DAVOS, Switzerland, Jan. 24, 2008

Gore, Bono Press West On Climate, Poverty

At World Economic Forum, G-8 Nations Urged To Speed Up Global Warming, Hunger Efforts

  • Irish musician Bono, left, sits with former U.S. Vice President Al Gore while addressing a conference at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Jan. 24, 2008.

    Irish musician Bono, left, sits with former U.S. Vice President Al Gore while addressing a conference at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Jan. 24, 2008.  (AP Photo/Michel Euler)

  • Photo Essay Bono

    Learn about one of Time magazine's persons of the year. The U2 frontman uses his voice to help AIDS patients and influence world politics.

  • Interactive Global Warming

    The greenhouse effect, a look at the Kyoto Protocol and a history of the Earth's climate.

(CBS/AP)  Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore and Irish rock singer Bono warned the World Economic Forum in Davos on Thursday that efforts to tackle climate change and global poverty were lagging, and not improving conditions as much as is needed.

At an early-morning session that drew several hundred attendees, climate change campaigner Gore warned that the world climate crisis was worsening, and was in fact unfolding more rapidly than some of the most pessimistic projections by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

"It is difficult to summon the moral imagination necessary to understand the degree of responsibility that is on the shoulders on those of us who are alive in this day and time," said Gore, who shared last year's Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts to fight climate change with the IPCC.

"All future generations will at some point look back and make an assessment of whether we succeeded or failed," he added.

Bono, a vocal and high-profile advocate of reducing global poverty by providing debt relief to African nations and boosting efforts to treat and prevent AIDS, was also critical of governments' failure to live up to their promises.

"There are now two million Africans on retroviral drugs and that is pretty astonishing," Bono said. But, he added, pledges by the Group of Eight (G-8) nations of $50 billion annually to eliminate poverty had not been met.

"The G-8 are not making good largely on their commitments. About half, I would say, is where we've got," Bono said. He expressed dismay that the United Nations' millennium development goals - reducing extreme poverty and hunger by half by 2015 - are not likely to be met.

"And this is a scandal," he said.

Speaking to AP Television after addressing the event, Bono said the West needed to work towards tackling extreme poverty, for example in Africa, where many people live on less than one dollar a day.

"The planet is in a precarious place right now and extreme poverty affects a billion people who are living on less than a dollar a day, scrambling for their life. We have a great life in the West. If we want it to continue we have to feel our interconnectedness with the people who are living on less than a dollar a day.

"Europe is next door to Africa. We need to partner with our neighbors in working some of this out."

Bono also stressed the interconnectedness of the issues of climate change and third world debt relief, as the environmental and economic consequences of global warming will only exacerbate efforts to reduce poverty, "and in fact undo all of the work that we've been trying to do over the years."

He called on all attendees to work together so "we can leave behind a better planet than what we were born into."

Bono said German Chancellor Angela Merkel has told him she will press for recommitment.

"She has promised to put that right, and that is courageous" considering that Germany is already spending 4 percent of its gross domestic product on its own efforts to reunify East and West Germany, Bono said.

He noted that French President Nicolas Sarkozy told him earlier this month that he, too, would try to keep France's commitments to the poorest of the poor even though he had his own campaign commitments to improve the lives of the French people.

The annual five-day meeting of 2,500 government, business and academic leaders in the Swiss Alps comes amidst turmoil and markets around the globe.

The opening day was made somber by the lingering fears of economic malaise.

"I think the mood is pretty gloomy," Chrystia Freeland, U.S. managing editor of the Financial Times, told CBS Early Show anchor Harry Smith. "People are watching the U.S. very closely. They're watching the American markets and also the behavior of the American authorities, both the Fed and the Treasury. And the big question here, particularly for the Europeans and the Asians, is will there be contagion? Will America's problems spread to the rest of the world? I think on balance, the Europeans and the Asians think that probably it will."

© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 34 Comments
by pboskovich January 25, 2008 11:21 PM EST
Does anyone know how many trilions are being spent to study and prevent manmade global warming? It is a whole lot more that is being spent in Iraq. Manmade global warming is a hoax and millions living in total poverty around the global are the ones suffering the most because of it. Africa, for example has incredible natural resources. However when global developers try to help African nations take advantage of what resources they have, the developers get blackmailed by the environmentalist propaganda machine.

