AP Poll: To Fix Economy, Get Out Of Iraq
Most Believe U.S. Is In Recession, And Quitting Iraq Would Be More Helpful Than Rebate Checks
-
Photo
(CBS/AP)
-
Interactive
Eye On The Economy
In-depth features on U.S. markets, taxes, employment and the Federal Reserve.
Pulling out of the war ranked first among proposed remedies in the survey, followed by spending more on domestic programs, cutting taxes and, at the bottom end, giving rebates to poor people in hopes they'll spend the economy into recovery.
The $168 billion economic rescue package Congress rushed to approval this week includes rebates of $600 to $1,200 for most taxpayers, the hope being that they will spend the money and help revive ailing businesses. President Bush is expected to sign the measure next week. Poor wage-earners, as well as seniors and veterans who live almost entirely off Social Security and disability benefits, would get $300 checks.
However, just 19 percent of the people surveyed said they planned to go out and spend the money; 45 percent said they'd use it to pay bills.
And nearly half said what the government really should do is get out of Iraq.
Forty-eight percent said a pullout would help fix the country's economic problems "a great deal," and an additional 20 percent said it would help at least somewhat. Some 43 percent said increasing government spending on health care, education and housing programs would help a great deal; 36 percent said cutting taxes.
"Let's stop paying for this war," said Hilda Sanchez, 44, of Waterford, Calif. "There are a lot of people who are struggling. We can use the money to pay for medical care and help people who were put out of their homes."
The subject of leaving Iraq shows a sharp partisan divide - 65 percent of Democrats think it would help the economy a lot, but only 18 percent of Republicans think so.
Just 29 percent of people think putting more money in the hands of the poor would help a great deal in fixing the country's economic problems.
According to many economists, the lower people are on the income ladder, the more probable it is that they will spend a rebate and do it quickly - a shot in the arm for the ailing economy.
In the poll, 61 percent said they think the economy is already in a recession.
"Things are bad, but it will get a lot worse," said Jim Sims, 60, of Greer, S.C.
And Nanette Dahlin, 52, of St. Louis Park, Minn., said the economic stimulus package "would only make a recession less damaging."
The economy nearly stalled in the final three months of last year. Some economists, like the majority of poll respondents, say it may actually be shrinking now, given the strains from a persistent housing slump and a painful credit crunch. The worry is that people and businesses will hunker down further and pull back their spending, sending the economy into a tailspin.
Let's stop paying for this war.
Hilda Sanchez, 44,Waterford, Calif.
Rebate checks could start showing up in mailboxes in May. However, Sanchez is typical is saying the money will "go automatically to bills." Thirty-two percent said they would save or invest the rebate. Said Sims: "I'm hoping to hold onto it."
Just 19 percent - like Dahlin - said they would spend it, while 4 percent said they would donate it to charity.
Paying off bills or saving the money won't give the economy a quick boost, though it may well be a wise financial decision for many people who are up to their eyeballs in bills.
"What is good for the economy as a whole - spending a rebate - is not the best idea at an individual household level if you are buried in debt," said Greg McBride, senior financial analyst at Bankrate.com. "Issuing rebate checks to give a boost to consumer spending amounts to a Band-Aid over the much bigger problem of consumer debt burdens," he said.
With Wall Street in turmoil, the top economic worry for poll respondents was seeing their nest eggs shrink. Fifty-nine percent said they were worried "a lot" or "some" about seeing the value of stocks and retirement investments drop. Those approaching retirement fretted the most.
Nearly half - 46 percent - said they were worried about being able to pay their bills. This is especially a concern for people whose household incomes are under $50,000, and for minorities. Twenty-eight percent most feared losing their jobs; minorities and those with a high school education or less were especially concerned.
Also, 48 percent of homeowners polled worried that the value of their homes would drop. The housing bust has led to record-high foreclosures, and weaker home values have made people feel less wealthy.
Who deserves most of the blame for the economy's troubles?
More than half - 56 percent - pointed the finger at mortgage lenders. Forty-four percent said President Bush deserves a lot of the blame. After that come Congress, Wall Street, consumers themselves, and in last place the Federal Reserve.
The Fed has the public's confidence that it will be able to right the economy.
More than half - 55 percent - said they have a great deal or some confidence in Fed to turn things around. Forty-one percent said that about Congress, only 28 percent about Mr. Bush.
In fact, economic problems have contributed to pulling the president's approval ratings to all-time lows. Only 29 percent approve of his handling of the economy, the lowest mark yet in this polling. Mr. Bush's overall job-approval rating slid to 30 percent, also a record low.
