CDC Suppressed Toxic Trailer Warnings
CBS News: Agency Suppressed Repeated Warnings From Top Scientist About Formaldehyde Fume Dangers
-
Play CBS Video Video CDC Implicated In FEMA Scandal FEMA is under fire for downplaying the health risk of formaldehyde exposure in its travel trailers. Armen Keteyian reports the public-health scandal has implicated the Centers For Disease Control.
-
-
After Hurricane Katrina, more than 143,000 families lived in toxic FEMA trailers like these. (CBS)
-
After Hurricane Katrina, FEMA trailers lined streets in New Orleans. (AFP/Getty Images)
-
Rep. Bernie Thompson, D-Miss., chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, said about FEMA, CDC and the toxic trailers: "To not do its due diligence on this issue borders on malfeasance." (CBS)
-
More than 143,000 families, like this one, have lived in the formaldehyde-contaminated FEMA trailers. (CBS)
-
-
Blog Primary Source Armen Keteyian and his investigative team keep you informed daily on their blog.
-
E-MAIL US CBS News Investigates E-mail Armen Keteyian and the investigation team with your story ideas.
Now, CBS News has learned, the public health fiasco reaches beyond FEMA - into the one of the nation's most respected agencies.
CBS News has learned that the Centers for Disease Control, the nation's top public health agency, suppressed repeated warnings from one of its top scientists, raising questions about whether the CDC bowed to pressure from FEMA to conceal the long-term health risks of formaldehyde in the trailers it distributed to hurricane victims - health risks like cancer and birth defects, CBS News chief investigative correspondent Armen Keteyian reports.
A string of internal documents obtained exclusively by CBS News reveal that Dr. Christopher De Rosa, director of the CDC's Division of Toxicology and Environmental Medicine, told his superiors "there is no safe level of exposure" to formaldehyde in trailers. That warning never made its way into any public report about the trailers.
In addition, Dr. De Rosa wrote in an email that two of his staff members had been directed by FEMA officials to not "address longer term health effects" of formaldehyde in this February 2007 report.
"To not do its due diligence on this issue borders on malfeasance," said Rep. Bernie Thompson, D-Miss., chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee.
In fact, it wasn't until October 2007 - after eight months and pressure from congressional investigators that the CDC revised its February report and finally issued warnings about cancer and other long-term health risks of formaldehyde.
"For them to punt on this issue does not speak well for them as an agency," Thompson said.
De Rosa refused an on-camera interview with CBS News. The CDC did not comment on the documents, but said it changed the report after it realized there was a problem.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- formaldehyde in FEMA trailers and other sources (aspartame, dark wines and
liquors, tobacco smoke): Murray 2008.01.30
rmforall.blogspot.com/2008_01_01_archive.htm
Wednesday, January 30, 2008
groups.yahoo.com/group/aspartameNM/message/1508
The FEMA trailers give about the same amount of formaldehyde daily as from a
quart of dark wine or liquor, or two quarts (6 12-oz cans) of aspartame diet
soda, from their over 1 tenth gram methanol impurity (one part in 10,000),
which the body quickly makes into formaldehyde -- enough to be the major
cause of "morning after" alcohol hangovers.
Methanol and formaldehyde also result from many fruits and vegetables,
tobacco and wood smoke, heater and vehicle exhaust, household chemicals and
cleaners, cosmetics, and new cars, drapes, carpets, furniture,
particleboard, mobile homes, buildings, leather... so all these sources add
up and interact with many other toxic chemicals. - Reply to this comment
- No one should have been allowed to live in New Orleans to begin with. When you have to have huge walls to keep the water out, there is a problem. And for years people have been warned that the walls would not hold in a severe storm. Why would people live there to begin with??
There is no way that New Orleans should be rebuilt. If it is, there are some truly stupid people in this world. - Reply to this comment
- '' .. i worked 70+ sudokus in the past month or two, yet reported live from 990 or 1980 spore bloom weed dragon trail fickle first aid lunch farm cottage studio trail crossing yseedsberry trail groups while dancing get well feed world get sick tax world hike naked dance dressed porn songs and shopgifting grass and dirt for cures for cancer and other margaritas and traveling eternitys at the speed of thought and shifting shapes and toggleing virtual and realtime and playing song dance skit kit medical you are here maps and zero resistance tai chi aikido yogaerobic inkblot sport and puzzle for life and lunch the musical epic quest to cure the common mortal death and the common immortal life, i don''t miss school at all .. ''
- Reply to this comment
- '' .. i worked 70+ sudokus in the past month or two, yet visited 990 or 1980 spore bloom weed dragon trail fickle first aid lunch farm cottage studio trail crossing yseedsberry trail groups, i don''t miss school at all .. ''
- Reply to this comment
- i can''t believe the lack of humanity here. it seems so many people live with their blinders on. if it doesn''t affect them, they don''t care. no wonder our country is so screwed up. noone wants to take time out of their busy, important lives to see the whole picture. when everything is yanked out from under you, what can you do? you don''t have a car to go anywhere, you don''t have a job anymore, the livlihood is gone. some of these victims have no family, nowhere to go. we pay taxes, our gov''t should help us out when tragedy strikes. when you live in a place that poor, how are you going to evacuate if you have no transportation? and then on top of that, your government places you in trailers that are known to be toxic. keep the people sick, depressed, uneducated so they can''t threaten your control. as crescentrose stated, i hope you never have to endure anything that devastating. since being a state empl, laid off in 2003, losing my health coverage, constantly having to fight for my medications, becoming disabled...
i have seen a lot. open your eyes, please. - Reply to this comment
- Hardly an exclusive...this story was all over the wires and cable television well before your story hit.
- Reply to this comment
- The point is not that the trailers have formaldehyde, it''s that the CDC knew that the formaldehyde posed health threats and covered up that fact instead of telling the people the truth and letting them make their own decisions about whether or not to stay. Our tax money funds the CDC; if they have information about health risks, that information belongs to all of us and nobody should be able to keep it under wraps for political reasons. The bigger crime is that formaldehyde is also an FDA approved ingredient in vaccines. I wish someone at the CDC or FDA would explain that one to me.
- Reply to this comment
- I don''t think it is right that these trailers or anything for that matter, should by made with anything toxic but let''s face it, these people wouldn''t be in them now if they had listened in the first place and evacuated. It is that simple. Because they didn''t listen, they should be very thankful they had somewhere to go because without them they would be on the street.
Now all they need to do is get their sh-t together. You would think with all the health issues they would have done it by now. I wouldn''t care what I had to do, I would not stay there and put my childrens health at risk. - Reply to this comment
- "You Neocon''''s know it all don''''t you?" posted by MCVet
You Americans are funny with all your nicknames for everything. What the **** is a neocon? Forget it I don''t really care.
Because your government is a bunch of idiots, these people should consider themselves lucky they got a trailer. It was meant for TEMPORARY use! I don''t think anyone expected that there would be people still in them! At least no one with any "get-up-and-go"!
There is formaldehyde in anything that has glue and there are millions of people living with it everyday without problems. If you have a problem, MOVE OUT! - Reply to this comment
- If we''re truly concerned about the toxicity of formaldehyde and government''s failure to address this as a health issue, we should also raise the alarm about the articifial sweetener aspartame (Nutrasweet). One of aspartame''s products in the body is methanol (wood alcohol) which is metabolized into formaldehyde. As it produces this likely carcinogen in the body, why is this product approved by the FDA?
I am not a specialist in this, but I urge people to Google "aspartame toxicity" or get a hold of the documentary film "Sweet Misery". Take a look and see what you think. - Reply to this comment
- So FEMA is the bad guy for trying to help?? Ask those folks when they were in the SuperDome if they would rather have stayed there. The truth is campers as well as mobile homes have been made the same way for DECADES. Where was Congress when poor folks who could only afford this type of housing were living in them for years?? Or when families were buying campers and taking vacations for weeks on end?? But Congress must justify their existence, so they beat up FEMA who was only trying to help. Did they have a better idea at the time. I think not, but hindsight is 20/20. The taxpayers might as well go ahead and sign a blank check and forward it to the law offices of James Sokolov!! If Congress really wants to get to the root of a problem (imagine that!) they should chat with the manufacturers of the wallboard; perhaps some controls need to be explored there. Lots to be learned from this tragedy, but this direction is not a positive, practical, or fair one.
- Reply to this comment
- You need a place to stay until the shock wears off and then you get your a-s-s moving. Things may never get put back together there. The problem is that there are a lot of lazy people who are just sitting there and are not even trying. They have a roof over their heads and that is all they care about.
If they had have evacuated like they were supposed to then they would now be in another city where they could get better jobs.
Even if I didn''''t have any money or transportation, if I was told to evacuate, I would have walked out if I had to.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by erasmus6 at 01:23 PM : Jan 29, 2008
+ report abuse
Yeah yeah we know... You Neocon''s know it all don''t you? You haven''t the foggest idea what these people went through or are going through. You''re nothing more that a Bush bootlicker attempting to direct attention away from the REAL issue. Since when does YOUR opinion of the folks who had to use the trailers justify what the CDC and that Piece of Human Trash you call a President did here. There''s a reason We put these laws in place, there''s a reason we put these agencies in place and it was NOT for Bush and the Gestapo to decide what we do or do not hear!! Sieg Heil Bush!! - Reply to this comment
- "You need a place to stay for a long time, until things get put back together again." posted by crescentrose
You need a place to stay until the shock wears off and then you get your a-s-s moving. Things may never get put back together there. The problem is that there are a lot of lazy people who are just sitting there and are not even trying. They have a roof over their heads and that is all they care about.
If they had have evacuated like they were supposed to then they would now be in another city where they could get better jobs.
Even if I didn''t have any money or transportation, if I was told to evacuate, I would have walked out if I had to. - Reply to this comment
- "For some reason you Bush Cultist..." posted by skyk
I am not an American.
