we used to, it would produce a changed attitude in the kids growing up, resulting in less violence and killings (as we used to have) ? Seems to me, we have become so willing to accept being told how we can and cannot raise our kids (and everything else) and look at the result!! I''m not talking about beatings or cruelty, just plain disclipline and that includes the word "no". Seems like many go beserk any more if they are rejected or told "no, I won''t do what you want", etc.
Yes, you are right and I agree with you completely.
However, I do not believe that, that alone would put an end to all the tragic acts that occur in the world.
There will always be many people out there that have
emotional/mental problems that cause them to do what a rational person would not.
If that we could weed them all out, but that of course, is impossible.
Could the media or CBS trying to plant a seed?
All I know is, all hell and its fury would break loose on the world never seen.
to Luvcomment: you are right on...today''s youth would have benefitted from the parenting of the 1950s.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 187 Comments