The AP-Ipsos poll was conducted Monday through Wednesday this week and involved telephone interviews with 1,006 adults. It had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points.
AP Director of Surveys Trevor Tompson and AP News Survey Specialist Dennis Junius contributed to this report.
By Jeannine Aversa
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 6
- next
See all 265 CommentsThese Regressives are willing to funnel money to the big defense contractors at the expense of education, health care, the economy, the environment, education, and the infrastructure of our country. Everything, and now they want more.
And here''s the capper. We don%u2019t have the money to spend. Where does it come from? China and others in the Far East. We are borrowing money to buy weapons to supposedly protect ourselves from the people that we are borrowing from. And, the 9 trillion dollar debt that we incur in the process makes your money worth less everyday.
Im not suggesting abolishing the military. However, a small portion of what we are currently spending on the military would feed every hungry kid in this country and educate every kid in this country that wants an education and leave a sizable tax break left over for the working class.
It%u2019s a question of priorities.
I was listening to Huckabee''s speech:
"People need to stand on their own." I think that the Regressives have certainly accomplished this.
"We need to increase defense spending so that we can guarantee our safety." This one of my biggest rubs with Bush, the Huckster and all other far right-wingers. We already spend more on the military than the entire world combined. 670 plus billion this year alone.
Has it made us safer? Someone once said, "If you have a military that is that big with that many weapons you will find a way to use it."
We have continued to pour money into the Pentagon with absolutely zero oversight. What has it gotten us? We cannot provide adequate benefits to our injured troops; with all this money we cannot provide the necessary equipment to our troops. So where does it go? Follow the money.
(cont)
Well if that''s the case, what was the need for a stimulus package? and why is Ben Benanke always asking "how high?" every time the adminstration or the stock market tell him to jump?
It does not take a brain surgeon to realize that the war is costing this country billions that are not there ....
Odd though, how the article does not mention all the other irresponsible spending that goes on in DC by ALL of the pols whether they have an R or D by thier name ...
It is absurd that citizens are not rewarded for saving money .. hence 3% CD rates and .5% savings account rates .. but one gets to buy an overpriced home and get a tax deduction for the interest ..
This country and the hacks that run it better wake up before its too late ...
We''ve allowed our economy to be weakened. We''ve had increasing deficits on every front. We started a wrong headed and very costly war. Our government policies have allowed and encouraged business to outsource our jobs that not only tears down our economy, but boosts theirs (China, India, etc), and boosts the demand (and price) for natural resources such as oil, etc. It is total mismanagement that has hurt the US dollar which in the end will be the down fall of our country and its wealth...and the instigators of all this were the business interests that no longer have an interest in the economy of the USA.
The politicians and party that understands and deals with this will control the country for decades.
See no evil, Hear no evil, Speak no evil. Fear no evil!
The Great Emperor Bush first, does not believe the country is in a recession and since he believes there is no recession, we therefore stay in Iraq! As it is, the Great Emperor sees the entire "recession" talk as being a plot hatched by Al Qeada to "scare" those who are not stupid neocon Fascsts into believing Iraq is the reason for the recession.
Of course, citizens of the US(SA) know who is responsible for the recession (real or not!) and it is not Osama Bin Laden and Al Qeada. It certainly is "terrrrrrrrrorists" but they reside at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington DC.
SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!!
Wouldn''t it be wonderful to have a president who was on board with the will of the people? Someone who said basically what this article says and who actually has a plan to getting done quickly and efficiently? There I go dreaming again.
The most expensive mortgage taken out in the last 5 years was for the House of Saud.
No doubt that war saps the economy of investment money and that war deprives the economy of vital workers and energies.This nation will be paying for this war for many generations.
The truth lies somewhere in the fog of people who took out the scam loans with escalating interest rates and who will not get the raises to be able to afford them...and people who have just flat lost their jobs, had to move on and couldn''t sell their houses and had to let them forclose.
You can''t make a house payment with an $8 to $10/hr job and that''s almost all that''s left unless you have some kind of education in technnology, or marketing of Chinese products.
On top of that you have people with credit cards paying high interest on money they didn''t have in the first place to spend. And then you have the dopes that fell for equity loans to pay off their credit cards. These folks will never have a paid off home to retire to, nor will they have saved money to supplement meagre retirement stipends (for those lucky enough to work for someone who provides that benefit--not many company''s do nowdays--and the ones that did are currently scamming your retirement fund).
We''re going to have to learn to live on our salaries, and learn to save for large purchases. Every time you are paying interst, you are losing money.
What about the 2nd coming of Christ and the Battle of Armagaddon?
