Aide: Bush Budget Curbs Domestic Programs
Senior Official Says President's 2009 Budget Will Likely Freeze Most Domestic Programs
-
President Bush (AP)
-
Interactive Bush Presidency The president's agenda, plus facts, figures, major events and key personalities.
- Stories
- Bush Chides Congress On Earmarks
The Bush budget also will likely exceed $3 trillion, this official said.
Bush on Monday will present his proposed budget for the new fiscal year to Congress, where it's unlikely to gain much traction in the midst of a presidential campaign. The president has promised a plan that would erase the budget deficit by 2012 if his policies are followed.
Bush will propose nearly $178 billion in savings from Medicare a number that's nearly triple what he proposed last year. Much of the savings would come from freezing reimbursement rates for most health care providers for three years. An additional $17 billion would come from the Medicaid program, the state-federal partnership that provides health coverage to the poor. The cuts would come over five years.
The official, whose spoke on condition of anonymity because the budget has not yet been released, said the budget for domestic programs would look like last year's.
"It's a very small increase," he said. "Very small."
A second official, who also spoke on condition of anonymity, said that domestic discretionary spending would increase by less than 1 percent under Bush's proposal.
The budget is likely to have deficits of about $400 billion for this year and next.
Economists say the best measure of the deficit is to compare it against the size of the economy. By that standard, a $400 billion deficit represents almost 3 percent of the gross domestic product. By contrast, President Clinton was facing deficits in the 4 percent range when he felt compelled to tackle the issue in 1993.
The president's cuts are exactly the wrong medicine when the cost of health care and the number of uninsured continue to rise and families are feeling economically insecure.
House Speaker Nancy PelosiSavings also would come by charging wealthier people higher monthly premiums for Medicare's drug program.
Last year, Congress declined to go along with the nearly $65 billion in savings the president proposed for Medicare over five years, and that proposal pales in comparison with the savings he now seeks.
Independent experts have warned that the government needs to address the rising cost of health care for businesses to stay competitive and for the government to be able to pay for other important programs in the decades ahead.
"In fact, if there is one thing that could bankrupt America, it's runaway health care costs. We must not allow that to happen," David M. Walker, the U.S. comptroller general, told lawmakers Tuesday during a congressional hearing.
But Democrats said Bush's budget targets the wrong health care providers for cuts. They said insurers subsidized to provide Medicare coverage are being overpaid.
"The president is proposing to once again slash health care coverage for seniors and low-income working Americans," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said. "The president's cuts are exactly the wrong medicine when the cost of health care and the number of uninsured continue to rise and families are feeling economically insecure."
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
- Why not just cut everything here and now if they want to ruin the country, as some around here claim?
I just don''t think the people claiming America is "being destroyed" are correct.
Change is inevitable, but destruction? Give proof. Not prattle. - Reply to this comment
- Miasands certainly reminds me of the southern white trash evangelicals. They love the bible except for where it says to provide help or comfort to those in need. They love to spend on weapons though. Probably THE MAIN REASON why I dumped religion 40 tears ago!!!
- Reply to this comment
- misands
So bubbala, you hard hearted christian you have a quandry. God loves babies but you can kill them later when you (misands) deem them unproductive! Explain to me exactly how you reconcile your christian religion with your Nazi social programs? - Reply to this comment
- misands - your silence is deafening.
- Reply to this comment
Bu$h:
Skrew America.- Reply to this comment
- misands -
What if the baby had no chance to be a "productive member of society"? According to your logic, they are useless pieces of sh** that you wouldn''t want to support...but if they live, you have to support them with your tax dollars.
That''s quite a moral quandry you are in...your thoughts? - Reply to this comment
- King George is getting s.h.i.t. done!!!
- Reply to this comment
- I think you''''ve confused me with your liberal baby killing friends.Posted by misands at 11:01 AM : Feb 01, 2008
Yes, so let the babies pour forth.
And Bush will take care of those that are born to crack-addicts, and 13-year-olds, and incest/rape victims, and poverty-stricken families with his social programs Republicans love to support so much.