"Perhaps the fact that there no jobs to get that pay enough for them to move out?" posted by brianbwb
Then perhaps it is time for them to move somewhere else where they can get a better job. Ain''t going to get a better job sitting there. - Reply to this comment
- My sister had a FEMA trailer. We visited once and when we went in our eyes immediately began to burn. My son has mild asthma and allergies that rarely flare up, but we had to get him out of that trailer.
People don''t know how bad some of these trailers were. I pray people making these ugly comments never have the situation where their whole metro area (2 million people) is put out of commission due to a natural disaster.
When the scale is that large, it''s not just a matter of camping out. You need food, water, work. You need a place to stay for a long time, until things get put back together again.
I am saddened by the lack of compassion I see in America today. - Reply to this comment
- When I first read this, I remembred when my partner and I were looking into modular homes for the property. Every one we looked at, had very big warning signs of Formaldehyde. After seeing this several times, it was one of the factors in not going this route.
That was some years before Katrina. So if the modular home business already was doing this, FEMA should have known too! Putting people in a confined space with good sealants, such as some of the Rfactors for the newer trailers are, means you are trapped in a toxic cloud.
The use of Formaldehyde in home building should be outlawed in this country, and in the world.The government should be leading the was to better emergency response with greened safer temporary shelters.
My tax dollars are being used to make people very ill who in turn become very sick and the state ends up picking up the hospital tabs. If a fraction of that money were spent on safer temp housing in the first place, it would cost less to recover from disasters like this. Well, not to mention people not getting sick and not feeling well, but money seems to be the only thing FEMA cares about. - Reply to this comment
- When I first read this, I remembred when my partner and I were looking into modular homes for the property. Every one we looked at, had very big warning signs of Formaldehyde. After seeing this several times, it was one of the factors in not going this route.
That was some years before Katrina. So if the modular home business already was doing this, FEMA should have known too! Putting people in a confined space with good sealants, such as some of the Rfactors for the newer trailers are, means you are trapped in a toxic cloud.
The use of Formaldehyde in home building should be outlawed in this country, and in the world.The government should be leading the was to better emergency response with greened safer temporary shelters.
My tax dollars are being used to make people very ill who in turn become very sick and the state ends up picking up the hospital tabs. If a fraction of that money were spent on safer temp housing in the first place, it would cost less to recover from disasters like this. Well, not to mention people not getting sick and not feeling well, but money seems to be the only thing FEMA cares about. - Reply to this comment
- When I first read this, I remembred when my partner and I were looking into modular homes for the property. Every one we looked at, had very big warning signs of Formaldehyde. After seeing this several times, it was one of the factors in not going this route.
That was some years before Katrina. So if the modular home business already was doing this, FEMA should have known too! Putting people in a confined space with good sealants, such as some of the Rfactors for the newer trailers are, means you are trapped in a toxic cloud.
The use of Formaldehyde in home building should be outlawed in this country, and in the world.The government should be leading the was to better emergency response with greened safer temporary shelters.
My tax dollars are being used to make people very ill who in turn become very sick and the state ends up picking up the hospital tabs. If a fraction of that money were spent on safer temp housing in the first place, it would cost less to recover from disasters like this. Well, not to mention people not getting sick and not feeling well, but money seems to be the only thing FEMA cares about. - Reply to this comment
- When I first read this, I rememebred when my partner and I were looking into modular homes for the property. Every one we looked at, had very big warning signs of Formaldehyde. After seeing this several times, it was one of the factors in not going this route.
That was some years before Katrina. So if the modular home business already was doing this, FEMA should have known too! Putting people in a confined space with good sealants, such as some of the Rfactors for the newer trailers are, means you are trapped in a toxic cloud.
The use of Formaldehyde in home building should be outlawed in this country, and in the world.The government should be leading the was to better emergency response with greened safer temporary shelters.
My tax dollars are being used to make people very ill who in turn become very sick and the state ends up picking up the hospital tabs. If a fraction of that money were spent on safer temp housing in the first place, it would cost less to recover from disasters like this. Well, not to mention people not getting sick and not feeling well, but money seems to be the only thing FEMA cares about. - Reply to this comment
- When I first read this, I rememebred when my partner and I were looking into modular homes for the property. Every one we looked at, had very big warning signs of Formaldehyde. After seeing this several times, it was one of the factors in not going this route.
That was some years before Katrina. So if the modular home business already was doing this, FEMA should have known too! Putting people in a confined space with good sealants, such as some of the Rfactors for the newer trailers are, means you are trapped in a toxic cloud.
The use of Formaldehyde in home building should be outlawed in this country, and in the world.The government should be leading the was to better emergency response with greened safer temporary shelters.
My tax dollars are being used to make people very ill who in turn become very sick and the state ends up picking up the hospital tabs. If a fraction of that money were spent on safer temp housing in the first place, it would cost less to recover from disasters like this. Well, not to mention people not getting sick and not feeling well, but money seems to be the only thing FEMA cares about. - Reply to this comment
The road ahead in Afghanistan, and the crucial decision Obama faces.