Posted by FloydZepp
You can thank the Republicon zeal to do away with any regulation or oversight of business for that. They are far more concerned with listening in on YOUR phone calls and reading YOUR e-mail than they are about protecting you from their campaign contributors.
Biggest items have been aviation parts, MRAP''s and other equipment. All US built.
Non US material tends to be water, fuel, some of the food and etc. The troops salaries are mostly spent in US or back to the US. Contractors are mostly US.
Without many choices to spend money on in Iraq, most of the money comes back to the US.
Actually, spending for the Iraq War has delayed the recession if you believe in the Laffer Curve.
Glad to hear that, didn''t really know. Thanks for the enlitement.
He doesn''t need any more money. He turned returned $40M in options to Haliburton to become VP.
There are real problems. They are enough to attack.
We can''t do THAT!!
Yup, that 14 BILLION a month we are throwing away certainly WOULD help.
"65 percent of Democrats think it would help the economy a lot, but only 18 percent of Republicans think so."
The RepubiCON''s 18% of course would be the minority, the BORROW and spend cons mantra against Dems was Dems TAX and spend, borrow and spend is like a credit card, you get cashola now for free, spend away and worry about the bill plus interest LATER- after they are out of office and leave the mess for the next guy.
A lousy $300 isnt going to do much, those who get $300 will simply pay bills with it and its gone
He doesn''''t need any more money. He turned returned $40M in options to Haliburton to become VP.
There are real problems. They are enough to attack.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by donbl1
DONBL1 -- It''s the "Hatred" factor at play with SGTRDS. That''s all it is. There is no facts, rhyme, or reason behind it.
It''s simply spat out by lefties as that is the message they are fed. Hatred of Bush, he''s an idiot, hatred of Cheney, he''s skimming money, the economy is bad, bush lied, we lost all of our freedoms, etc...etc....
The usual mumbo jumbo *** on here daily. None of which, by the way, that can be proven.
I am becoming concerned that the lower end of the intelligence ladder is going to suffer going forward. If you are smart and prepared, you make a very good salary. If not,,,,, those jobs have moved to India.
I am noticing a significant reduction in illegals around here. More Americans now doing jobs that used to be done by Hispanics.
The 12M illegals ALONG with the outsourcing may have been the "proverbial" straw that broke the back of the lower end wage jobs.
''The most expensive mortgage taken out in the last 5 years was for the House of Saud.'' It was a 2nd mortgage and it was on the White House,... backed with an unsecured loan by America''s school children."
Not necessarily. The target of the Bush debt (and the war debt) is Social Security. Set up a classic confrontation between school children and their parents. Either the parents can give up the SocSec they''ve paid into all their lives, or the kids can kiss their first-world status goodbye.
Now, says BushCo, CHOOSE!!! (don''t ya just love the choices offered us in this ''land of the free''???)
The 12M illegals ALONG with the outsourcing may have been the "proverbial" straw that broke the back of the lower end wage jobs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by donbl1
Indeed. That is good news. The border needs to be shut down. That''s all their is to it.
Also, you are correct. By the overwhelming left wing media, it''s no wonder that these people think the way they do.
They are eternal pessimists and always will be. They will camoflauge their true intent (Bush hating) with calling themselves "True Americans" etc....
We know the whole story though.
Posted by donbl1
Don''t forget the H1B program and the attack on the higher wage side of the pay scale.
think of the future value of the debt the "children" must pay off assuming it is 20 years before they pay taxes? In future dollars, that value is only about 25% of today''s dollar value; i.e., not a big deal. Money is always cheaper in the future.
The REAL danger for our kids is Medicare. That is on a runaway ramp.
We know by the charisma who said this!
Answer
Hit-lers quote Jan 27 1932
I guess they are looking for a free handout in California.....
Posted by poopusbuttus
I don''t need the "left wing media" to tell me that my family members, friends and neighbors are out of work or that the cost of everything has skyrocketed.
My children are grown. They''re paying for the Reagan administration. Think that''s fair?
(We''ve paid $1 trillion just in INTEREST PAYMENTS on the debt Reagan left us since he left office. My kids, and yours, will pay the PRINCIPAL on that loan).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by omega39
Hmmmmm. Out of a job? Forgive me Omega for seeming a bit "not to caring" about your situation. Perhaps it is time that you wake up and realize that the govt is not going to take care of every aspect of your life.
On top of that, dont you think it''s about time you start persuing another line of work?
What the govt will do for you though is to provide you "Pell Grants", etc, to further your education so you can learn a new skillset.
Don''t listen to those sound bites as that debt has actually provided jobs and economic growth over the past few years.
If the debt to GDP ratio approaches 80%, I will have a different position.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 6
- next
See all 265 Comments