Republicans - let ''em live, then let ''em starve. - Reply to this comment
- "Are you kidding me? I''''m absolutley against abortions no matter what the circumstance." Posted by misands
...then don''t have one - it''s called ''choice''. - Reply to this comment
- misands -
I can''''t believe that you believe in abortions, being a right-wing Christian. Because you think people that can''''t support themselves are worthless, and they have no use in society. - rwassel
__________________________
Are you kidding me? I''m absolutley against abortions no matter what the circumstance. A baby is the most precious thing the Lord gives us. I think you''ve confused me with your liberal baby killing friends. - Reply to this comment
- "The president has promised a plan that would erase the budget deficit by 2012 if his policies are followed."
How is that for honor?
Make your buddies richer, run the deficit up to unheard of levels, and then design budgets on the way out the door that shaft the other 95% of America - and America itself - so you can leave office saying "Hey, I told them how to balance the budget but the Democrats didn''t want to.".
Man, today''s Republicans don''t even have enough honor to make good thieves. - Reply to this comment
- I have to comment on this - While this President and Vice President are bending us over and FU*CK*ING US their OIL Buddies in one company alone have the following:
Exxon Mobil Corp.''s (XOM) 2007 net income of $40.61 billion sets a new record for a US company, but marked a departure from torrid growth seen in previous years.
Tell me we are not being ENRON''d here! We are being Gouged. And our Republican Leadership is Happy about their work on behave of the American People. - Reply to this comment
- Looks like were going to end up with two Democrats running against each other for Prsident. McCain and Hillary. The only difference between the two is the war. Does this mean the national vote in November will be on the war and nothing else? Looks like it from here........
- Reply to this comment
- No war on the terror of having sick children or ill family members and not having the money for proper medical care.
- Reply to this comment
- You are welcome, until the economy collapses, and the social upheaval from the suffering of Americans hits the streets. Don''''t come to any "liberal" you might meet, asking for help, because your hypocrisy will be revealed.
Posted by brianbwb at 01:25 AM : Feb 01, 2008
Then, I guess we will have to do it the old fashioned way, we''ll take it. - Reply to this comment
- Please Sir, may I have some more gas?
Posted by AaaBee at 10:08 AM : Feb 01, 2008
For a pence!,,and hence, you may have a spoonful! - Reply to this comment
- Exxon Mobil Makes Monster Profit
Oil Giant Raked In $40.6B In 2007 - Biggest Annual Profit In History For U.S. Company
Please Sir, may I have some more gas? - Reply to this comment
- C''''mon misands, enlighten us, o lover of abortions!
Posted by rwassel at 09:50 AM : Feb 01, 2008
O chooser of blind ignorance, read the book "The Cider House Rules" and get back to me.
Or don''t read it because you can''t handle honest reality and want to remain in your ignorant fairy tale land where no abortions ever need to take place.
Don''t watch the stupid movie, read the book. - Reply to this comment
- Feel that Republican choke hold on your way of life, America?
Feel the rich elite taking away your safety nets, whether you use them or not?
Feel the "haves" stripping the "have nots"?
Feel the Bush love and how he has supported our country, our safety, our well-being, our global reputation, our constitution, our children, our elderly and sick, our civil liberties, and our peace and prosperity?
Can you feel it? Can you feel what the blind loyalty of Republican self-interest has wrought for America?
Let''s vote them in again and see how much further they can dump America for their own personal gain. - Reply to this comment
- misands -
I can''t believe that you believe in abortions, being a right-wing Christian. Because you think people that can''t support themselves are worthless, and they have no use in society.
The fact that you would then be willing to kill that child with no arms or legs who has no chance of supporting themselves (remember, you think people that can''t support themselves are worthless, and should be left to die) is astonishing.
Tell me again, what verse of the Bible says "And ye shall kill all those in need, or all those who are sick, for they have become useless to society, and your taxes should only go to things you want them to"? Is it Proverbs?
C''mon misands, enlighten us, o lover of abortions! - Reply to this comment
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."