If you really care about global poverty, look for the truth and stop blindly believing something just because Al Gore says so. there is a better way to save the earth.
Reply to this comment
by terrorislam6 January 25, 2008 6:39 AM EST
if you believe in human caused global warming then you have to believe in global population reduction,,,

over 1.3 billion chinese just in china
over 1 billion indians just in india
over 1.3 billion muslims

these are not populations,,, they are infestations

in7fest (n-fst)
tr.v. in7fest7ed, in7fest7ing, in7fests
1. To inhabit or overrun in numbers or quantities large enough to be harmful, threatening, or obnoxious
Reply to this comment
by libsluvsuvs January 25, 2008 3:26 AM EST
Bono..if you ever get to read this..I just would like to say that you, you stand right next to the slave trade, are the biggest threat to this continent. I would doubt that your intentions are true considering that you are making millions on residuals. You are creating more chaos and misguiding world opinion and creating a continent full of dependent souls.
Reply to this comment
by libsluvsuvs January 25, 2008 12:42 AM EST
What the helll are you talking about?
Explain brain, cause you lost me before the first turn.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by rushlimpdrug at 03:48 PM : Jan 24, 2008
+ report abuse

***************


maybe you need it to explained to you with pop pictures..IT MEANS CONSERVE YOU MORON!
Reply to this comment
by libsluvsuvs January 25, 2008 12:40 AM EST
"Bono, a vocal and high-profile advocate of reducing global poverty by providing debt relief to African nations"

*************

it is funny that it seems like every time this bono strong arm a debt forgiveness program for these african nations..VIOLENCE TENDS TO PRECEED IT..EVER WONDERED WHY??? maybe because they have more money to slave thier people..
Reply to this comment
by rushlimpdrug January 24, 2008 6:48 PM EST
The solution to global warming is to cut down on energy usage.

Cutting down energy usage lowers the carrying capacity of the world (the number of human beings who can live here).

Lowering the carrying capacity means that lots of people will die. Do you honestly think you will survive? Don''''t count on it.
Posted by random_radar at 01:51 PM

What the helll are you talking about?
Explain brain, cause you lost me before the first turn.
Reply to this comment
by rheola-2009 January 24, 2008 6:36 PM EST

Posted by random_radar at 01:51 PM : Jan 24, 2008

Your statement is total garbage, it will not be necessary to cut down on energy use, just a reappraisal of the manner in which it is produced.
Reply to this comment
by random_radar January 24, 2008 4:51 PM EST
The solution to global warming is to cut down on energy usage.

Cutting down energy usage lowers the carrying capacity of the world (the number of human beings who can live here).

Lowering the carrying capacity means that lots of people will die. Do you honestly think you will survive? Don''t count on it.
Reply to this comment
by nolalou January 24, 2008 4:50 PM EST
brianp55, you have every right not to listen to them, but they have every right to champion whatever causes they choose. If you don''t like what they have to say, then don''t pay any attention to them!

While we can pretend it doesn''t exist, or we can debate the best way to address it, being in denial about global climate change is not a solution!
Reply to this comment
by mike71067 January 24, 2008 4:49 PM EST
Nothing speaks more clearly about the "global warming" hoax than the fact that its biggest proponents are washed-up has-beens.

Really - when was the last time U2 released a song of any importance? Hint: It was in the 1980''s. And Al Gore has been insignificant since his election loss to the "idiot from Texas", and his subsequent whining about it.
Reply to this comment
by pghlady3 January 24, 2008 4:02 PM EST
Many of the most alarming studies rely on long-range predictions using inherently untrustworthy climate models, similar to those that cannot accurately forecast the weather a week from now. Interpretations of these studies rarely consider that the impact of carbon on temperature goes down %u2013not up- the more carbon accumulates in the atmosphere.

Average temperatures rose only about 0.6 degrees since the beginning of the industrial era, and the change hasn%u2019t been uniform- warming has largely occurred during the periods from 1919 to 1940 and from 1976 to 1998, cooling in between. Researchers have been unable to explain this discrepancy.



Reply to this comment
by pghlady3 January 24, 2008 4:01 PM EST
The conclusion of the late climate scientist Roger Revelle- Al Gore%u2019s mentor- is worth pondering: %u201C%u2026the evidence for global warming thus far doesn%u2019t warrant any action unless it is justifiable on grounds that have nothing to do with climate.%u201D

Per Richard S. Lindzen the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (receives NO funding from any energy companies)%u2026.

%u2026.actions taken thus far to reduce emissions have already ha negative consequences without improving our ability to adapt to climate change. There is no compelling evidence that the warming trend we%u2019ve seen will amount to anything close to catastrophe. The earth is always warming or cooling. The current alarm rests on the false assumption not only that we live in a perfect world, temperaturewise, but also that our warming forecasts for the year 2040 are somehow more reliable than the weatherman%u2019s forecast for next week.

Much of the alarm over climate change is based on ignorance of what is normal for weather and climate. According to scientists at the U.S. National Hurricane Center, the World Meteorological Organization and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, there is no evidence for instance that extreme weather events are increasing in any systematic way.

Reply to this comment
by hawksprings January 24, 2008 3:57 PM EST
"Is it just me or does anyone else resent wealthy celebrities attempting to influence social and political policies that you and I are going to end up paying for? Most of us are attempting to heat our homes, feed our kids and put gas in our cars and these two idiots are looking for noble causes to champion......presumably, to embellish their self image. Or maybe they just have too much time on their hands. I just wish Bono and Gore would shut the hell up and go away."
Posted by brianp55


Amen, brother.


...
Reply to this comment
by easeup-2009 January 24, 2008 3:56 PM EST
Al Gore invented global poverty.
Reply to this comment
by infidel_us January 24, 2008 3:48 PM EST
So now AL Bore is going to lecture us on global poverty? If there is a God, this man would go TU in the very near future; like, within the next five minutes.
Reply to this comment
by brianp55 January 24, 2008 3:44 PM EST
Is it just me or does anyone else resent wealthy celebrities attempting to influence social and political policies that you and I are going to end up paying for? Most of us are attempting to heat our homes, feed our kids and put gas in our cars and these two idiots are looking for noble causes to champion......presumably, to embellish their self image. Or maybe they just have too much time on their hands. I just wish Bono and Gore would shut the hell up and go away.
Reply to this comment
by sharncedar January 24, 2008 3:33 PM EST
To solve "global poverty" the result would be more meny for the "global poor" (that''s what "poverty" is, a lack of money) so then they could buy more stuff, causing more industrial activity, causing more greenhouse gases. And what I know every third world person dreams of more than anything in the world is a car, and after that a big, wasteful, energy inefficient home. Causing a massive increase in world greenhouse gas emissions. But let''s not stop Gore and Bono, Dumb and Dumber, they are going to solve global warming by increasing the amount of CO2 in the air. That should work. If only the "world''s poor" were rich, then global warming would go away ... right liberal? Then the "world''s poor" could have fancy automobiles and use more fuel for heating and do more activities like go to rock concerts and have big, giant homes to live in. that should save the world from global warming. Oh yes, they could use much, much, much more electricty to run their free laptops.

Bono and Gore, Humpty and Dumpty, Dumb and dumber.

Reply to this comment
by sharncedar January 24, 2008 3:27 PM EST
Is it just me, or are the goals of building up the economy of "poor people" which presumably means giving them white collar jobs and cars and ewasteful homes versus preventing global warming antagonistc?

Liberals are just such phonies. They don''t have to be consistent, they''re celebrities!
Reply to this comment
by hawksprings January 24, 2008 3:10 PM EST
MCVet,

This fetish you have with Nazis is interesting, you post about it constantly.
What makes you think Conservatives are the Nazis??

Why don''t you do a little investigating and see what Party in the US is closer to Nazism, the Democrats or Republicans?


The term "Nazi" is a nickname from "National Socialists."
Which Party here aligns itself more with Socialism?

The Nazis in Germany took away guns from the private citizens.
Which Party here wants to do that?

The Nazis removed all religious symbols from public places and government buildings.
Which Party here wants to do that?

THe Nazis federalized ALL private industry and took over control of everything.
Which Party here wants to do that?


So before you throw out the "Nazi" term again, you should really consider which party is more "Nazi".
Reply to this comment
by easeup-2009 January 24, 2008 2:38 PM EST
Al Gore invented MCVet''s mental imbalance.
Reply to this comment
See all 34 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: