Miss. Considers Restaurant Ban For Obese
Lawmaker From Fattest State In U.S. Says He Wants To Draw Attention To Obesity Epidemic
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Miss. Bill Bans Obesity
A Mississippi lawmaker says 'fat bill' will raise discussion of obesity health risks in the state where one-third are overweight, irking obesity health professionals. Maggie Rodriguez reports.
-
Photo
A Mississippi lawmaker made waves by filing a bill that would ban restaurants from serving food to obese customers. Mississippi is the first state where more than 30 percent of adults are considered obese, according to a 2007 study. (AP)
-
Quiz
Dining Out Diet Quiz
Are you eating healthy when you dine out? Take this quiz and find out if you are making the right choices when ordering.
-
Quiz
Are You Food Savvy?
Have you consumed myths about diet and nutrition? Take these quizzes to find out.
He says he never even expected his plan to become law.
"I was trying to shed a little light on the number one problem in Mississippi," said Republican Rep. John Read of Gautier.
"It was a far-reaching bill, but you're trying to get people's attention to study the proper motive of obesity which is a concern to all of us," Read told CBS News'The Early Show. "Sometimes you have to go a little extreme to get the dialogue started."
Mississippi is the first state where more than 30 percent of adults are considered obese, according to a 2007 study by the Trust for America's Health, a research group that focuses on disease prevention.
The state House Public Health Committee chairman, Democrat Steve Holland of Plantersville, said he is going to "shred" the bill filed by Read and two other House members, Republican Ted Mayhall of Southaven and Democrat Bobby Shows of Ellisville.
"While I appreciate the efforts of my fellow House members to help curb the obesity problem in Mississippi, this is totally the wrong approach," Holland said in a news release, reports the Jackson Clarion-Ledger.
Public Health and Human Services Committee Chairman Steve Holland said today he will "pocket veto" House Bill 282, which means it will die in a subcommittee this week.
"It is too oppressive for government to require a restaurant owner to police another human being from their own indiscretions," Holland said Monday.
Still, in a state where lunch buffets are laden with fried chicken and butter-soaked vegetables, Holland said he understands the intentions of the bill's sponsors.
"Certainly, I can identify," Holland said. "I'm obese myself."
The Center for Consumer Freedom, a Washington-based nonprofit group supported by restaurants and food companies, blasted the no-serve bill in Mississippi.
"Give me a break," J. Justin Wilson, a senior research analyst for the group, said Monday. "Bills like this strip personal responsibility out of the obesity equation. Frankly, that's the only solution to the problem."
Jackson restaurant owner Al Stamps said it is "absurd" for the state to consider telling him which customers he can't serve. He and his wife, Kim, do a bustling lunch business at Cool Al's, which serves big burgers - beef or veggie - and specialty foods like "Sassy Momma Sweet Potato Fries."
"There is a better way to deal with health issues than to impose those kind of regulations," Al Stamps said as reggae music played in the background. "I'm sorry - you can't do it by treating adults like children and telling them what they can and cannot eat."
"Obesity is like an 800-pound or 1,000-pound or 2,000-pound elephant walking around. And everybody ignores it."
Rep. John Read, R-Gautier"I think it's definitely a publicity stunt and a troublesome one," Joseph Nadglowski, president of the Obesity Action Coalition told The Early Show. "We are not going to help those affected by obesity by further discriminating against them."
"Unfortunately, there's this view that if you stigmatize someone who's obese or you discriminate against them, you're going to help them lose weight," Nadglowski said. "But research actually shows this is absolutely not true."
Read, a pharmacist, acknowledges he would have a tough time at restaurants if his bill were to become law - he said he is 5-11 and about 230 pounds. Even though the bill will die, Read said he hopes he has created serious discussion about an expensive public health issue.
"Obesity is like an 800-pound or 1,000-pound or 2,000-pound elephant walking around," Read said. "And everybody ignores it."
"We're not trying to hurt people," Read told The Early Show. We're not trying to discriminate against people. We want people to think."
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 129 CommentsThe restaurants can''t use margarine or any other trans-fat yet the store shelves are LOADED with foods saturated with trans-fats (and saturated fats for that matter). Just check the label .. ignore the 0 per serving ***, if it says *hydrogenated* or *partially hydrogenated* next to any oil thats trans-fat.
Now, don''t get me wrong, I believe everyone should be able to make their own choice whether or not to buy and consume products ...
.... I just think that picking on restaurants that provide a small percentage of weekly intake because thats the only horse that states and cities have the authority to beat on is wrong.
I often see the obese clients eating four or five plates of food at one sitting.
No wonder they''re obese......
Well Jerkface - the process of creating new laws - particularly ones that strip personal freedoms - isn''t supposed to be YOUR personal tool to advertise & ''bring awareness'' to issues without any intention whatsoever of actually making it a law... frankly, that''s an abuse of the legal system.
If I''m in charge of the water department - and I shut off the city''s water to ''bring attention'' to drought stricken Sudan - I ought to be fired...
Why stop at obesity qualifications? Why not have a dirty fingernail inspector or a doctor''s excuse proving that you are medically okay to partake of the salad bar. I know I always hate to see someone sneeze over the lettuce.
This concept is just crazy. Obesity is a symptom not an illness. We need to stop singling out those who are different.
And just like all those business owners & smoking patrons warned... next time, they''ll come after something that DOES affect you...
Overeating doesn''t affect other people like 2nd hand smoke you say??? Well, just like they trumped up the true dangers of 2nd hand smoke to make it a ''social'' problem - obesity results in many health problems which drives up the cost of insurance & other health costs for everyone... now it IS a social problem...
You''re getting precisely what you''re asking for....
Posted by Jlynx1
A simpler solution might be to ban all the fast food ads from television like they did cigarettes. I can sit in front of my computer for hours and never get hungry. Thirty minutes in front of the television watching ads for Taco Bell, Burger King, Pizza hut etc. and I am running for the refrigerator.
Posted by Jlynx1
Overweight people don''t harm other people like smoke does. The only way overweight people or their life styles will affect me is if our tax dollars are used to subsidize their health care.
I am a 50 year old woman who is considered Morbidly Obese and had gastric bypass surgery in Sept 2007. So, blogger Displeased...There IS hope for adults!
Mr. Nadglowski is right when he said "Unfortunately, there''s this view that if you stigmatize someone who''s obese or you discriminate against them, you''re going to help them lose weight," "But research actually shows this is absolutely not true."
How many people do you know who have quit smoking or drinking or doing drugs or doing anything addictive in nature has "quit" because they were discriminated against or nagged at to quit? It doesn''t work that way!
Americans need to stand up and take back their rights and tell government to butt out!
The government is supposed to keep us united as a nation and protect us from outside forces, but NOT tell us how to live our lives.
If people want to be fat, let them be fat.
Besides, I think that this is a clear violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
America would never let a thing like debt or health get in the way of her greed for money.
The person who proposed this should be voted out by the rest of the state--then HE can lose weight due to lack of a job.
There is something in the air with McCain''s nomination that signals an end to the Fox News Rush Limbaugh insanity that Republicans have obeyed like zombies for too long.
Who sets the standard for "obese" for the restaurants to use? Is everyone in Mississippi going to be issued an card with their weight ''status'' on it? Worse than stupid this is an unenforceable ''law''. Even the politician who proposed it stated it was just to get peoples attention. I hope it did, so that they can vote the time wasting idiot out of office. No wonder the state is the poorest in the nation - even the politicians have poor ways.
Bring on the food police! Everybody gets weighed before you enter a McDonalds!
If the people of Mississippi don''t throw that Bum out of Office in the next election they deserve Facism.
On the other hand, having to look at them while eating IS an appetite killer, so I can sort of see where this politician is coming from.
Don''t vote for anyone who wants to increase governmental power over individuals.
First it was the smokers next it will be fat people. little by little we will have a government version of perfect citizen''s. They will not question any freedoms taken away for "there own good"
This bill was started by Republican Rep. John Read of Gautier.
read the story.
On the other hand, having to look at them while eating IS an appetite killer, so I can sort of see where this politician is coming from.
Posted by oeangus at 10:30 AM : Feb 05, 2008
That sounds like it''s your problem. I don''t pay attention to people while I am dining. I''ve never had a weight problem so how could put myself in their shoes. This won''t make people lose weight - in fact the opposite I would guess.
Next time you%u2019re out dining look at your food or the person with you instead of at other diners.
First it was the smokers next it will be fat people. little by little we will have a government version of perfect citizen''''s. They will not question any freedoms taken away for "there own good" - gopack443"
What you anticipate is unfortunately true. That''s a primary reason why we have terms for lawmakers.
Anyone in the position of legislature that even jokingly makes that type of announcement, is not qualified for public office.
If Mississippians want to live in a facist state all they have to do is re-elect Read. Allowing someone in that position is paramount to stupidity.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by gunnerv1 at 10:57 AM : Feb 05, 2008
Actually this is a red state and the congressman is a Republican. So let me see I would see you just vetoed all the Repulbicans who say small government and everytime they get into power they mushroom the government.
Actions speak louder than words and America is starting to see it now again.
Posted by insightman
~~~~~~~~~~~~
They aren''t just in the South. There are many similar establishments around the country. I remember my ex-husband telling me that when he played high school football the coach would take the team to an all-you-can-eat place after practice and turn them loose. He said the blood drained from the restaurant manager''s face every time the team came in!
Posted by tuckerndfw at 11:16 AM : Feb 05, 2008
Excellent point. I really don''t mind the food either, except for maybe the pudding the contents of which may contain (at any given moment) M&M''s, oreo cookies, Hershey kisses, bananas, hair, snot, boogers, blood, fingernails, etc.
They shouldn''t let a drug-addict fascist run our country, but he does...
I didn''t vote for King Jorge.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 129 Comments