February 11, 2009 3:30 PM

Court: Feds Delayed $100B Owed To Indians

(AP)  A federal judge on Wednesday ruled that the Interior Department has "unreasonably delayed" its accounting for billions of dollars owed to Indian landholders.

The federal agency "has not, and cannot, remedy the breach" of its responsibilities to account for the Indian money, U.S. District Judge James Robertson said in a 165-page decision in a long-running federal lawsuit alleging mismanagement of Indian trust funds.

"Indeed, it is now clear that completion of the required accounting is an impossible task," Robertson said.

The suit, first filed in 1996 by Blackfeet Indian Elouise Cobell, claims the government has mismanaged more than $100 billion in oil, gas, timber and other royalties held in trust from Indian lands dating back to 1887.

Cobell said in a statement that "this is a great day in Indian Country."

"We've argued for over 10 years that the government is unable to fulfill its duty to render an adequate historical accounting, much less redress the historical wrongs heaped upon the individual Indian trust beneficiaries," Cobell said.

An Interior Department spokeswoman said officials were reviewing Robertson's decision and had no immediate comment.

Robertson said he will schedule a hearing in the next month to discuss a way to solve the problem. He added that his conclusion that Interior is unable to perform an adequate accounting does not mean that the task is hopeless.

"It does mean that a remedy must be found for the department's unrepaired, and irreparable, breach of its fiduciary duty over the last century. And it does mean that the time has come to bring this suit to a close," Robertson said.

The judge said that although department officials had attempted and continued to attempt to "cure the breach of their fiduciary duty" they have not succeeded in doing so and "have unreasonably delayed the completion of the required accounting."

Robertson also blamed Congress for the lack of money appropriated for the cause, citing the "tension between the expense of an adequate accounting and congressional unwillingness to fund such an enterprise."

Interior Department officials argued during the October trial that their job was difficult with limited money from Congress. The judge agreed, saying the department deserves credit for trying to strike a balance between "exactitude and cost."

He said he did not agree with the Indian plaintiffs' assertion that an adequate accounting is not possible because of missing records. The record is inconclusive on that point, he said.

The lawsuit deals with individual Indians' lands. Several tribes have sued separately, claiming mismanagement of their lands.

The government proposed paying $7 billion partly to settle the Cobell lawsuit in March 2007, but that was rejected by the plaintiffs, who estimate the government's liability could exceed $100 billion. The Interior Department estimates that it has spent $127 million on its accounting in the past five years.

Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., chairman of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee, said Wednesday that he hopes the judge's decision is a catalyst for a settlement.

"Ultimately the question is going to be for the administration and the Justice Department, are they willing to settle for all of these years of mismanagement," he said.

Robertson took over the case after Judge Royce Lamberth was removed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which said he had lost his objectivity.

The government had asked that Lamberth be replaced after the judge lambasted the Interior Department, writing in a decision that it "is a dinosaur — the morally and culturally oblivious hand-me-down of a disgracefully racist and imperialist government that should have been buried a century ago."

In his decision, Robertson detailed the extensive background of the case, saying that it would "stretch the limits of understatement" to say the case's history has been exhaustively chronicled in district court. He noted there are 3,504 entries on the case's docket and 10 circuit judges have been engaged in the case. His opinion will have the shorthand of "Cobell XX," he noted.

Throughout his conclusion, Robertson quoted Charles Dickens' "Bleak House," which chronicles a never-ending legal suit. Using passages from that novel, he notes that the "suit has, in course of time, become so complicated" that "no two lawyers can talk about it for five minutes without coming to a total disagreement as to all the premises."

"'Innumerable children have been born into the cause,' and, as plaintiffs have reminded us on occasion, 'innumerable old (plaintiffs) have died out of it,"' Robertson said.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 41 Comments
by January 31, 2008 5:49 PM EST
Just wondering-have any of you whining weasels ever been around the people that "LOST" out on everything the would have "inherited"????????????????????????
I''m guessing not.
I have, I live there.
They wreck everything they are given-and get new from the government.
They drink every dime they get-and get more from the government.
Native Americans in my state are the most hateful people I''ve ever met, and they want MORE and MORE.
I''m sorry, I didn''t steal ANYTHING from them. NEITHER did my ancestors.
And they use all of the white peoples help to continue to abuse each other from birth.
GIVE ME A BREAK.
And by the way-I am part Native American.
And I''m NOT proud of "my people" for how they are.
Reply to this comment
by klingon69 January 31, 2008 3:17 PM EST
Everything was taken from them and always with the promise that they would be compensated. Now it''''s time to pay up. Why do you have a problem with paying your bill?
Posted by Element51 at 07:03 PM : Jan 30, 2008
So will it be paid to just those on the reservations, or will it be paid to anyone with Native American blood? If so, what percentage, and how much blood line must there be? Will the percentage payout be based upon the amount in your blood? Say a full-blooded vs 1/4 blooded?
Reply to this comment
by dan9111 January 31, 2008 3:02 PM EST
Some of these arguments are silly. Clearly one is not obligated to pay the debts that another has incurred. The murder and treason committed by the whites was done by white who today are dead ones. One can only blame government itself, not racial or technological divides.

To believe our "leaders" today (be they McCain or Hillary) are going to stop murdering people is fantasy in the extreme. If you want to stop violence, then you should stop condoning this belief in "good government". There is no such animal.


Reply to this comment
by beehive21-2009 January 31, 2008 1:05 PM EST
WE lost a lot we should have learned from the Indians,took the land,scalped for a bounty in California, dishonored treaties,gave tribes blankets infected with smallpox,killed all the Buffalo,raped the Earth of oil,timber,gold silver, water etc.and now,have become the world Super Power thru inventions and landing on the moon.We cannot be held responsible for what happened hundreds of years ago,however we can be kind to Indians today,and does not mean lining there pockets with gold,they have no use for but helping them when we can thru education,housing,kindness.
Reply to this comment
by olebd January 31, 2008 12:43 PM EST
Heck, according to my family tree, I''ve got a fractional amount of Native American blood in me. I hope I see some money out of all this :)

Come to think of it, most of us probably have a little Native American in us if you have relatives that were in this country way back when.
Reply to this comment
by extremophil January 31, 2008 12:02 PM EST
100 billion is still not enough to compensate for what was done.... Posted by mediamomma


Yeah, I sure feel guilty for how much YOU have suffered. Just take the conscience money and go have a cocktail.
Reply to this comment
by olebd January 31, 2008 11:56 AM EST
In the words of the great Chief Geronimo, "UGH" and "HOW?"
Reply to this comment
by kevzgrl January 31, 2008 11:42 AM EST
The word was skan-ky, by the way. In no way is that cursing or racially/sexu-ally charged - it refers to dirt, plain and simple.
Reply to this comment
by Krazcarl January 31, 2008 11:41 AM EST
JKHAGEMANN...Does your sign in stand, for pimple on the *ss of prgress. Besides making jr high fun what points don''t you agree with what has you in a lather. I''m open to debate I''m educated informed you apparently are not and jealous. I recommend a little reading broaden your horizens child.
Reply to this comment
by kevzgrl January 31, 2008 11:40 AM EST
Element51: I, too, have reported these idiots who post on here for "hot girls" and the like - however, CBS doesn''t do anything about it, because they probably get money from these *** websites the posters keep trying to direct you to. Then, they turn around and censor the words you use in a legitimate post response to a story. Go figure, the media is king.....
Reply to this comment
See all 41 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook