Stimulus Plan Vows $600-$1,200 Tax Rebates
Congress, White House Announce Deal On Tax Refunds, Business Breaks To Boost Economy
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Congress OKs Stimulus Plan
To rescue to economy, Congress has agreed upon a stimulus package that includes rebates of $600-1,200. But as Anthony Mason reports, economists predict the plan will do little to stop a recession.
-
Video
Who Gets Stimulus Checks?
"CBS News Raw:" 116 million taxpayers are expected to get a tax rebate from the House's economic stimulus package. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson explains how it works.
-
Video
Congress Unites For Economy
Republicans and Democrats are working together to try rescue the economy. Bill Plante reports.
-
Photo
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Republican Minotiry Leader John A. Boehner announced the agreement, hammered out after a week of intense negotiations. (CBS)
-
News Tools
Ins & Outs Of Stimulus Plan
What's in, what's out of bipartisan package designed to stimulate ailing economy.
-
Interactive
Eye On The Economy
In-depth features on U.S. markets, taxes, employment and the Federal Reserve.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Congress would act on the agreement - hammered out in a week of intense negotiations and uncustomary bipartisanship - "at the earliest date, so that those rebate checks can be in the mail."
But even if Congress does act quickly, the IRS will be bogged down in April handling tax returns and probably couldn't begin to process the rebates until early May, reports CBS News correspondent Anthony Mason. Then comes the mailing, which takes eight to 10 weeks, so most people could have the checks by July.
President Bush praised the agreement at the White House, saying it "has the right set of policies and is the right size."
The rebates, which would go to about 116 million families, had appeal for both Democrats and Republicans. Pelosi's staff noted that they would include $28 billion in checks to 35 million working families who wouldn't have been helped by Mr. Bush's original proposal. Republicans, for their part, were pleased that the bulk of the rebates - more than 70 percent, according to an analysis by Congress' Joint Tax Committee - would go to individuals who pay taxes.
Individuals who pay income taxes would get up to $600, working couples $1,200 and those with children an additional $300 per child under the agreement. Workers who make at least $3,000 but don't pay taxes would get $300 rebates.
The rebates were expected to cost about $100 billion, and the package also includes close to $50 billion in business tax cuts.
The principal players in pulling the deal together were Pelosi, House Republican leader John Boehner and Paulson. The package would allow businesses to immediately write off 50 percent of purchases of plants and other capital equipment and permit small businesses to write off additional purchases of equipment. A GOP-written provision to allow businesses suffering losses now to reclaim taxes previously paid was dropped.
Pelosi, D-Calif., agreed to drop increases in food stamp and unemployment benefits during a Wednesday meeting in exchange for gaining the rebates of at least $300 for almost everyone earning a paycheck, including those who make too little to pay income taxes.
"I can't say that I'm totally pleased with the package, but I do know that it will help stimulate the economy. But if it does not, then there will be more to come," Pelosi said.
Boehner said the agreement "was not easy for the two of us and our respective caucuses."
"You know, many Americans believe that Washington is broken," the Ohio Republican said. "But I think this agreement and I hope that this agreement will show the American people that we can fix it and will serve to move along other bipartisan agreements that we can have in the future."
Paulson said he would work with the House and Senate to enact the package as soon as possible, because "speed is of the essence." But he also cautioned that "the work is far from over."
The Treasury Department has already been talking to the IRS about getting the checks out "as quickly as possible, recognizing that the tax filing season is ongoing," said Treasury spokesman Andrew DeSouza.
The rebates would phase out gradually for individuals whose income exceeds $75,000 and couples with incomes above $150,000, aides said. Individuals with incomes up to $87,000 and couples up to $174,000 would get partial rebates. The caps are higher for those with children.
"I think this is a good big first step, I think it's the right step," Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Economy.com, told CBS News. "I think for many hard-pressed households, a few hundred dollars in their checking account is going to make a big difference for them."
The agreement left some lawmakers in both parties with a bitter taste, and they complained that their leaders had sacrificed too much in the interest of striking a deal. Many senior Democrats were particularly upset that the package omitted the unemployment extension.
"I do not understand, and cannot accept, the resistance of President Bush and Republican leaders to including an extension of unemployment benefits for those who are without work through no fault of their own," Rep. Charles B. Rangel, D-N.Y., the Ways and Means Committee chairman, said in a statement.
Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., the Finance Committee Chairman, said leaving out the unemployment extension was "a mistake," as he announced plans to craft a separate stimulus package in the Senate starting next week.
Majority Leader Harry Reid said the goal is to send the package to the White House by Feb. 15 for Mr. Bush's signature, but he noted the Senate would likely try to add more spending to the package.
"I expect that the (Finance) Committee and other senators will work to improve the House package by adding funds for other initiatives that can boost the economy immediately, such as unemployment benefits, nutrition assistance, state relief and infrastructure investment," Reid said in a statement.
Asked about this, Paulson praised Reid's leadership but said, "I don't know what he has in mind."
Mr. Bush has supported larger rebates of $800-$1,600, but his plan would have left out 30 million working households who earn paychecks but don't make enough to pay income tax, according to calculations by the Urban Institute-Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center. An additional 19 million households would receive only partial rebates under Mr. Bush's initial proposal.
Meanwhile, the housing market keeps getting uglier, reports Mason. New figures show the median price of a single family home actually fell last year for the first time since the Great Depression, while sales plummeted 13 percent - the largest decline in 25 years.
To address the mortgage crisis, the package raises the limit on Federal Housing Administration loans from $362,000 to as high as $729,750 in expensive areas, allowing more subprime mortgage holders to refinance into federally insured loans. To widen the availability of mortgages across the country, it also provides a one-year boost to the cap on loans that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can buy, from $417,000 up to $729,750 in high-cost markets.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 10
- next
See all 488 CommentsOh, I forgot, we don''t need to be prudent about the future when our country is being run by far right "end of the world" believers. The Mayan calender runs out in 2012, so don''t worry about the future spend all you want. Be idiots.
I''m sure there are plenty of folks out there that are willing to take it off your hands.
Kinda reminds me of the old saying, "A FOOL AND HIS MONEY SHALL SOON PART WAYS."
Besides they always build people up just to break them down.
Almost everything the government does is a joke anyway but guess who gets the last laugh? I wonder?
I guess 300.00 is better than nothing at all? I just wonder with horrible war going on where are they getting this money?
Tax Rebate = Taxable Income therefore the $300.00 your going to get to "stimulate the economy" is going to be added to your taxable income for the "2008" taxes. by the time your taxed at whatever bracket your in, your $300.00 will maybe buy you a tank of gas! Big stimulus! Way to go Bushey, you moron!
HHMMPPHH,,,And what about us retired people? Who survives on very little, as it is. And yet, we also pay taxes.
Well, maybe not any more, I won''t.
One last vital step - No one truly knows what our true national debt is and no one really knows what our true annual deficit is. Comptroller General Walker comes close to knowing this but no one in Washington in power wants to listen to him. Until we face up to the true figures, we can never begin to solve the problem.
Todays Conservatives believe that putting more money into the pockets of the super rich is the answer to every problem. Hence the 9 trillion dollar deficit and the current recession.
:P
Cheney has a Tinky-Winky tie on. Purple! Do you believe our esteemed Vice President is flaunting Gaay Colors? How embarrassing.
this is the only way they can help american..
Why is congress even considering such an assinine deal! Do they think this is going to buy some brownie points with the public?
Why aren''t they working on raising salaries, creating jobs, getting rid of this abhorrent occupation of Iraq, reforming welfare and encouraging people to work, a universal health care plan? Geezus!
Everybody already knows what Bush is...this isn''t going to buy him or the republicans brownie points!
What possible thing can this do to stimulate the economy? This is a joke!
Another failed snap decision by the zoo monkeys in charge of the people.
That will really jump start the economy.
Not that I am ungrateful, it''s just that what in the world do they think we will spend this little bit of help on? This one time fix will cost more than it was worth to even do.
Great. Leaves me out, again.
MAYBE IF GWB & REPUBs could have passed increases in Minimum Wage laws YEARS ago the recession wouldn''''t be happening !!!
Posted by apple2pie
Don''t you see? Putting more money into the hands of people that actually need it and will spend it goes against everything modern conservatives stand for. They believe that the sole purpose of government is to make the rich richer.
Posted by underdogus at 11:15 AM : Jan 24, 2008
+ report abuse
Well of course you will... can''t expect anything less from a Fascist now can we? Sieg Heil Y''all ROFLMAO
What a waist of time and effort. What a joke!
I can use it to fill my car up with gas or pay my home''s energy cost.
