LONDON, Feb. 3, 2008

Sale Of "Lolita" Beds For Young Girls Ends

U.K. Retailer Claims No One On Staff Knew Name Referred To Infamous Story of Pedophilia

  • The Photo

    The "Lolita Midsleeper Combi" bedroom set, marketed to young girls. Woolworths announced it would stop selling the set in the U.K., after initially doubting the inappropriateness of naming a child's bed set after a character in an infamous novel of pedophilia.  (CBS)

(CBS/AP)  Woolworths stores in Britain have stopped selling "Lolita" beds for young girls, after a parents' organization complained because of the name's association with the famous novel about a pedophile.

Woolworths said staff members who administered the retail chain's Web site that sold the beds were unaware of the name's connection with Vladimir Nabokov's 1955 novel "Lolita" and two film adaptations.

The novel centers on protagonist Humbert Humbert's obsession with his 12-year-old stepdaughter, Lolita. Humbert essentially kidnaps her, traveling across the country and holding her sexually captive.

[Curiously, in spite of Woolworths staff's unfamililarity with the classic story, DVDs of both versions of the film - Stanley Kubrick's classic 1962 version, and a 1997 remake starring Jeremy Irons - are available for purchase on Woolworth's Web site.]

Woolworths canceled its sale of the Lolita Midsleeper Combi bedroom set Wednesday, the same day the Raisingkids parents' group had called to complain about the name, Woolworths spokeswoman Lisa Lim said by telephone Sunday.

The set, made and delivered by an outside supplier, costs £395 ($775).

"There aren't many people in the company, in the whole world, who know about the 'Lolita' book or films," Lim said.

Quote

There aren't many people in the company, in the whole world, who know about the 'Lolita' book or films.

Woolworths spokeswoman Lisa Lim
"There might be a few people in the country who have a problem with it, but it's just a name."

She said Woolworths would speak with the supplier, however, about how the branding of the product came about.

Raisingkids said it was pleased Woolworths had halted sale of the product.

"It's interesting to see how fast a multinational company can move if it's worried about its public image," Raisingkids said on its Web site, calling the product's use of the Lolita name "unbelievably bad taste."

© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Video and Galleries from Business

Add a Comment See all 14 Comments
by burneb February 3, 2008 4:37 PM PST
Lim sound like a typical marketing spokesperson who is paid to make ridiculous statements with a straight face. Or perhaps she is simply too young to realize that the name Lolita has been pretty much a byword for jailbait for 50 years.

We have the same problem in our marketing department, where the typical age is about 23. They have the historical perspective of tree squirrels. If it is classic, they are clueless. Elvis who?

Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 February 3, 2008 4:55 PM PST
"There aren''''t many people in the company, in the whole world, who know about the `Lolita'''' book or films," Lim said."

Of course most of the Western world knows about the name "Lolita" it has been used for the past 50 years or so, to describe any very young girl, who, through precociousness, or early physical development (or both) is prone to be sexually exploited by grown men. To not know the term is to display a level of ignorance not only with literature, but with life itself. "Lolita" is now a name synonymous with a very pretty, young girl, from any culture, who through no fault of her own--could be the target of a grown man''s attention.

Lolita=jail bait=child at risk=*** victim. Lolita is the polite term for any of these other names--essentially and subtly stating that :

1. the man is attracted to the child through no fault of his own, but through her own sexual awakening and seduction skills

2. The child secretly "knows" her affect on the man and likes it and cultivates it.

It is the ultimate pedophile wet dream--where the young victim is everything he could want in a child and is a willing participant instead of a *** abuse victim.

Woolworth (which was drummed out of business in most if not all of AMerica--should fire Lim and any other illiterate person on their staff.
Reply to this comment
by cdfoxtrot February 3, 2008 5:12 PM PST
Only the bible thumpers are obsessed with this kind of thing. Lolita is a person''s name. Nothing more. Whoever wrote the article heavily implies the people at this store were involved in some kind of conspiracy and casts doubt on their lack of knowledge of this 1950s novel. I never heard of it and I suspect most people haven''t. Lolita is a person''s name. Nothing more. Not a big deal.
Reply to this comment
by soldat44 February 3, 2008 5:59 PM PST
""There aren''t many people in the company, in the whole world, who know about the `Lolita'' book or films," Lim said.

"There might be a few people in the country who have a problem with it, but it''s just a name." "

OMG! Woolworths must have a high-school drop-out for a spokeswoman.

Anyway - Just look up at the wallpaper in any Barnes and Noble cafe and you will see a caricature of Nabakov. Even the music group Police mention him in their song "Don''t stand so close to me"(not sure of song title...sorry)

Where the H#$% has the Lim person been...


I weep for the future...
Reply to this comment
by s0055d-2009 February 3, 2008 6:00 PM PST
Back in the West Texas town of El Paso, I fell in love with a Mexican girl, her name was Lolita, and you''d like to meet her, she was the girl of my dreams and 29 years old , I might add. Prudish dummies!
Reply to this comment
by keithle1 February 3, 2008 6:03 PM PST
So many girls'' names they could have used & they chose that one?
Reply to this comment
by soldat44 February 3, 2008 6:04 PM PST
"Only the bible thumpers are obsessed with this kind of thing. Lolita is a person''''s name. Nothing more. Whoever wrote the article heavily implies the people at this store were involved in some kind of conspiracy and casts doubt on their lack of knowledge of this 1950s novel. I never heard of it and I suspect most people haven''''t. Lolita is a person''''s name. Nothing more. Not a big deal.

Posted by cdfoxtrot at 05:12 PM : Feb 03, 2008

ROFLMAO!

Where the H%$# have you been? Get in your car...drive to a bookstore(not an adult one)...and go to the LITERATURE Section! You would be amazed at what you will find there.
Reply to this comment
by darkbeach72 February 3, 2008 7:18 PM PST
The best reason to withdraw this particular name for this product is that it does not appear to be constructed well enough to support the weight of both a child and a fully grown male. Any fully Lolita-worthy bed should be constructed of at least 3/4" ply and not MDF.
Reply to this comment
by keithle1 February 3, 2008 8:16 PM PST
Company spokespeople are a trip. Amazing what nonsense comes out of their mouths. They can spin anything. No matter what you say to them, they have an answer. Always with a big, cheesy smile.
Reply to this comment
by jaykay3141 February 3, 2008 8:16 PM PST
Yeah right, "no one [knew] about the book or films ...". Just like the sporting goods company that named a woman''s running shoe "The Incubus". Or when Toyota used an R-rated drinking song to advertise their cars.

So there are 2 possibilities: these decisions were made by people who knew what they were doing, or by people who who have the mental ability of houseplants. You can take your pick of which set of barbarians are at the gates.
Reply to this comment
by standlee5 February 3, 2008 8:36 PM PST
U.K. Retailer Claims No One On Staff Knew Name Referred To Infamous Story of Pedophilia


right.
Reply to this comment
by rheola-2009 February 3, 2008 8:45 PM PST


One thing you can be certain of in business, and that is.

If there is a dollar to be made, morality and ethics are thrown out the door
Reply to this comment
by gce65 February 3, 2008 11:08 PM PST
Woolworths said staff members who administered the retail chain''s Web site that sold the beds were unaware???
Nobody believes that! You tried to make money off the suggestion and association with young poon! WOOLWORTH''S HUH? DO THEY ALSO OFFER A NAMBLA BED FOR BOYS?
Reply to this comment
by ov442 February 5, 2008 1:37 PM PST
You have GOT to be Kidding....

| "There aren''t many people in the company, in the whole world, who know about the ''Lolita'' book or films," Lim said. |

What a crock! They have both of the movies for sale on their website and not many companies do that.
That name is totally synonamous with the novel''s character. Where did they think they got that name from ? coincidence? jeez.
Reply to this comment
See all 14 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs