Nebraska: Electric Chair Is "Torture"
Judges Declare State's Only Death Penalty Procedure Is Unconstitutional
-
Photo
A 1988 file photo of the Nebraska electric chair. Nebraska is the only state that requires use of the electric chair when carrying out the death penalty. But on Friday, the state's Supreme Court said electrocution is torture and violates constitutional protections against cruel and unusual punishment. (AP/H. Dreimanis, Journal Star)
-
Interactive
Capital Punishment
Learn about the death penalty in the United States. Check out statistics, history, famous trials and more.
"Appellant wishes to be executed," it said.
On Friday, the court said electrocution is unconstitutional, a stunning response to Dean, nine others on death row and those who question whether the electric chair constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.
"Condemned prisoners must not be tortured to death, regardless of their crimes," Judge William Connolly wrote in the 6-1 opinion for the court.
The decision erased Nebraska's distinction as the only state with electrocution as its sole means of execution. State courts are left with the ability to sentence people to death but no way to carry out the penalty.
The high court made the ruling in the case of Raymond Mata Jr., convicted for the 1999 kidnapping and killing of 3-year-old Adam Gomez of Scottsbluff, the son of his former girlfriend. Parts of the boy's body were found at Mata's home in a freezer and dog bowl. Bone fragments also were recovered from the stomach of Mata's dog.
The court said in its opinion that evidence shows that electrocution inflicts "intense pain and agonizing suffering" and that it "has proven itself to be a dinosaur more befitting the laboratory of Baron Frankenstein" than a state prison.
From the conclusion of State v. Mata:
"Mata’s sentence of death is affirmed. But under our system of government, while the Legislature may vote to have the death penalty, it must not create one that offends constitutional rights. We recognize the temptation to make the prisoner suffer, just as the prisoner made an innocent victim suffer. But it is the hallmark of a civilized society that we punish cruelty without practicing it. Condemned prisoners must not be tortured to death, regardless of their crimes.There are conflicting views on whether federal courts might agree to hear an appeal. Attorney General Jon Bruning said he would ask the state court to reconsider its decision, and spokeswoman Leah Bucco-White said, "We're exploring all our options."
"And the evidence clearly proves that unconsciousness and death are not instantaneous for many condemned prisoners. These prisoners will, when electrocuted, consciously suffer the torture that high voltage electric current inflicts on the human body. The evidence shows that electrocution inflicts intense pain and agonizing suffering. Therefore, electrocution as a method of execution is cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Nebraska Constitution, article I, § 9. And, without a constitutionally acceptable method of execution, Mata’s sentence of death is stayed."
Gov. Dave Heineman's spokeswoman, Jen Rae Hein, said Heineman is considering introducing a bill this legislative session to replace electrocution with lethal injection.
"Today the court has asserted itself improperly as a policymaker," Heineman said. "Once again, this activist court has ignored its own precedent and the precedent set by the U.S. Supreme Court to continue its assault on the Nebraska death penalty."
The state's high court said electrocution violated the Nebraska Constitution rather than the U.S. Constitution, a move that one expert on death penalty law said appeared to shield its decision from federal review. But Chief Justice Mike Heavican wrote in dissent that the majority's stated reliance on Nebraska's constitution is misleading because the court based its decision entirely on federal precedent.
The court stressed that its ruling did not strike down the death penalty - just electrocution as the method. Approving another method, however, could prove difficult.
Past attempts to replace electrocution with lethal injection in Nebraska have failed, largely due to the efforts of the Legislature's staunchest opponent of capital punishment, Sen. Ernie Chambers of Omaha.
Chambers pointed out Friday that a bill to replace the execution method would have to be approved by the Judiciary Committee. That's unlikely, he said, given that on Thursday the committee sent to the full Legislature a bill that would repeal the death penalty.
"It would be stupid and a waste of time and strictly for political purposes to introduce a bill to replace electrocution with lethal injection," Chambers said.
Last year, a state bill to repeal the death penalty failed after first-round debate by just one vote. Bills must go through three rounds before they get final approval.
Legal experts said it doesn't make sense for Nebraska to rush to establish a new method of execution.
Courts across the country have put off several executions pending a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, which agreed in September to hear a challenge filed by two Kentucky death row inmates over that state's lethal injection method.
The use of the electric chair began to decline when Oklahoma adopted lethal injection in 1977, said Richard Dieter, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center. Since 1976, when executions resumed following a U.S. Supreme Court ban, there have been 154 electrocutions and more than 900 lethal injections, Dieter said.
Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia still allow electrocution, but some of those states do not allow newly condemned inmates to choose it.
The last person to be executed by electrocution was Daryl Holton on Sept. 12. in Tennessee. Holton, who confessed to murdering four children in 1997, chose the electric chair over lethal injection.
Moore was to have been electrocuted in May, but the Nebraska Supreme Court stopped it less than a week before his scheduled date because of the case it ruled on Friday.
Press writers Oskar Garcia, Josh Funk and Eric Olson in Omaha, Neb., contributed to this report.
By Nate Jenkins
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 84 CommentsIt''s not up to us to judge the souls of these people, but their acts, and the expedient way of getting these people to where their souls will be judged is by means of execution.
As far as lethal injection, why do they need to make the cocktail they do? Why don''t they just give them an overdose of morphine? The convicted would not feel anything (maybe some nausea then euphoria before passing).
Death by firing squad would mean bleeding to death...
Of the alternatives, lethal injection, hanging, or electrocution would be the viable methods.
Of course though, the methods of cruel and unusual punishment our forefathers were thinking of at the time were thumbscrews, neck screws, stocks, iron maidens and other carry-overs from the inquisition.
With all the technology today we still cannot agree.
This current society does not want heinous individuals loose, but are also fed up with the high cost of keeping an individual in prison for life.
What are we to do as a society?
I can see it now, "Prisoner 6790264, the good news is, you''re leaving today. The bad news is, not all of you is going."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by GrammaWhamma at 04:38 PM : Feb 09, 2008
+ report abuse
What if they refuse to pick. Keep in mind that some of those on death row today are not guilty, that''s a given. I wouldn''t pick if I were innocent. When you look at the number of people who have been found to be put on death row in error has grown so much since DNA evidence has been accepted, I can''t agree with ANY state, especially those were human life is rated on your position in the community, putting anyone to death. It''s no telling what the State''s Attorney in these places have done for that conviction. Have any on you ever checked out some of these people? They make Stalag 17 look like it was run by a friendly guy! Sieg Heil and Amen
With all the technology today we still cannot agree.
This current society does not want heinous individuals loose, but are also fed up with the high cost of keeping an individual in prison for life.
What are we to do as a society?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by kaiyo4u at 05:23 PM : Feb 09, 2008
+ report abuse
Right or wrong has nothing to do with anything to you does it? YOU are just blood thristy and greedy. You think you are superior to these folks and the fact that they may have been wrongly convicted has never crossed your mind. So we kill a few innocent of the lower class''s no big deal huh? You Nazi''s are really the worst you know!? Sieg Heil Y''all.
I can see it now, "Prisoner 6790264, the good news is, you''''re leaving today. The bad news is, not all of you is going."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by speakinup at 05:28 PM : Feb 09, 2008
+ report abuse
Garbage in Garbage out... thus the working of a Nazi mind! Thanks for proving my point swastika breath. You fascist have always thought like that about those "below" you haven''t you? They aren''t any good so you can use them or any part thereof, anyway you choose? Yeah right! Say aren''t you late for your rally? SIEG HEIL GRAND WIZARD!! ROFLMAO
Parts of the boy''s body were found in a freezer and dog bowl at Mata''s home. Bone fragments also were recovered from the stomach of Mata''s dog.
Now this is definitely someone who deserves sympathy from the court ...
His victims family should be allowed to choose his form of death ... Not some stuffed shirt sitting in a chamber who is appointed for life ... with no accountability ..
Who can honestly be an advocate for such a dimented and evil human?
He should be put to death as the jury of his peers decided, fried, put to sleep or shot right between the eyes .. none of these methods would even come close to what he did to this child ...
You haven''t got no azz left mcvet. It''s been laughed off months ago.
So, I''m a fascist for hating killers! Hah - that''s rich. And, of course, according to this liberal, they are all innocent. Yup - liberalism is a mental illness.
Or, maybe you are incarcerated huh. Wow, dude, what did you do ?
(I always did think your posts were so stupid as to be a crime.)
we should start calling them as ''FETUS''
all people have rights. the state does not give them those rights, neither do you. so you cannot "give them" or take them away, and neither can any court, or person.
Of course the death penalty is inhumane. Doctors are banned from participating. Any person who administers the death penalty, or who aids in it, or does not prevent it when given an opportunity is a despicable criminal. No civilized country uses the death penalty, any country that kills people in the name of justice is fatally flawed.
Of course the death penalty is inhumane. Doctors are banned from participating. Any person who administers the death penalty, or who aids in it, or does not prevent it when given an opportunity is a despicable criminal. No civilized country uses the death penalty, any country that kills people in the name of justice is fatally flawed.
Posted by andor3 at 08:23 PM : Feb 09, 2008
+ report abuse
**********
the problem with your dumb arse is that you are failing to understand that you are GIVING MORE RIGHTS to crimianls than to victims..WHO IS SAYING ON MORAL GROUNDS??DO YOU WANT TO PAY FOR THESE FU CKING PIECES OF SHI T??
EYE FOR AN EYE.
Posted by andor3 at 08:23 PM : Feb 09, 2008
Excuse me...but what happened to the rights of the victims that were murdered...they were taken away by their killer.
But that chair looks so comfortable.
Does it have a drink holder?
Maybe it''s torture because there is no HDTV in the room with cable.
Killing is too good for these people!
Execute Execute Execute
I could pull the switch on a convicted murderer, it is more humane to use Lethal injection. Execute Execute Execute
This is a clear effort from the radical left to simply save the lives of these pieces of sht..and not a question of ''torture''
Ahem! If I''m not mistaken I thought that was the point!
We need to adopt the guillotine. It''s quick and almost painless to the participant and it makes all who witness it think twice about breaking the law.
If afterward you find that the person you pulled the switch on was not guilty, then how you would justify your guilt for the murder you committed?
The electric chair is needed! So is hanging and a firing squad as well as lethal injection-the easier route.
I am tired of this bleeding heart stuff. If you kill you should die just as painful and awful a death.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 84 Comments