February 11, 2009 3:30 PM

Prince Charles: High Rises Diminish London

(AP)  Britain's Prince Charles warned Thursday that historic sites like the Tower of London have been "vandalized" by high-rise construction, threatening to ruin the character of the architecture.

The heir to the British throne, who spoke at a conference on city planning, argued that poor planning could damage the integrity of Britain's historical areas - particularly if tall buildings dwarf smaller structures.

"We seem to be determined to vandalize these few remaining sites which retain the kind of human scale and timeless character that so attract people to them and which increase in value as time goes by," Charles said at St. James's Palace.

The speech is a challenge to London Mayor Ken Livingstone's support for a project near the Tower. The "Shard of Glass" structure would be Britain's tallest skyscraper.

Charles suggested tall buildings be clustered into corporate areas where they would not tower over historic sites. He cited the planning of La Defense in Paris, a business district full of skyscrapers kept separate from Paris's most famous museums and landmarks.

"The key point I want to make is that I am not opposed to all tall buildings," he said. "My concern is that they should be considered in their context; in other words, they should be put where they fit properly."

His speech also took aim at plans to build more than 3 million new homes by 2020 - development Charles said should be done right.

"My concern is that London will become just like everywhere else with the same homogenized buildings that express nothing but outdated unsustainability," he said.

In 1984 Charles referred to a proposed addition to London's National Gallery as a "monstrous carbuncle." More skyscrapers in London would be worse, he said.

"Not just one carbuncle, ladies and gentlemen, on the face of a much-loved old friend, but a positive rash of them that will disfigure precious views and disinherit future generations of Londoners," he said.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment
by bradosol February 1, 2008 2:31 PM EST
As a Londoner, I agree with Prince Charles on this issue.

His opinions about new prestige buildings often chime in with what real Londoners think.

Hitler''s bombs blitzed the area round St Paul''s Cathedral but a succession of post-war developers have destroyed it.

We need a voice like Charles''s to counteract the money-making vandals of the City. If it carries influence because he''s a royal, so much the better.

Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 February 1, 2008 4:27 AM EST
"Prince Charles: High Rises Diminish London"

As also have idiots posing as "royalty".
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 February 1, 2008 2:49 AM EST
Well said, Prince Charles!
Reply to this comment
by singerdn February 1, 2008 1:39 AM EST
Prince Charles is right. There is a "timeless character" to historical London and this should not be destroyed for the sake of big bucks. Surely there would be another location for this "Shard". I hope the city planners listen to him!
Reply to this comment
by excoachken February 1, 2008 12:19 AM EST
Hey Charlie, the ugliest thing in London is that Horseface Camilla, on your left arm.
Reply to this comment
by rfcnj68 February 1, 2008 12:18 AM EST
Never thought that i would say it but Charles is right. We destroy wonderful structures that could be rehabed to put up the *** of today, all in the name of progress. This is another reason why we have fewer acres of farm land. Offer someone that has a struggling farm to sell and they will then we get the clustered houses that look a like and are built so cheap that within six months to a year the home owner is having to go back and make wall repairs.
Reply to this comment
by joyous88 January 31, 2008 10:46 PM EST
Now this is an important story!

mission accomplished
Reply to this comment
by p-syrus January 31, 2008 9:51 PM EST
My God! What a NOVEL CONCEPT!

Actual URBAN PLANNING instead of a simple rush to profit through commercialization of local resources.
Reply to this comment
by l8c6 January 31, 2008 9:47 PM EST
I''d have to agree with him. Some of the old world architectural ideas that came to america came from a rich history of the arts started in Europe. The old world had it''s good side.

Such planning had a start in young america but seemed to fall apart after world war II in the rapid growing america that turned into a swelling urban mess in most cities with a type of planning that took on an unplanned cheaply slapped together appearance. It hasn''t ceased to this day.
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook