January 24, 2008 1:44 PM

Marty Tankleff's fight for the truth

Watch the Episode »

Web Extras

Marty Tankleff, surrounded by family and friends after his release from prison. (CBS)

(CBS News)  Produced By Gail Zimmerman

[This story was first broadcast on Jan. 26, 2008. It was updated on Aug. 8, 2008.]

Marty Tankleff was only a teenager when he was convicted of murdering his parents. He spent more than half his life in remote New York state prisons, a far cry from his privileged childhood on New York's Long Island.

Marty initially confessed, but quickly recanted. He fought for years for his innocence, especially as new witnesses surfaced that could potentially exonerate him.

Correspondent Erin Moriarty, who has covered this case for years, reports on this rollercoaster of a legal case.

Marty had just turned 17 when he was arrested for the murder of his parents, Seymour and Arlene. He has spent his entire adult life in remote upstate New York prisons.

It's a far cry from Marty's childhood, spent in the lap of luxury in a sprawling Long Island waterfront home. Seymour and Arlene were unable to have children of their own, so they adopted Marty as a baby.

Marty says his mom was "great." "She adored me and I adored her. We were the best of friends," he remembers.

He was also close to his father. "My father had a poor childhood. When I became a teenager, he had money, so he lived vicariously through me," says Marty, who admits he was spoiled by his parents.

Seymour, a savvy and tough entrepreneur, was grooming Marty to follow in his footsteps. "I wanted to be a businessman. So I enjoyed being involved in all of that," Marty explains.

Marty says he knew everything about his father's businesses, including the trouble his dad was having with a partner in a bagel shop, Jerry Steuerman, who owed him around half a million dollars. "The friendship had dissipated. They essentially became enemy business partners," Marty says.

Despite the tension between Seymour and Jerry Steuerman, both men continued to play in a weekly poker game. And on Sept. 6, 1988, it was Marty's father's turn be host. The game lasted into the wee hours and Steuerman was the last to leave. The next morning, Marty says, he woke to find his father near death.

Marty called 911. "I just remember the woman yelling back at me saying 'Calm down, calm down.' She gave me some instructions," he remembers.

Then, Marty says, he searched for his mother. He found her dead on her bedroom floor.

James McCready, the lead detective, now retired, arrived an hour later, and remembers the scene as "very brutal."

Seymour, bludgeoned and stabbed but still alive, had been rushed to the hospital; Arlene's body still lay in her room. "She was nearly decapitated," McCready remembers. "And it appeared to me that she had struggled with whoever had assaulted her."

McCready, a homicide cop for ten years, saw no sign of forced entry and was immediately bothered by Marty's appearance. "He was sitting as calm as calm could be, with his hands clasped like this," McCready recalls.

Asked what he would have expected for Marty to be doing, McCready says, "Oh, I think he would have been crying, I think he would have been shaken, been very upset."

What impression did Marty get from McCready? "I felt that they were trying to help me and I was trying to help them," he says.

But McCready says he "could see" Marty was lying. "I get a feeling, it's not so much the way, what is said. It's the way in which it's said."

Marty volunteered his suspicions that Steuerman, his father's partner, was somehow involved and Marty agreed to talk more about that at police headquarters. But in fact McCready thought he already had his man.

Why would Marty kill his parents? McCready has a theory: greed.

Seventeen-year-old Marty sat alone with McCready and his partner, without a lawyer, in a small windowless room for hours, where the detectives questioned him. "It was the constant barrage that 'Marty, we know you did it, everything will be ok, just tell us you did it. We know you did it.' And the on and on and on questioning. Over and over," he remembers.

Then, McCready did something that would change everything: he left the room, pretended to talk on the phone, and came back with news about Seymour. The detective told Marty his father had come out of his coma and had implicated Marty in the murder.

But McCready admits he lied to Marty, and that Seymour's statement never happened. Asked if that's all right to do, McCready says, "the United States Supreme Court says it is."

Marty begged to take a polygraph, but the detectives refused.

"So you're better at telling whether someone is lying?" Moriarty asks McCready.

"I? I think I'm better than the polygraph machine," the detective replies.

McCready's scheme worked. Marty began to wonder if he blacked out and in fact had attacked his parents. Finally, he told the police what they wanted to hear.

McCready began to prepare a written statement. Although Marty - who didn't write it himself - never signed it, and almost immediately recanted, the detectives had enough. Marty was arrested and charged with murder.



© 2008 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.
Add a Comment See all 43 Comments
by conrad1964 October 26, 2011 6:40 PM EDT
these police officers wont know the truth in this case if it jumped up and slapped them in the face they charged trhe son just to get the case off the books
Reply to this comment
by hemalitanna September 22, 2011 3:02 AM EDT
Who the hell does McCready think he is! He might have been bribed...
Reply to this comment
by abelquist05 April 9, 2010 8:14 PM EDT
Look this was a show all about Tankleff not about the truth, has anyone bothered to know anything about this respected Detective. My husband grew up with Mr McCreadys children, and Mr McCready is a very fair and honest person and detective. He solved cases that no one else could solve. He did his job and put a murderer behind bars. The guy was 17 not 2 if he did not commit the crime there is no way he would admit to doing it. Was you there do you know what happene no you dont. Mr McCready did his job caught a killer and provided the prosecuter with the evidence he acquired. Everyone is saying Mr McCready should be in prison over this and that the Sulfolk Co police department did not do there job. But if anyone of you that posted thesse wretched and horibble comments about Mr McCready had a brain in your head you would realize that he did not go and say ok you did this crime now lets go spend the rest of your life in jail. HJe had a Trial and was convicted by a judge and jury not by Mr. McCready so really God gave you a brain now use it dumb *****.
Reply to this comment
by Stoney13 August 25, 2008 6:26 AM EDT
lo1411,

Let''s see what kind of detective I am! I think "lo" stands for Law Officer, and "1411" is your badge number!

This kid is SOOOOOO innocent! The fact that one of your fellow officers is getting called on to the carpet for this must REALLY get to you! Well, brother that is the wrong way to think!

Because of McCready''s sloppy, heavy-handed, and arrogant behavior, a jury might let a guilty person go! Perhaps a scared kid out there will decide he has nothing to lose and go down shooting and take a fellow officer with him!

One McCready undoes the work of a hundred decent, honest officers! And I know same damned fine men who chose to wear the badge! McCready sullys their name! Think about that before you give your loyalty to an officer who doesn''t deserve it!
Reply to this comment
by davidj121 August 14, 2008 12:38 AM EDT
McCready is one stubborn ignorant stupid idiot. Why on Earth would marty tankleff kill his parents. there is no motive whatsoever. yet, there is a shady guy that owes seymour tankleff 500 grand. a 5th grader could put this one together. shouldn''t they teach detectives about motive and how it figures into crime ? what a ******* ! that guy belongs behind bars.
Reply to this comment
by godsfiddler August 11, 2008 4:15 PM EDT
James McCready is nothing more than an a hole con artist, and was probably the one counseling the actual killers.
Reply to this comment
by godsfiddler August 11, 2008 3:52 PM EDT
I wonder if McCready was part of the crime...as well as the three other guys.
Reply to this comment
by godsfiddler August 11, 2008 3:51 PM EDT
Such a shame that all three guys are free men. McCready needs to be in prison for his ***.
Reply to this comment
by pfd572 August 10, 2008 3:12 AM EDT
lo1411 and lovetoread1: you might want to take the time to learn about the volumes of false and coerced confessions; the hundreds of innocent people who have been released after DNA evidence analyzed (an example of how the courts and law enforcement CAN err); the forensic evidence that was suppressed that almost entirely clears Marty; the State Commission''s investigation into probable misconduct by law enforcement, etc. Its EXTREMELY naive to think that police and the courts never make a mistake, are alway honest and never have an agenda at others expense. I am relieved that, at least in this case, the system eventually, but way too long after the fact, got it right. (the only motive the police and prosecution could come up with was money he would inherit; if they had checked they would have found out he wouldn''t have access to any inheritance, regardless of his parents alive or dead, until he was 25, eight years after their murder - this is no motive)
Reply to this comment
by tboetj7 August 10, 2008 1:20 AM EDT
It is an outrage that Jerry Steuerman is a free man. He gets to retire in Florida. Shouldnt he at least be on trial?
Reply to this comment
See all 43 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
48 Hours New iPad app A perfect companion to TV's most popular true-crime series.
48 Hours on Facebook