I''m glad to see so many of us feel the same way.
I''m donating my check to the democratic nominee''s campaign.
I love watching all the neocons worried to death that someone on welfare is going to get an extra loaf of bread in June. I don''t know why they''re complaining, they can buy new gun racks with their check from Junior.
ainttaken
As usual, Bush doesn''t really have a clue what to do about the mess he''s made. He''ll punt his recession, his 9 trillion dollar deficit and his 2 trillion dollar Iraq debacle to the next (Democratic) president. Then, as you said, the Republicon spin machine will blame it all on Clinton and the Democrats.
Business doesn''t pay their fair share to begin with, they have more tax breaks than the wealthiest of people.
Considering how the value of the US dollar has fallen about 47% in the last seven years and the cost of living has skyrocketed, these rebates are CHUMP CHANGE.
The rebates as they are structured aren''t helping anybody but businesses.
-Posted by micma at 11:38 AM : Jan 24, 2008
Uh, this deal is from Bush and Pelosi. Republicans and Democrats. Ultimately, it''s all just a show. Both parties want to appear concerned for the citizens. Yes, we''ll get a check. It will be nice. But I don''t see how that will affect things in the long term.
-Posted by sevenveils at 11:39 AM : Jan 24, 2008
Not to shock you or anything, but not all business owners are wealthy. I co-owned a business several years ago and was barely able to scrape by, because the taxes were so high. Also remember that businesses are what create jobs, and if they have to pay high taxes, the employees are the ones who suffer.
Stop with the left-wing rhetoric. You sound like a bumper sticker on a VW bus.
Posted by bigley973 at 11:18 AM : Jan 24, 2008
As soon as the lead based ink on the paper is dry...
LMAO! Then I''m against God because if that rhetoric is applicable I guess God put Osama and Hiler in power as well? Idiot - God also gave us a mind to make those that are criminals accountable. God might have put him in power but Bush made the choices to descieve and lie to the American people.
Posted by livermanr at 11:41 AM : Jan 24, 2008
Nothing to say to that post, Except,,,ROTFLMAO!
So you failed at a business. That makes you only an expert in what you learned. If you really were a small business owner you''d know small businesses don''t have the tax breaks of large corporations, of which I am really referring to here. Less than half of all startups succeed, better luck on your next try; seriously, keep trying.
Meanwhile I''m going to showing that sticker on my VW bus. Beep beep
This liberal *** is BS - the Repugs have put us in this precarious situation........now swallow what you voted for Repugs!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by livermanr
SO when do they let you out?
SO when do they let you out?
Bush just had a bowel movement.........LMAO!
Posted by commonsence1 at 11:45 AM : Jan 24, 2008
nice logic - then I guess you are not in favor of the government via the Fed giving money to banks, for example? Or the trillion dollars each year of direct payments from the government to big businesses? Because apparently the richest people in America have no problems taking government handouts in the trillions, in fact they work all day long to make sure those handouts continue. While they use much of the money and influence to fool tiny little peons lik you into thinking somehow some dumb poor guy is getting the money.
C''mon, even a kool-aid drinking republican must have a brain somewhere. If poor people and deadbeats were really getting all that money from the government, we''re talking an annual budget of 2 trillion or more, wouldn;t they become rich? That''s an extraordinary amount of money. The facts are, the people who are getting that money are exactly who logic dictates they must be - the rich. That''s why they''re rich, dummy. Crack hounds are not getting 1 trillion in government subsidies, dummy. Or they wouldn''t be crack hounds in the projects, would they, they would be more like Paris Hiliton, a refined "cocaine" user.
-Posted by Sevenveils at 11:53 AM : Jan 24, 2008
And large corporations are the ones that employ lots of people. Your hatred for large businesses is silly, since they provide lots of jobs. But I suppose that would be a difficult concept to understand while you''re dropping acid at Grateful Dead concerts during most of the year.
If you''re not a conservative when you''re in your 30''s, then you have no brain.
Posted by lundjohn at 11:58 AM : Jan 24, 2008
Not according to the article,,I guess we don''t count.
We''d just owe more Tax money anyways.
America exports $148B/month.
America is not self sufficient in natural resources.
If we did not sell to the other 6.7B people, we could not afford to buy the natural resources which are more than just oil.
Just my thoughts.....
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 10
- next
See all 488 Comments